Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

Medical Cannabis for Best Supportive Care of Patients Affected by Cancers of the Head and Neck: A Narrative Review

FRANCESCO PERRI, MARIA LUISA MARCIANO, ALESSIA ZOTTA, MONICA PONTONE, ARIANNA PICCIRILLO, MARINA CASALE, PASQUALE DI FILIPPO, MARIA ROSARIA SARNO, ROBERTA D’ ANIELLO, MARCO CASCELLA and PIERA MAIOLINO
In Vivo January 2026, 40 (1) 50-63; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14172
FRANCESCO PERRI
1Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA LUISA MARCIANO
1Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ml.marciano{at}istitutotumori.na.it
ALESSIA ZOTTA
2Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MONICA PONTONE
1Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARIANNA PICCIRILLO
1Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARINA CASALE
3Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli - IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PASQUALE DI FILIPPO
3Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli - IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA ROSARIA SARNO
3Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli - IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTA D’ ANIELLO
3Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli - IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCO CASCELLA
4Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy Unit, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIERA MAIOLINO
3Pharmacy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli - IRCCS “G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cancers of the head and neck, including malignancies of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and salivary glands, are often associated with severe symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Patients commonly experience pain, nausea, cachexia (severe weight loss), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and xerostomia (dry mouth), all of which can be exacerbated by both the disease and its treatments, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Research has demonstrated that medical cannabis can be effective in managing symptoms such as chronic pain, nausea, vomiting, and anxiety, making it a valuable option in cancer care. Its ability to interact with the endocannabinoid system to reduce nociception (pain perception) and inflammation makes it particularly suitable for the complex symptom burden of patients with head and neck cancer. This review explores the role of the endocannabinoid system and medical cannabis in mitigating symptoms and improving patient outcomes, as well as its place within the comprehensive care of patients with cancers of the head and neck.

Keywords:
  • Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
  • cannabidiol
  • supportive care
  • head and neck cancer
  • cannabis
  • review

Introduction

Medical cannabis refers to the use of the cannabis plant or its derivatives for medicinal purposes. It contains a wide array of compounds, but two of the most studied are delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). THC is primarily responsible for cannabis’ psychoactive effects, while CBD is non-psychoactive and has anti-inflammatory, antiemetic, and analgesic properties. The endocannabinoid system, which includes receptors in the brain, immune system, and other parts of the body, plays a crucial role in modulating pain, appetite, and mood. These pathways are commonly dysregulated in patients with cancer.

Cannabis medicinal use dates to ancient times, with both its benefits and toxic effects having been recognized for centuries. Paleobotanical studies suggest that the cannabis plant was present around Central Asia (1, 2) as long as 11,400 years ago, and evidence of its use dates back 10,000 years in Japan. Additionally, ancient texts from China, such as the Shen Nung Pen Ts’ao Ching (circa 4,000 BCE), document its use for treating pain and inflammation (3). In the Roman Empire, Pliny the Elder referenced the medical use of cannabis in his Naturalis Historia (circa AD 23-79), an encyclopaedic work on natural science considered a summation of ancient scientific knowledge (4, 5). Over time, cannabis use became more widespread, with recreational use being described as early as 1857 in an article titled The Hasheesh Eater. Discussions around the legal, ethical, and societal implications of cannabis use have been ongoing for over a century. In recent decades, physician-prescribed cannabis has seen a substantial rise across many U.S. states, being used to treat various medical conditions such as chronic pain and psychiatric disorders (6). The current arising in medical cannabis use, alongside evolving legal landscapes, has brought issues surrounding the safe use of cannabis to greater prominence.

This review explores the role of the endocannabinoid system and medical cannabis in mitigating symptoms and improving patient outcomes, as well as its place within the comprehensive care of patients with cancers of the head and neck.

Phytocannabinoids, Synthetic Cannabinoids, and Endocannabinoids

More than 500 compounds have been reported from C. sativa, of which 125 cannabinoids have been isolated and/or identified as cannabinoids. Cannabinoids are C21 terpeno-phenolic compounds specific to Cannabis. The non-cannabinoids are non-cannabinoid phenols, flavonoids, terpenes, alkaloids and others (7), which contribute to the “entourage effect”. The entourage effect refers to the phenomenon whereby cannabis compounds, when consumed together, produce different effects than the individual components alone. This synergy between phytocannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids may explain the variability of experiences and therapeutic effects that cannabis produces (8).

There are three main classes of cannabinoids including phytocannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, and endocannabinoids. Phytocannabinoids (plant-derived, such as those from cannabis) are compounds unique to the cannabis plant that interact with the human endocannabinoid system. The most well-known are Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), but there are over 100 phytocannabinoids with different properties (Figure 1). CBD was first isolated from marijuana in 1940, and its structure was reported in 1963 (9). However, because CBD is non-psychoactive, it was initially overlooked in favor of THC. The structure of THC, the primary psychoactive compound, was identified by Mechoulam and Gaoni in 1964 (10, 11), sparking research into the effects of cannabinoids on the brain and body. CBD has a different interaction profile with cannabinoid receptors than THC. It is known for its anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, and anticonvulsant effects, which is why it is widely used in treatments for epilepsy and anxiety. Although generally well tolerated, CBD may interact with some medications, such as anticoagulants, increasing the risk of side effects. THC interacts predominantly with the CB1 receptors of the endocannabinoid system, located primarily in the central nervous system (CNS), producing effects such as euphoria, altered sensory perception, and pain relief. Additionally, THC is known for its antiemetic, appetite-stimulating, and muscle-relaxing effects. It also has side effects, such as cognitive changes, anxiety, paranoia. Other minor phytocannabinoids include cannabigerol (CBG), considered the “precursor” to THC and CBD, with antibacterial and analgesic effects; cannabichromene (CBC) with anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties; and tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), which produces effects similar to THC but milder; in some research, it has been studied for its potential to control appetite (Table I).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Synthetic cannabinoids (psychoactive compounds).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Main and secondary phytocannabinoids.

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) include JWH-018, HU-210, HU-331, SR144528, WIN 55,212-2, UR-144, and JWH-133, but more than 140 have been classified in this group. There are four main groups: aminoalkylindoles, classical cannabinoids, non-classical cannabinoids, and fatty acid amides (12). SCBs can cause cell death by apoptosis, and they are associated with more serious adverse effects, and they are more addictive than the phyto-cannabinoids drugs (13) (Figure 1).

Psychotropic effects include increased relaxation, elevated well-being, and social disinhibition. Adverse events are several and may affect the central nervous system, liver, pulmonary system, kidneys, skin, cardiovascular system, muscles, and eyes (14).

Finally, there are the endocannabinoids, which are produced naturally by the human body. The “classical” components of the endogenous cannabinoid system are the endocannabinoids N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (anandamide, AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), along with the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. These receptors are activated by cannabinoid ligands. CB1 receptors are predominantly found in the central nervous system, where they regulate neurotransmitter release, particularly via GABAergic neurons. CB1 receptors are abundant in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, hippocampus, and cerebellum, and they also exist on plasma membranes, endosomes, and mitochondria, where they help regulate neuronal energy metabolism. Astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and their precursors also express CB1 receptors, influencing cognitive functions like working memory (15, 16). Of significant clinical relevance, CB1 receptors in peripheral tissues–including the heart, lungs, liver, and reproductive organs–play key roles in gastrointestinal motility, energy balance, reproduction, pain regulation, and muscle metabolism. Additionally, CB1 and CB2 receptors are expressed in human immune tissues and leukocyte subpopulations (17, 18). CB2 receptors, are mainly found in immune regulatory tissues such as B cells and natural killer cells. These receptors play a crucial role in modulating inflammatory responses and are being explored as potential therapeutic targets, as CB2 agonists can produce pain-relieving effects without the psychoactive side effects associated with CB1 activation. Unlike CB1, CB2 also helps reduce the production of reactive oxygen species (19). In addition to CB1 and CB2, endocannabinoids interact with other receptors and channels, including transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, GPCRs like GPR55, GPR18, and GPR119, as well as GABA-A receptors, glycine receptors, adenosine receptor, dopamine receptor, and nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) (20, 21) (Figure 2). Some studies suggest that the activation of CB1 receptors may translate into an antitumor activity as it causes: cell cycle arrest, cell growth inhibition, metastasis inhibition and apoptosis (22).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cannabinoid receptors.

We can also recognize other compounds, like Terpenes, which are aromatic compounds found in many plants, including cannabis. Chemically, terpenes are compounds derived from the isoprene unit (C5H8) and can be classified into different categories based on the number of these units in their structure. Although not psychoactive, terpenes influence the effectiveness of cannabinoids through the entourage effect, a synergy that amplifies their overall effects. The main terpene is Myrcene, one of the most common terpenes in cannabis. It has an earthy, musky, clove-like aroma and is thought to contribute to the sedative effects of cannabis. It has a sedative and analgesic effect. Limonene is known for its citrus aroma and potential antidepressant and anxiolytic effects. Limonene has been observed to improve mood and reduce stress. Linalool, also found in lavender, is associated with relaxing and anti-inflammatory properties. It is often used in aromatherapy to reduce anxiety and improve sleep quality. Pinene has a pine-like aroma and is known for its anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator properties. It may also help counteract the memory loss effects associated with THC. Flavonoids are a class of antioxidant compounds found in many plants, including cannabis. From a chemical point of view, flavonoids have a basic structure of 15 carbon atoms (C6-C3-C6), characterized by two aromatic rings (A and B) linked by a three-carbon chain that often forms an oxygenated ring (C). Approximately 20 flavonoids have been identified in cannabis, some of which are unique to this plant. Flavonoids are categorized into six primary subclasses based on their chemical structure: Flavonols, found in onions and apples, such as quercetin and Kaempferol; Flavones, present in parsley and celery, such as Apigenin, Luteolin; Flavanones, mainly from citrus fruits, such as Naringenin, Hesperidin; Isoflavones, found in soy and legumes, such as Genistein, Daidzein; Flavanols (Catechins), abundant in green tea and chocolate, such as Catechin, epigallocatechin gallate; and Anthocyanins, responsible for blue, red, and purple colors in fruits and vegetables, such as Cyanidin. This classification allows us to understand the functional diversity of flavonoids and the various biological activities they can exhibit, like antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities (23). Cannaflavins (A, B, C) are flavonoids unique to cannabis with potent anti-inflammatory properties. Cannaflavin A has been studied for its therapeutic potential against chronic inflammation (24-28). Table II lists the terpenes and flavonoids in cannabis and their effects.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Terpenes and flavonoids in cannabis.

Bioavailability of Cannabis

Bioavailability is the fraction (%) of the administered drug which reaches the bloodstream. Bioavailability of cannabis plays a crucial role in therapeutic outcome, as the onset times, duration and intensity of the pharmacological effect vary according to the route of administration (29).

Healthcare providers and patients should consider these factors when selecting the appropriate route of administration of cannabis for medical purposes. The possible routes of administration for medical cannabis include the following:

  • i) Inhalation (smoking and vaporization).

    When cannabis is smoked, THC and CBD are rapidly absorbed through the lungs. The bioavailability of THC via smoking ranges from 10% to 35%, depending on factors such as how deeply and how long the smoke is inhaled. Peak plasma levels are generally reached within 6 to 10 min after inhalation. Vaporizing cannabis involves heating the plant material or extract to a temperature that releases cannabinoids without combustion. This method provides a bioavailability of approximately 30% to 60%, with peak effects occurring within minutes (30).

  • ii) Oral ingestion.

    This route is characterized by a delayed onset of effects (1 to 2 hours post-ingestion) due to the digestive process and first-pass metabolism in the liver, a phenomenon that occurs whenever a drug is administered orally and reduces its bioavailability. The bioavailability of orally ingested THC is approximately 4% to 12%, while CBD’s oral bioavailability is approximately 6%. In addition, other factors, such as gastric contents and individual metabolism, can influence absorption (31).

  • iii) Sublingual and oromucosal administration.

    The Administration of cannabis sublingually (under the tongue) or buccally (inside the cheek) offers a faster onset of effects, typically within 15 to 45 min, and a bioavailability ranging from 12% to 35% for CBD (32).

  • iv) Rectal administration.

    Administration of cannabis through the rectal route (often in the form of suppositories) allows higher bioavailability than oral ingestion due to reduced first-pass metabolism. THC-hemisuccinate suppositories have demonstrated bioavailability of approximately 13.5% in animal studies (31).

  • v) Transdermal application.

    Transdermal patches administer cannabinoids through the skin directly into the bloodstream, providing a consistent release over time. However, the bioavailability of transdermally applied cannabinoids is generally low as absorption may be hindered and discontinuous (33).

  • vi) Intranasal administration.

    This method delivers cannabinoids directly into the nasal cavity using a spray, allowing for rapid absorption through the mucous membranes. The bioavailability of cannabinoids administered intranasally varies based on the specific compound and formulation used (34).

Clinical Use in Head and Neck Cancers

Head and neck cancers are characterized by a distinct set of symptoms that vary depending on the location and stage of the disease. Moreover, these cancers often involve aggressive therapies such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which can cause significant side effects that impair quality of life. Cannabinoids are especially beneficial in the management of head and neck cancers due to the complex symptom burden and the limitations of conventional treatments. Potential use of cannabinoids includes pain management, nausea and vomiting, cachexia and anorexia, anxiety and depression, dysphagia, and xerostomia.

  • i) Pain management.

    Cancer-related pain, including mucositis (painful inflammation of the mucous membranes), can be debilitating. Post-surgical pain and pain from metastasis to the bones or nerves add to the burden (35). Chronic pain is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients with head and neck cancer. Traditional analgesics, including opioids, often fail to provide adequate relief or come with a significant burden of side effects such as sedation and constipation. Medical cannabis, particularly THC, has been shown to reduce cancer pain by acting on the cannabinoid receptors (CB1) in the brain and spinal cord, modulating pain perception. In combination with conventional pain medications, cannabis has a synergistic effect, potentially reducing the required dose of opioids and mitigating the risk of opioid-related adverse effects (36, 37). Furthermore, an interesting feature of cannabidiol is the negative allosteric modulation of the μ opioid receptor (MOR), which is involved in the control of opioid drug abuse and relapse (38).

    Table III presents the types of pain commonly associated with head and neck cancer and how cannabis may help manage each type.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table III.

    This table highlights how cannabis may address different pain types commonly found in head and neck cancer patients.

  • ii) Nausea and vomiting.

    The side effects of chemotherapy or radiation severely impact a patient’s ability to maintain nutrition and hydration. One of the best-established uses of medical cannabis is its antiemetic properties. Both THC and CBD have been shown to reduce nausea and vomiting. In particular, THC works by binding to CB1 receptors in the brain and gut areas involved in the regulation of nausea and vomiting. CBD is not as effective on nausea as THC; it has been shown to help by reducing anxiety, which can sometimes worsen nausea, and by modulating the gastrointestinal system (6).

    Cannabis can help patients with head and neck cancer to tolerate chemotherapy better, maintain their nutritional status, and prevent dehydration (39).

  • iii) Cachexia and anorexia.

    Many patients experience weight loss due to a combination of reduced appetite, swallowing difficulties, and increased metabolic demands of the tumor. The anorectic effects of head and neck cancers, compounded by treatment side effects, can lead to profound weight loss and cachexia, which negatively affects patient survival and quality of life (40). Medical cannabis, particularly formulations high in THC, has appetite-stimulating properties, commonly referred to as “the munchies”. Specifically, THC activates the CB1 receptors in the brain, which are involved in regulating appetite and food intake, and CBD (although not directly stimulating appetite like THC) has anti-inflammatory and anti-anxiety properties, which may be beneficial in reducing symptoms that exacerbate cachexia and anorexia, such as pain and psychological distress. Therefore, by improving food intake, medical cannabis helps to counteract weight loss and promote energy balance in patients with cancer (41).

  • iv) Anxiety and depression.

    The psychological impact of a head and neck cancer diagnosis, disfigurement, and treatment side effects contribute to anxiety and depression. Anxiety and depression are common among patients with cancer, particularly those with head and neck cancers due to the visible and functional impairments caused by the disease and its treatment. Furthermore, some studies suggest that cannabis use can improve sleep quality, another critical factor in the holistic management of patients with cancer.

    Cannabis may help with anxiety and depression in head and neck cancer through the following mechanisms:

    Anxiolytic effects. Studies suggest that cannabis, particularly CBD, may help reduce anxiety in some patients. It is thought to interact with the brain’s endocannabinoid system, which regulates mood and stress responses (42).

    Antidepressant effects. Some studies suggest that cannabis (especially CBD) may have mild antidepressant-like effects by modulating serotonin levels, a key neurotransmitter involved in mood regulation. By enhancing mood and reducing stress, it can improve patients’ emotional well-being.

    Pain management. Chronic pain is common in patients with head and neck cancer, and both THC and CBD are well-known for their pain-relieving properties. By reducing pain, cannabis may indirectly help alleviate symptoms of anxiety and depression that stem from physical discomfort (43).

    Sleep improvement. Both THC and CBD have shown potential in improving sleep quality. Since poor sleep is a common issue among people with cancer and those suffering from anxiety or depression, better sleep could positively affect their mental health. However, it is important to note that THC’s effects on sleep are dose-dependent. While low doses may reduce sleep onset latency and increase slow-wave sleep, high doses can cause sleep disturbances (44).

  • v) Dysphagia and xerostomia.

    Radiation therapy to the head and neck often results in dry mouth and difficulty swallowing, further impairing the patient’s ability to eat and drink. Dry mouth and difficulty swallowing are particularly challenging for patients with head and neck cancer, especially those receiving radiation therapy (45). While direct evidence on cannabis’s role in alleviating xerostomia is limited, cannabinoids’ ability to reduce inflammation and modulate pain may offer indirect benefits for patients struggling with oral discomfort and mucositis. Particularly THC and CBD, may help alleviate symptoms in certain cases.

    Muscle relaxation. THC has been shown to relax muscles, which could help ease the difficulty in swallowing by reducing spasms or tightening of the throat.

    Pain management. Dysphagia often comes with pain, especially when caused by head and neck cancer or its treatments. THC is known for its analgesic (pain-relieving) effects, which may help in reducing discomfort associated with swallowing. While the direct impact of cannabis on dysphagia is not yet fully studied, research into cannabinoids for muscle relaxation and pain control in related conditions (such as esophageal cancer) is promising (46). Regarding Xerostomia, some anecdotal evidence suggests that cannabis may help stimulate salivary flow, though more research is needed in this area (47).

    Saliva stimulation. THC and CBD may stimulate the endocannabinoid receptors involved in the regulation of saliva production. Some studies suggest that cannabinoids might enhance salivation, which could counteract the effects of xerostomia (47).

    Pain relief and comfort. For those with cancer treatments affecting the salivary glands, the analgesic effects of THC can help alleviate dry mouth’s associated discomfort, improving the overall quality of life. However, while cannabinoids may provide relief, they may also have a paradoxical effect on some individuals by causing dry mouth owing to the way THC interacts with the body. This necessitates further studies to understand the full scope of cannabis’ impact on xerostomia (47).

Safety Considerations and Challenges

The use of medical cannabis as part of supportive care in patients with head and neck cancer has been gaining attention due to its potential benefits in managing symptoms such as pain, nausea, anxiety, and loss of appetite, which are common in these patients. Head and neck cancers often involve treatments like surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which can result in significant side effects, making symptom control a key component of patient care.

Studies have shown that cannabis, particularly its active components THC and CBD, may help alleviate cancer symptoms. For instance, medical cannabis has been used effectively to manage pain and reduce the use of opioids, a common pain management approach with many side effects. A study noted that some patients with cancer were able to significantly reduce their opioid intake by using cannabis, thus minimizing opioid-related complications like constipation and respiratory depression.

While medical cannabis has shown promise, its use in cancer care comes with safety considerations. Common side effects of THC include drowsiness, euphoria, xerostomia and impaired cognitive function, which may be undesirable for some patients. CBD, which is generally well-tolerated, can have side effects such as fatigue, diarrhea, and changes in appetite, but it is less likely to cause the psychoactive effects of THC. Dose titration is essential to balance therapeutic benefits with minimal side effects. Long-term use of cannabis, particularly in high doses, has been associated with tolerance and dependency, although these risks are considered lower than those associated with opioids. Another aspect to consider concerns drug interactions, especially for patients who are on multiple medications (e.g., opioids, antidepressants, or chemotherapy agents). Cannabis can interact with enzymes in the liver, potentially altering the metabolism of other drugs.

Another challenge is the variability in the quality and concentration of cannabis products, especially in regions where cannabis is not standardized or well-regulated. The method of administration also matters—smoking cannabis, for example, may exacerbate respiratory symptoms, particularly in patients undergoing radiation therapy. Inhalation via vaporization or oral administration (oils, capsules) may offer safer alternatives. Further clinical trials are necessary to establish standardized dosing guidelines for cannabis use in patients with head and neck cancer. The main types of approved cannabinoids are summarized in Table IV. In Italy, cannabis extracts in MCT oil containing THC and/or CBD are regulated for use in compounded preparations (magistral preparations) with clearly defined therapeutic indications and legal requirements, as outlined in AIFA Determinations DD 194/2023 and DD 337/2024 (Table V). Ongoing clinical trials investigating the role of cannabinoids in cancer care are presented in Table VI.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Overview of the main types of approved cannabinoids (also those not approved and under research), their indications, approval authorities, and the countries where they are legally available for medical treatments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Cannabis extracts in MCT oil – Magistral use in Italy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

These ongoing clinical trials explore the use of cannabinoids in cancer care, focusing on symptom management, chemotherapy side effects, and quality of life improvements for oncology patients.

Conclusion

The safety profile of cannabis widely varies, and its use should be carefully monitored by healthcare providers. Cannabis should only be used under medical supervision, particularly in patients with cancer, such as head and neck cancer, who are undergoing complex treatments and suffer from pain at a rate of 80%. The legal status of medical cannabis varies widely by country and state. In regions where medical cannabis is legal, it is typically prescribed by a healthcare provider with experience in managing cancer-related symptoms. Medical cannabis is a very interesting and emerging tool in the supportive care of patients with head and neck cancers, offering relief from pain, nausea, loss of appetite, and psychological distress. It complements existing therapies and provides an alternative or adjunct to conventional symptom management strategies, particularly for patients who do not tolerate traditional medications well. However, its use must be carefully managed, considering potential side effects, legal issues, and the need for more robust clinical evidence. As medical cannabis becomes more accepted in oncologic practice, future research should focus on its long-term efficacy, safety, and optimal dosing regimens. Medical professionals should be educated about its benefits and risks to provide informed guidance to patients, making medical cannabis a thoughtful and personalized approach to best supportive care in head and neck cancer management.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank the INT IRCCS Foundation G Pascale and the Ministry of Health for providing the funds (coming from Current Research) for the publication of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Try to Research and to Improve the Anticancer Links (TRIAL) Group.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization: Perri F, Maiolino P, Cascella M; data curation and formal analysis: Casale M, Sarno MR, Pontone M, Di Filippo P; writing-original draft: Marciano ML, Zotta A, Piccirillo A; writing-review and editing: Cascella M, D’Aniello R; approval to submit: Perri F, Marciano ML, Zotta A, Pontone M, Piccirillo A, Casale M, Di Filippo P, Sarno MR, D’ Aniello R, Cascella M and Maiolino P.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Funding

    This research received no external funding.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received May 28, 2025.
  • Revision received September 8, 2025.
  • Accepted October 6, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tarasov P,
    2. Bezrukova E,
    3. Karabanov E,
    4. Nakagawa T,
    5. Wagner M,
    6. Kulagina N,
    7. Letunova P,
    8. Abzaeva A,
    9. Granoszewski W,
    10. Riedel F
    : Vegetation and climate dynamics during the Holocene and Eemian interglacials derived from Lake Baikal pollen records. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 252(3-4): 440-457, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.05.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Clarke RC,
    2. Merlin MD
    : Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Berkeley, CA, USA, University of California Press, 2013.
  3. ↵
    1. Jiang HE,
    2. Li X,
    3. Zhao YX,
    4. Ferguson DK,
    5. Hueber F,
    6. Bera S,
    7. Wang YF,
    8. Zhao LC,
    9. Liu CJ,
    10. Li CS
    : A new insight into Cannabis sativa (Cannabaceae) utilization from 2500-year-old Yanghai Tombs, Xinjiang, China. J Ethnopharmacol 108(3): 414-422, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Pliny the Elder [Pline l’Ancien]
    . Histoire Naturelle. Books XIX & XX. Paris, France, Les Belles Lettres, 1965.
  5. ↵
    1. Dunn D
    : The shadow of Vesuvius. A life of Pliny. New York, NY, USA, Norton & Company, 2019.
  6. ↵
    1. Whiting PF,
    2. Wolff RF,
    3. Deshpande S,
    4. Di Nisio M,
    5. Duffy S,
    6. Hernandez AV,
    7. Keurentjes JC,
    8. Lang S,
    9. Misso K,
    10. Ryder S,
    11. Schmidlkofer S,
    12. Westwood M,
    13. Kleijnen J
    : Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 313(24): 2456, 2015. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.6358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Radwan MM,
    2. Chandra S,
    3. Gul S,
    4. ElSohly MA
    : Cannabinoids, phenolics, terpenes and alkaloids of cannabis. Molecules 26(9): 2774, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092774
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Silva Sofrás FM,
    2. Desimone MF
    : Entourage effect and analytical chemistry: chromatography as a tool in the analysis of the secondary metabolism of Cannabis sativa L. Curr Med Chem 29(6): 394-406, 2023. DOI: 10.2174/1381612829666221103093542
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Burstein S
    : Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: a review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorg Med Chem 23(7): 1377-1385, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.01.059
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Mechoulam R,
    2. Gaoni Y
    : A total synthesis of DL-Delta-1-tetrahydrocannabinol, the active constituent of hashish. J Am Chem Soc 87(14): 3273-3275, 1965. DOI: 10.1021/ja01092a065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pertwee RG
    : Cannabinoid pharmacology: the first 66 years. Br J Pharmacol 147 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S163-S171, 2006. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706406
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Śledziński P,
    2. Nowak-Terpiłowska A,
    3. Zeyland J
    : Cannabinoids in medicine: cancer, immunity, and microbial diseases. Int J Mol Sci 22(1): 263, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Volkow ND,
    2. Swanson JM,
    3. Evins AE,
    4. DeLisi LE,
    5. Meier MH,
    6. Gonzalez R,
    7. Bloomfield MA,
    8. Curran HV,
    9. Baler R
    : Effects of cannabis use on human behavior, including cognition, motivation, and psychosis: a review. JAMA Psychiatry 73(3): 292, 2016. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3278
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Roque-Bravo R,
    2. Silva RS,
    3. Malheiro RF,
    4. Carmo H,
    5. Carvalho F,
    6. da Silva DD,
    7. Silva JP
    : Synthetic cannabinoids: a pharmacological and toxicological overview. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 63(1): 187-209, 2023. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031122-113758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Schurman LD,
    2. Lu D,
    3. Kendall DA,
    4. Howlett AC,
    5. Lichtman AH
    : Molecular mechanism and cannabinoid pharmacology. Handb Exp Pharmacol 258: 323-353, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/164_2019_298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lu HC,
    2. Mackie K
    : An introduction to the endogenous cannabinoid system. Biol Psychiatry 79(7): 516-525, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Donvito G,
    2. Nass SR,
    3. Wilkerson JL,
    4. Curry ZA,
    5. Schurman LD,
    6. Kinsey SG,
    7. Lichtman AH
    : The endogenous cannabinoid system: a budding source of targets for treating inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Neuropsychopharmacology 43(1): 52-79, 2018. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Bryant LM,
    2. Daniels KE,
    3. Cognetti DM,
    4. Tassone P,
    5. Luginbuhl AJ,
    6. Curry JM
    : Therapeutic cannabis and endocannabinoid signaling system modulator use in otolaryngology patients. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 3(3): 169-177, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Pacher P,
    2. Mechoulam R
    : Is lipid signaling through cannabinoid 2 receptors part of a protective system? Prog Lipid Res 50(2): 193-211, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Maccarrone M,
    2. Bab I,
    3. Bíró T,
    4. Cabral GA,
    5. Dey SK,
    6. Di Marzo V,
    7. Konje JC,
    8. Kunos G,
    9. Mechoulam R,
    10. Pacher P,
    11. Sharkey KA,
    12. Zimmer A
    : Endocannabinoid signaling at the periphery: 50 years after THC. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36(5): 277-296, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Oláh A,
    2. Szekanecz Z,
    3. Bíró T
    : Targeting cannabinoid signaling in the immune system: “High”-ly exciting questions, possibilities, and challenges. Front Immunol 8: 1487, 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Garmpis N,
    2. Damaskos C,
    3. Dimitroulis D,
    4. Garmpi A,
    5. Diamantis E,
    6. Sarantis P,
    7. Georgakopoulou VE,
    8. Patsouras A,
    9. Prevezanos D,
    10. Syllaios A,
    11. Kyriakos G,
    12. Koustas E,
    13. Despotidis M,
    14. Vallilas C,
    15. Papalexis P,
    16. Antoniou EA,
    17. Kontzoglou K,
    18. Kouraklis G
    : Targeting the endocannabinoid system: from the need for new therapies to the development of a promising strategy. What about pancreatic cancer? In Vivo 36(2): 543-555, 2022. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12736
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Manach C,
    2. Scalbert A,
    3. Morand C,
    4. Rémésy C,
    5. Jiménez L
    : Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr 79(5): 727-747, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Russo EB
    : Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol 163(7): 1344-1364, 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mechoulam R,
    2. Parker LA
    : The endocannabinoid system and the brain. Annu Rev Psychol 64(1): 21-47, 2013. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hillig KW
    : Genetic evidence for speciation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Genet Resour Crop Evol 52(2): 161-180, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-003-4452-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Pertwee RG
    : The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br J Pharmacol 153(2): 199-215, 2008. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Elsohly MA,
    2. Slade D
    : Chemical constituents of marijuana: The complex mixture of natural cannabinoids. Life Sci 78(5): 539-548, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Chayasirisobhon S
    : Mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics of cannabis. Perm J 25: 1-3, 2020. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/19.200
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Zgair A,
    2. Lee JB,
    3. Wong JCM,
    4. Taha DA,
    5. Aram J,
    6. Di Virgilio D,
    7. McArthur JW,
    8. Cheng YK,
    9. Hennig IM,
    10. Barrett DA,
    11. Fischer PM,
    12. Constantinescu CS,
    13. Gershkovich P
    : Oral administration of cannabis with lipids leads to high levels of cannabinoids in the intestinal lymphatic system and prominent immunomodulation. Sci Rep 7(1): 14542, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15026-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Brenneisen R,
    2. Egli A,
    3. ElSohly MA,
    4. Henn V,
    5. Spiess Y
    : The effect of orally and rectally administered delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on spasticity: a pilot study with 2 patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 34: 446-452, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hosseini A,
    2. McLachlan AJ,
    3. Lickliter JD
    : A phase I trial of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol administered as single-dose oil solution and single and multiple doses of a sublingual wafer in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 87(4): 2070-2077, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Valiveti S,
    2. Hammell DC,
    3. Earles D,
    4. Stinchcomb AL
    : In vitro/in vivo correlation studies for transdermal Δ8-THC development. J Pharm Sci 93(5): 1154-1164, 2004. DOI: 10.1002/jps.20036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Al-Ghananeem AM,
    2. Malkawi AH,
    3. Crooks PA
    : Bioavailability of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol following intranasal administration of a mucoadhesive gel spray delivery system in conscious rabbits. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 37(3): 329-334, 2011. DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2010.513009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Greco MT,
    2. Roberto A,
    3. Corli O,
    4. Deandrea S,
    5. Bandieri E,
    6. Cavuto S,
    7. Apolone G
    : Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(36): 4149-4154, 2014. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0383
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Denaro N,
    2. Merlano MC,
    3. Russi EG
    : Dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: pretreatment evaluation, predictive factors, and assessment during radio-chemotherapy, recommendations. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 6(3): 117-126, 2013. DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2013.6.3.117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Bimonte S,
    2. Nocerino D,
    3. Schiavo D,
    4. Crisci M,
    5. Cascella M,
    6. Cuomo A
    : Cannabinoids for cancer-related pain management: an update on therapeutic applications and future perspectives. Anticancer Res 44(3): 895-900, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16883
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Caputo MP,
    2. Rodriguez CS,
    3. Padhya TA,
    4. Mifsud MJ
    : Medical cannabis as adjunctive therapy for head and neck cancer patients. Cureus 13(9): e18396, 2021. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Andre CM,
    2. Hausman JF,
    3. Guerriero G
    : Cannabis sativa: the plant of the thousand and one molecules. Front Plant Sci 7: 19, 2016. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Porter SR,
    2. Ukwas A
    : Cachexia and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A scoping review. Oral Dis 30(4): 1746-1755, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/odi.14749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Reuter SE,
    2. Martin JH
    : Pharmacokinetics of cannabis in cancer cachexia-anorexia syndrome. Clin Pharmacokinet 55(7): 807-812, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0363-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Graczyk M,
    2. Łukowicz M,
    3. Dzierzanowski T
    : Prospects for the use of cannabinoids in psychiatric disorders. Front Psychiatry 12: 620073, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Cartabellotta A,
    2. Iacono C
    : Uso terapeutico della cannabis nel dolore cronico: Efficacia ed effetti avversi. Evidence 9(9): e1000173, 2017. DOI: 10.4470/E1000173
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Martin EL,
    2. Strickland JC,
    3. Schlienz NJ,
    4. Munson J,
    5. Jackson H,
    6. Bonn-Miller MO,
    7. Vandrey R
    : Antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of medicinal cannabis use in an observational trial. Front Psychiatry 12: 729800, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.729800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Govender R,
    2. Gilbody N,
    3. Simson G,
    4. Haag R,
    5. Robertson C,
    6. Stuart E
    : Post-radiotherapy dysphagia in head and neck cancer: current management by speech-language pathologists. Curr Treat Options Oncol 25(6): 703-718, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01198-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Siegfried Z,
    2. Meiri D
    : Cannabinoid use for neurological and muscular conditions. Eur J Neurol, 2015.
  44. ↵
    1. Elliott DA,
    2. Nabavizadeh N,
    3. Romer JL,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Holland JM
    : Medical marijuana use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24(8): 3517-3524, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3180-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 40 (1)
In Vivo
Vol. 40, Issue 1
January-February 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Medical Cannabis for Best Supportive Care of Patients Affected by Cancers of the Head and Neck: A Narrative Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Medical Cannabis for Best Supportive Care of Patients Affected by Cancers of the Head and Neck: A Narrative Review
FRANCESCO PERRI, MARIA LUISA MARCIANO, ALESSIA ZOTTA, MONICA PONTONE, ARIANNA PICCIRILLO, MARINA CASALE, PASQUALE DI FILIPPO, MARIA ROSARIA SARNO, ROBERTA D’ ANIELLO, MARCO CASCELLA, PIERA MAIOLINO
In Vivo Jan 2026, 40 (1) 50-63; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14172

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Medical Cannabis for Best Supportive Care of Patients Affected by Cancers of the Head and Neck: A Narrative Review
FRANCESCO PERRI, MARIA LUISA MARCIANO, ALESSIA ZOTTA, MONICA PONTONE, ARIANNA PICCIRILLO, MARINA CASALE, PASQUALE DI FILIPPO, MARIA ROSARIA SARNO, ROBERTA D’ ANIELLO, MARCO CASCELLA, PIERA MAIOLINO
In Vivo Jan 2026, 40 (1) 50-63; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14172
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Phytocannabinoids, Synthetic Cannabinoids, and Endocannabinoids
    • Bioavailability of Cannabis
    • Clinical Use in Head and Neck Cancers
    • Safety Considerations and Challenges
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Granulocytes and their Involvement in the Foreign Body Response to Biomaterials and Tissue Repair
  • Calcifying Aponeurotic Fibroma: A Review and Update
Show more Review

Keywords

  • Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
  • Cannabidiol
  • supportive care
  • head and neck cancer
  • cannabis
  • review
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire