Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serum CA 19-9 Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy is Associated with Outcome in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a useful prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA); however, data on the significance of a change in CA 19-9 following neoadjuvant therapy are lacking.

Methods

All patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for PDA from July 2010 to February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Resection rate, R0 resection rate, need for venous resection, and overall survival were correlated to CA 19-9 response. Fisher’s exact test, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and multivariate analysis using Cox regression were used.

Results

A total of 78 patients were studied (21 patients with resectable disease, 40 borderline resectable, and 17 with locally advanced disease). A variety of chemotherapies ± radiation were utilized during the study period. Overall, 56 patients (72 %) had a decrease in CA 19-9 of >50 % with neoadjuvant treatment. In borderline resectable patients, CA 19-9 response of >50 % predicted R0 resection (odds ratio 4.2; p = 0.05). In borderline resectable patients who had an increase in CA 19-9, none of five (0 %) underwent R0 resection compared with 80 % of the remaining cohort (p = 0.001). The complete pathologic response rate was 29 % in patients who had a CA 19-9 response of >90 % versus 0 % in the remaining patients (p < 0.001). A CA 19-9 response of >50 % resulted in improved overall survival (28.0 vs. 11.1 months; p < 0.0001) and was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 0.26; 95 % CI 0.13–0.55; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

CA 19-9 response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with R0 resection rate, histopathologic response, and survival. Incorporation of this easily obtainable biomarker into future clinical trials may facilitate more rapid evaluation of novel regimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rhim AD, Mirek ET, Aiello NM et al. EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation. Cell. 2012;148:349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz MH, Fleming JB, Bhosale P, et al. Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators. Cancer. 2012;118:5749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Onesti J, Blazer M, Williams T, et al. Radiographic response to neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for advanced non-metastatic pancreatic cancer is not required to proceed with resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:P386.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, et al. Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer. 2012;118:3182–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Winter JM, Yeo CJ, Brody JR. Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parikh DA, Durbin-Johnson B, Urayama S. Utility of serum CA19-9 levels in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in an endoscopic ultrasound referral population. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014;45:74–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sperti C, Beltrame V, Bissoli S, Pedrazzoli S. Accuracy of CA 19-9 and radiologic imaging in detecting recurrence after resection for pancreatic cancer. JOP. 2013;14:680–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Catalini S, et al. CA 19-9 as a prognostic index after resection for pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1993;52:137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Turrini O, Schmidt CM, Moreno J, et al. Very high serum CA 19-9 levels: a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1791–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammad N, Heilbrun LK, Philip PA, et al. CA19-9 as a predictor of tumor response and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine based chemotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010;6:98–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Distler M, Pilarsky E, Kersting S, Grutzmann R. Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 are prognostic markers for survival after curative resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a retrospective tumor marker prognostic study. Int J Surg. 2013;11:1067–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartwig W, Strobel O, Hinz U, et al. CA19-9 in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: perspective to adjust surgical and perioperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2188–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boeck S, Stieber P, Holdenrieder S, et al. Prognostic and therapeutic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as tumor marker in patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2006;70:255–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrone CR, Finkelstein DM, Thayer SP, et al. Perioperative CA19-9 levels can predict stage and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2897–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A retrospective analysis of early CA199 change in salvage chemotherapy for refractory pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72:1291–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakai Y, Kawabe T, Isayama H, et al. CA 19-9 response as an early indicator of the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2008;75:120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer TM, El-Rayes BF, Li X, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of 6 prospective trials. Cancer. 2013;119:285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, et al. Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsutsumi K, Kawamoto H, Hirao K, et al. Monitoring of CA19-9 and SPan-1 can facilitate the earlier confirmation of progressing pancreatic cancer during chemotherapy. Pancreatology. 2012;12:409–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park BB, Park JO, Lee HR, et al. A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;60:489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz MH, Varadhachary GR, Fleming JB, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1794–801.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tzeng CW, Balachandran A, Ahmad M, et al. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 represents a marker of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:430–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang GY, Malik NK, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Change in CA 19-9 levels after chemoradiotherapy predicts survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;4:361–9.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marrelli D, Caruso S, Pedrazzani C, et al. CA19-9 serum levels in obstructive jaundice: clinical value in benign and malignant conditions. Am J Surg. 2009;198:333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1727–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bao P, Potter D, Eisenberg DP, et al. Validation of a prediction rule to maximize curative (R0) resection of early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:606–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. This work was supported by grant number T32CA113263 from the National Cancer Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert J. Zeh III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boone, B.A., Steve, J., Zenati, M.S. et al. Serum CA 19-9 Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy is Associated with Outcome in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 4351–4358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3842-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3842-z

Keywords

Navigation