Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Mar;65(3):569-75. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp469. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

Abstract

Objectives: We describe rates of success for two-stage revision of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), including data on reimplantation microbiology.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from all the cases of PJI that were managed with two-stage revision over a 4 year period. Patients were managed with an antibiotic-free period before reimplantation, in order to confirm, clinically and microbiologically, that infection was successfully treated.

Results: One hundred and fifty-two cases were identified. The overall success rate (i.e. retention of the prosthesis over 5.75 years of follow-up) was 83%, but was 89% for first revisions and 73% for re-revisions [hazard ratio = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-7.4, P = 0.023]. Reimplantation microbiology was frequently positive (14%), but did not predict outcome (hazard ratio = 1.3, 95% CI 0.4-3.7, P = 0.6). Furthermore, most unplanned debridements following the first stage were carried out before antibiotics were stopped (25 versus 2 debridements).

Conclusions: We did not identify evidence supporting the use of an antibiotic-free period before reimplantation and routine reimplantation microbiology. Re-revision was associated with a significantly worse outcome.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Joint Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Joint Diseases / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / drug therapy*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery*
  • Replantation*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents