Clinical TrialA randomised phase II trial of docetaxel versus docetaxel plus carboplatin in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after response to prior docetaxel chemotherapy: The RECARDO trial
Introduction
Docetaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapeutic treatment for patients with symptomatic metastatic castration–resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC) or asymptomatic patients with progressive disease [1]. In 2004, two randomised phase III trials showed a survival benefit for docetaxel as first-line treatment for these patients, as well as pain relief and improvement in quality of life (QoL) [2], [3].
After response to docetaxel, at some point, progression will occur. At the start of this study in 2010, mitoxantrone was the only approved second-line chemotherapeutic agent. Two different studies showed better pain palliation and QoL for the combination of mitoxantrone with steroids compared with steroids alone. Nevertheless, there was no survival benefit for the combined therapy and the PSA response rates of 10–20% after second-line treatment with mitoxantrone were modest [4], [5], [6], [7].
Nowadays, there are several different treatment options with cabazitaxel as a second-line cytotoxic agent, enzalutamide and abiraterone as hormone-blocking agents, radiopharmaceuticals as radium-233 and sipuleucel-T immunotherapy [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Although all these agents have a proven survival benefit and are all registered for treatment in the post-docetaxel setting, they all have their own limitations and side-effects, and effects on survival are still modest.
Previous phase II studies supported the use of platinum chemotherapy in the management of mCRPC and suggested a synergistic effect when carboplatin is combined with docetaxel [13], [14]. In mCRPC patients refractory to docetaxel, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3–6.5 months with an overall survival (OS) of 12.4–15.8 months has been described with combination therapy of carboplatin and docetaxel [15], [16]. Recently, molecular profiling has shown a role for DNA repair defects (in BRCA 1/2 germline variants) in advanced prostate cancer. This makes these tumours more sensitive for treatment with platinum compounds which exert their antitumour effect through covalent adducts with cellular DNA resulting in DNA damage [17]. Moreover, treatment of docetaxel-naïve patients with clinical features of an anaplastic prostate carcinoma with docetaxel plus carboplatin resulted in stable disease in 65% of the patients after 12 weeks and a median OS of 16 months [18].
There is also evidence from retrospective data and small cohorts of patients that patients with an initial good response to docetaxel might benefit from a re-challenge with single-agent docetaxel. In these patients, docetaxel was mostly discontinued after receiving the planned number of treatment cycles, without severe side-effects [19], [20], [21]. In the trial of Bracarda et al. [21], 98 patients were re-treated after an initial response to docetaxel (median interval between treatments was 8.3 months), with a median PFS of 16.4 months . In the prospective cohort study of Di Lorenzo et al. [22], 45 patients with an initial biochemical remission of at least 5 months were re-treated with docetaxel. The median PFS was 5 months (range 2–8 months) with an overall survival of 13 months.
The progression-free interval (PFI) after first-line docetaxel seems to be associated with the response rate and PFS after re-challenge [20].
Since both docetaxel re-treatment as well as docetaxel combined with carboplatin seem to be appealing second-line treatment options for a selected patient group, we performed this phase II study comparing both treatment regimens.
This study is the first phase II randomised study prospectively assessing the activity of docetaxel plus carboplatin relative to that of re-treatment with docetaxel monotherapy in mCRPC patients with an initial response but progression on prior docetaxel-based treatment.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
We performed a randomised multi-center phase II study in patients with histologically proven metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Results
As a result of insufficient recruitment, the study was discontinued early after inclusion of 75 patients, instead of the targeted 150 patients. At the stage of the planned interim analysis, analysis on the primary and secondary end-points was performed. Inclusion was lower than expected, mostly because of the availability of new treatment options in trials (enzalutamide and abiraterone). Besides, some patients refused re-treatment with docetaxel because of the lack of experience or earlier
Discussion
This study was discontinued early because of insufficient recruitment. However, the post hoc conditional power analysis showed that the study would not have shown a significant difference between both study arms if the study was completed according to protocol. Therefore, this trial suggests that the addition of carboplatin to re-treatment with docetaxel does not prolong the PFS or OS in patients with mCRPC, whereas the combination resulted in more toxicity.
The studies that suggest benefit of
Conclusion
For patients with mCRPC and an initial good response to docetaxel, re-treatment with docetaxel monotherapy is a feasible and safe treatment option. Addition of carboplatin resulted in more toxicity. Docetaxel re-challenge could be considered for selected mCRPC patients with a relatively long PFI after docetaxel treatment.
Role of the funding source
This work was financially supported by Sanofi Genzyme. The financial sponsor of the trial had no role in the design or conduct of the trial, data collection or analysis and preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
E.W.B.W received a travel grant from Sanofi Genzyme. C.H.S. received a travel grant from Roche. H.M.W.V. received research grants from Immunovo BV, Vitromics Healthcare and Roche and has received honoraria as a member of an advisory board from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Merck. A.J.M.E. has received research grants from Sanofi and a speaker honorarium from Astellas and is a member if the advisory board of Astellas. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement
The authors want to thank the other study participants for their input and guidance of the patients, and the local data managers and central data management of the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation for collecting the data.
References (28)
- et al.
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer
Eur Urol
(2014) - et al.
Phase III study of mitoxantrone plus low dose prednisone versus low dose prednisone alone in patients with asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer
J Urol
(2002) - et al.
Response to second-line chemotherapy in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer receiving two sequences of mitoxantrone and taxanes
Urology
(2006) - et al.
Survival and PSA response of patients in the TAX 327 study who crossed over to receive docetaxel after mitoxantrone or vice versa
Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol
(2008) - et al.
Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial
Lancet (London, England)
(2010) - et al.
Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study
Lancet Oncol
(2012) - et al.
Anti-tumour activity of platinum compounds in advanced prostate cancer-a systematic literature review
Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol
(2016) - et al.
The interval from the last cycle of docetaxel-based chemotherapy to progression is associated with the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel in patients with prostate cancer
Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England 1990)
(2010) - et al.
Multiple rechallenges for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients responding to first-line docetaxel: assessment of clinical outcomes and predictive factors
Urology
(2012) - et al.
Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial
Lancet (London, England)
(2016)