International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Physics ContributionTime Dependence of Intrafraction Patient Motion Assessed by Repeat Stereoscopic Imaging
Introduction
With advanced in-room imaging techniques, the interfraction patient setup error could in principal be reduced to the millimeter or even submillimeter range 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. To guarantee that the patient does not move after the initial setup verification and correction, immobilization devices are used. In general, we prefer noninvasive over invasive devices for reasons of patient comfort and ease of use. These devices, such as vacuum bags and thermoplastic masks, cannot fully eliminate intrafraction movement. The magnitude and probability of patient movement from the initial setup to the moment of dose delivery will most likely increase when fraction times are extended by, for example, the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, noncoplanar treatment techniques, hypofractionation, and extensive image-guidance procedures. In such cases, intrafraction patient motion might have an impact on the required clinical target volume to planning target volume margin.
In this article, we present detailed measurements of intrafraction motion of the skull and the spine, the latter treated in supine or prone position. Intrafraction motion was assessed by analyzing stereoscopic kV X-ray images acquired on average every 1.7 min during CyberKnife (6) treatment fractions. Only a few studies on intrafraction patient motion have been published 4, 7, 8, 9, 10. In most of these studies, imaging data acquired at the start and the end of a treatment fraction, or just before and after delivery of a treatment beam, were analyzed. The relatively long durations (45–70 min) of CyberKnife treatments and that the patient position is updated regularly made it possible to quantify the time dependence of intrafraction motion. Murphy et al. also measured intrafraction motion with the CyberKnife image-guidance system, but only reported patient movements between consecutive image acquisitions taken at 1-min to 2-min intervals. The purpose of the current study was to quantify intrafraction patient movements over a longer period. Furthermore, we differentiated systematic drifts in patient motion from random displacements. The results can be used to optimize the imaging and correction frequency for CyberKnife treatments. For high-precision radiation treatments on conventional linear accelerators, the results can be used to incorporate intrafraction motion associated with longer treatment times in the margin calculation.
Section snippets
Patient group
The intrafraction motion data of 57 consecutive patients, all treated with the robotic CyberKnife therapy unit, were analyzed. The number of treatment fractions per patient ranged between 1 and 12. Thirty-two patients were treated for intracranial and head-and-neck tumors, the others for extracranial tumors. Fourteen of the latter patients were treated in a prone, and 11 in a supine orientation. The prone orientation was chosen for tumors located dorsally, because the CyberKnife has limited
Treatment characteristics
Table 1 summarizes the mean treatment time per fraction, the mean number of localizations per treatment fraction and per patient, and the localization frequency for the three patient groups. The initial setup and intermediate setups were not included in the reported values. Intermediate setups are setups between treatment parts, setups that follow couch corrections if the patient motion exceeded the limits of the robot correction, and setups that follow treatment interruptions for other reasons.
Accuracy of the imaging system
The overall accuracy of the system, which comprises the accuracy related to the acquisition of the planning CT scan, the patient or target position verification during the treatment, the motion compensation, and the actual dose delivery, has been measured on a regular basis. The measurements were performed with an anthropomorphic head phantom loaded with two orthogonal radiochromic films. The mean 3D overall targeting error (the displacements of the dose contours of the treatment plan and the
Conclusions
Despite applied immobilization devices, patients drift away from their initial setup during a treatment fraction. These drifts are, in general, small if compared with other error sources (e.g., example interfraction setup errors, delineation errors, geometrical errors from internal organ motion). The drifts are also small compared with conventional treatment margins, which lie in the order of 5–10 mm, but will significantly contribute to the margin for high-precision radiation treatments with
References (16)
- et al.
A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1999) - et al.
Patterns of patient movement during frameless image-guided radiosurgery
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Interfractional and intrafractional accuracy during radiotherapy of gynecologic carcinomas: A comprehensive evaluation using the ExacTrac system
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1999) - et al.
Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2002) - et al.
The probability of correct target dosage: Dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2000) - et al.
Analysis and reduction of 3D systematic and random setup errors during the simulation and treatment of lung cancer patients with CT-based external beam radiotherapy dose planning
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2001) - et al.
The impact of geometric uncertainty on hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003)
Cited by (207)
Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac
2024, Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation OncologyThe accuracy of artificial intelligence deformed nodal structures in cervical online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy
2024, Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyAn analysis of the impact of different levels of inspiratory volume using active breathing control on the intrafraction motion and dose coverage of target volumes in patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy
2023, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesEvaluation of the clinical feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography guided online adaption for simulation-free palliative radiotherapy
2023, Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologySimple immobilization for stereotactic radiotherapy aimed at pelvic metastases
2023, Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyThe effect of primary tumor volume on the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in era of volumetric modulated arc therapy: a propensity score matched cohort study
2023, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Conflict of interest: none.