open access

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)
Original article
Submitted: 2018-10-08
Accepted: 2018-11-04
Published online: 2018-11-14
Get Citation

Volumetric and three-dimensional examination of sella turcica by cone-beam computed tomography: reference data for guidance to pathologic pituitary morphology

L. Taner1, F. Deniz Uzuner1, O. Demirel2, K. Güngor2
·
Pubmed: 30444524
·
Folia Morphol 2019;78(3):517-523.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  2. Department of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

open access

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2018-10-08
Accepted: 2018-11-04
Published online: 2018-11-14

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the dimensions and volume of sella turcica in healthy Caucasian adults with normal occlusion and facial appearance from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods: CBCT images of 80 Caucasian adult patients (40 males, 40 females) with normal facial appearance and occlusion taken previously for diagnostic purposes were evaluated. Two groups were constructed in accordance to gender. The volume, length, diameter, and depth of the sella turcica were measured by Romexis software programme. Mann-Whitney U test and Independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean lengths of the sella were 9.9 mm and 10.2 mm, depths were 9.2 mm and 8.8 mm and diameters were 12.3 mm and 12.1 mm in female and male groups, respectively. Between the genders, no statistically significant differences were found for any of the measurements. There were significantly higher values for the volume of sella turcica in males than in females (1102 ± 285.3 mm3 and 951.3 ± 278.5 mm3, respectively).

Conclusions: The dimensions of sella turcica in healthy Caucasian adults with normal occlusion and facial appearance revealed nonsignificant differences between the genders. Individual variability in dimensions and gender differences in the volume are of importance in comparison of patients with craniofacial syndromes and aberrations. Knowledge concerning the dimensions and volume of sella turcica will be clinically relevant for a guidance to consciously realize pituitary disorders.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the dimensions and volume of sella turcica in healthy Caucasian adults with normal occlusion and facial appearance from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods: CBCT images of 80 Caucasian adult patients (40 males, 40 females) with normal facial appearance and occlusion taken previously for diagnostic purposes were evaluated. Two groups were constructed in accordance to gender. The volume, length, diameter, and depth of the sella turcica were measured by Romexis software programme. Mann-Whitney U test and Independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean lengths of the sella were 9.9 mm and 10.2 mm, depths were 9.2 mm and 8.8 mm and diameters were 12.3 mm and 12.1 mm in female and male groups, respectively. Between the genders, no statistically significant differences were found for any of the measurements. There were significantly higher values for the volume of sella turcica in males than in females (1102 ± 285.3 mm3 and 951.3 ± 278.5 mm3, respectively).

Conclusions: The dimensions of sella turcica in healthy Caucasian adults with normal occlusion and facial appearance revealed nonsignificant differences between the genders. Individual variability in dimensions and gender differences in the volume are of importance in comparison of patients with craniofacial syndromes and aberrations. Knowledge concerning the dimensions and volume of sella turcica will be clinically relevant for a guidance to consciously realize pituitary disorders.

Get Citation

Keywords

sella turcica size; sella turcica volume; Turkish saddle; cone-beam computed tomography; adult; gender differences

About this article
Title

Volumetric and three-dimensional examination of sella turcica by cone-beam computed tomography: reference data for guidance to pathologic pituitary morphology

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)

Article type

Original article

Pages

517-523

Published online

2018-11-14

Page views

1735

Article views/downloads

1574

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2018.0106

Pubmed

30444524

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2019;78(3):517-523.

Keywords

sella turcica size
sella turcica volume
Turkish saddle
cone-beam computed tomography
adult
gender differences

Authors

L. Taner
F. Deniz Uzuner
O. Demirel
K. Güngor

References (30)
  1. Alkofide EA. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29(5): 457–463.
  2. Axelsson S, Storhaug K, Kjaer I. Post-natal size and morphology of the sella turcica. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between 6 and 21 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 597–604.
  3. Balos Tuncer B, Canigur Bavbek N, Ozkan C, et al. Craniofacial and pharyngeal airway morphology in patients with acromegaly. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015; 73(6): 433–440.
  4. Bonneville JF, Cattin F, Dietemann JL. Hypothalamic-pituitary region: computed tomography imaging. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989; 3(1): 35–71.
  5. Canigur Bavbek N, Dincer M. Dimensions and morphologic variations of sella turcica in type 1 diabetic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(2): 179–187.
  6. Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132(1): 7–14.
  7. Choi WJ, Hwang EH, Lee SR. The study of shape and size of normal sella turcica in cephalometric radiographs. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2001; 31: 43–49.
  8. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. NewYork: Interscience Publications. 1940.
  9. DI Chiro G, Nelson KB. The volume of the sella turcica. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1962; 87: 989–1008.
  10. Diri H, Tanriverdi F, Karaca Z, et al. Extensive investigation of 114 patients with Sheehan's syndrome: a continuing disorder. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014; 171(3): 311–318.
  11. Dökmetaş HS, Kilicli F, Korkmaz S, et al. Characteristic features of 20 patients with Sheehan's syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006; 22(5): 279–283.
  12. Friedrich RE, Baumann J, Suling A, et al. Sella turcica measurements on lateral cephalograms of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2017; 6: Doc05.
  13. Haji Ghadimi M, Amini F, Hamedi S, et al. Associations among sella turcica bridging, atlas arcuate foramen (ponticulus posticus) development, atlas posterior arch deficiency, and the occurrence of palatally displaced canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(3): 513–520.
  14. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, et al. Bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(5): 714–718.
  15. Keleştimur F. Sheehan's syndrome. Pituitary. 2003; 6(4): 181–188.
  16. Kjær I. Sella turcica morphology and the pituitary gland-a new contribution to craniofacial diagnostics based on histology and neuroradiology. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37(1): 28–36.
  17. Kjaer KW, Hansen BF, Keeling JW, et al. Malformations of cranial base structures and pituitary gland in prenatal Meckel syndrome. APMIS. 1999; 107(10): 937–944.
  18. Kjaer I, Keeling JW, Reintoft I, et al. Pituitary gland and sella turcica in human trisomy 21 fetuses related to axial skeletal development. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 80(5): 494–500, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981228)80:5<494::AID-JMG11.
  19. Kucia A, Jankowski T, Siewniak M, et al. Sella turcica anomalies on lateral cephalometric radiographs of Polish children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(8): 20140165.
  20. Mah JK, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141 Suppl 3: 7S–713S.
  21. Meyer-Marcotty P, Reuther T, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Bridging of the sella turcica in skeletal Class III subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(2): 148–153.
  22. Miles DA. Clinical experience with cone beam volumetric imaging: a report of findings in 381 cases. US Dent. 2006; 1: 39–41.
  23. Newaz ZA, Barghan S, Katkar RA, et al. Incidental findings of skull-base abnormalities in cone-beam computed tomography scans with consultation by maxillofacial radiologists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 147(1): 127–131.
  24. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Khaleghi I. A cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of the size of the sella turcica in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Orthod. 2017; 44(3): 164–168.
  25. Ramiandrasoa C, Castinetti F, Raingeard I, et al. Delayed diagnosis of Sheehan's syndrome in a developed country: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013; 169(4): 431–438.
  26. Ruiz C, Wafae N, Wafae G. Sella Turcica morphometry using computed tomography. Eur J Anat. 2008; 12: 47–50.
  27. Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Cassani M, et al. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 27(6): 568–573.
  28. Seidenwurm DJ. Neuroendocrine imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29(3): 613–615.
  29. Tekiner H, Acer N, Kelestimur F. Sella turcica: an anatomical, endocrinological, and historical perspective. Pituitary. 2015; 18(4): 575–578.
  30. Yassir AY, Nahidh M, Yousif HA. Size and morphology of sella turcica in Iraqi adults. Mustansiria Dent J. 2010; 7: 23–30.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl