Adjuvant contralateral neck irradiation for oral cavity cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
Oral cavity cancer is currently a globally prominent malignancy. According to the Global Burden of Disease database, more than 300,000 patients had lip and oral cavity cancer worldwide in 2017 [1].
The oral cavity is a sophisticated anatomical structure, comprising the buccal mucosa, gingiva, hard palate, floor of mouth, tongue and retromolar region. The mortality rates for oral cavity cancer in these various parts differ [2]. Oral cavity cancer risk factors are smoking, betel nut chewing and alcohol consumption [3,4].
The 5-year overall survival rate is approximately 50% for patients with oral cavity cancer [2,5]. Due to advances in medical technology [6,7], patients with the cancer live longer than previously. Subsequently, quality of life has become increasingly prominent concern.
According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, the standard oral cavity cancer treatment is operation or surgical resection. When adverse pathological features exist in oral cavity cancer, including in the positive or close margin and the extracapsular nodal extension, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation should be administered. In patients with other risk factors, including pathological stage T3 or T4 disease, N2 disease, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant radiotherapy should be delivered [8].
The appropriateness of contralateral neck irradiation in the adjuvant setting of oral cavity cancer is a prominent question in clinical settings. Reportedly, the omission of contralateral neck irradiation better preserves the contralateral parotid gland and reduces xerostomia [9]. The basic principle of radiotherapy is to reduce irradiation volume without compromising locoregional control.
There is some research on this topic. However, after literature review, no systematic review or meta-analysis have been performed. Considering the heterogeneous setting of these studies, a systemic approach is required to obtain conclusive results. As the result, our study aimed to identify the patient groups of oral cavity cancers who were candidate of elective contralateral neck irradiation.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We conducted this study of oral cavity cancer according to PRISMA guidelines [10].
Literature collection
In total 168 full-text articles were collected. After article selection, only 8 articles were remained for further analysis. The article retrieval flow chart is provided in Fig. 1. Four articles were rule out due to not mentioning the detail of radiotherapy [[17], [18], [19]]. Two articles were ruled out due to not separating oral cavity cancer and oropharyngeal cancer [20,21]. The articles suitable for analysis are was listed in Table 1. All 8 articles were retrospective cohort studies. The
Discussion
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the adjuvant contralateral neck irradiation of oral cavity cancer. This topic is important in clinical practice. In 2020, new articles continue to be published to investigate this unresolved clinical dilemma.
We enrolled 524 patients in total from 8 articles, and only 18 of the patients for whom contralateral neck radiation was omitted exhibited contralateral neck failure. Contralateral neck relapse occurred at an extremely low rate of
Conclusions
The omission of contralateral irradiation is reasonable in well lateralized pN0–1 oral cavity cancer.
Funding
No.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Concepts design: Y.-S. Kao, data assembly and analysis: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu, manuscript writing: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu, approval of final manuscript: Y.-S. Kao and Y. Hsu.
Declaration of competing interest
No.
References (31)
- et al.
Incidence trends of lip, oral cavity, and pharyngeal cancers: global burden of disease 1990–2017
J Dent Res
(2020) - et al.
Does anatomic subsite influence oral cavity cancer mortality? A SEER database analysis
Laryngoscope
(2019) - et al.
Smoking and drinking in relation to cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus in northern Italy
Cancer Res
(1990) - et al.
Epidemiology of oral cavity cancer in Taiwan with emphasis on the role of betel nut chewing
ORL.
(2005) - et al.
Trends in clinical features and survival of oral cavity cancer: fifty years of experience with 3,362 consecutive cases from a single institution
Cancer Management and Research
(2018) - et al.
Trends in oral cavity cancer incidence, mortality, survival and treatment in the Netherlands
Int J Cancer
(2016) - et al.
Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: an international collaborative study
Cancer.
(2013) Head and neck cancer (version 2.2020)
- et al.
Unilateral versus bilateral irradiation in squamous cell head and neck cancer in relation to patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva
Radiother Oncol
(2007) - et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
PLoS Med
(2009)
Challenging the requirement to treat the contralateral neck in cases with >4 mm tumor thickness in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue or floor of mouth
Am J Clin Oncol
Contralateral regional recurrence after elective unilateral neck irradiation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: a literature-based critical review
Cancer Treat Rev
Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package
J Stat Softw
R: a language and environment for statistical computing
RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA
Cited by (3)
Head and Neck Cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines, Sixth Edition
2024, Journal of Laryngology and Otology