Clinical Investigation
Clinical Outcomes of Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Radiation Therapy for Carcinoma of the Cervix

Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL, November 1–5, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.041Get rights and content

Purpose

To evaluate disease outcomes and toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Methods and Materials

We included all patients with Stage I–IVA cervical carcinoma treated with IMRT at three different institutions from 2000–2007. Patients treated with extended field or conventional techniques were excluded. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were designed to deliver 45 Gy in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to the planning target volume while minimizing dose to the bowel, bladder, and rectum. Toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group system. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Pelvic failure, distant failure, and late toxicity were estimated by use of cumulative incidence functions.

Results

The study included 111 patients. Of these, 22 were treated with postoperative IMRT, 8 with IMRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy and adjuvant hysterectomy, and 81 with IMRT followed by planned intracavitary brachytherapy. Of the patients, 63 had Stage I–IIA disease and 48 had Stage IIB–IVA disease. The median follow-up time was 27 months. The 3-year overall survival rate and the disease-free survival rate were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68–88%) and 69% (95% CI, 59–81%), respectively. The 3-year pelvic failure rate and the distant failure rate were 14% (95% CI, 6–22%) and 17% (95% CI, 8–25%), respectively. Estimates of acute and late Grade 3 toxicity or higher were 2% (95% CI, 0–7%) and 7% (95% CI, 2–13%), respectively.

Conclusions

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is associated with low toxicity and favorable outcomes, supporting its safety and efficacy for cervical cancer. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IMRT vs. conventional techniques.

Introduction

Over the past decade, interest in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies has grown considerably (1). Multiple studies have shown that IMRT reduces bowel, rectal, bladder, and bone marrow (BM) dose 2, 3, 4 and is associated with lower rates of gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and hematologic toxicity compared with conventional techniques 5, 6, 7, 8. Optimizing IMRT plans may further reduce toxicity 9, 10, 11, 12 and/or permit higher target doses 13, 14, 15, thereby improving the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy (RT).

Despite promising results with IMRT for gynecologic cancer, outcomes data remain limited. Moreover, the application of IMRT in cervical cancer, particularly for women with an intact uterus, remains controversial. Among the factors contributing to this controversy are the increased complexity of IMRT, potential for underdosing target because interfraction and intrafraction motion 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and debate regarding optimal pelvic IMRT techniques, including target definition 21, 22, 23, normal tissue dosimetric constraints 10, 12, and magnitude of planning margins required (24). The comparative effectiveness of IMRT vs. conventional pelvic RT techniques for cervical cancer therefore remains unknown.

Studies reporting long-term outcomes in cervical cancer are needed to help provide benchmark results for prospective clinical trials. We began using IMRT in 2000 at the University of Chicago, with favorable early treatment results 5, 6, 25, 26, and have subsequently collected data in a large cohort of women treated at several different medical centers. Here, we report our findings on acute and late GI and GU toxicity and disease outcomes for this cohort.

Section snippets

Patients

All patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I–IVA cervical cancer treated with IMRT between 2000 and 2007 at the University of Chicago, University of Illinois at Chicago, and University of California, San Diego were included. Patients with synchronous malignancies, positive para-aortic lymph nodes or distant metastases, or treatment with extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT), conventional RT techniques, or palliative intent were excluded. The study was

Patients

Of the 141 patients screened, 111 met the inclusion criteria. The reasons for exclusion included the use of EFRT (n = 13), initial treatment with conventional RT (n = 11), palliative intent (n = 4), concurrent treatment for lung cancer (n = 1), and missing records (n = 1). Of the patients, 63 (57%) had Stage I–IIA and 48 (43%) had Stage IIB–IVA disease (Table 1). Two women with Stage IA2 disease who were not candidates for surgery were treated with RT alone. Of the patients, 22 (20%) were

Discussion

The use of IMRT for gynecologic malignancies has increased during the past decade (1), despite limited data on long-term toxicity or disease control. Currently, the only completed prospective trial of IMRT in cervical cancer has been in the postoperative setting (43). Long-term outcomes data remain limited, particularly for women with intact cervical cancer. This study represents the largest analysis of cervical cancer patients treated with IMRT to date. We found that IMRT was associated with

References (57)

  • M. Guerrero et al.

    Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: Radiobiological and dosimetric considerations

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • J. Esthappan et al.

    Prospective clinical trial of positron emission tomography/computed tomography image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2008)
  • R.S. Ahmed et al.

    IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • C.M. Lee et al.

    Rapid involution and mobility of carcinoma of the cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • L. van de Bunt et al.

    Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • B.M. Beadle et al.

    Cervix regression and motion during the course of external beam chemoradiation for cervical cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • P. Chan et al.

    Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2008)
  • A. Taylor et al.

    Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: Guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • W. Small et al.

    Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2008)
  • L. van de Bunt et al.

    Motion and deformation of the target volumes during IMRT for cervical cancer: What margins do we need?

    Radiother Oncol

    (2008)
  • A.J. Mundt et al.

    Initial clinical experience with intensity-modulated whole-pelvis radiation therapy in women with gynecologic malignancies

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • K. Lim et al.

    Cervical cancer regression measured using weekly magnetic resonance imaging during fractionated radiotherapy: Radiobiologic modeling and correlation with tumor hypoxia

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2008)
  • A. Sedlis et al.

    A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • F.B. Stehman et al.

    Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma: Follow-up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2007)
  • L. Portelance et al.

    Post-operative pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for patients with cervical carcinoma/RTOG 0418 phase II study

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • P. Mauch et al.

    Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: Acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1995)
  • A. Dueñas-Gonzalez et al.

    Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: A randomized Phase II study

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • C.A. Perez et al.

    Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1998)
  • Cited by (139)

    • Basic principles in gynecologic radiotherapy

      2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic Oncology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by National Institute of Health Grants L30 CA135746-01 and T32 RR023254.

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text