Abstract
Background: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been shown to have a salutary effect on the overall psychological well-being of women being treated for breast cancer. Unfortunately, however, not every patient is an ideal candidate for reconstruction. Complications stemming from reconstructive surgery can cause significant morbidity, the most important of which may be the delay of subsequent adjuvant antineoplastic therapies, and therefore may not be in the best interests of the patient.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of 123 breast reconstructions in 98 patients, performed by one of two plastic surgeons, in a university setting over a 5-year period, for all surgical outcomes. Specifically, wound-healing complications, infections, and reoperations leading to the potential delay of subsequent chemotherapy or radiotherapy were recorded, and possible risk factors leading to these were sought.
Results: Three presurgical risk factors were found to have a statistically significant influence on the development of complications following breast reconstruction. These were: (1) increasing obesity, defined by the body mass index, (2) an active or recent (<5 year) history of cigarette smoking, and (3) a history of previous radiation exposure. Odds ratios were used to describe the magnitude of the effect of each factor for the development of complications. An ordinal regression analysis was used to create a nomogram based on this information that can be used to calculate any individual patient’s presurgical risk for developing major complications following breast reconstruction, based on the presence of these factors.
Conclusions: It is possible, based on the presence of specific presurgical risk factors, to predict the probability of developing major complications following breast reconstruction. This information can be useful to the referring physician and plastic surgeon alike in determining which patients are the best candidates for breast reconstruction and which type of reconstruction would be best suited for each individual patient.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Noone RB, Frazier TG, Hayward CZ, Skiles MS. Patient acceptance of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 632–40.
Trabulsy PP, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. Changing trends in post mastectomy breast reconstruction: A 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 1418–27.
Miller MJ. Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 145–56.
Ginsburg AD, Perrault DJ, Pritchard KI, Browman GP, McCulloch PB, Skillings J. Systemic therapy for node-negative breast cancer. CMAJ 1989; 141: 381–7.
Ragaz J, Jackson SM, LeN, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 956–63.
Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 949–55.
Pritchard K. Systemic adjuvant therapy for node negative breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111: 1–4.
Johnson CH, van Heerden JA, Donohue JH, Martin JK, Jackson IT, Ilstrup DM. Oncological aspects of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for malignancy. Arch Surg 1989; 124: 819–24.
O’Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993; 166: 1–5.
Yule GJ, Concannon MJ, Croll GH, Puckett CL. Is there liability with chemotherapy following immediate breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 969–73.
Deutsch MF, Smith M, Wang B, Ainsle N, Schusterman MA. Immediate breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42: 240–4.
Berrino P, Campora E, Leone S, Zappi L, Nicosia F, Santi P. The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 27: 221–31.
Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 886–92.
Paige KT, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Jones G. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101: 1819–27.
Watterson PA, Bostwick J, Hester TR, Bried JT, Taylor GI. TRAM Flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 1185–94.
Kroll S. Necrosis of abdominoplasty and other secondary flaps after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94: 637–43.
Mitchell BE, Sobel HL, Alexander MH. The adverse health effects of tobacco and tobacco-related products. Prim Care 1999; 26: 463–98.
Scheflan M, Kalisman M. Complications of breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11: 343–50.
Kraemer O, Andersen M, Siim E. Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1996; 30: 201–6.
Forman DL, Chiu J, Restifo RJ, Ward BA, Haffty B, Ariyan S. Breast reconstruction in previously irradiated patients using tissue expanders and implants: A potentially unfavorable result. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40: 360–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, K.Y., Johns, F.R., Gibson, J. et al. An Outcome Study of Breast Reconstruction: Presurgical Identification of Risk Factors for Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 8, 586–591 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0586-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0586-3