FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: Prognostic factors and outcomes
Introduction
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with an estimated 40,100 new cases diagnosed in 2008. Most patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, which is cured in the majority of patients with surgery alone [1]. The presence of extrauterine disease significantly affects recurrence rates and survival, which emphasizes the importance of identification of sites of disease spread and provision of appropriate adjuvant postoperative therapy [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
In 1987, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) published results of Protocol 33, which investigated the usefulness of surgical staging in patients with endometrial cancer clinically confined to the uterus. They found that 22% of the 621 patients had extrauterine disease, including disease spread to the pelvic lymph nodes in 9% and to the para-aortic lymph nodes in 5%. In response to this report and others, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) changed to a surgical staging system in 1988 [7]. The performance of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of surgical staging of endometrial cancer has increased due to reports showing both diagnostic and therapeutic advantages [3], [8], [9], [10]. In patients with stage IIIC disease, resection of para-aortic lymph nodes in particular has been shown to give a therapeutic advantage [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].
The mainstay of adjuvant treatment for advanced endometrial cancer has been radiation. Small et al. and others showed tolerable toxicity and good pelvic and abdominal locoregional control with whole abdomen radiation. More recently, adjuvant treatment for patients with advanced disease has included both radiation and chemotherapy. In GOG 122, patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin and doxorubicin) had an improved OS and PFS compared to those undergoing whole abdomen irradiation [17].
The objectives of this study are to analyze the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of a large series of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer at a single institution where lymphadenectomy was performed for almost all patients with endometrial cancer since 1979, to describe prognostic differences based on location of lymph node metastases, and to analyze patterns of recurrence in relationship to treatment provided.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We performed a retrospective review of all endometrial cancer patients with nodal involvement who underwent primary surgical therapy at Northwestern University's Prentice Women's Hospital between October 1979 and December 2005. Of 1487 patients who underwent surgery for non-sarcomatous endometrial cancer, 104 were found to be stage IIIC. Of the 104 total cases identified, 19 were excluded for incomplete records. The remaining 85 cases were analyzed.
Data regarding patient medical histories,
Results
Between October 1979 and December 2005, 104 (7.0%) of the 1487 patients with carcinoma of the uterine corpus undergoing surgical staging were found to have involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Of these 104 patients, 85 of them were included in this analysis. Stage was determined by positive pelvic lymph nodes only in 54 patients, and positive para-aortic ± pelvic nodes in 31 patients. Of the 31 patients with positive PaLN, 7 (22.6%) had negative PLN, and 2 did not have a pelvic
Discussion
This report describes one of the largest experiences of patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer with lymph node involvement from a single institution [3], [4], [6], [12], [18], [19]. The survival in this series is among the highest reported. Prior to the conversion to a surgical staging system for endometrial cancer, clinical stage I patients found to have nodal disease on final pathologic examination had a 50% RFS and a 52% OS [9]. Since surgical staging was adopted in 1988, a
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References (39)
- et al.
Adjuvant brachytherapy removes survival disadvantage of local disease extension in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: a SEER registry analysis
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
(2008) - et al.
Stage IIIC endometrioid corpus cancer includes distinct subgroups
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2002) - et al.
Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2005) - et al.
FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy
Gynecol. Oncol.
(1999) - et al.
Complete surgical staging of early endometrial adenocarcinoma: optimizing patient outcomes
Semin. Radiat. Oncol.
(2000) - et al.
Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may improve disease-related survival in patients with multipositive pelvic lymph node stage IIIc endometrial cancer
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2007) - et al.
Analysis of FIGO Stage IIIC endometrial cancer patients
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2001) - et al.
Resection of lymph node metastases influences survival in stage IIIC endometrial cancer
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2005) - et al.
Endometrial cancer with para-aortic adenopathy: patterns of failure and opportunities for cure
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
(1992) - et al.
Surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in FIGO Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
(2001)
Stage III endometrial cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and failure patterns after adjuvant chemotherapy
Gynecol. Oncol.
Prognostic value of pathologic features and DNA analysis in endometrial carcinoma
Gynecol. Oncol.
DNA ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: major objective prognostic factor
Mayo Clin. Proc.
DNA flow cytometric analysis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinomas with lymph node metastases
Gynecol. Oncol.
Ovarian metastasis in endometrial carcinoma
Gynecol. Oncol.
Immunohistochemical profile of endometrial adenocarcinoma: a study of 61 cases and review of the literature
Mod. Path.
Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Gynecol. Oncol.
Radiation therapy for surgically proven para-aortic node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling
Gynecol. Oncol.
Cited by (43)
Robotic-assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Technique and indications in gynecological oncology
2023, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyMaximizing sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer with dual cervical and transcervical fundal indocyanine green injection: 5-year single-center prospective study
2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyThe outcome and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma with solitary adnexal involvement: A retrospective single-institution study
2014, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Since patients with solitary adnexal involvement have a favorable prognosis, less toxic therapies are considered in order to decrease complication risks [12]. Several trials have indicated that selected patients may have survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy alone [6,11,31], although the particular groups of these patients have not been clearly identified. In view of this background, we performed this study to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with solitary adnexal involvement.
Efficacy of contemporary chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: A histologic dichotomy
2014, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Nonetheless, contemporary therapeutic algorithms for stage IIIC disease have yielded disparate posttreatment recurrence rates [10–15]. Although multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in minimizing pelvic relapses, treatment failures at distant sites, including the paraaortic area, are frequently observed [15–19]. Consequently, systemic therapy alone or in combination with EBRT has been advocated, but outcomes are inconsistent [10,11,15,20–22].
Trends in use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and combination chemoradiotherapy in advanced uterine cancer before, during, and after GOG 258
2023, International Journal of Gynecological CancerAdjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive Endometrial Cancer: A Focus on Chemotherapy
2022, Current Oncology Reports