Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Case ReportsCase Reports
Open Access

Pathologic Complete Response After Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

KAYO KIKUCHI, YUKI KOBARI, KAZUTAKA NAKAMURA, KANA SHIBUSAWA, TAKASHI IKEDA, TAKAYUKI NAKAYAMA, HIRONORI FUKUDA, TOMOKO YAMAMOTO, KAZUHIKO YOSHIDA, JUMPEI IIZUKA, HIDEKI ISHIDA, YOJI NAGASHIMA and TOSHIO TAKAGI
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1796-1802; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14332
KAYO KIKUCHI
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKI KOBARI
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yuukikobari17{at}gmail.com
KAZUTAKA NAKAMURA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KANA SHIBUSAWA
2Department of Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI IKEDA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAYUKI NAKAYAMA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIRONORI FUKUDA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOKO YAMAMOTO
2Department of Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIKO YOSHIDA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUMPEI IIZUKA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKI ISHIDA
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOJI NAGASHIMA
2Department of Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIO TAKAGI
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) is the preferred first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinomas. However, the optimal therapy duration and the role of consolidative surgery in patients achieving a complete response remain unclear.

Case Report: A 75-year-old Japanese man presented with intermittent gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a locally advanced lower ureteral carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis (cT4N2M0). First-line systemic EVP therapy was initiated. After six cycles, radiologic assessment demonstrated a partial response of the primary tumor and complete resolution of the lymph node metastases. Subsequently, the patient underwent robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. Histopathological examination revealed no residual viable carcinoma, confirming a pathologic complete response. No lymph node dissection was performed. Given the lack of pathological confirmation of the nodal response, an additional postoperative cycle of EVP was administered. Systemic therapy was discontinued based on shared decision-making considering concerns regarding cumulative peripheral neuropathy. The patient remained recurrence-free without treatment-related adverse events at 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: This case demonstrates that EVP can induce a pathologic complete response in patients with node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma, enabling subsequent surgical consolidation and treatment-free surveillance. Although the optimal criteria for treatment discontinuation remain undefined, a treatment-free strategy may be feasible for selected patients who achieve a strong response to EVP. Further studies are warranted to clarify the role of surgery and to establish evidence-based strategies for treatment duration and discontinuation.

Keywords:
  • Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab
  • pathologic complete response
  • upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Introduction

Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has become the preferred first-line regimen for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) based on the EV-302 trial, which showed improvements in response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) compared with platinum chemotherapy (1). Recent guidelines recommend EVP as the standard initial systemic therapy for many patients with mUC, irrespective of platinum eligibility (2). However, current trials and guidelines generally advise continuing EVP until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, and do not define clear criteria for the safe discontinuation of systemic therapy in patients who achieve a complete response (CR). Although patients who achieve radiographic CR have been reported to maintain durable disease control over a long period, prolonged treatment carries the risk of cumulative toxicities such as peripheral neuropathy and immune-related adverse events, and the optimal timing for treatment discontinuation or consolidative surgery remains uncertain.

Herein, we report a case of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with lymph node involvement that achieved a pathologic complete response following six cycles of EVP and subsequent radical nephroureterectomy.

Case Report

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokyo Women’s Medical University (approval no. 2024-0017), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

A 75-year-old Japanese man with intermittent gross hematuria was referred to our department. His medical history included hypertension and spinal canal stenosis. He had no history of smoking. Urine cytology was class V and cystoscopy revealed no bladder tumor. Computed tomography (CT) revealed an irregular mass involving the left ureter, with suspected invasion into the surrounding adipose tissue and the adjacent descending colon (Figure 1A and B). Additionally, enlargement of the retroperitoneal and left obturator lymph nodes was confirmed, which was consistent with lymph node metastasis (Figure 2A and B). Based on these findings, the clinical diagnosis of was cT4N2M0. Given the presence of locally advanced disease with nodal metastases, first-line systemic therapy with EVP was initiated. After the first cycle, the patient developed a grade 2 skin rash, which was managed with oral antihistamines and local corticosteroids, resulting in an improvement to grade 1. The second cycle was administered by reducing the enfortumab vedotin (EV) to 90%. Following the completion of the fifth cycle, grade 2 peripheral neuropathy developed, leading to a delay in the sixth cycle. After improvement of the neuropathy to grade 1, the sixth cycle was administered as planned. Radiological assessment after six cycles demonstrated a partial response of the primary ureteral tumor (Figure 3) and CR for every lymph node metastasis. After multidisciplinary discussions and consultation with the patient, he underwent robot-assisted left radical nephroureterectomy via the transperitoneal approach using the da Vinci Xi system. Although strong adhesions were observed around the primary tumor, the surgery was completed without any intraoperative complications. The operative time was 327 min and the estimated blood loss was 80 ml. The postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. Histopathological examination revealed no residual viable carcinoma in the resected specimen, confirming a pathologic complete response (pCR) (Figure 4A and B). After shared decision-making, one additional cycle of EVP was administered; however, systemic therapy was subsequently discontinued because of the patient’s concern regarding further worsening of the peripheral neuropathy. The patient underwent treatment-free surveillance and remained recurrence-free at six months of follow-up without any adverse events.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Plain computed tomography axial (A) and coronal slice (B) showing a left lower ureteral tumor with suspected invasion of the descending colon.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Plain computed tomography showing lymph node metastases: (A) enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes and (B) swelling of the left obturator lymph node.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Plain computed tomography images obtained after six cycles of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab therapy, demonstrating significant shrinkage of the primary ureteral tumor.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Surgical specimen of the left radical nephroureterectomy (A): hematoxylin and eosin–stained section showing predominantly chronic inflammatory cell infiltration with fibrosis and no histopathological findings suggestive of residual malignancy (B).

Discussion

The present case highlights the potential clinical value of combining EVP with consolidative surgery in selected patients with node-positive UTUC. A major strength of this case is the achievement of pCR following systemic therapy, which enables a treatment-free strategy without compromising short-term oncological control.

The EV-302 trial established EVP as the preferred first-line regimen for la/mUC, demonstrating a significantly improved overall response rate, PFS, and OS compared with platinum-based chemotherapy (1). Several real-world studies have reported on the effectiveness and manageable safety of EVP in clinical practice (3-6). Furthermore, real-world data in elderly populations have demonstrated that EV-based therapy remains feasible and effective, although careful toxicity monitoring is essential (7, 8). Importantly, subgroup analyses showed that patients with lymph node–only metastases had particularly favorable responses, suggesting a high sensitivity of nodal disease to EVP. Furthermore, durable responses have been reported in patients who achieved a CR, supporting the idea that deep initial responses may translate into prolonged disease control. However, the optimal duration of EVP therapy for patients who achieve a CR remains unclear. In clinical trials, pembrolizumab administration is limited to a maximum of two years according to the protocol design, whereas EV is continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prolonged exposure to EV is associated with cumulative toxicities, most notably peripheral neuropathy, which can significantly impair quality of life and may be irreversible (9, 10). Recent evidence suggests that maintaining an adequate relative dose intensity of EV is associated with improved oncological outcomes, although dose reduction may be necessary to balance toxicity and efficacy (11). However, there are no established criteria for discontinuing EV or EVP in patients who achieve radiographic CR. Moreover, outcomes after progression on EV remain heterogeneous, and optimal post-EV treatment strategies have not yet been established (12). Imaging alone cannot reliably exclude residual microscopic disease, creating uncertainty regarding the safety of treatment cessation. Consolidative surgery may serve both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Several recent case reports have described patients with urothelial carcinoma who achieved pCR after EVP followed by surgical resection, allowing the discontinuation of systemic therapy. Chan et al. reported that an 84-year-old woman with UTUC with regional lymph node metastases who underwent EVP achieved pCR after subsequent radical nephroureterectomy. This case suggests the potential role of combining EVP with surgery in selected patients with UTUC (13). Hara et al. reported that a 76-year-old man with node-positive urothelial carcinoma achieved a pCR after six cycles of EVP followed by robot-assisted nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection (LND) (14). This case demonstrates the feasibility of surgical consolidation after an excellent systemic response in a patient initially considered unresectable because of bulky nodal disease. Although both reports achieved a pCR after EVP and subsequently adopted a treatment-free strategy, there was a significant difference between the two cases. In the report by Chan et al., treatment discontinuation was decided without LND, whereas in the report by Hara et al., LND was performed and the ypN0 status was pathologically confirmed before transitioning to treatment-free surveillance. While pathological confirmation of ypN0 may offer additional confidence in adopting a treatment-free strategy, the potential benefits should be balanced with the invasiveness of lymph node dissection. Wakamiya et al. reported a case of a 76-year-old woman with renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma who received multiple lines of systemic therapy, including platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab, followed by enfortumab vedotin. After prolonged enfortumab vedotin treatment, the metastatic lymph nodes remained radiologically stable, while isolated progression of the primary tumor was observed, prompting salvage nephroureterectomy. No additional systemic therapy was administered after salvage nephroureterectomy, and the patient remained recurrence-free for approximately one year postoperatively (15). The authors considered that LND was intentionally omitted because nodal disease appeared to be well-controlled radiographically, and there was limited evidence supporting the curative benefit of systematic lymphadenectomy in this setting.

Our patient had locally advanced lower ureteral carcinoma with clinically positive lymph node metastases and achieved a marked radiologic response after six cycles of EVP, including complete resolution of nodal disease. Radical nephroureterectomy was subsequently performed and pathological examination revealed a CR in the resected specimen. As LND was not performed, pathological confirmation of the nodal response was not available, and systemic therapy with EVP was resumed postoperatively. However, after one additional postoperative cycle, EVP was discontinued based on shared decision-making, considering the patient’s concerns regarding cumulative peripheral neuropathy. Six months after surgery, the patient remained recurrence-free without treatment-related adverse events, suggesting that a treatment-free strategy may be feasible even in initially node-positive disease when a strong response to EVP is achieved.

Study limitations. First, this is a single case report, and the findings cannot be generalized. Second, the follow-up duration was relatively short, and the long-term oncologic outcomes remain uncertain. In addition, lymph node dissection was not performed; therefore, pathological confirmation of the nodal response was not possible. Larger prospective studies are required to define the optimal treatment duration, identify candidates for consolidative surgery, and establish evidence-based strategies for treatment discontinuation in patients who achieve a complete response to EVP.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the potential of EVP in achieving pCR in node-positive UTUC, allowing surgical consolidation and treatment-free surveillance. Further investigation is needed to define the optimal treatment duration and the role of surgery in patients achieving a deep response to EVP.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Editage for editing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Kayo Kikuchi was involved in patient care, reviewed the literature, collected patient data, and prepared the manuscript. Yuki Kobari prepared and revised the manuscript critically. Kazutaka Nakamura, Takashi Ikeda, Takayuki Nakayama, Hironori Fukuda, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Jumyu Iizuka and Hideki Ishida were involved in patient treatment and clinical management. Kana Shibusawa, Tomoko Yamamoto, and Yoji Nagashima contributed to the pathological evaluation and interpretation of pathological findings. Toshio Takagi supervised the study and critically revised the manuscript. All the Authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    During the preparation of this manuscript, a large language model (ChatGPT) was used solely for language editing and stylistic improvements to the selected paragraphs. No sections involving the generation, analysis, or interpretation of research data were produced using generative AI. All scientific content was created and verified by the authors. Furthermore, no figures or visual data were generated or modified using generative AI or machine learning–based image enhancement tools.

  • Received January 20, 2026.
  • Revision received February 14, 2026.
  • Accepted February 19, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Powles T,
    2. Valderrama BP,
    3. Gupta S,
    4. Bedke J,
    5. Kikuchi E,
    6. Hoffman-Censits J,
    7. Iyer G,
    8. Vulsteke C,
    9. Park SH,
    10. Shin SJ,
    11. Castellano D,
    12. Fornarini G,
    13. Li JR,
    14. Gümüş M,
    15. Mar N,
    16. Loriot Y,
    17. Fléchon A,
    18. Duran I,
    19. Drakaki A,
    20. Narayanan S,
    21. Yu X,
    22. Gorla S,
    23. Homet Moreno B,
    24. van der Heijden MS, EV-302 Trial Investigators
    : Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med 390(10): 875-888, 2024. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Powles T,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Comperat E,
    4. De Santis M,
    5. Huddart R,
    6. Loriot Y,
    7. Necchi A,
    8. Valderrama BP,
    9. Ravaud A,
    10. Shariat SF,
    11. Szabados B,
    12. van der Heijden MS,
    13. Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee
    : ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on first-line therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Ann Oncol 35(6): 485-490, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jain P,
    2. Naqvi SAA,
    3. Tripathi N,
    4. Oberoi JK,
    5. Humayun MA,
    6. Zakharia Y,
    7. Orme JJ,
    8. Kase A,
    9. Childs DS,
    10. Chen R,
    11. Riaz IB,
    12. Singh P
    : Real-world outcomes of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 23(6): 102453, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102453
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Niedersuess-Beke D,
    2. Mayrhofer K,
    3. Krauter J,
    4. Schnabel S,
    5. Gampenrieder SP,
    6. Miechowiecki J,
    7. Kiesl D,
    8. Luger F,
    9. Pfuner J,
    10. Wiesinger C,
    11. Vallet S,
    12. Andalibi H,
    13. Vais D,
    14. Banner A,
    15. Stoiber F,
    16. Spielgelberg J,
    17. Barth D,
    18. Bauernhofer T,
    19. Aufderklamm S,
    20. Weibrecht S,
    21. Mühlmann J,
    22. Mayer M,
    23. Hilbe W,
    24. Boulmé F,
    25. Klinglmair G,
    26. Heintel D,
    27. Shariat SF,
    28. Pichler M,
    29. Pichler R
    : Real-world evidence for enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: an Austrian multicentre study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 23(1): 102278, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102278
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Iwatani K,
    2. Urabe F,
    3. Mori K,
    4. Nakano J,
    5. Fujiwara K,
    6. Saito S,
    7. Hara S,
    8. Kawano S,
    9. Ishikawa M,
    10. Fukuokaya W,
    11. Imai Y,
    12. Kayano S,
    13. Kasai K,
    14. Yanagisawa T,
    15. Tashiro K,
    16. Murakami M,
    17. Tsuzuki S,
    18. Waki Y,
    19. Miki J,
    20. Kimura T
    : Safety profile of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter Japanese cohort study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 56(2): 234-240, 2026. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaf182
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Furubayashi N,
    2. Mochida M,
    3. Kijima A,
    4. Fujimoto Y,
    5. Nakamura M,
    6. Negishi T
    : Steroid premedication impact on efficacy and cutaneous toxicity of enfortumab vedotin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. In Vivo 39(3): 1607-1614, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13961
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Nishio K,
    2. Hirosuna K,
    3. Uchimoto T,
    4. Niigawa H,
    5. Kakumae S,
    6. Jo T,
    7. Morinaka H,
    8. Fukuokaya W,
    9. Yoshizawa A,
    10. Saruta M,
    11. Hashimoto M,
    12. Minami T,
    13. Yamamoto Y,
    14. Sakamoto M,
    15. Nishimura K,
    16. Maenosono R,
    17. Tsujino T,
    18. Yoshikawa Y,
    19. Urabe F,
    20. Mori K,
    21. Yanagisawa T,
    22. Tsuduki S,
    23. Takahara K,
    24. Inamoto T,
    25. Fujita K,
    26. Kimura T,
    27. Azuma H,
    28. Komura K
    : Real-world outcomes of enfortumab vedotin in elderly patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Res 45(10): 4575-4583, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17803
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kobari Y,
    2. Iizuka J,
    3. Kondo H,
    4. Ichioka M,
    5. Watanabe S,
    6. Nakamura K,
    7. Horiuchi T,
    8. Mizoguchi S,
    9. Yoshida K,
    10. Shimmura H,
    11. Hashimoto Y,
    12. Kondo T,
    13. Kobayashi H,
    14. Takagi T
    : Safety and efficacy of enfortumab vedotin for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in patients aged 80 years and older: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan. J Geriatr Oncol 16(3): 102216, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Ren X,
    3. Dai Y,
    4. Wang Y
    : Pharmacovigilance study of the association between peripheral neuropathy and antibody-drug conjugates using the FDA adverse event reporting system. Sci Rep 14(1): 21386, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71977-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hayakawa N,
    2. Kikuchi E,
    3. Kaneko G,
    4. Yamashita R,
    5. Ikarashi D,
    6. Endo Y,
    7. Usui K,
    8. Obara W,
    9. Oyama M,
    10. Kondo Y
    : Association between response to enfortumab vedotin and peripheral neuropathy in urothelial carcinoma patients: a multicenter retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 54(11): 1194-1200, 2024. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae082
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Furubayashi N,
    2. Negishi T,
    3. Mochida M,
    4. Kijima A,
    5. Katsuki H,
    6. Nakamura M
    : Impact of relative dose intensity of enfortumab vedotin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. In Vivo 39(1): 411-418, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13843
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Furubayashi N,
    2. Mochida M,
    3. Kijima A,
    4. Fujimoto Y,
    5. Nakamura M,
    6. Negishi T
    : Treatment outcomes after progression with enfortumab vedotin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Res 45(5): 2185-2193, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17592
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Chan KH,
    2. Shu T,
    3. Al Shaarani M,
    4. Cen P
    : Complete pathologic response with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 12: 23247096241257333, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/23247096241257333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hara T,
    2. Inoue E,
    3. Wakita N,
    4. Nakanishi T,
    5. Suzuki K,
    6. Matsuyama N,
    7. Tobe T,
    8. Ueki H,
    9. Chiba K,
    10. Teishima J,
    11. Miyake H
    : Pathologic complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in node-positive urothelial carcinoma: a case report. Int Cancer Conf J 14(4): 407-411, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s13691-025-00785-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Wakamiya T,
    2. Iwahashi Y,
    3. Kawabata H,
    4. Muraoka S,
    5. Yamashita S,
    6. Kojima F,
    7. Kohjimoto Y
    : Salvage surgery for primary renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma after enfortumab vedotin: a case of durable remission with nectin-4 loss. IJU Case Rep 9(1): e70122, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.70122
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 40 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 40, Issue 3
May-June 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pathologic Complete Response After Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pathologic Complete Response After Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
KAYO KIKUCHI, YUKI KOBARI, KAZUTAKA NAKAMURA, KANA SHIBUSAWA, TAKASHI IKEDA, TAKAYUKI NAKAYAMA, HIRONORI FUKUDA, TOMOKO YAMAMOTO, KAZUHIKO YOSHIDA, JUMPEI IIZUKA, HIDEKI ISHIDA, YOJI NAGASHIMA, TOSHIO TAKAGI
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1796-1802; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14332

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Pathologic Complete Response After Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
KAYO KIKUCHI, YUKI KOBARI, KAZUTAKA NAKAMURA, KANA SHIBUSAWA, TAKASHI IKEDA, TAKAYUKI NAKAYAMA, HIRONORI FUKUDA, TOMOKO YAMAMOTO, KAZUHIKO YOSHIDA, JUMPEI IIZUKA, HIDEKI ISHIDA, YOJI NAGASHIMA, TOSHIO TAKAGI
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1796-1802; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14332
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Corrigendum
  • When Vasculitis Is Not Vasculitis: A Case Report in Which Dynamic Immunophenotyping Revealed Hidden Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma
  • Management of a Complex Orbital Post-transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Case Report and Literature Review
Show more Case Reports

Keywords

  • Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab
  • pathologic complete response
  • upper tract urothelial carcinoma
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire