Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 142, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages 156-162
Surgery

Society of University Surgeon
Stat1 acetylation inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in interferon-γ–treated RAW264.7 murine macrophages

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.016Get rights and content

Background

We hypothesized that acetylation of the Stat1 regulates interferon-γ (IFN-γ) mediated macrophage expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).

Methods

RAW 264.7 iNOS expression was induced with IFN-γ. Deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) or valproic acid (VPA) were added. Stat1 and iNOS mRNA and protein were measured. Acetylated Stat1 was determined by immunoprecipitation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assessed in vivo binding of Stat1 to the iNOS promoter.

Results

IFN-γ significantly increased nitrite, iNOS protein and iNOS mRNA, and iNOS promoter activation. (P < .01 vs control for nitrite, protein, and mRNA). TSA-mediated acetylation decreased these to levels that were not different from controls. IFN-γ increased acetylated Stat1 by 5-fold (P < .02 vs control); TSA + IFN-γ caused an additional 4-fold increase in acetylated Stat1 (P < .05 vs IFN alone). Stat1 binding to the iNOS promoter increased 8-fold with IFN-γ (P < .01 vs control). In TSA + IFN-γ, Stat1 binding was not different from controls. Although less potent than TSA, VPA also significantly decreased nitrite, iNOS protein, iNOS mRNA, Stat1 acetylation, and Stat1 binding.

Conclusions

Acetylation of Stat1 protein correlates with decreased Stat1 binding to the iNOS promoter with resultant inhibition of IFN-γ–mediated iNOS expression. Acetylation of the Stat1 protein may downregulate iNOS expression in proinflammatory states.

Section snippets

Cell culture

RAW 264.7 macrophages were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 100-U/mL penicillin, and 100-μg/mL streptomycin, and incubated in 5% CO2–95% air at 37°C. IFN-γ (500 u) was used to induce NO synthesis. In selected instances, the deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA; 200 nmol/L) and valproic acid (VPA; 1.5 mmol/L) were used. After incubation for 3, 12, and/or 24 hours, the supernatants and cells were harvested.

Assay of NO production

After stimulation, 50

Results

RAW264.7 murine macrophages were exposed to IFN-γ (500 U/mL) for 0, 3, 12, and 24 hours. Unstimulated cells served as controls. TSA and VPA were added in the presence and absence of IFN-γ to inhibit deacetylase activity. NO was measured as nitrite, the NO metabolite (Fig 1, A). In the presence of IFN-γ, NO production was readily detected after 12 and 24 hours with concentrations of 62 ± 2.3 μmol/L and 88 ± 4.8 μmol/L, respectively (P < .01 vs control at 12 and 24 hours). In IFN + TSA cells, NO

Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrate that acetylation of Stat1 in IFN-γ–stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages accompanies decreased binding to the iNOS promoter GAS binding site, decreased iNOS mRNA and protein expression, and decreased NO production. This result occurs despite increased levels of activated Stat1 that is phosphorylated at Tyr 701. Stat1 Tyr701 phosphorylation induces Stat1 dimerization, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding, which suggests that a hierarchy of acetylation

References (22)

  • T. Kouzarides

    Acetylation: a regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation?

    EMBO J

    (2000)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Valproic acid counteracts polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-induced tumorigenic effects by regulating the polarization of macrophages

      2022, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
      Citation Excerpt :

      We suspected that the above phenomenon may be very complicated and further studies are needed. VPA reduced inflammation by decreasing the expression of M1-related factors, and also decreased the expression of iNOS and IL-12 under lipopolysaccharide and IFN-γ stimulation in vitro (Guo et al., 2007; Serrat et al., 2014). In addition, VPA can transform macrophages from pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype (Wu et al., 2012).

    • Manipulating macrophage polarization and function using classical HDAC inhibitors: Implications for autoimmunity and inflammation

      2018, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Addition of HDAC inhibitors such as sodium butyrate (SB), suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), trichostatin A (TSA), valproic acid (VPA), MS-275, and ITF2357 to macrophages down-regulates the expression of several host defense genes including growth factors, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), co-stimulatory molecules, pro-inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and chemokines expression and release via inhibition of the transcription factors, mainly NF-κB (Ariffin et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2008; Chong et al., 2012a,b; Choo et al., 2010; Das Gupta et al., 2016; Dragunow et al., 2006; Fang et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2013; Ghizzoni et al., 2011; Grabiec et al., 2012, 2010; Guo et al., 2007; Hamalainen et al., 2008; Han and Lee, 2009; Ichiyama et al., 2000; Jambalganiin et al., 2014; Ji et al., 2016; Joosten et al., 2011; Leoni et al., 2002; Leus et al., 2017, 2016b; Lewis et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Lohman et al., 2016; Lugrin et al., 2009; Luhrs et al., 2002; Mombelli et al., 2011; Montero-Melendez et al., 2013; Neele et al., 2015; Nguyen et al., 2011; Ohira et al., 2013, 2016; Patel et al., 2017; Poralla et al., 2015; Rahman et al., 2003; Shein et al., 2009; Sugiura et al., 2011; Sweet et al., 2012; Thangavel et al., 2015; Toussirot et al., 2013, 2010a,b; Van den Bossche et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2015a; Wu et al., 2012; Xiong et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016, 2012; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2014b; Zini et al., 2012). HDAC inhibitors also inhibit the polarization of M1 macrophage (Ji et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2017; Thangavel et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015a; Wu et al., 2012), generation of Th17 cells (Bosisio et al., 2008; Frikeche et al., 2012a; Glauben et al., 2009), and effectively suppress the expression, production and release of pro-inflammatory mediators in macrophage, DCs, and CD4+ T cells (Ariffin et al., 2015; Bosisio et al., 2008; Brogdon et al., 2007; Cavaglieri et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2008; Chong et al., 2012a,b; Choo et al., 2010; Das Gupta et al., 2016; Dobreva et al., 2016; Dragunow et al., 2006; Fang et al., 2016; Frikeche et al., 2012a,b; Gao et al., 2013; Ghizzoni et al., 2011; Ginter et al., 2012; Glauben et al., 2014, 2009; Grabiec et al., 2012, 2010; Guo et al., 2007; Hamalainen et al., 2008; Han and Lee, 2009; Ichiyama et al., 2000; Jambalganiin et al., 2014; Ji et al., 2016; Joosten et al., 2011; Leoni et al., 2002; Leus et al., 2017, 2016b; Lewis et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Lohman et al., 2016; Lugrin et al., 2009; Luhrs et al., 2002; Mombelli et al., 2011; Montero-Melendez et al., 2013; Neele et al., 2015; Nguyen et al., 2011; Ohira et al., 2013, 2016; Patel et al., 2017; Poralla et al., 2015; Rahman et al., 2003; Roger et al., 2011; Shein et al., 2009; Sugiura et al., 2011; Sweet et al., 2012; Thangavel et al., 2015; Toussirot et al., 2013, 2010a,b; Van den Bossche et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2015a; Wu et al., 2012; Xiong et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016, 2012; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2014b; Zini et al., 2012). These effects may contribute to the therapeutic potentials of HDAC inhibitors.

    • Regulation of STAT signaling by acetylation

      2013, Cellular Signalling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Here, STAT1 functions as a molecular switch and make STAT1 and NF-κB binding possible and then enhances NF-κB signaling. In addition, acetylation of the STAT1 protein may downregulate iNOS expression in proinflammatory states [60] by decreasing STAT1 binding to the iNOS promoter with resultant inhibition of IFN-γ-mediated iNOS expression. Krämer et al. [61] showed that there is a phosphorylation-acetylation switch which regulates STAT1 signaling.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by grants GM65113 (P.C.K.), AI44629 (P.C.K.), and DK070642 (P.C.K.) from the National Institutes of Health.

    View full text