Elsevier

Clinical Imaging

Volume 24, Issue 1, January–February 2000, Pages 19-27
Clinical Imaging

Original article
Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging revisited

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(00)00157-1Get rights and content

Abstract

To assess and compare with computed tomography (CT) the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of osteoid osteoma, and determine the features of this lesion on MR imaging. The prospective MR imaging and CT diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was determined from original radiology reports. MR images were assessed retrospectively with regard to the location and signal intensity of the nidus and surrounding bone marrow and soft tissue edema. These findings were correlated with the age of the patient, duration of symptoms, and drug therapy. Ten patients with histologically proven osteoid osteoma who underwent MR imaging were reviewed. All 10 lesions were correctly diagnosed at the time of MR imaging. None of the lesions was intracortical. Nine lesions were intra-articular. Two out of five patients with extracortical lesions had false negative CT preceding the MR study. Signal intensity of the nidus, marrow, and soft tissue edema on MR imaging were variable. Perinidal edema was most pronounced in younger patients and had no apparent relation to drug therapy. MR imaging reliably demonstrates the nidus of an osteoid osteoma, which has a variable appearance related to its position relative to the cortex of the bone. A predominance of cancellous osteoid osteomas are encountered in patients referred for MR imaging. Marrow edema in the vicinity of the lesion improves the conspicuity of the nidus. CT may fail to diagnose osteoid osteoma when the nidus is in a cancellous location, due to the lack of perinidal density alteration.

Introduction

Osteoid osteoma is a common bone tumor, comprising approximately 12% of all benign skeletal lesions [1], [2]. Its diagnosis has previously relied on a combination of clinical history and radiographs, complemented by computed tomography (CT) and scintigraphy [3]. Although magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is regarded as the modality of choice for assessment of many musculoskeletal neoplasms, it is currently believed to have limited value for diagnosis of osteoid osteoma [4], [5]. Published reports indicate that osteoid osteoma has a misleading appearance, often leading to the diagnosis of infection or a more aggressive bone tumor on MR imaging and cite CT as being more accurate than MR imaging for detection of the nidus [5], [6], [7], [8]. The relatively low resolution MR imaging techniques employed in previous studies, combined with the unfamiliar and variable findings, which may be present on MR imaging, could have contributed to misdiagnosis in the past.

A retrospective evaluation of 10 patients with histologically proven osteoid osteoma who underwent MR imaging using higher resolution techniques than previously reported [5], [6] was undertaken. The performance of MR imaging in the detection and diagnosis of osteoid osteoma and the features of these lesions on MR imaging were assessed. MR imaging was compared to CT for lesion diagnosis in those patients who had CT prior to the MR examination.

Section snippets

Patients

A computer search of all patients who were radiologically and/or pathologically diagnosed with osteoid osteoma and underwent MR imaging from 1987 through 1995 generated 10 patients. Seven additional patients who were prospectively identified while undergoing MR imaging between 1996 and 1998 were also included. Thus, a total of 17 patients over the entire 11-year period were evaluated with MR imaging. Of these 17 patients, 10 had lesions with histologic confirmation of the diagnosis. The other

Results

There were six males and four females. The age range was 6–49 years (mean, 21 years). The mean duration of symptoms to diagnosis was 2.5 years and ranged from 9 months to 5 years. The clinical diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was not considered prior to MR imaging in four patients, and all of these patients had intra-articular lesions. In retrospect, most patients in this latter group had classic symptoms suggestive of the diagnosis, which were not elicited by the referring physician. Most of the

Discussion

MR imaging is favored for the assessment and diagnosis of many musculoskeletal neoplasms; however, its use in the evaluation of osteoid osteoma has not been generally supported [4]. A nidus had been prospectively identified in the MR images of every patient in this series. Failure to identify a nidus with MR imaging in published reports may be attributed to the use of low resolution techniques, which included the use of local coils with an overly generous field of view (18 cm for ankle/elbow

References (19)

  • MD Cohen et al.

    Osteoid osteoma: 95 cases and a review of the literature

    Semin Arthritis Rheum

    (1983)
  • VN Cassar-Pullicino et al.

    Intra-articular osteoid osteoma

    Clin Radiol

    (1992)
  • A Greenspan

    Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: clinical, imaging, pathologic and differential considerations

    Skeletal Radiol

    (1993)
  • MJ Kransdorf et al.

    Osteoid osteoma

    RadioGraphics

    (1991)
  • JH Healey et al.

    Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: current concepts and recent advances

    Clin Orthop

    (1986)
  • M Sundaram et al.

    Computed tomography or magnetic resonance for evaluating the solitary tumor or tumor-like lesion of bone?

    Skeletal Radiol

    (1988)
  • AB Goldman et al.

    Osteoid osteomas of the femoral neck: report of four cases evaluated with isotopic bone scanning, CT and MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • J Assoun et al.

    Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging vs. CT

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • ER Woods et al.

    Reactive soft-tissue mass associated with osteoid osteoma: correlation of MR imaging features with pathologic findings

    Radiology

    (1993)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text