PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - NAOTAKA YAMAGUCHI AU - DAISUKE MORIOKA AU - YUSUKE IZUMISAWA AU - JUNYA TOYODA AU - KAZUYA YAMAGUCHI AU - NOBUTOSHI HORII AU - NORIO OHYAMA AU - FUMIO ASANO AU - MASARU MIURA AU - RYUSEI MATSUYAMA AU - YOSHIKI SATO AU - ITARU ENDO TI - A Classification System Specific for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Following Open Hernia Surgery AID - 10.21873/invivo.12652 DP - 2021 Nov 01 TA - In Vivo PG - 3501--3508 VI - 35 IP - 6 4099 - http://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/35/6/3501.short 4100 - http://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/35/6/3501.full SO - In Vivo2021 Nov 01; 35 AB - Background/Aim: Currently, there is no classification system specializing in recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH) after open-surgery. For this reason, in this study we proposed one so as to understand the causes of RIH. Patients and Methods: Recurrence of IH after suture-repair was classified either as the tissue-loosening (TL) or the tissue-disruption (TD) type. Recurrence after open-mesh-repair was classified according to the locational relation between the hernia-defect and the mesh, as follows: i) mesh-distant (MD), ii) para-mesh (PM), iii) mesh-migration (MM), and iv) unclassifiable (UC). Fifty-two RIHs in 48 patients were classified, using this system, and analyzed. Results: This system-based classification led to the identification of: i) MM in 11 lesions, ii) PM in 11, iii) MD in 10, iv) TL in 7, v) TD in 5, and vi) UC in 8 lesions. The median time to recurrence (MTR) was significantly shorter in patients who had previously undergone a mesh-repair (n=34) compared to those who had undergone a suture-repair (n=13) [Mesh-repair vs. suture-repair MTR: 1.6 years (0.1-20) vs. 30 years (15-72), p<0.001]. MTR was significantly shorter in the following order: i) MM [0.5(0.1-2.0)]), ii) PM [2.6(0.2-15)]), iii) MD [11(0.5-20)], iv) TD [20(15-30)], and v) TL [40(30-72)] (p<0.001). Conclusion: This classification system helps understand the causes of RIH, leading to improved outcomes following open-surgery in the future.