Relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer
Introduction
Patients with lung cancer are subject to different delays in the diagnosis of the disease and in receiving surgical treatment [1], [2], [3], [4], and several different reasons have been identified as their cause [3], [5]. Delayed diagnosis may, in turn, lead to medicolegal problems [6]. In asymptomatic populations, three controlled clinical trials have evaluated the effectiveness of screening with chest radiography and cytology on the reduction of lung cancer mortality [7], [8], [9]: after 5 to 11 years of follow-up, no significant benefit was shown in the reduction of mortality amongst patients with this type of cancer. At present, no scientific organization recommends routine screening for the general public or smokers, including chest radiography or cytology [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].
Studies also have been carried out into the impact that symptom to diagnosis interval (SDI) in cancer diagnosis may have on the stage of the tumor at the time of surgery or the diagnosis [1], [17], [18], [19], as well as the impact of delayed diagnosis on survival [18], [19]. Different studies have indicated a relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion of the cancer. Some authors have either suggested [20], [21] or demonstrated [17] that a shorter SDI progressively decreases the degree of invasion and increases the survival rate. Others, however, have asserted that there is not necessarily any relationship between SDI, the extent of invasion and mortality [1], [19], [22], [23], [24], and some have indicated that in general terms, SDI does not affect the degree of invasion but does modify the survival rate [18].
As Porta et al. [19] discussed, the concept of the “early detection” of cancer may be veiling two different phenomena: the limited extension of a tumor at the time of diagnosis, or a short period of time between the clinical onset of the disease and its diagnosis.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between delayed diagnosis, the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer.
Section snippets
Methods and materials
During the period from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 1998, 378 patients were diagnosed as having lung cancer at the Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo in A Coruña (Spain). This medical complex covers the population of the A Coruña health district, totaling some 500,000 people. All the cases included in the study had cytohistologic confirmation, and the variables studied in all of the patients were obtained from their clinical histories. Cases without anatomopathologic confirmation were
Results
The 378 patients were followed up for a mean period of 12.4 months and a median of 6.5 months. As 85.4% of the patients died during follow-up, 14.6% of the cases were censored. The censored data are independent of SDI and sex.
The patients had a mean age of 65.7±11.4, with a median of 66 years and a range of 31 to 90 years; 95.5% of the patients were male, and were significantly older than the female patients, 66.1 vs. 56.6 years (P = .011).
At the time of their diagnosis, 35.5% of the patients
Discussion
The results of this study show that SDI has no effect on the stage of patients with lung cancer. This result is maintained after adjusting for age and sex. These findings are consistent with those published by Robinson [18] and Porta [19]. Our median SDI (2.1 months) is similar to Porta's [19] of 2.0 months, as is the percentage of censored cases (14.6% in our series, compared to 16.1% in Porta's). Our results differ from those published by Christensen [17] who, after classifying the patients
References (40)
- et al.
Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York
Chest
(1984) - et al.
Analysis of survival versus patient and doctor delay of treatment in gastrointestinal cancer
Am J Surg
(1974) - et al.
Influence of delays on survival in the surgical treatment of bronchogenic carcinoma
Lung Cancer
(2002) New prognostic factors in lung cancer. Biologic prophets of cancer cell aggression
Chest
(1995)- et al.
Outcome in patients with lung cancer found retrospectively to have had evidence of disease on past lung cancer mass screening roentgenograms
Lung Cancer
(2002) - et al.
Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lung cancer
Thorax
(1996) - et al.
Lung cancer and the delay in the diagnosis: analysis of 300 cases
Rev Assoc Med Bras
(1992) - et al.
Delay factors in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a public health problem
Rev Paul Med
(1991) Treatment delay in lung cancer-associated atelectasis
Intensive Care Med
(1997)- et al.
Causes of delayed treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer
Pneumonol Pol
(1990)
Medicolegal analysis of the delayed diagnosis of cancer in 338 cases in the United States
Arch Surg
Screening for lung cancer: the effect of 5–7 years of periodic roentgenographic and cytologic examinations on detection survival and mortality from lung cancer
Am Rev Respir Dis
Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program
J Occup Med
Guide to clinical preventive services
Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care
Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: an update
Age charts for periodic health examination
ACR standard for adult chest radiography
Screening for adult respiratory disease
Am Rev Respir Dis
Screening for lung cancer
Cited by (34)
Impact of Delays in Lung Cancer Treatment on Survival
2021, ChestCitation Excerpt :After screening, 17 articles were included for qualitative data synthesis. Eighteen prior studies identified in the CHEST lung cancer guidelines were also included in the evidence review (N = 35) (Table 1).10-44 All studies were retrospective cohort studies.
Does timeliness of care in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer impact on survival?
2017, Lung CancerCitation Excerpt :The aim of ensuring prompt diagnosis and treatment is to improve outcomes in lung cancer, namely survival. However studies to date have shown conflicting data on survival with some showing no impact of delay on survival [8–15], others showing poorer survival with shorter time intervals [16–19] or poorer survival with longer time intervals [20,21]. Early referral to palliative care has also been associated with improved survival in Stage IV NSCLC [22].
An analysis of delays in the management of thoracic cancers: A prospective study
2014, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires