Adjuvant contralateral neck irradiation for oral cavity cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102885Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Whether contralateral neck irradiation should be administered for oral cavity cancer is a critical question because patients receiving bilateral neck irradiation experience more adverse effects. Patients not receiving contralateral neck irradiation are at risk of contralateral neck recurrence of oral cavity cancer

Materials and Methods

Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed for the rates of contralateral neck recurrence of oral cavity cancer in patients receiving no contralateral neck radiation. We aimed to identify the patient group suitable for contralateral neck radiotherapy omission. The PRISMA guideline was used for this study. We extracted data including the first author, country, sample size, numbers of patients receiving ipsilateral neck radiotherapy and experiencing contralateral neck recurrence, participant characteristics, and details of cancer types

Results

The rate of contralateral neck recurrence is extremely low, 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.2%–5.4%). Isolated contralateral neck recurrence occurred in 18 of 524 patients receiving radiotherapy to the primary tumor site with or without ipsilateral irradiation. The subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate pathological lymph node stage and subsite. Subgroup analysis showed that the N2–3 group was more likely to exhibit recurrence in contralateral neck than the N0–1 group was (14.4% versus 1.5%, p = 0.0008). In addition, the contralateral neck recurrence rate was 6.3% (95% CI = 2.3%–13.1%) and 2.8% (95% CI = 1.5%–4.8%), in the tongue cancer patient group and the non-tongue cancer patient group, respectively. Meta-regression showed that the rate of contralateral recurrence was not different between both groups (p = 0.08). Only 2 exhibited isolated contralateral neck recurrence (5.1%) in pN0–1 tongue cancer patient. Most of them (>90%) are lateralized.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the omission of contralateral irradiation is reasonable in pN0–1, well lateralized oral cavity cancer.

Introduction

Oral cavity cancer is currently a globally prominent malignancy. According to the Global Burden of Disease database, more than 300,000 patients had lip and oral cavity cancer worldwide in 2017 [1].

The oral cavity is a sophisticated anatomical structure, comprising the buccal mucosa, gingiva, hard palate, floor of mouth, tongue and retromolar region. The mortality rates for oral cavity cancer in these various parts differ [2]. Oral cavity cancer risk factors are smoking, betel nut chewing and alcohol consumption [3,4].

The 5-year overall survival rate is approximately 50% for patients with oral cavity cancer [2,5]. Due to advances in medical technology [6,7], patients with the cancer live longer than previously. Subsequently, quality of life has become increasingly prominent concern.

According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, the standard oral cavity cancer treatment is operation or surgical resection. When adverse pathological features exist in oral cavity cancer, including in the positive or close margin and the extracapsular nodal extension, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation should be administered. In patients with other risk factors, including pathological stage T3 or T4 disease, N2 disease, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant radiotherapy should be delivered [8].

The appropriateness of contralateral neck irradiation in the adjuvant setting of oral cavity cancer is a prominent question in clinical settings. Reportedly, the omission of contralateral neck irradiation better preserves the contralateral parotid gland and reduces xerostomia [9]. The basic principle of radiotherapy is to reduce irradiation volume without compromising locoregional control.

There is some research on this topic. However, after literature review, no systematic review or meta-analysis have been performed. Considering the heterogeneous setting of these studies, a systemic approach is required to obtain conclusive results. As the result, our study aimed to identify the patient groups of oral cavity cancers who were candidate of elective contralateral neck irradiation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We conducted this study of oral cavity cancer according to PRISMA guidelines [10].

Literature collection

In total 168 full-text articles were collected. After article selection, only 8 articles were remained for further analysis. The article retrieval flow chart is provided in Fig. 1. Four articles were rule out due to not mentioning the detail of radiotherapy [[17], [18], [19]]. Two articles were ruled out due to not separating oral cavity cancer and oropharyngeal cancer [20,21]. The articles suitable for analysis are was listed in Table 1. All 8 articles were retrospective cohort studies. The

Discussion

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the adjuvant contralateral neck irradiation of oral cavity cancer. This topic is important in clinical practice. In 2020, new articles continue to be published to investigate this unresolved clinical dilemma.

We enrolled 524 patients in total from 8 articles, and only 18 of the patients for whom contralateral neck radiation was omitted exhibited contralateral neck failure. Contralateral neck relapse occurred at an extremely low rate of

Conclusions

The omission of contralateral irradiation is reasonable in well lateralized pN0–1 oral cavity cancer.

Funding

No.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Concepts design: Y.-S. Kao, data assembly and analysis: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu, manuscript writing: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu, approval of final manuscript: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu.

Declaration of competing interest

No.

References (31)

  • M. Du et al.

    Incidence trends of lip, oral cavity, and pharyngeal cancers: global burden of disease 1990–2017

    J Dent Res

    (2020)
  • Z. Farhood et al.

    Does anatomic subsite influence oral cavity cancer mortality? A SEER database analysis

    Laryngoscope

    (2019)
  • S. Franceschi et al.

    Smoking and drinking in relation to cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus in northern Italy

    Cancer Res

    (1990)
  • Y.-S. Lin et al.

    Epidemiology of oral cavity cancer in Taiwan with emphasis on the role of betel nut chewing

    ORL.

    (2005)
  • S.-W. Chen et al.

    Trends in clinical features and survival of oral cavity cancer: fifty years of experience with 3,362 consecutive cases from a single institution

    Cancer Management and Research

    (2018)
  • B.A.C. van Dijk et al.

    Trends in oral cavity cancer incidence, mortality, survival and treatment in the Netherlands

    Int J Cancer

    (2016)
  • M. Amit et al.

    Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: an international collaborative study

    Cancer.

    (2013)
  • Network NCC

    Head and neck cancer (version 2.2020)

  • A.P. Jellema et al.

    Unilateral versus bilateral irradiation in squamous cell head and neck cancer in relation to patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva

    Radiother Oncol

    (2007)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • L. O’Steen et al.

    Challenging the requirement to treat the contralateral neck in cases with >4 mm tumor thickness in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue or floor of mouth

    Am J Clin Oncol

    (2019)
  • A. Al-Mamgani et al.

    Contralateral regional recurrence after elective unilateral neck irradiation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: a literature-based critical review

    Cancer Treat Rev

    (2017)
  • W. Viechtbauer

    Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package

    J Stat Softw

    (2010)
  • R.C. Team

    R: a language and environment for statistical computing

    (2013)
  • J. Allaire

    RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA

    (2012)
  • View full text