Skip to main content
Log in

A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to chemotherapy, the treatment options are limited. Via this phase II study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (modified FOLFOX6).

Methods

Patients who had histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer refractory to ≥ two previous chemotherapy regimens were included. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by an independent central review. According to an assumption of a threshold ORR of 10% and expected ORR of 25%, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20, at least 33 patients were required. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life measured by EQ-5D, and safety.

Results

Among the 35 enrolled patients, 33 were included in the primary analysis. All patients previously received fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, and taxanes, and 24 (73%) were pretreated with irinotecan. The confirmed ORR was 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13–46]. The median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI 1.2–3.2) and 5.6 (95% CI 4.1–7.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, immunotherapy within 90 days and a Glasgow Prognostic Score of 0 were associated with better treatment outcomes. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (36%), and no febrile neutropenia was observed. The median EQ-5D scores did not change from baseline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (p value = 0.38, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively).

Conclusion

Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) showed substantial activity and acceptable toxicity for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000016416).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Narita Y, Pentheroudakis G, Baba E, Li J, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic gastric cancer; a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, Muro K, Satoh T, Machado M, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 Clinical KEYNOTE-059 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e180013. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn M, Young K, Cunningham D, Starling N. The evolving immunotherapeutic landscape in advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918786228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835918786228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shitara K, Doi T, Dvorkin M, Mansoor W, Arkenau HT, Prokharau A, et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1437–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30739-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perego P, Robert J. Oxaliplatin in the era of personalized medicine: from mechanistic studies to clinical efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2901-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kondoh C, Kadowaki S, Komori A, Narita Y, Taniguchi H, Ura T, et al. Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:1050–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0825-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0259-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brahmer JR, Drake CG, Wollner I, Powderly JD, Picus J, Sharfman WH, et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3167–75. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.7609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Osa A, Uenami T, Koyama S, Fujimoto K, Okuzaki D, Takimoto T, et al. Clinical implications of monitoring nivolumab immunokinetics in non-small cell lung cancer patients. JCI Insight. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.59125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, Nishimura S, Sakai I, Fukuda T, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11:341–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim DY, Kim JH, Lee SH, Kim TY, Heo DS, Bang YJ, et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in previously platinum-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:383–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YS, Hong J, Sym SJ, Park SH, Park J, Cho EK, et al. Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX-4) combination chemotherapy as a salvage treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2010;42:24–9. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.1.24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuji K, Yasui H, Onozawa Y, Boku N, Doyama H, Fukutomi A, et al. Modified FOLFOX-6 therapy for heavily pretreated advanced gastric cancer refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, cisplatin and taxanes: a retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:686–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hys084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masuishi T, Kadowaki S, Kondo M, Komori A, Sugiyama K, Mitani S, et al. FOLFOX as first-line therapy for gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:7037–42. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Jang HJ, Kim JB, Kim JW, et al. Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX-6) as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients with poor performance status. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:425–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamayo E, Montes M, Vicente D, Perez-Trallero E. Streptococcus pyogenes pneumonia in adults: clinical presentation and molecular characterization of isolates 2006–2015. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schvartsman G, Peng SA, Bis G, Lee JJ, Benveniste MFK, Zhang J, et al. Response rates to single-agent chemotherapy after exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;112:90–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pestana RC, Becnel M, Rubin ML, Torman DK, Crespo J, Phan J, et al. Response rates and survival to systemic therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;101:104523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park SE, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Park K, Sun JM. Increased response rates to salvage chemotherapy administered after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:106–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossi S, Basso M, Strippoli A, Schinzari G, D'Argento E, Larocca M, et al. Are markers of systemic inflammation good prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:264–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. M. Nomura from Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine for tumor assessment. We also sincerely appreciate all the patients who received treatment and were enrolled in this study.

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study. The journal’s Rapid Service Fee was funded by the authors.

Editorial Assistance

The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Authorship

All the authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Seiichiro Mitani reports payment for lectures from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Eli Lilly, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Shigenori Kadowaki reports grants and payment for lectures from Eli Lilly and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., grants from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and payment for lectures from Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer, and Merck. Chihiro Kondoh reports payment for lectures from Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., NIPPON SHINYAKU, Eisai, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Toshiki Masuishi reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo, MSD and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., and payment for lectures from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Merck and Bayer. Yukiya Narita reports payment for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Nihon Kayaku and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Hiroya Taniguchi reports grants and payment for lectures from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., grants from Daiichi Sankyo and Sysmex, and payment for lectures from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Eli Lilly. Kei Muro reports grants and payment for lectures from Sanofi, grants from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Shionogi, Parexel International, Mediscience Planning and Pfizer, and payment for lectures from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Bayer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All remaining authors (Azusa Komori, Isao Oze, Kyoko Kato, Kazunori Honda, Masashi Ando, Tsutomu Tanaka and Masahiro Tajika) have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. This study was approved by the institutional review boards and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000016416). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before study enrollment, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigenori Kadowaki.

Additional information

Digital Features

To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12156927.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitani, S., Kadowaki, S., Komori, A. et al. A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies. Adv Ther 37, 2853–2864 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01358-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01358-2

Keywords

Navigation