Elsevier

Annals of Oncology

Volume 27, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages 274-280
Annals of Oncology

original articles
gastrointestinal tumors
A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv541Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

ABSTRACT

Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most common and the third most lethal cancer in both men and women in developed countries. About 75% of cases are first diagnosed when the disease is classified as localized or regional, undergo potentially curative treatment and enter a post-treatment surveillance program. Although such programs drain significant resources from health systems, empirical evidence of their efficacy is scanty.

Patients and methods

Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who had no evidence of disease at the end of their front-line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radiochemotherapy, if indicated) were eligible for the trial and randomized to two different surveillance programs. These programs differed greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They had similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments. Patients received baseline and yearly health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and QoL.

Results

From 1998 to 2006, 1228 assessable patients were randomized, 933 with colon cancer and 295 with rectal cancer. More than 90% of patients had the expected number of diagnostic procedures. Median follow-up duration was 62 months [interquartile range (IQR) 51–86] in the minimal surveillance group and 62 months (IQR 50–85) in the intensive group. At primary analysis, 250 patients had recurred and 218 had died. Intensive surveillance anticipated recurrence, as shown by a significant difference in mean disease-free survival of 5.9 months. Comparison of OS curves of the whole intention-to-treat population showed no statistically significant differences. HR-QoL of life scores did not differ between regimens.

Conclusion

Our findings support the conclusions of other randomized clinical trials, which show that early diagnosis of cancer recurrence is not associated with OS benefit.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT02409472.

Key words

colorectal carcinoma
randomized clinical trial

Cited by (0)