Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of using the same total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays calibrated with World Health Organization (WHO) materials or with Hybritech Tandem-R calibrator.
Methods: From the initial correlation study that included 150 patients, the clinical impact of the WHO calibration was simulated using a large cohort (n=4548) of referred patients. Interim reports of the European Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa).
Results: WHO calibration of tPSA assays leads to a reduction of about 20% in measured results (tPSA WHO=0.81 tPSA Hybritech+0.04; fPSA WHO=0.78 fPSA Hybritech+0.00; %fPSA WHO=0.92 %fPSA Hybritech+0.00). The simulation showed that the WHO calibration is associated with a risk of missing 15% of PCa.
Conclusions: The discrepancies between the two calibrations lead to significant clinical misinterpretation with decreased detection of PCa if tPSA cut-off thresholds are not adjusted.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:285–8.
©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
