International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Clinical InvestigationRadiation-Related Predictors of Hematologic Toxicity After Concurrent Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer and Implications for Bone Marrow–Sparing Pelvic IMRT
Introduction
The current standard of care for the management of advanced cervical carcinoma is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by brachytherapy 1, 2. The goal of these combined therapies is to maximize tumor cell death with the radiosensitizing effects of chemotherapy while minimizing tumor repopulation by completing therapy within 8 weeks. Although this treatment is effective and has been validated by Phase III randomized studies 3, 4, 5, 6, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation increases the risk of hematologic toxicity (HT), as shown in reviews of the subject 7, 8. This acute toxicity is more severe with combined therapy compared with radiation therapy (RT) alone (8).
Patients who receive CCRT for cervical carcinoma have an increased risk of Grade 2 through 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia developing. These women also have an increased risk of Grade 2 through 4 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities along with the prolongation of median treatment time (7). Patterns-of-care studies have shown that treatment prolongation of 1 day corresponds roughly to a 1% decrease in local control (9). The presence of significant neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (Grade 3 or 4) can result in mandatory prolongation of radiation treatment, which has been shown to be detrimental for local tumor control.
Hematologic toxicity has been particularly noted in women undergoing pelvic RT for cervical cancer, compared with other locations, because of the increased radiosensitivity of pelvic bone marrow (BM), which is in the radiation field (10). Moreover, approximately 40% of the total-body BM reserve lies within the pelvic bones (11). This radiation–related risk for HT is in addition to myelotoxic effects of chemotherapy agents used in these regimens. Conventional two-dimensional four-field pelvic radiotherapy as was used in the previously mentioned Phase III studies irradiates large volumes of BM, which can be a contributory factor for HT. Using computed tomography (CT) image–based planning, one can deliver three-dimensional conformal radiation (3D-CRT) to the clinical target volume (CTV), which may reduce the volume of BM in the field. A series of publications from a single institution have studied the impact of whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy and showed a relationship between HT and volume of BM radiated to low doses 12, 13, 14.
Because IMRT is known to result in large regions of low-dose radiation and BM stem cells are exquisitely radiosensitive, it is possible that the relationships derived by these studies may not apply to whole-pelvis 3D-CRT, where the gradient between moderate and low isodose levels is quite sharp. Hence we chose to evaluate a series of patients who have received whole-pelvis 3D-CRT with concurrent chemotherapy and correlate several parameters to determine which of these are important predictors of HT. Our goal was to define these important parameters and their relationship to HT. If these factors are modifiable, one could potentially reduce HT, thereby avoiding prolongation of total treatment completion time.
Section snippets
Patients and radiation planning
The medical records of all women receiving radiation for cervical cancer at Loyola University Medical Center between 2001 and 2006 were reviewed. Of these patients, 40 with complete records who received weekly cisplatin and whole-pelvis 3D-CRT were selected for further analysis. Prior to simulation, these patients were immobilized with custom alpha cradles (Smithers Medical Products, North Canton, OH). Oral and intravenous contrast was administered. The patients then underwent a planning CT
Results
Tables 1 and 2 summarize pertinent patient characteristics of this group of women undergoing combined chemotherapy and RT. Approximately 42.5% of group had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I through IIA cervical cancer and 57.5% were Stage IIB through IIIB. Table 3 lists the frequency of HT grade. Of the patients, 13 (32.5%) had Grade 0 or 1 HT and 27 (67.5%) had Grades 2 through 4 (HT2+). Mean volumes (%) (SD) for different dose levels of BM irradiated were as
Discussion
Our study explored the factors predictive for acute HT with whole-pelvis conformal CCRT for cervical cancer. We have shown a correlation between whole-pelvis BM volume radiated to 20 Gy and development of HT. Although it is well known that chemotherapy can cause neutropenia, the impact of CCRT results in significant HT, which can cause delayed delivery of chemotherapy and increased treatment breaks, potentially impacting the local control of cervical cancer. Most of the studies performed in
References (19)
- et al.
A systematic review of acute and late toxicity of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer
Radiother Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: Acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - et al.
Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2006) - et al.
Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute hematologic toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2002) - et al.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecological patients receiving whole pelvic radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Impact of pretreatment factors on adverse events: A pooled analysis of north central cancer treatment group advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer trials
J Thorac Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2008) Improved treatment for cervical cancer—Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy
N Engl J Med
(1999)Clinical practice guidelines in oncology
(2009)
Cited by (134)
NTCP Modeling and Dose-Volume Correlations of Significant Hematocrit Drop 3 Months After Prostate Radiation Therapy
2024, Advances in Radiation OncologyA Dosimetric Correlation Between Radiation Dose to Bone and Reduction of Hemoglobin Levels After Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
2024, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsComprehensive Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Automatic Organs-at-Risk Segmentation on Heterogeneous Computed Tomography Images for Abdominal Radiation Therapy
2023, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsBone marrow sparing oriented multi-model image registration in cervical cancer radiotherapy
2023, Computers in Biology and MedicinePredictors of Acute Hematologic Toxicity in Women Receiving Extended-Field Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer: Do Known Pelvic Radiation Bone Marrow Constraints Apply?
2022, Advances in Radiation OncologyCitation Excerpt :Dosimetric constraints to the bone marrow (BM) may provide an actionable means to guide treatment and reduce HT, given that approximately 60% of hematopoietic stem cells in adults are within the lumbar spine and pelvis and are particularly radiosensitive.21 Multiple studies have evaluated the role of BM radiation dose on acute HT and provided dosimetric constraints to decrease HT.19,22-27 Mell et al demonstrated that intensity modulated RT (IMRT) can be used to decrease BM radiation dose compared with the traditional 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) 4-field box technique.20
Conflict of interest: none.