ReviewAre the available experimental models of type 2 diabetes appropriate for a gender perspective?
Introduction
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D and T2D) are the more common forms of diabetes but further rare forms including maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY1) [1], gestational diabetes [2], and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA1) [3] have also been characterized. In particular, among these different forms of diabetes, T2D is the most common endocrine disease with steadily increasing incidence [2]. Importantly, many gender differences have been described in this disease, including risk factors and clinical management [4], [5]. For instance, it has been suggested that diabetic women have a higher morbility and mortality for cardiovascular diseases [6], [7], [8] with respect to men.
In order to improve our knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms of T2D, many experimental models have so far been developed to determine the possible pharmacological targets of the disease and to better evaluate diabetes-associated complications, e.g. the cardiovascular disease. Many spontaneous, but highly heterogeneous, animal models of T2D are in fact available (Table 1). The rodent model seems to be the more suitable and includes different species such as rats [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], including Psammomys obesus [14], and mice [13], [15]; however, cats [16], [17], pigs [18], and non-human primates [19] have also been taken into consideration. Besides, T2D can also experimentally be induced. For example, chemical destruction or removal of beta cells, lesioning the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) [13], [20], feeding animals with high-fat and high-sugar diet [21], malnutrition in utero [22], [23], glucocorticoids administration or other chemicals such as glutamate [24], [25] have been employed. Furthermore, animal models of diabetes have also been constructed through genetic manipulation [26]. Together, genetic animal models have provided major insights into the roles of proteins that modulate glucose homeostasis, but it is not yet known how and to what extent these genes could contribute to the disease. It is worth recalling that T2D is a polygenic disease and it is heavily influenced by environmental factors. However, T2D has to be considered as a gender-associated disease [4], [5]. Hence the main topic of this review will be to evaluate whether the available experimental models of T2D could provide useful information that can be transferred to humans, i.e. to men and women.
Section snippets
Gender differences in human diabetes
In children, type 2 diabetes is far more common in girls than in boys [27], [28], [29]. In fact, increasing evidence suggests that girls are more insulin resistant than boys, starting from the birth through early and late childhood [30], [31], [32], [33], puberty and adolescence [34], [35], [36]. In adults, gender differences have recently been summarized in interesting reviews [4], [5] that are very briefly summarized here.
As a general rule, the incidence of diabetes is approximately
Experimental models of T2D
Due to the ethical limitations in performing in vivo studies in humans, many animal models that mimic the human disease have been established (Table 1). These models provide the opportunity to evaluate the onset, the development, and the progression of the disease and contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying T2D.
Considering that the fundamental dysfunction is insulin resistance, which comprises both the failure of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake in skeletal
Conclusions
Several animal models exhibit sexually dimorphic diabetic phenotypes [12], [119], [129], [179], [180], [181], [182], [183], [184], [185], [186], [187]. Albeit several differences are partly sustained from sexual hormones, the results are sometimes still contradictory. For example, male gonadectomy can be ineffective or can even accentuate differences [182], [183], [188], [189], [190] but it can also protect against development of diabetes [12], [179], [184], [190], [191]. Animals in which
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by grant from the Ministero della Sanita’ to WM and to FF and in part with “Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio Pistoia e Pescia” and SAR-Ricerca finalizzata-2006. We express deep gratitude to Maria Luisa Marilotti Consigliera di Pari Opportunità della Regione Sardegna that provided a fellowship for SC.
References (238)
- et al.
Gender-specific care of the patient with diabetes: review and recommendations
Gend Med
(2006) - et al.
Relationships between diet control and the development of spontaneous type II diabetes and diabetic nephropathy in OLETF rats
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(1996) - et al.
Glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in the JCR:LA-corpulent rat: effect of miglitol (Bay m1099)
Metabolism
(1999) - et al.
Changing pattern of prevalence of insulin resistance in Psammomys obesus, a model of nutritionally induced type 2 diabetes
Metabolism
(1999) - et al.
Canine and feline diabetes mellitus: nature or nurture?
J Nutr
(2004) - et al.
Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective
J Pediatr
(2000) - et al.
Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study
Am J Cardiol
(1974) - et al.
The influence of sex on the protein anabolic response to insulin
Metabolism
(2005) - et al.
Increased insulin secretion in puberty: a compensatory response to reductions in insulin sensitivity
J Pediatr
(1989) - et al.
Puberty decreases insulin sensitivity
J Pediatr
(1987)