Incidence and long-term prognosis of papillary compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma – A multicentre study
Introduction
Clear cell renal carcinoma (cRCC) is the most common histopathological subtype of malignant kidney tumours and accounts for approximately 75–80% of all cases. As most clinical studies and guidelines focus on patients with this subtype, those with less common tumour entities such as papillary, chromophobe or collecting duct tumours have often been excluded.1 Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), the second common subtype after cRCC accounting for 10–15% of all cases, is morphologically and cytogenetically subclassified as type 1 and type 2; it can occur sporadically or as part of a hereditary syndrome.2, 3, 4 Up to now, it has been widely assumed that papillary tumours generally have a more favourable prognosis than cRCC.
The prognostic significance of histological subtypes has been investigated in several studies with patient populations of to up to 4063 individuals.5 Regardless of these in part large study cohorts, results are not consistent. Some authors identified histologic subtype as a prognostic factor,6, 7 while others were not able to show a survival advantage for pRCC.3, 8 Particularly multivariate analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between histological subtypes when tumour stage and differentiation were included.3, 5, 9, 10, 11
Therefore, the aim of this large retrospective multicentre study was to compare incidence, tumour characteristics and long-term prognosis of papillary and clear cell RCC.
Section snippets
Patients and tumour characteristics
This retrospective study included 4941 patients who underwent renal tumour surgery 1990–2010 for pRCC (n = 565) or cRCC (n = 4376) at Hannover, Homburg, Mainz, Ulm (1995–2010), or Marburg (1990–2005) University Medical Centers. The histological tumour subtype was determined according to the 1997 UICC Classification12 by pathologists dedicated to GU pathology. Staging was based on the 2002 TNM Classification. Information on patients’ and tumour characteristics, such as age, sex, stage, presence of
Results
Our patient population of 3208 (64.9%) men and 1733 (35.1%) women had a mean age of 62.3 (range, 19–93) years. The median/mean follow-up was 46.7/60.3 months (IQR: 18.0–91.9). By the last day of data acquisition, 954 (22.3%) had died from their tumour disease and 381 (8.9%) from other causes. Detailed tumour and patients’ characteristics are summarised in Table 1.
Discussion
The prognostic significance of the tumour subtype has been investigated in a series of large inter-institutional and collaborative national and international studies with patient populations of up to 4063 individuals.5 Despite these large numbers of cases, study results are not consistent. Some authors identified the histologic subtype as a prognostic factor,6, 7 while others saw no survival advantage for a histological subtype of RCC.3, 8 Particularly multivariate analysis failed to reveal any
Conclusion – practical implications
The pRCC group can apparently be differentiated into two prognostically divergent subgroups: an organ-confined/localised subgroup with a significantly better prognosis and a metastatic subgroup with a worse prognosis than the clear cell reference group. The question of whether they correspond to the classical pRCC subtypes 1 and 2 or are characterised by other genetic alterations has to be further evaluated.
Conflict of interest statement
This work had no specific funding. There are no financial disclosures from any authors.
References (26)
- et al.
Prognostic factors of papillary renal cell carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional series after pathological review
J Urol
(2010) - et al.
Renal cell carcinoma in South Korea: a multicenter study
Hum Pathol
(2004) - et al.
Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients
Eur Urol
(2005) - et al.
Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: meaning of histological typing and multifocality
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Survival analysis of 130 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility of type 1 and type 2 subclassification
Urology
(2007) - et al.
Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype
Pathology
(2007) - et al.
Second-line strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: classics and novel approaches
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Incidence and long-term prognosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
(2009) - Zucchi A, Novara G, Costantini E, Antonelli A, Carini M, Carmignani G, et al. Prognostic factors in a large...
- et al.
Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience
J Clin Oncol
(2005)
Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma
Am J Surg Pathol
Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic study of 34 cases
Cancer
Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases
Am J Surg Pathol
Cited by (109)
The prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma after curative surgery: is subtype really irrelevant? A propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional real life data
2024, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsRace/Ethnicity Determines Life Expectancy in Surgically Treated T1aN0M0 Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
2022, European Urology FocusExpression of the CXCR4 and CXCR7 in renal cancers; can “the orphan receptor” predict the mortality?
2021, Annals of Diagnostic PathologyCitation Excerpt :Our study group included 13 pRCC patients out of which 7 had advanced metastatic disease. Mortality was associated with well-known parameters of aggressiveness such as: tumour size, higher grade, pTNM stage and stadium, as well as the presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid differentiation [16,17]. In our study overall survival (OS) decreased 1.2 times with every cm of tumour growth.