Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usefulness of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the diagnosis of uterine sarcomas was investigated, as well as whether DW images and quantitative measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values can facilitate differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. MR images including DW images were obtained in 43 surgically treated patients with 58 myometrial tumors, including seven uterine sarcomas (five leiomyosarcomas and two endometrial stromal sarcomas) and 51 benign leiomyomas (43 ordinary leiomyomas, two cellular leiomyomas and six degenerated leiomyomas). Qualitative analysis of non-enhanced and postcontrast MR images and DW images and quantitative measurement of ADC values were performed for each myometrial tumor. Both uterine sarcomas and cellular leiomyomas exhibited high signal intensity on DW images, whereas ordinary leiomyomas and most degenerated leiomyomas showed low signal intensity. The mean ADC value (10−3 mm2/s) of sarcomas was 1.17 ± 0.15, which was lower than those of the normal myometrium (1.62 ± 0.11) and degenerated leiomyomas (1.70 ± 0.11) without any overlap; however, they were overlapped with those of ordinary leiomyomas and cellular leiomyomas. In addition to morphological features on nonenhanced and postcontrast MR sequences, DW imaging and ADC measurement may have a potential ability to differentiate uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahanpaa KV, Wahlstrom T, Grohn P, Heinonen E, Nieminen U, Widholm O (1986) Sarcomas of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 119 patients. Obstet Gynecol 67:417–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zoloudek C, Norris H (2002) Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s Pathology of the female genital tract, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I, Shepherd JH, Oram DH, Reznek RH (2001) MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1307–1311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, Maruo T (2002) Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12:354–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Okamoto Y, Yoshikawa H (2004) Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:998–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koyama T, Togashi K, Konishi I, Kobayashi H, Ueda H, Kataoka ML, Itoh T, Higuchi T, Fujii S, Konishi J (1999) MR imaging of endometrial stromal sarcoma: correlation with pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:767–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueda M, Otsuka M, Hatakenaka M, Torii Y (2000) Uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma located in uterine myometrium: MRI appearance. Eur Radiol 10:780–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda M, Otsuka M, Hatakenaka M, Sakai S, Ono M, Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Torii Y (2001) MR imaging findings of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: differentiation from endometrial carcinoma. Eur Radiol 11:28–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, Sagoh T, Minami S, Yamashita K et al (1989) Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171:531–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, Kataoka ML, Koyama T, Fujiwara T, Kobayashi H, Fujii S, Konishi J (1999) Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19(Spec No):S131–S145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Tanaka N, Katabuchi H, Miyazaki K, Ito M, Okamura H (1993) Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology 189:721–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Bihan D, Turner R, Douek P, Patronas N (1992) Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:591–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahn MM, Oser AB, Cross DT 3rd (1996) CT and MRI of stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:833–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li TQ, Takahashi AM, Hindmarsh T, Moseley ME (1999) ADC mapping by means of a single-shot spiral MRI technique with application in acute cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med 41:143–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F (2007) Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17:1385–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:397–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22:275–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17:2646–2655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK (2000) Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 43:828–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, Haraguchi K, Ito S, Akashi T, Ohashi I (2001) Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:757–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Szafer A, Zhong J, Gore JC (1995) Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 33:697–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koyama T, Tamai K, Togashi K (2006) Current status of body MR imaging: fast MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Int J Clin Oncol 11:278–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A (2006) Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 16:1468–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sumi M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T (2007) Diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficients for lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx. Eur Radiol 17:2631–2637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matoba M, Tonami H, Kondou T, Yokota H, Higashi K, Toga H, Sakuma T (2007) Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging-preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 243:570–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Kuroki S, Murakami K, Nawano S, Moriyama N (2004) Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, Kumada H, Miura S, Takizawa O, Ishigaki T (2005) Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:258–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S, Kuroki S, Tsukamoto T, Yamamoto S, Motoori K, Ueda T (2006) Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 239:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y (2003) Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 226:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Katsuoka Y (2007) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results. Eur Radiol 17:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsuki M, Inada Y, Nakai G, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, Masuda D, Arisaka Y, Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Diffusion-weighed MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 32(4):481–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs MA, Herskovits EH, Kim HS (2005) Uterine fibroids: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for monitoring therapy with focused ultrasound surgery-preliminary study. Radiology 236:196–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liapi E, Kamel IR, Bluemke DA, Jacobs MA, Kim HS (2005) Assessment of response of uterine fibroids and myometrium to embolization using diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:83–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shimada K, Ohashi I, Kasahara I, Watanabe H, Ohta S, Miyasaka N, Itoh E, Shibuya H (2004) Differentiation between completely hyalinized uterine leiomyomas and ordinary leiomyomas: three-phase dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. diffusion-weighted MRI with very small b-factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maldjian JA, Listerud J, Moonis G, Siddiqi F (2001) Computing diffusion rates in T2-dark hematomas and areas of low T2 signal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:112–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hiwatashi A, Kinoshita T, Moritani T, Wang HZ, Shrier DA, Numaguchi Y, Ekholm SE, Westesson PL (2003) Hypointensity on diffusion-weighted MRI of the brain related to T2 shortening and susceptibility effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1705–1709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Koyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamai, K., Koyama, T., Saga, T. et al. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18, 723–730 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0787-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0787-7

Keywords

Navigation