Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH

  • Original article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of decision-to-delivery interval of crash emergency cesarean section on Apgar and umbilical artery pH in a level-3 university hospital. Materials and methods: In a retrospective analysis, all women undergoing “crash” emergency cesarean section were evaluated. Emergency cesarean sections were performed in the delivery room. Data relating to indication, Apgar score, arterial cord pH, and time intervals between decision-to-deliver and actual delivery were collected retrospectively. Results: All 109 crash emergency cesarean sections were performed within a decision-to-delivery time of 30 min. The median (with 10–90th percentile) time was 10 min (5–19). Thirty-three (30.3%) of the emergency cesarean sections had a gestational age below 32 weeks and 60 (55%) below 37 weeks. An abnormal fetal heart rate pattern was noted in most of the cases (91%). Prolapsed cord (21%) and placental abruption (20%) were the most frequent reasons for emergency cesarean section but in one-fourth (25.7%) no morphological reason could be identified. Very short decision-to-delivery times below 20 min were inversely correlated to fetal outcome, i.e., lower umbilical blood pH and Apgar scores (P<0.01). Conclusion: The 30-min standard for the decision-to-delivery time interval set by Anglo-American countries may be a feasible guideline at least for level-3 hospitals. The 20-min interval set by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics could not be achieved in all cases. The positive effect of very short intervals on neonatal outcome still needs to be proven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1989) Committee on Professional Standards. In: Standards for Obstetric-Gynecologic Services, 7th edn. Washington, DC

  2. Canadian Medical Association (1986) Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on aspects of cesarean birth. CMAJ 134:1348–1352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1995) Report of a joint working group: organisational standards for maternity services. RCOG Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chauhan SP, Mobley JA, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD, Martin JN Jr (2000) Cesarean delivery for suspected fetal distress among preterm parturients. J Reprod Med 45:395–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chauhan SP, Roach H, Naef RW II, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Martin JN Jr (1997) Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision–incision time make a difference? J Reprod Med 42:347–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choate JW, Lund CJ (1968) Emergency cesarean section: an analysis of maternal and fetal results in 177 operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 100:703–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyer RA, Els I, Farbas J, Torr GJ, Schoeman LK, James MF (2003) Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace (see also discussion pp5A–6A). Anesthesiology 99:561–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Halsey H, Douglas R (1957) Fetal distress and fetal death in labor. Surg Clin North Am 37:421–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillemanns P, Hasbargen U, Strauss A, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Hepp H (2003) Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268(3):136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hood DD, Curry R (1999) Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: a retrospective survey. Anesthesiology 90:1276–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I (2001) Prospective 12 month study of 30 minute decision to delivery intervals for “emergency” caesarean section. BMJ 322:1334–1335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I (2002) What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG 109:498–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MacLennan A (1999) A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 319:1054–1059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roemer VM, Heger Romermann G (1992) Emergency cesarean section—basic data. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 196:95–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roemer VM, Heger Romermann G (1992) What factors modify the condition of the newborn infant in emergency cesarean section? Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 196:141–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roemer VM, Heger-Romermann G (1993) Clinic structure and timely management of emergency cesarean section—reference values and recommendations. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 197:153–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Beguin EA, Schaper AM, Spindler J (1994) Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections. J Am Coll Surg 179:151–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheller A, Terinde R (1992) Comparison of the rate of complications after primary, secondary and emergency Cesarean section. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 196:253–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spencer MK, MacLennan AH (2001) How long does it take to deliver a baby by emergency Caesarean section? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N (2001) Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section—are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ 322:1330–1333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallace DH, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Giesecke AH, Shearer VE, Sidawi JE (1995) Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 86:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich—Klinikum Grosshadern, 81377, Munich, Germany

    P. Hillemanns, A. Strauss, U. Hasbargen & H. Hepp

  2. Division of Neonatology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich—Klinikum Grosshadern, 81377, Munich, Germany

    A. Schulze & O. Genzel-Boroviczeny

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich—Klinikum Grosshadern, 81377, Munich, Germany

    E. Weninger

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Jena, 07740, Jena, Germany

    P. Hillemanns

Authors
  1. P. Hillemanns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Hasbargen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. Genzel-Boroviczeny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Weninger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Hepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Hillemanns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillemanns, P., Strauss, A., Hasbargen, U. et al. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 161–165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0045-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0045-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation