Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Does Irradiation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes Have an Impact on the Bladder Filling Status in Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer?

DIRK RADES, LAURA DOEHRING, JAN-DIRK KÜTER, CHARLOTTE KRISTIANSEN, CHRISTINE VESTERGÅRD-MADSEN, CHRISTIAN F. SCHULZ and STEFAN JANSSEN
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1733-1737; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14324
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dirk.rades{at}uksh.de
LAURA DOEHRING
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAN-DIRK KÜTER
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHARLOTTE KRISTIANSEN
3Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTINE VESTERGÅRD-MADSEN
3Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTIAN F. SCHULZ
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Campus, Kiel, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEFAN JANSSEN
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
5Radiation Oncology, MVZ RON Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: In patients irradiated for high-risk prostate cancer, bladder volumes should be ≥200 ml to reduce the risk of radiation cystitis. A prospective trial evaluates a reminder app to increase bladder filling during irradiation without pelvic lymph nodes (LN). This retrospective study investigates whether patients irradiated with LN can also be included in that trial.

Patients and Methods: Forty patients irradiated with (N=17, group A) or without (N=23, group B) pelvic LN and presenting with a pre-irradiation bladder volume <200 ml were analyzed regarding fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml.

Results: Mean numbers of fractions with a volume <200 ml in the entire cohort, group A, and group B were 29.0±7.0, 28.8±7.6, and 29.2±6.6, respectively. The difference between groups A and B was not significant (p=0.978).

Conclusion: Irradiation of pelvic LN had no significant impact on the number of fractions for bladder volumes <200 ml. Patients irradiated with LN may be included in the prospective trial.

Keywords:
  • Prostate cancer
  • high-risk situation
  • radiation therapy
  • pelvic lymph nodes
  • bladder filling

Introduction

Many patients with high-risk prostate cancer receive conventionally fractionated definitive radiotherapy with doses per fraction of 2.0 Gy and total doses up to 80 Gy (1). This treatment is often associated with urinary discomfort caused by radiation cystitis. Previous studies have shown that the occurrence of cystitis is inversely correlated with bladder volume before or during the radiotherapy course (2-4). The risk of this treatment-related side effect was particularly increased if the bladder volume was less than 180 or 200 ml (2-4). Therefore, radiation oncologists should strive for a minimum bladder volume of 200 ml at the time of the planning computed tomography (CT-simulation) and as many treatment sessions (radiation fractions) as achievable. One idea to improve the bladder filling status is the implementation of drinking protocols (5-10). However, adhering to a drinking protocol often requires considerable discipline from patients. This has led to the development of a mobile application (reminder app). This app reminds the patients on each treatment day of drinking 300 ml of water 45 min prior to the start of their radiation session. The potential benefit of the reminder app is currently investigated in two phase 2 trials (11, 12). One of these trials focuses on high-risk patients treated with definitive irradiation to the prostate and the seminal vesicles (12). However, in many patients with high-risk prostate cancer, the treatment volume also includes pelvic lymph nodes (LN). The question has arisen whether these patients should be included in our trial as well. Therefore, the present retrospective study was performed in patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. It includes both patients irradiated at prostate and seminal vesicles alone and patients additionally irradiated at the pelvic LN. The study investigates the impact of the treatment volume (with vs. without pelvic LN) and seven other patient- and tumor-related characteristics on the number of radiation fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml. The outcomes of this study are mandatory for a planned amendment of our ongoing prospective trial (10).

Patients and Methods

Data of 40 patients irradiated for high-risk prostate cancer between 2021 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. In 17 of these patients, the treatment volume included the pelvic LN (group A), and 23 previously reported patients (group B) were irradiated without pelvic LN (13). The current version of this retrospective study was approved via an additional amendment by the leading Ethics Committee at the University of Lübeck under the file number 2024-447_4.

Inclusion criteria included histologically confirmed high-risk prostate cancer, treatment with external-beam radiotherapy with or without pelvic LN (no surgery, no brachytherapy), and a pre-treatment bladder volume <200 ml. To be rated as high-risk cancer, patients were required to have a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/ml, and/or a Gleason score ≥8, and/or a primary tumor stage of T2c or higher (1). Due to the high-risk situation, all patients received antihormonal therapy before and/or during and/or following the course of radiotherapy. Total doses of conventionally fractionated (dose per fraction=2.0 Gy) irradiation ranged between 74 Gy and 80 Gy (median dose=78 Gy). Like in previous studies, statistical analyses considered the initial 35 fractions (treatment sessions) (13, 14). At each session, the volume of the urinary bladder was determined using the current cone-beam computed tomography. Of the resulting bladder volumes, the mean [plus/minus standard deviations (±SD)] and median [plus interquartile ranges (Q1-Q3)] numbers of treatment sessions with a bladder volume <200 ml were calculated. In addition, eight possible risk factors for inappropriate filling of the urinary bladder (<200 ml) during the radiotherapy course were evaluated. These factors included irradiation of pelvic LN, age, Karnofsky performance score, body-mass index, prostate volume prior to irradiation, pre-treatment PSA level, Gleason score, and stage of the primary tumor (Table I). As done in the previous studies, standard methods of descriptive statistics were used and performed with SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) (13, 14). Wilcoxon-two-sample tests were performed to evaluate associations between possible risk factors and treatment sessions with a bladder volume <200 ml. After Bonferroni adjustment for multiple tests, associations were considered being significant in case of a p-value <0.0064.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Distribution of possible risk factors in the entire cohort.

Results

The mean numbers of fractions (±SD) with a volume <200 ml in the entire cohort, group A, and group B were 29.0±7.0, 28.8±7.6, and 29.2±6.6, respectively (Table II). The corresponding median numbers (plus Q1-Q3) were 32.0 (25.5-34.5), 32.0 (27.0-34.0), and 32.0 (24.0-35.0), respectively (Table II). The difference between group A and group B was not significant (p=0.978, Table II and Figure 1). Moreover, none of the other investigated potential risk factors was significantly associated with mean and numbers of radiotherapy fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Mean and median numbers of radiotherapy sessions with a bladder volume <200 ml.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of group A (irradiation with pelvic LN) and group B (irradiation without pelvic LN) with respect to the number of fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml.

Discussion

Definitive conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with total doses up to 80 Gy is a standard approach for high-risk prostate cancer. This treatment can be associated with urinary toxicity, particularly if the bladder volume is comparably small (2-4). In 2006, Pinkawa et al. investigated 80 patients with prostate cancer irradiated with 70.2 Gy (dose per fraction=1.8 Gy) with respect to bowel and urinary function (4). Patients who initially had a bladder volume of >180 ml did not report pain on urination six weeks to six months (median 2 months) following radiotherapy compared to 24% of the patients with a bladder volume <180 ml. In 2019, Grün et al. presented a prospective study of 193 patients irradiated with median 80 Gy (range=74-84 Gy) who received a special training using a bio-feedback method to maintain the bladder volume at 200-300 ml at the CT-simulation and the radiotherapy sessions. It was possible to keep the bladder volume >180 ml, which was associated with less acute genitourinary toxicity (3). In the larger study of Pisani et al. (N=280) patients received 76 Gy (2.0 Gy per fraction) for low-risk prostate cancer and 78 Gy for intermediate-risk or high-risk tumors (2). In addition, in patients with positive pelvic LN or a risk >15% for LN-involvement the pelvic LN were irradiated with 45 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction). In that study, a bladder volume <200 ml was significantly associated with increased acute urinary toxicity (2). Considering the results of these studies, bladder volumes should be at least 200 ml at the CT-simulation and during radiotherapy. To achieve this goal, the benefit of drinking protocols has been evaluated in several studies (5-10, 15-17). Since adherence to drinking protocols may be a challenge for some patients, a reminder app has been developed and is currently tested in two prospective trials (11, 12). One of these trials focuses on patients with high-risk prostate cancer (12). Until now, only patients irradiated at the prostate and the seminal vesicles alone, i.e., without treatment of the pelvic LN, can be included. Since many high-risk patients receive radiotherapy also to the pelvic LN, the current study protocol may not sufficiently reflect the clinical reality. Therefore, we consider to submit an amendment to the responsible Ethic Committee and open the trial also for patients additionally irradiated at the pelvic LN. Before this can be done, the present retrospective study is required. It should answer the question whether the mean and median numbers of radiation fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml differ between patients receiving radiotherapy of the prostate and the seminal vesicles alone (group B) and patients additionally irradiated at the pelvic LN (group A). According to its results, there is no significant difference between groups A and B with respect to mean and median numbers of radiation fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml during the course of radiotherapy. Moreover, the corresponding numbers in the entire cohort will lead to an update of the sample size required for the prospective trial (12). In addition to irradiation of the pelvic LN, seven characteristics were evaluated for associations with the numbers of radiation fractions with a bladder volume <200 ml (Table II). For none of these characteristics, a significant association was found. In our previous study, patients with a Karnofsky performance score of <90 had a greater number of fractions with suboptimal bladder filling (13). This finding was not confirmed in the present study including a larger number of patients. However, both studies are retrospective in nature and bear the risk of a hidden selection bias. Additional studies are required to properly define the prognostic role of the Karnofsky performance score. Possibly, our prospective trials will be helpful in this context.

In summary, the bladder filling status was not sufficient at the vast majority of the treatment sessions and, therefore, needs particular attention during radiotherapy of high-risk prostate cancer. Since suboptimal bladder filling occurred regardless of irradiation of the pelvic LN, both patients irradiated with and without pelvic LN may be included in the prospective trial. The sample size calculation of that trial needs to be updated.

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the project HeAT (Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly) and has been funded in parts by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Deutschland-Danmark program.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    The Authors contributed to the design of this additional study and/or collection of data. The data were analyzed by an external professional statistician. The article was drafted by D.R., and subsequently reviewed and approved by all Authors.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors indicate that there are no conflicts of interest related to this study.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received January 15, 2026.
  • Revision received February 2, 2026.
  • Accepted February 3, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF)
    : S3-Leitlinie Prostatakarzinom, Langversion 8.1, 2025, AWMF-Registernummer: 043-022OL. Available at: https://www.leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/leitlinien/prostatakarzinom/ [Last accessed on January 12, 2026]
  2. ↵
    1. Pisani C,
    2. Galla A,
    3. Loi G,
    4. Beldì D,
    5. Krengli M
    : Urinary toxicity in patients treated with radical EBRT for prostate cancer: Analysis of predictive factors in an historical series. Bull Cancer 109(7-8): 826-833, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.03.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Grün A,
    2. Kawgan-Kagan M,
    3. Kaul D,
    4. Badakhshi H,
    5. Stromberger C,
    6. Budach V,
    7. Böhmer D
    : Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 195(6): 517-525, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1398-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Pinkawa M,
    2. Fischedick K,
    3. Asadpour B,
    4. Gagel B,
    5. Piroth MD,
    6. Eble MJ
    : Low-grade toxicity after conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer—impact of bladder volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(3): 835-841, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chauhan K,
    2. Ebner DK,
    3. Tzou K,
    4. Ryan K,
    5. May J,
    6. Kaleem T,
    7. Miller D,
    8. Stross W,
    9. Malouff TD,
    10. Landy R,
    11. Strong G,
    12. Herchko S,
    13. Serago C,
    14. Trifiletti DM,
    15. Miller RC,
    16. Buskirk S,
    17. Waddle MR
    : Assessment of bladder filling during prostate cancer radiation therapy with ultrasound and cone-beam CT. Front Oncol 13: 1200270, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1200270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith GA,
    2. Dunlop A,
    3. Barnes H,
    4. Herbert T,
    5. Lawes R,
    6. Mohajer J,
    7. Tree AC,
    8. McNair HA
    : Bladder filling in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy on a MR-linac: The dosimetric impact. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 21: 41-45, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shah M,
    2. Agarwal S,
    3. Agarwal R,
    4. Subramanian B,
    5. Gupta S,
    6. De S,
    7. Mishra S
    : Observational study of cone beam computed tomography based interfractional urinary bladder filling variation during image guided radiation therapy in pelvic malignancies. J Cancer Res Ther 17(1): 152-156, 2021. DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_626_18
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chetiyawardana G,
    2. Hoskin PJ,
    3. Tsang YM
    : The implementation of an empty bladder filling protocol for localised prostate volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT): early results of a single institution service evaluation. Br J Radiol 93(1114): 20200548, 2020. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ingrosso G,
    2. Miceli R,
    3. Ponti E,
    4. Lancia A,
    5. di Cristino D,
    6. de Pasquale F,
    7. Bove P,
    8. Santoni R
    : Interfraction prostate displacement during image-guided radiotherapy using intraprostatic fiducial markers and a cone-beam computed tomography system: A volumetric off-line analysis in relation to the variations of rectal and bladder volumes. J Cancer Res Ther 15(Supplement): S69-S75, 2019. DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_463_17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Pang EPP,
    2. Knight K,
    3. Hussain A,
    4. Fan Q,
    5. Baird M,
    6. Tan SXF,
    7. Mui WH,
    8. Leung RW,
    9. Seah IKL,
    10. Master Z,
    11. Tuan JKL
    : Reduction of intra-fraction prostate motion - Determining optimal bladder volume and filling for prostate radiotherapy using daily 4D TPUS and CBCT. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 5: 9-15, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.01.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Küter JD,
    3. von Staden M,
    4. Al-Salool A,
    5. Ziemann C,
    6. Janssen S,
    7. Koeck J,
    8. Domschikowski J,
    9. Kristiansen C,
    10. Madsen CV,
    11. Duma MN,
    12. Bartscht T,
    13. Cacicedo J,
    14. Cremers F
    : Evaluation of reminder app for optimization of bladder filling status during hypo-fractionated irradiation for prostate cancer: protocol of REFILL-PAC-HYPO trial. Clin Pract 15(3): 40, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15030040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Küter JD,
    3. von Staden M,
    4. Al-Salool A,
    5. Janssen S,
    6. Timke C,
    7. Duma MN,
    8. Bartscht T,
    9. Vestergård Madsen C,
    10. Kristiansen C,
    11. Cremers F
    : A reminder app to optimize bladder filling during radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (REFILL-PAC): protocol for a prospective trial. JMIR Res Protoc 14: e68179, 2025. DOI: 10.2196/68179
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Doehring L,
    3. Küter JD,
    4. Domschikowski J,
    5. Cacicedo J,
    6. Janssen S
    : Frequency and risk factors of inappropriate bladder filling in patients irradiated for high-risk prostate cancer. In Vivo 39(4): 2333-2339, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14030
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Cremers F,
    3. Ziemann C,
    4. Splettstösser L,
    5. Narvaez-Wolf CA,
    6. Al-Salool A,
    7. von Staden M,
    8. Küter JD,
    9. Janssen S,
    10. Timke C
    : Changes in bladder volume during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 44(10): 4457-4463, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17275
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Roch M,
    2. Zapatero A,
    3. Castro P,
    4. Hernández D,
    5. Chevalier M,
    6. García-Vicente F
    : Dosimetric impact of rectum and bladder anatomy and intrafractional prostate motion on hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 23(11): 2293-2301, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02628-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Heng SP,
    2. Low SH,
    3. Sivamany K
    : The influence of the bowel and bladder preparation protocol for radiotherapy of prostate cancer using kilo-voltage cone beam CT: Our experience. Indian J Cancer 52(4): 639, 2015. DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.178386
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. O’Doherty UM,
    2. McNair HA,
    3. Norman AR,
    4. Miles E,
    5. Hooper S,
    6. Davies M,
    7. Lincoln N,
    8. Balyckyi J,
    9. Childs P,
    10. Dearnaley DP,
    11. Huddart RA
    : Variability of bladder filling in patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate. Radiother Oncol 79(3): 335-340, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.05.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 40 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 40, Issue 3
May-June 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Irradiation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes Have an Impact on the Bladder Filling Status in Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Does Irradiation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes Have an Impact on the Bladder Filling Status in Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer?
DIRK RADES, LAURA DOEHRING, JAN-DIRK KÜTER, CHARLOTTE KRISTIANSEN, CHRISTINE VESTERGÅRD-MADSEN, CHRISTIAN F. SCHULZ, STEFAN JANSSEN
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1733-1737; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14324

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Does Irradiation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes Have an Impact on the Bladder Filling Status in Patients With High-risk Prostate Cancer?
DIRK RADES, LAURA DOEHRING, JAN-DIRK KÜTER, CHARLOTTE KRISTIANSEN, CHRISTINE VESTERGÅRD-MADSEN, CHRISTIAN F. SCHULZ, STEFAN JANSSEN
In Vivo May 2026, 40 (3) 1733-1737; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14324
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • high-risk situation
  • radiation therapy
  • pelvic lymph nodes
  • bladder filling
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire