Original Paper
Comparison of optimized intensity correction methods for 23Na MRI of the human brain using a 32-channel phased array coil at 7 Tesla

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2019.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To correct for the non-homogeneous receive profile of a phased array head coil in sodium magnetic resonance imaging (23Na MRI).

Methods

23Na MRI of the human brain (n = 8) was conducted on a 7T MR system using a dual-tuned quadrature 1H/23Na transmit/receive birdcage coil, equipped with a 32-channel receive-only array. To correct the inhomogeneous receive profile four different methods were applied: (1) the uncorrected phased array image and an additionally acquired birdcage image as reference image were low-pass filtered and divided by each other. (2) The second method substituted the reference image by a support region. (3) By averaging the individually calculated receive profiles, a universal sensitivity map was obtained and applied. (4) The receive profile was determined by a pre-scanned large uniform phantom. The calculation of the sensitivity maps was optimized in a simulation study using the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE). All methods were evaluated in phantom measurements and finally applied to in vivo 23Na MRI data sets. The in vivo measurements were partial volume corrected and for further evaluation the signal ratio between the outer and inner cerebrospinal fluid compartments (CSFout:CSFin) was calculated.

Results

Phantom measurements show the correction of the intensity profile applying the given methods. Compared to the uncorrected phased array image (NRMSE = 0.46, CSFout:CSFin = 1.71), the quantitative evaluation of simulated and measured intensity corrected human brain data sets indicates the best performance utilizing the birdcage image (NRMSE = 0.39, CSFout:CSFin = 1.00). However, employing a support region (NRMSE = 0.40, CSFout:CSFin = 1.17), a universal sensitivity map (NRMSE = 0.41, CSFout:CSFin = 1.05) or a pre-scanned sensitivity map (NRMSE = 0.42, CSFout:CSFin = 1.07) shows only slightly worse results.

Conclusion

Acquiring a birdcage image as reference image to correct for the receive profile demonstrates the best performance. However, when aiming to reduce acquisition time or for measurements without existing birdcage coil, methods that use a support region as reference image, a universal or a pre-scanned sensitivity map provide good alternatives for correction of the receive profile.

Introduction

Sodium ions (Na+) play an important role in metabolic processes. The sodium-potassium pump ensures a resting membrane potential between the extra- and intracellular fluid compartments by transporting potassium-ions in and sodium-ions out of the cell. The resting membrane potential guarantees the excitability of cells and thus, the transmission of electrical stimuli. Consequently, changes in extra- and intracellular Na+ concentrations – and therefore also of the averaged total Na+ concentration – indicate altered metabolic processes. Changed total Na+ concentrations can be found in pathological processes in all body parts [1]. Elevated total tissue Na+ concentrations (TSC) can be observed in the human brain for several diseases [2], such as multiple sclerosis [3], [4], [5], [6], Alzheimer's disease [7], after stroke [8], [9], [10] and in malignant tumors [11].

Sodium magnetic resonance imaging (23Na MRI) offers the possibility to non-invasively quantify TSC [1], [12]. However, quantitative measurements require acquisition techniques that enable ultra-short echo times [13] and – depending on the type of the used radiofrequency coil – also correction of the transmit [14] and receive [15] profile. Moreover, due to low in vivo concentrations and low MR sensitivity, 23Na MRI suffers from a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Different approaches have been developed to increase the SNR of 23Na MRI data. On the hardware side, the use of ultra-high field systems increases the total spin polarization of the sample and therefore the SNR [16]. In addition, phased array coils (instead of volume coils) can further improve the SNR due to their design consisting of many small receiver elements, which provides a higher SNR efficiency [17], [18], [19]. However, since phased array coils entail a non-homogeneous receive profile, their use hampers straightforward quantification. If the phased array coil is equipped with a homogeneous transmit/receive (Tx/Rx) volume coil (e.g. a birdcage coil), sensitivity maps can be easily calculated and used to correct the receive profile of the phased array coil. Another, more sophisticated method is using the SENSE reconstruction algorithm, which exploits the encoding property of the receiver sensitivity to reconstruct multi-channel raw data sets, but also corrects for the receive profile [20], [21]. Although, SENSE has been applied in a few 23Na MRI studies [15], [22], [23], these requirements are not broadly available for 23Na MRI. This might be a reason why phased array coils, despite their mentioned advantages, are used less often in 23Na MRI as compared to volume coils [15], [22], [24].

In this work, basic intensity correction methods were evaluated. The first method utilized a measured birdcage image as reference image to calculate a receive profile that was then used for correction. However, this requires additional acquisition time and not all multi-channel receive coils are equipped with a combined Tx/Rx birdcage coil. Thus, a second method was employed, which approximated the reference image from the combined phased array image [25]. Additionally, a third method, which utilized a universal sensitivity map, obtained by averaging individually calculated receive profiles, was applied. Finally, as fourth and very simple method, a pre-scanned sensitivity map measured from a large uniform phantom was employed. The methods were optimized and evaluated in a simulation study and were applied to 23Na MRI of the healthy human brain using a 32-channel phased array coil with integrated birdcage coil. The intensity corrected in vivo measurements were partial volume corrected [26] and signal intensities in the inner and outer cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments were compared to each other for further evaluation.

Section snippets

Intensity correction

The measured signal Sx,y,z of a multi-channel phased array coil is given by multiplying the object magnetization Mx,y,z with the receive profile Ex,y,z plus noise Nx,y,z:Sx,y,z=Ex,y,zMx,y,z+Nx,y,z.

Under the assumption E · M  N, the object magnetization can be calculated viaMx,y,z=Sx,y,zEx,y,z.

To determine the receive profile Ex,y,z, two methods were implemented and evaluated. Both methods require a homogeneous reference image, where the influence of the receive profile is negligible. First, the

Simulation

In simulation studies, optimized filter parameters for the correction methods using a birdcage image and a support region were determined for each data set (see supplementary material, Table A.1). This was done by minimizing the NRMSE with respect to the GT for different parameter combinations of σ1 and σ2 (see supplementary material, Figure A.1). The optimized filter parameters were applied to calculate the receive profile, which was used to correct the phased array image. Additionally, a

Discussion

We analyzed four intensity correction methods for 23Na MRI with a 32-channel receiver head coil. A birdcage image as well as a support region were employed as reference image to calculate the receive profile. In addition, a universal and a pre-scanned phantom sensitivity map were applied.

The method utilizing a birdcage image performs best. However, the acquisition of the birdcage image requires additional measurement time. This can be avoided by employing a support region as homogeneous

Conclusion

In this work, the inhomogeneous receive profile of a 32-channel head phased array coil was corrected using a measured birdcage image and a support region as homogeneous reference image. Additionally, a universal and a pre-scanned sensitivity map were applied. The proposed correction methods were optimized and evaluated in a simulation study and applied to eight in vivo head data sets acquired at 7T. The method with measured birdcage image yields the best results. However, a support region, a

Declarations of interest

none.

References (39)

  • N.J. Shah et al.

    Imaging of sodium in the brain: a brief review

    NMR Biomed

    (2016)
  • M. Inglese et al.

    Brain tissue sodium concentration in multiple sclerosis: a sodium imaging study at 3 tesla

    Brain

    (2010)
  • M. Petracca et al.

    of multiple sclerosis

    NMR Biomed

    (2016)
  • W. Zaaraoui et al.

    Distribution of brain sodium accumulation correlates with disability in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional 23Na MR imaging study

    Radiology

    (2012)
  • K. Huhn et al.

    Potential of Sodium MRI as a Biomarker for Neurodegeneration and Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis

    Front Neurol

    (2019)
  • E. Mellon et al.

    Sodium MR imaging detection of mild Alzheimer disease: preliminary study

    Am J Neuroradiol

    (2009)
  • K.R. Thulborn et al.

    imaging protocol for stroke management: tissue sodium concentration as a measure of tissue viability in nonhuman primate studies and in clinical studies

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • A. Tsang et al.

    Relationship Between Sodium Intensity and Perfusion Deficits in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2011)
  • R. Ouwerkerk et al.

    Tissue sodium concentration in human brain tumors as measured with 23Na MR imaging

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Volumetric <sup>23</sup>Na Single and Triple-Quantum Imaging at 7T: 3D-CRISTINA

      2022, Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
      Citation Excerpt :

      An additional T1-weighted sequence (e.g. the MP2RAGE sequence [23]) acquisition would have helped to provide a GM and WM segmentation. But the MP2RAGE sequence was designed to be employed with a multi-channel receiver coil array, requiring a change of coil which was incompatible with this study [24]. Another clear limitation is the low SQ and TQ signal of phantom vial 7 (4% agar and 50 mM 23Na), further work is needed with standardized fabricated phantoms to explore limitations and rule out phantom ageing problems.

    • Compressed sensing and the use of phased array coils in <sup>23</sup>Na MRI: a comparison of a SENSE-based and an individually combined multi-channel reconstruction

      2021, Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the breast coil does not entail an integrated homogeneous volume coil, a reference image can be approximated by the combined phased array image [39,48]. In addition, the receive profile can be estimated using phantom measurements [39]. Finally, the inhomogeneous receive profile of the phased array image can be corrected by division with the determined receive profile.

    • Towards accelerated quantitative sodium MRI at 7 T in the skeletal muscle: Comparison of anisotropic acquisition- and compressed sensing techniques

      2021, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, approaches such as sensitivity encoding (SENSE [26]) or generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition (GRAPPA [27]) use sensitivity profiles of phased array coils to speed up the acquisition. Multi-channel phased array coils are also used increasingly for 23Na MRI [28,29], but are not available for every application. Another category of reconstruction algorithms for acceleration, which are applicable for single channel radiofrequency (RF-)coils, are based on compressed sensing [30,31] (CS).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text