PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - CARLOS NARVAEZ
AU  - STEVEN E. SCHILD
AU  - DIRK RADES
TI  - Comparison of Conventional Fractionation and Accelerated Fractionation With Concomitant Boost for Radiotherapy of Non-metastatic Stage IV Head-and-Neck Cancer
AID  - 10.21873/invivo.12272
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - In Vivo
PG  - 411--415
VI  - 35
IP  - 1
4099  - http://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/35/1/411.short
4100  - http://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/35/1/411.full
SO  - In Vivo2021 Jan 01; 35
AB  - Background/Aim: Some patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head-and-neck cancer (SCCHN) cannot tolerate radiochemotherapy. Alternatives are needed that are more effective than conventional radiotherapy alone. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigated patients irradiated for non-metastatic stage IV SCCHN who could not receive concurrent chemotherapy. Eight patients received accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost (group A) and 31 patients conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (group B). Groups were matched for tumor site, gender, age, performance score and histologic grade. Results: Two-year PFS-rates were 63% in group A vs. 41% in group B, and median PFS-times were 36 vs. 10 months (p=0.48). Two-year OS-rates were 88% vs. 37%, and median OS-times were 44 vs. 14 months (p=0.19). Grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis was significantly (p=0.040) more common in group B; other toxicities were similar. Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost appeared superior to conventional fractionation and can be considered for patients with stage IV SCCHN not suitable for radiochemotherapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.