Abstract
Background/Aim: To determine whether methionine restriction using recombinant methioninase (rMETase) enhances the efficacy of ultra-low-dose cisplatinum against lung cancer cells in vitro, and whether combining a methionine-restricted (MR) diet with low-dose cisplatinum can inhibit lung cancer growth in vivo with reduced toxicity.
Materials and Methods: Human A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells were treated with rMETase and cisplatinum in vitro. Cell viability was assessed after 72 hours using the WST-8 reagent. The IC50 value of rMETase was determined, and synergy was evaluated by combining rMETase at its IC50 with cisplatinum at its determined IC10-IC50. For in vivo analysis, A549 xenografts were established in nude mice and assigned to four groups: control: standard-dose cisplatinum [6 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), weekly]; low-dose cisplatinum (3 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) + a methionine-restricted (MR) diet; or the MR diet alone. Treatments were administered for two weeks, with tumor size and body weight were monitored.
Results: For A549 lung-cancer cells the IC50 value of rMETase was 0.64 U/ml. Combination treatment with rMETase (IC50) and cisplatinum (IC10-IC50) synergistically reduced cell viability compared with either agent alone, even at the IC10 of cisplatinum. In vivo, A549 tumor eradication was observed only in the low-dose cisplatinum + MR diet group. Standard-dose cisplatinum alone and MR-alone showed delayed or limited efficacy. Body-weight loss was minimal in the low-dose cisplatinum + MR group compared with the standard-dose cisplatinum group, indicating reduced systemic toxicity.
Conclusion: Methionine restriction enhances the efficacy of ultra-low-dose cisplatinum on lung cancer cells in vitro. Low-dose cisplatinum in combination with an MR diet prevented lung-cancer growth in nude mice. The present approach of cancer therapy may help reduce platinum-related toxicity and improve treatment outcomes, suggesting further investigation for clinical translation.
- Methionine addiction
- Hoffman effect
- methionine restriction
- recombinant methioninase (rMETase)
- cisplatinum
- microdose
- combination
- synergy
- lung cancer
- in vitro
- nude mice
Introduction
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for nearly 1.8 million deaths annually (1). Although molecularly-targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in selected patient populations, platinum-based chemotherapy–particularly cisplatinum–continues to serve as first-line treatment for both small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancers (2, 3). However, cisplatinum efficacy is limited by severe dose-dependent toxicities, including nephrotoxicity and myelosuppression (4-6). Therefore, potential strategies that enhance cisplatinum efficacy while minimizing its required dose are of considerable clinical importance.
Methionine addiction is a fundamental and general hallmark of cancer, termed the Hoffman effect (7-22). Methionine restriction inhibits tumor growth and enhances sensitivity to cisplatinum of multiple malignancies, including lung cancer (15-19). Mechanistically, methionine restriction perturbs the abnormal transmethylation metabolism of cancer cells and induces cancer-specific late-S/G2-phase cell-cycle arrest, thereby potentiating the effects of DNA-damaging agents such as cisplatinum (15-20).
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that methionine restriction, including enzymatic depletion using recombinant methioninase (rMETase), acts synergistically with cisplatinum in osteosarcoma, bladder-cancer, and colon-cancer mouse models, enabling effective dose reduction (15-19). Nevertheless, whether methionine restriction can similarly potentiate cisplatinum efficacy while allowing dose reduction in lung cancer remains unknown.
The present study aimed to investigate whether methionine restriction enhances the efficacy of ultra-low-dose cisplatinum against lung-cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and reagents. The human lung-adenocarcinoma cell line A549 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2. Cisplatinum was obtained from WG Critical Care, LLC (Paramus, NJ, USA).
Production of recombinant methioninase (rMETase). rMETase was produced at AntiCancer Inc (San Diego, CA, USA) by fermentation of recombinant E. coli, containing the Pseudomonas putida methioninase gene. Purification used a 60°C heat-step, polyethylene-glucol precipitation and DEAE Sepharose ion-exchange chomatography, as previously described (23).
Determination of IC50 of rMETase and IC10-50 of cisplatinum on A549 cells. A549 cells were cultured in 96-well plates at 1.0×103 cells/well in 100 μl of DMEM for 24 h. Cells were treated with rMETase (0.0625-8 U/ml) or cisplatinum (0.5-64 μM) for 72 h. After cell culture, 10 μl of the cell-viability reagent WST-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was then added to each well and incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Sunrise, Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Drug-sensitivity curves were generated using Microsoft Excel for Mac 2024 (ver. 16.89.1), GraphPad Prism 10.4.1 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and ImageJ (ver. 1.54g). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of rMETase and values of cisplatinum (from IC10 to IC50) were calculated based on drug-sensitivity curves.
Determination of the synergistic efficacy of the combination of rMETase and decreasing cisplatinum on A549 lung cancer cells. After culturing cells for 24 h in a 96-well plate as described above, cells were divided into the following eight groups and treated for 72 h: 1) untreated control (DMEM); 2) rMETase (IC50); 3) cisplatinum (IC50); 4) rMETase + cisplatinum (each at IC50); 5) rMETase (IC50) + cisplatinum (IC40); 6) rMETase (IC50) + cisplatinum (IC30); 7) rMETase (IC50) + cisplatinum (IC20); and 8) rMETase (IC50) + cisplatinum (IC10). After treatment, cell viability was determined as described above.
Mouse husbandry. In the present study, 5- to 6-week-old athymic nu/nu nude mice, produced by AntiCancer Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), were used. The mice were housed in a barrier facility on a high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA)-filtered rack under standard conditions of 12-hour light/dark cycles. All experiments were conducted according to protocols specifically approved for this study by the AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The procedures adhered to the principles and guidelines for the care and use of animals outlined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Each experiment was performed in accordance with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines version 2.0. To minimize pain for the mice, all experiments were performed under anesthesia. The anesthetic solution contained 20 mg/kg of ketamine, 15.2 mg/kg of xylazine, and 0.48 mg/kg of acepromazine maleate and was administered at a volume of 0.02 ml.
Study design for the determination of the efficacy of the combination of low-dose cisplatinum and rMETase on A549 lung cancer growing subcutaneously in nude mice. Cultured A549 cells (1.0×106 cells) were suspended in 100 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected subcutaneously into the right flank of nude mice. Two weeks after injection, 20 mice with A549 subcutaneous tumors grown to 50-100 mm3 were selected and randomly assigned to four treatment groups (five mice per group) for a two-week treatment using a methionine-restricted (MR) diet (TD.90262; Inotiv, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, USA) or a normal diet (Inotiv): 1) untreated group (normal diet); 2) standard-dose cisplatinum [6 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection weekly] and a normal diet; 3) MR diet + low-dose cisplatinum (3 mg/kg i.p. weekly); 4) MR diet (Figure 1). Measurements of the tumor’s long and short axes using calipers and body-weight measurements were made twice a week. Tumor volume was calculated from measured tumor size using the following formula: tumor volume (mm3)=long axis (mm)×short axis (mm)×short axis (mm)×1/2.
Drug sensitivity curves of (A) recombinant methioninase (rMETase) and (B) cisplatinum (CDDP) on A549 lung-cancer cells in vitro. Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences between groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. All statistical analyses were conducted using EZR (Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Japan). A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. All in vitro experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated independently twice. In vivo experiments had n=5.
Results
Efficacy of the IC10-50 of cisplatinum combined with the IC50 of rMETase on A549 lung cancer cells in vitro. Drug sensitivity curves were generated for rMETase and cisplatinum in A549 cells, and the inhibitory concentrations were calculated. For A549 lung cancer cells, the IC50 value for rMETase was 0.64 U/ml. For cisplatinum the IC10 was 0.16 μM; IC20 was 0.38 μM; IC30 was 0.67 μM; IC40 was 1.06 μM; and IC50 was 1.61 μM (Figure 1). The combination of rMETase at its IC50 concentration with cisplatinum at concentrations between IC10 and IC50 produced a synergistic decrease in cell viability compared to treatment with rMETase alone or cisplatinum alone at their IC50 (Figure 2).
Treatment of A549 lung-cancer cells with recombinant methioninase (rMETase) and cisplatinum at differenct concentration. The combination of rMETase and ultra-low concentrations of cisplatinum was highly effective against A549 cells. (*p-value <0.05). CDDP: Cisplatinum. Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Efficacy of low-dose cisplatinum combined with rMETase on subcutaneous A549 tumors in nude mice. Subcutaneous A549 tumors in nude mice were eradicated by low-dose cisplatinum combined with an MR diet (Please see Figure 3 for schema and Figure 4 for results). The tumor volume in the high-dose-cisplatinum-alone-treated mice decreased more than tumors in mice on the MR diet alone, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 4). Neither treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to the untreated normal-diet group (Figure 4). Body weight in the control and MR diet groups increased steadily during treatment, with a greater increase observed in the control group than in the MR diet group (Figure 5). Both the standard-dose cisplatinum and low-dose-cisplatinum + MR-diet groups had a decrease in body weight immediately after cisplatinum administration, followed by recovery. At the final measurement, body weight in the low-dose cisplatinum + MR diet group was nearly identical to that in the MR diet group, whereas the standard-dose cisplatinum group had the greatest body weight loss, although the difference was not statistically significant. Only the standard-dose-cisplatinum group showed a final body weight lower than the pre-treatment weight (Figure 6).
Treatment of A549 tumors in nude mice with rMETase and low- and high-cisplatinum doses. Group 1 (untreated control): vehicle [PBS, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, weekly] with a normal diet. Group 2 (CDDP): standard-dose cisplatinum (6 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) with a normal diet. Group 3 (Low-CDDP + MR): low-dose CDDP (3 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) combined with a methionine-restricted (MR) diet. Group 4 (MR): MR diet only. Tumor volume and body weight were measured twice per week. CDDP: Cisplatinum. MR: Methionine restricted. Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Efficacy of an MR diet alone; high-dose cisplatinum alone; or low-dose cisplatinum plus an MR diet on subcutaneous A549 tumors in nude mice. Control: vehicle phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection weekly] with a normal diet; CDDP: standard-dose cisplatinum (6 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) with a normal diet; Low-CDDP + MR: low-dose cisplatinum (3 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) combined with an MR diet; MR: methionine-restricted diet; CDDP: cisplatinum. (*p-value <0.05). Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Body weight changes of nude mice in after treatment with high-dose cisplatinum; an MR diet; or low-dose cisplatinum plus an MR diet. Control: vehicle phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection weekly] with a normal diet; CDDP: standard-dose cisplatinum (6 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) with a normal diet; Low-CDDP + MR: low-dose cisplatinum (3 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) combined with an MR diet; MR: methionine restricted diet; CDDP: cisplatinum. Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Comparison of body weight in nude mice before and after the treatment period with high-dose cisplatinum; an MR diet plus low-dose cisplatinum or an MR diet. Control: vehicle phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection weekly] with a normal diet; CDDP: standard-dose cisplatinum (6 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) with a normal diet; Low-CDDP + MR: low-dose cisplatinum (3 mg/kg, i.p., weekly) combined with an MR diet. MR: Methionine restricted diet; CDDP: cisplatinum. Please see Materials and Methods for details.
Discussion
The present study is the first to demonstrate that combining methionine restriction with low-dose cisplatinum provides stronger tumor inhibition than standard-dose cisplatinum in both in vitro and in vivo lung-cancer models. Furthermore, in vivo experiments revealed that the combination of a methionine-restricted diet and low-dose cisplatinum caused less body weight loss than standard-dose cisplatinum alone, indicating potentially lower systemic toxicity.
Masaki et al. reported that oral recombinant methioninase (o-rMETase) combined with cisplatinum significantly reduced the effective cisplatinum dose and eliminated cisplatinum-associated toxicity in a patient-derived osteosarcoma nude-mouse model (19). Other studies have reported synergy of rMETase and cisplatinum (15-18).
The present study showed that ultra-low concentrations of cisplatinum, down to the IC10 when combined with rMETase, significantly inhibited A549 lung cancer cells in vitro, an unexpected result. In vivo, low-dose cisplatinum combined with a low-methionine diet eradicated A549 subcutaneous tumors in nude mice.
Methionine addiction, also known as the Hoffman effect, is a fundamental and general hallmark of cancer (7-14). Restricting methionine is known to arrest cancer cells in the S/G2 phase of the cell cycle, which is the same cell-cycle phase targeted by cisplatinum (15, 20). Therefore, the combination of methionine restriction, including rMETase, and cisplatinum has synergistic anti-tumor efficacy in various cancer types.
The absence of substantial weight loss with the combination of low-dose cisplatinum and an MR diet suggests a favorable systemic safety profile and supports the feasibility of dose reduction of cisplatinum when administered in conjunction with methionine restriction. Furthermore, the mechanism of the synergistic efficacy of ultra-low-dose cisplatinum combined with rMETase on cancer cells may be due to extensive chromosomal, nucleolar and nuclear abnormalities in the cancer cells induced by subtoxic concentrations of cisplatinum (24). Further studies on systemic toxicity and organ-specific effects are needed for translation into clinical practice.
Conclusion
The present study provides novel evidence that methionine restriction using rMETase or a low-methionine diet enhances the efficacy of low-dose cisplatinum in lung cancer while maintaining favorable tolerability. The present study suggests ultra-low doses of cisplatinum plus rMETase are effective against lung-cancer cells. This strategy may represent a promising approach to reduce platinum-related toxicity and improve therapeutic outcomes. Further studies are necessary to assess their translational potential in the treatment of lung cancer. rMETase is effective because it targets a fundamental hallmark of cancer (7-14, 20-22, 25-59). rMETase is showing clinical promise (60). Comparison of methionine-based PET imaging with glucose-based PET imaging is showing the Hoffman effect is stronger than the Warburg effect, respectively (61).
Acknowledgements
This article is dedicated to the memory of A.R. Moossa, MD; Professor Philip Miles; Sun Lee, MD; Richard W Erbe, MD; Professor Milton Plesur; Professor Gordon H. Sato; Professor Li Jiaxi; Masaki Kitajima, MD; Joseph R. Bertino, MD; John Mendelsohn, MD; Professor I.J. Fidler; Shigeo Yagi, PhD; J.A.R Mead, PhD. Eugene P. Frenkel, MD, Professor Lev Bergelson; Professor Sheldon Penman; Professor John R. Raper; Professor J.D. Watson and Joseph Leighton, MD. The Robert M. Hoffman Foundation for Cancer Research provided funds for the present study.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
YA and RMH designed the study. QH and SL provided rMETase. YA performed experiments and formal analysis. YA was the major contributor to writing - original draft and RMH revised the manuscript. QH, SL, BMK, JSK, YM, NY, KH, HK, ShM, KI, TH, SeM, HT, and SD critically read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this study.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure
No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.
- Received November 5, 2025.
- Revision received November 24, 2025.
- Accepted November 25, 2025.
- Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).












