ReviewHeat generation and drill wear during dental implant site preparation: systematic review
Introduction
Heat that is released during the preparation and insertion of implants could have consequences for the bone, and it has already been shown that the extent of the necrotic zone around the preparation site is proportional to the amount of heat generated.1 Repeated use causes drills to wear and reduces their efficiency, and the temperature increases each time a bur is used.2 Other variables may also affect their cutting ability and the amount of heat generated. Preparation of the site is a complex process and the shape, sharpness, and speed of the drill, applied axial load, and the density of the bone all have an effect.3, 4, 5, 6, 7
To our knowledge, the only review of this subject was published in 1999 by Tehemar who tried to identify all the factors that influence the amount of heat generated when bone is drilled.8 However, questions remain about the optimal design of the drill, the best type of irrigation, the degree of heat generated depending on the bone density, and the speed of the drill. Our aim was to find out whether these could now be answered.
Section snippets
Material and methods
We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed database for articles published between January 2000 and February 2014 using different combinations of the keywords implant and; heat or; temperature and; osteotomies or; drill. A total of 41 were found. After initial screening of titles and abstracts, the text was studied in more detail. Fourteen articles were excluded because they did not investigate preparation of the implant bed. Finally, 27 studies remained and were included in this review (Fig. 1).
Results
To assess the amount of heat generated in real time, thermocouples were used in 18 studies (Table 1) and infrared thermographs in 7 (Table 2). Three studies investigated immediate cell viability using immunohistochemical analysis (Table 3). Drill wear was the focus of 10 investigations.
Discussion
Direct comparison of the studies is difficult because of their different designs. This is attributed in part to the study model, the method used to measure the heat generated, or the variety of surgical tools used. For example, the axial load varied between 0.1 and 10 kg, even if it was not the aim of the investigation, and speeds varied between 500 and 2500 rpm.
Even the bone models, particularly the studies on porcine and bovine bone, must be questioned because they contain a lot of cancellous
Conclusion
Much research has been done on dental implants but less has been done on preparation of the implant site, and further studies are needed. To achieve better comparability and to maximise the translational potential of such research, we recommend the use of standard variables: an axial load of 2 kg, drilling speed of 1500 rpm, irrigation, standard artificial bone blocks, and the use of infrared thermography.
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
Sources of support: None.
Disclosure: The authors do not have any financial interests or commercial associations to disclose.
Ethics statement/confirmation of patient permission
This is a review about current literature without any patient contact. Consent for publication is not necessary.
References (48)
Bone growth around dental implants
Dent Clin North Am
(1991)- et al.
Effect of surgical drill guide on heat generated from implant drilling
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects
Int J Oral Surg
(1982) - et al.
The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1984) - et al.
Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit
J Prosthet Dent
(1983) - et al.
Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2006) - et al.
Comparison of heat generation during implant drilling using stainless steel and ceramic drills
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Influence of the drill material and method of cooling on the development of intrabony temperature during preparation of the site of an implant
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2013) - et al.
An in vitro study of temperature changes in type 4 bone during implant placement: bone condensing versus bone drilling
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(2011) - et al.
The effect of guided flapless implant procedure on heat generation from implant drilling
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2014)