Objective: Accurate postoperative stratification of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in distinct prognostic groups is essential for tailoring follow-up, medical therapy, and inclusion in clinical trials. Increasing evidence suggests that Onodera׳s prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a stage- and grade-independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with cancer, but there are no data in RCC.
Materials and methods: We reviewed medical records of 1,344 patients with RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy at the Medical University of Vienna and the University of California-Los Angeles between 1991 and 2012. Associations with cancer-specific survival were assessed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Discrimination was measured with the C-index.
Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 40 months. An increase of PNI by 1 unit was associated with a decrease in the risk of death from RCC by 7% (hazard ratio = 0.93, P<0.001). In multivariable analyses, the PNI was an independent prognostic factor (P<0.001). Adding the PNI improved the discrimination of a base model by 0.4%.
Conclusions: The PNI is an independent prognostic factor in patients with RCC. Its use increases the accuracy of established prognostic factors. PNI may be a meaningful adjunct for tailoring surveillance, medical therapy, and clinical trial design.
Keywords: Inflammation; Prognosis; Prognostic nutritional index; Recurrence; Renal cell carcinoma.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.