Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

Calcifying Aponeurotic Fibroma: A Review and Update

JUN NISHIO, YUKI SHINOHARA, MIKIRO KOGA, KAORI KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI and TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo January 2026, 40 (1) 30-38; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14170
JUN NISHIO
1Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nishio{at}fdcnet.ac.jp
YUKI SHINOHARA
1Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKIRO KOGA
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAORI KOGA
3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKIKO AOKI
3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAMASA KOGA
4Koga Orthopaedic Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma (CAF) is a rare benign but locally aggressive mesenchymal tumor that primarily occurs in the distal extremities of children and adolescents. It typically presents as a slow-growing, painless, poorly circumscribed mass, often of prolonged duration. Radiographs may reveal a soft-tissue mass with a variable extent of fine stippled calcifications. On magnetic resonance imaging, CAF usually appears as an ill-defined subcutaneous mass with low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and heterogenous high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Areas of calcification exhibit low signal intensity on all pulse sequences. Intense heterogeneous enhancement is seen after intravenous contrast administration. Histologically, CAF is characterized by a fibromatosis-like component and a nodular calcified component. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells are variably positive for smooth muscle actin, muscle-specific actin and CD99 but negative for desmin and β-catenin. Moreover, frequent expression of ETS transcription factor ERG (ERG) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been demonstrated. Recent molecular studies have identified the presence of a recurrent fibronectin 1 (FN1)-EGF gene fusion. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for CAF, but local recurrence is common due to its infiltrative nature. This review provides an updated overview of the clinical, radiological, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic features of CAF and discusses the differential diagnosis of this uncommon condition.

Keywords:
  • Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma
  • calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm
  • lipofibromatosis
  • fibronectin 1
  • epidermal growth factor
  • fusion gene
  • review

Introduction

Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma (CAF), formerly known as juvenile aponeurotic fibroma, is a rare benign but locally aggressive mesenchymal tumor first described by Keasbey in 1953 (1). It belongs to the fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor group according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue tumors (2). The etiology of this peculiar tumor is unknown.

CAF can show clinical, radiological and histological overlaps with a variety of benign and aggressive mesenchymal tumors such as inclusion body fibromatosis (IBF), lipofibromatosis (LPF), soft tissue chondroma (STC), calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm (CCMN) and bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP). The diagnosis of CAF can often be challenging on the basis of imaging alone. Advances in knowledge of the histological and molecular features of CAF are leading to more accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

This review provides valuable insights into the clinical, radiological, histopathological and molecular genetic features of CAF. In addition, we will discuss the differential diagnosis of this unusual lesion.

Clinical Features

CAF occurs most commonly in children and adolescents with a peak incidence between the ages of 5 and 15 years (2). Several cases have been encountered in adults (3-5). There is a male predominance. CAF typically presents as a slow-growing, painless, poorly circumscribed, subcutaneous mass in the distal extremities, particularly the palm of the hand and the sole of the foot. It may also occur in less common sites such as the trunk and proximal extremities (6). The lesion has a predilection for the deep volar fascia, tendons and aponeuroses and is usually less than 3 cm in size (7). Complete surgical excision with preservation of function is the treatment of choice for CAF. Local recurrence occurs in up to 53% of cases (6, 7) and is usually seen within 3 years. The risk of local recurrence appears to be higher in children under 5 years of age (7). In general, simple re-excision of local recurrence rather than more aggressive resection is preferred to maintain function. Malignant transformation has been described in at least one case (8), but it is exceptionally rare.

Radiological Features

Radiographs usually reveal a non-specific soft-tissue mass with or without fine stippled calcifications. Although extrinsic pressure erosion/scalloping of the adjacent bone has been reported in a few cases (9-11), the underlying bone is typically normal. Ultrasonography (US) may show a well-defined or ill-defined, hypoechoic or mixed echoic mass with no significant vascularity (4, 11-13). Microlithiasis can be seen on US (13). Computed tomography (CT) is optimal for displaying the calcified areas of the lesion, with other regions showing non-specific soft-tissue attenuation (3, 14). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibits an ill-defined subcutaneous mass with low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and heterogenous high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences (3, 13, 15, 16). The calcified areas typically show low signal intensity on all plus sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates intense heterogenous enhancement (3, 13, 15, 17).

Histological and Immunohistochemical Features

The definitive diagnosis of CAF is made based on histopathological examination. Grossly, CAF usually appears as a firm or rubbery, ill-defined mass with a gray-white, gritty cut surface. Histologically, CAF is characterized by a fibromatosis-like component and a nodular calcified component (2) (Figure 1). The fibromatosis-like areas are moderately cellular and consist of uniform, plump spindle cells without significant nuclear atypia (Figure 2A). The nodular calcified areas are less cellular and contain islands of calcification surrounded by more rounded, epithelioid cells (Figure 2B). Osteoclast-type giant cells are frequently present. Cartilaginous metaplasia may be seen in long-standing lesions (3). Mitotic figures are scare and necrosis is absent. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are variably positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA), muscle-specific actin (MSA) and CD99. In the chondroid areas, S100 is usually positive (6). More recently, frequent expression of ETS transcription factor ERG (ERG) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been demonstrated in CAF (12, 18). Immunostain for desmin and β-catenin is typically negative (6, 19).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Low-power view of calcifying aponeurotic fibroma highlighting the presence of a fibromatosis-like component and a nodular calcified component.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

High-power view of calcifying aponeurotic fibroma. (A) The fibromatosis-like areas are composed of uniform, plump spindle cells without significant nuclear atypia. (B) The calcified areas contain epithelioid fibroblasts and scattered giant cells.

Pathogenesis

Only one case of CAF has been cytogenetically characterized in the literature, showing an ins(2;4) (q35;q25q?) (18). Most notably, a molecular study by Puls et al. (18) demonstrated the presence of a recurrent fibronectin 1 (FN1)-EGF gene fusion. The same fusion has also been detected in a subset of LPFs (20). FN1, located on chromosome 2q35, encodes fibronectin, a ubiquitous extracellular matrix protein, that is implicated in the regulation of cell adhesion, migration and proliferation (21). Interestingly, the presence of FN1 fusions with various gene partners have been reported in other mesenchymal neoplasms, including CCMN (22), STC (23), synovial chondromatosis (23) and phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (24). EGF, located on chromosome 4q25, encodes prepro-EGF which can activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase. EGF is widely expressed in the body and plays a fundamental role in development, tissue regeneration and ion transport (25). Moreover, EGF has been shown to upregulate FN1 expression in human dermal fibroblasts at the level of post-transcription (26). These findings suggest that the FN1-EGF fusion gene may possibly drive pathogenesis via an autocrine mechanism in CAF. Further functional studies are needed to fully understand the exact pathogenesis of CAF.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of CAF is broad and includes IBF, LPF, STC, CCMN and BPOP. The corresponding clinicopathological and molecular characteristics are summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Major differential diagnosis of calcifying aponeurotic fibroma.

IBF, also known as infantile digital fibromatosis, is a rare benign myofibroblastic tumor that most commonly occurs in the fingers and toes of infants and young children (27). Although rare, synchronous or metachronous multifocality has been reported (28, 29). There is no significant sex predominance (27). IBF typically presents as a small (usually <2 cm), slow-growing, painless, dome-shaped cutaneous nodule. Interestingly, lesions may spontaneously regress (30-32). Current treatment options include function-preserving excision for symptomatic IBF and serial observation or intralesional steroid injection for asymptomatic IBF (33). Local recurrence occurs in 61-75% of cases (27). There is no documented risk of malignant transformation or distant metastasis. Radiographs may show soft-tissue edema (34). Unlike CAF, calcification is absent. Histologically, IBF is composed of a proliferation of bland spindle cells arranged in whorls, short fascicles or storiform patterns (27). Mitotic figures are rare. The most pathognomonic feature is the presence of round, eosinophilic, intracytoplasmic inclusions. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for SMA, calponin, desmin and CD99 (29). Nuclear immunoreactivity for β-catenin is usually absent. To date, there is no reproducible cytogenetic or molecular alteration.

LPF is a rare intermediate (locally aggressive) mesenchymal tumor that most commonly occurs in the hands and feet of infants and young children (35). There is a male predominance (36). LPF typically presents as a slow-growing, painless, poorly demarcated subcutaneous mass. Complete surgical excision with preservation of adjacent neurovascular structures is the treatment of choice for LPF. Local recurrence occurs in 33-72% of cases (37, 38). There is no documented risk of malignant transformation or distant metastasis. Radiographs may show soft-tissue thickening with fat-type radiolucency (36). MRI usually reveals an ill-defined mass with variable proportions of adipocytic and solid components. The histological features of LPF overlap with CAF (37). However, unlike CAF, LPF lacks nodular foci with calcification and cartilage formation. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CD34 and CD99. Immunoreactivity for SMA is variable. A three-way translocation, t(4;9;6)(q21;q22;q2?4), has been described in one case (39). As mentioned above, the FN1-EGF gene fusion has been identified in four cases (20), suggesting a link to CAF. Al-Ibraheemi et al. (20) postulated that activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway might be implicated in the pathogenesis of LPF.

STC is a relatively rare benign chondrogenic tumor that most commonly occurs in the hands and feet of middle-aged adults. There is a slight male predominance (40). STC typically presents as a small (usually <2 cm), solitary, slow-growing, painless mass. Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice for STC. Local recurrence occurs in 15-20% of cases (40). There is no documented risk of malignant transformation or distant metastasis (41). Radiographs may show a soft-tissue mass with focal ringlike or curvilinear calcifications (42). STC does not involve the underlying bone. MRI usually reveals a well-demarcated, extraosseous mass with intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Histologically, STC is composed of lobules of mature hyaline cartilage delineated by fibrous septa. Chondroblastoma-like variant is hypercellular and contains enlarged chondrocytes within a variable amount of chondroid matrix and osteoclast-type giant cells (43), recently reclassified as CCMN (22). Like CAF, expression of ERG and EGF seems to be common in STC (18, 44). Cytogenetic studies have shown several different aberrations, including rearrangements of 12q13-15 and trisomy 5 (45-50). In addition, a high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2)-LIM domain containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma (LPP) gene fusion has been identified in one case (50). Recently, FN1 gene rearrangements were detected in 50% of cases (23). Most notably, all cases with FN1 alterations exhibited grungy calcification, suggesting a diagnosis of the chondroblastoma-like variant. Fusions of FN1 to fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) or fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have also been demonstrated in a subset of STCs with grungy matrix calcification (23).

CCMN is a recently recognized entity that predominantly occurs in the distal extremities and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of adults, with hypercellular chondroid histology and frequent FN1 gene fusions (22). It encompasses chondroblastoma-like STC, chondroid tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) and tophaceous pseudogout (51). There is a slight female predominance (52). CCMN typically presents as a small (mean 2.1 cm), solitary, slow-growing, painless mass (52, 53). Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice for CCMN. Local recurrence has been reported in only two cases after incomplete excision (53, 54). Although CCMN may be focally infiltrative (55), its prognosis is generally favorable. There is no documented risk of malignant transformation or distant metastasis (51). Radiographs generally show a nodular soft-tissue mass with internal calcifications (53). On MRI, the lesion usually reveals low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences (53). Histologically, CCMN shows a multinodular growth pattern and is characterized by a proliferation of ovoid to stellae cells in an abundant chondroid or cartilaginous matrix, often with coarse, grungy, irregular or lace-like calcifications. Mitotic figures are very few and necrosis is absent. The immunophenotype is variable and non-specific. The most common molecular alteration in CCMN is FN1 gene rearrangement, involving various fusion partners such as FGFR1, FGFR2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), MER proto-oncogene, tyrosine kinase (MERTK), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (NTRK1), TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK), proteoglycan 4 (PRG4), bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) and ArfGAP with FG repeats 1 (AGFG1) (22, 52, 53, 55-57). In addition, 11 cases harbored platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-ubiquitin specific peptidase 8 (USP8) fusions (54, 55, 57, 58), one case exhibited a FGFR1-PLAG1 zinc finger (PLAG1) fusion (22) and one case showed a collagen type I alpha 2 chain (COL1A2)-microRNA 29b-1 (MIR29B1) fusion (55). Interestingly, Benard et al. (55) reported that all cases harboring FN1-TEK fusions showed chondroid TGCT-like features and were located in the TMJ.

BPOP is a rare benign surface-based bone lesion that predominantly occurs in the hands and feet of young and early middle-aged adults (59). There is no significant sex predominance (60). BPOP typically presents as a firm, painless mass of variable duration. The lesion has a predilection for the small bones and is usually less than 3 cm in size (60). Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic BPOP. Local recurrence occurs in 11-64% of cases (60). Malignant transformation has been reported in one case (61). Radiographs may show a well-defined, pedunculated or sessile mass arising from the cortical surface of bone. On MRI, the lesion usually reveals low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and variable signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences (60). Histologically, BPOP is characterized by the presence of ‘blue bone’ and consists of a variable mixture of cartilage, bone and fibrous tissue (59). The immunophenotype is essentially non-specific. Unlike CAF, BPOP is cytogenetically characterized by a t(1;17) translocation or inv(7)(q21-22) (62-68). Moreover, rearrangements of collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1) or COL1A2 have been identified in a significant subset of cases (69). The COL1A2-long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, P53 induced transcript (LINC-PINT) and COL1A1-MIR29B2 and MIR29C host gene (MIR29B2CHG) fusions have been demonstrated in three cases and one case, respectively (69).

Conclusion

CAF is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor that predominantly occurs in the distal extremities of children and adolescents. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for CAF, but local recurrence is common. CAF is histologically characterized by bland spindle cells and less cellular areas of calcification with epithelioid fibroblasts. Expression of ERG and EGF is frequently seen, although the immunophenotype is essentially non-specific. A recurrent FN1-EGF gene fusion is the hallmark of CAF. Further investigations are required to better delineate the relationship between CAF and CCMN.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    JN researched the literature and drafted the article. YS and MK collected the data. KK and MA performed the histological evaluation. TK reviewed the article. All Authors read and approved the final article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this article.

  • Funding

    No funding was received for conducting this study.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this article.

  • Received September 16, 2025.
  • Revision received October 1, 2025.
  • Accepted October 20, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Keasbey LE
    : Juvenile aponeurotic fibroma (calcifying fibroma). A distinctive tumor arising in the palms and soles of young children. Cancer 6(2): 338-346, 1953. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(195303)6:2<338::aid-cncr2820060218>3.0.co;2-m
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Puls F,
    2. Kilpatrick SE
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 74-75, 2020.
  3. ↵
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Inamitsu H,
    3. Iwasaki H,
    4. Hayashi H,
    5. Naito M
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the finger in an elderly patient: CT and MRI findings with pathologic correlation. Exp Ther Med 8(3): 841-843, 2014. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1838
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Garcia Navas FM,
    2. Fernandez N,
    3. Lopez A,
    4. Montero P
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the sole of the foot in an elderly patient. Foot 40: 64-67, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2019.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Won SH,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Cho J,
    4. Chun DI,
    5. Kim K,
    6. Yi Y
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma around posterior tibialis tendon in an elderly patient with flatfoot: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(30): e26803, 2021. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Fetsch JF,
    2. Miettinen M
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma: A clinicopathologic study of 22 cases arising in uncommon sites. Hum Pathol 29(12): 1504-1510, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90022-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Allen PW,
    2. Enzinger FM
    : Juvenile aponeurotic fibroma. Cancer 26(4): 857-867, 1970. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197010)26:4<857::aid-cncr2820260420>3.0.co;2-s
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lafferty KA,
    2. Nelson EL,
    3. Demuth RJ,
    4. Miller SH,
    5. Harrison MW
    : Juvenile aponeurotic fibroma with disseminated fibrosarcoma. J Hand Surg Am 11(5): 737-740, 1986. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80024-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Schonauer F,
    2. Avvedimento S,
    3. Molea G
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the distal phalanx. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(2): e47-e49, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Giuffre JL,
    2. Kovachevich R,
    3. Bishop AT,
    4. Shin AY
    : Recurrent calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the thumb: case report. J Hand Surg Am 36(1): 110-115, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.09.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Choi SJ,
    2. Ahn JH,
    3. Kang G,
    4. Lee JH,
    5. Park MS,
    6. Ryu DS,
    7. Jung SM
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma with osseous involvement of the finger: a case report with radiologic and US findings. Korean J Radiol 9(1): 91-93, 2008. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.91
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pena-Burgos EM,
    2. Iglesias-Urraca C,
    3. González-García MC,
    4. Rodríguez-García AM,
    5. Tapia-Viñe M,
    6. Ortiz-Cruz EJ,
    7. Pozo-Kreilinger JJ
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma: Radiologic-pathologic analysis of ten cases and review of the literature. Ann Diagn Pathol 61: 152056, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.152056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kang JH,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Yoo HJ,
    4. Chae HD,
    5. Hong SH,
    6. Choi JY
    : Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging features of calcifying aponeurotic fibromas. J Ultrasound Med 39(7): 1299-1306, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Sanmiguel J,
    2. Diaz PS,
    3. Marsico S,
    4. Lloreta Trull J,
    5. Solano López A
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma: a multimodal imaging description of an unusual case involving soft tissues adjacent to the clavicle. Radiol Case Rep 17(5): 1424-1430, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.02.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Morii T,
    2. Yoshiyama A,
    3. Morioka H,
    4. Anazawa U,
    5. Mochizuki K,
    6. Yabe H
    : Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative differential diagnosis of calcifying aponeurotic fibroma. J Orthop Sci 13(3): 180-186, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-008-1226-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sekiguchi T,
    2. Nakagawa M,
    3. Miwa S,
    4. Shiba A,
    5. Ozawa Y,
    6. Shimohira M,
    7. Sakurai K,
    8. Shibamoto Y
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma in a girl: MRI findings and their chronological changes. Radiol Case Rep 12(3): 620-623, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.04.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kim OH,
    2. Kim YM
    : Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma: case report with radiographic and MR features. Korean J Radiol 15(1): 134-139, 2014. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.134
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Puls F,
    2. Hofvander J,
    3. Magnusson L,
    4. Nilsson J,
    5. Haywood E,
    6. Sumathi VP,
    7. Mangham DC,
    8. Kindblom LG,
    9. Mertens F
    : FN1-EGF gene fusions are recurrent in calcifying aponeurotic fibroma. J Pathol 238(4): 502-507, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/path.4683
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Thway K,
    2. Gibson S,
    3. Ramsay A,
    4. Sebire NJ
    : Beta-catenin expression in pediatric fibroblastic and myofibroblastic lesions: a study of 100 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 12(4): 292-296, 2009. DOI: 10.2350/08-07-0506.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Al-Ibraheemi A,
    2. Folpe AL,
    3. Perez-Atayde AR,
    4. Perry K,
    5. Hofvander J,
    6. Arbajian E,
    7. Magnusson L,
    8. Nilsson J,
    9. Mertens F
    : Aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in lipofibromatosis: a clinicopathological and molecular genetic study of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 32(3): 423-434, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0150-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Zollinger AJ,
    2. Smith ML
    : Fibronectin, the extracellular glue. Matrix Biol 60-61: 27-37, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Liu YJ,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Yeh J,
    4. Wu Y,
    5. Mantilla JG,
    6. Fletcher CDM,
    7. Ricciotti RW,
    8. Chen EY
    : Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms with FN1-receptor tyrosine kinase gene fusions including FGFR2, FGFR1, MERTK, NTRK1, and TEK: a molecular and clinicopathologic analysis. Mod Pathol 34(7): 1373-1383, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00786-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Amary F,
    2. Perez-Casanova L,
    3. Ye H,
    4. Cottone L,
    5. Strobl AC,
    6. Cool P,
    7. Miranda E,
    8. Berisha F,
    9. Aston W,
    10. Rocha M,
    11. O’Donnell P,
    12. Pillay N,
    13. Tirabosco R,
    14. Baumhoer D,
    15. Hookway ES,
    16. Flanagan AM
    : Synovial chondromatosis and soft tissue chondroma: extraosseous cartilaginous tumor defined by FN1 gene rearrangement. Mod Pathol 32(12): 1762-1771, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0315-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Yin X,
    3. Li D,
    4. Li K,
    5. Zhang H,
    6. Lu J,
    7. Zhou L,
    8. Gao J,
    9. Wang J,
    10. Wu H,
    11. Liang Z
    : RNA sequencing reveals novel oncogenic fusions and depicts detailed fusion transcripts of FN1-FGFR1 in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Mod Pathol 36(10): 100266, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Zeng F,
    2. Harris RC
    : Epidermal growth factor, from gene organization to bedside. Semin Cell Dev Biol 28: 2-11, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.01.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mimura Y,
    2. Ihn H,
    3. Jinnin M,
    4. Asano Y,
    5. Yamane K,
    6. Tamaki K
    : Epidermal growth factor induces fibronectin expression in human dermal fibroblasts via protein kinase C δ signaling pathway. J Invest Dermatol 122(6): 1390-1398, 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22618.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Laskin WB
    : Inclusion body fibromatosis. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 65-66, 2020.
  27. ↵
    1. O’Gorman DJ
    : Infantile digital fibromatosis. Proc R Soc Med 67(9): 880, 1974. DOI: 10.1177/003591577406700927
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Laskin WB,
    2. Miettinen M,
    3. Fetsch JF
    : Infantile digital fibroma/fibromatosis: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 69 tumors from 57 patients with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 33(1): 1-13, 2009. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181788533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ishii N,
    2. Matsui K,
    3. Ichiyama S,
    4. Takahashi Y,
    5. Nakajima H
    : A case of infantile digital fibromatosis showing spontaneous regression. Br J Dermatol 121(1): 129-133, 1989. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1989.tb01409.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kawaguchi M,
    2. Mitsuhashi Y,
    3. Hozumi Y,
    4. Kondo S
    : A case of infantile digital fibromatosis with spontaneous regression. J Dermatol 25(8): 523-526, 1998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1998.tb02448.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Niamba P,
    2. Léauté-Labrèze C,
    3. Boralevi F,
    4. Lepreux S,
    5. Chamaillard M,
    6. Vergnes P,
    7. Taïeb A
    : Further documentation of spontaneous regression of infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol 24(3): 280-284, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2007.00403.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Eypper EH,
    2. Lee JC,
    3. Tarasen AJ,
    4. Weinberg MH,
    5. Adetayo OA
    : An algorithmic approach to the management of infantile digital fibromatosis: Review of literature and a case report. Eplasty 18: e19, 2018.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Godse R,
    2. Dany M,
    3. Tamazian S,
    4. Wan J,
    5. Jen M,
    6. Rubin AI
    : Infantile digital fibromatosis/inclusion body fibromatosis: a comprehensive literature review. Skin Appendage Disord 9(1): 1-7, 2023. DOI: 10.1159/000526253
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Miettinen M,
    2. Al-lbraheemi A,
    3. Zambrano E
    : Lipofibromatosis. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 96-97, 2020.
  34. ↵
    1. Shinohara Y,
    2. Nishio J,
    3. Nakayama S,
    4. Aoki M
    : Lipofibromatosis revisited. In Vivo 39(5): 2512-2516, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14054
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Fetsch JF,
    2. Miettinen M,
    3. Laskin WB,
    4. Michal M,
    5. Enzinger FM
    : A clinicopathologic study of 45 pediatric soft tissue tumors with an admixture of adipose tissue and fibroblastic elements, and a proposal for classification as lipofibromatosis. Am J Surg Pathol 24(11): 1491-1500, 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200011000-00004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Boos MD,
    2. Chikwava KR,
    3. Dormans JP,
    4. Chauvin NA,
    5. Jen M
    : Lipofibromatosis: an institutional and literature review of an uncommon entity. Pediatr Dermatol 31(3): 298-304, 2014. DOI: 10.1111/pde.12335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kenney B,
    2. Richkind KE,
    3. Friedlaender G,
    4. Zambrano E
    : Chromosomal rearrangements in lipofibromatosis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 179(2): 136-139, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2007.08.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Rosenberg AE
    : Soft tissue chondroma. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 222-223, 2020.
  39. ↵
    1. Cho SJ,
    2. Horvai A
    : Chondro-osseous lesions of soft tissue. Surg Pathol Clin 8(3): 419-444, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2015.05.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hondar Wu HT,
    2. Chen W,
    3. Lee O,
    4. Chang CY
    : Imaging and pathological correlation of soft-tissue chondroma. Clin Imaging 30(1): 32-36, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.01.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Cates JM,
    2. Rosenberg AE,
    3. O’Connell JX,
    4. Nielsen GP
    : Chondroblastoma-like chondroma of soft tissue: An underrecognized variant and its differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 25(5): 661-666, 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Shon W,
    2. Folpe AL,
    3. Fritchie KJ
    : ERG expression in chondrogenic bone and soft tissue tumours. J Clin Pathol 68(2): 125-129, 2015. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202601
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Mandahl N,
    2. Heim S,
    3. Arheden K,
    4. Rydholm A,
    5. Willén H,
    6. Mitelman F
    : Chromosomal rearrangements in chondromatous tumors. Cancer 65(2): 242-248, 1990. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900115)65:2<242::aid-cncr2820650211>3.0.co;2-l
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bridge JA,
    2. Bhatia PS,
    3. Anderson JR,
    4. Neff JR
    : Biologic and clinical significance of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic abnormalities in benign and malignant cartilaginous lesions. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 69(2): 79-90, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(93)90080-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shadan FF,
    2. Mascarello JT,
    3. Newbury RO,
    4. Dennis T,
    5. Spallone P,
    6. Stock A
    : Supernumerary ring chromosomes derived from the long arm of chromosome 12 as the primary cytogenetic anomaly in a rare soft tissue chondroma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 118(2): 144-147, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(99)00196-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tallini G,
    2. Dorfman H,
    3. Brys P,
    4. Dal Cin P,
    5. De Wever I,
    6. Fletcher CD,
    7. Jonson K,
    8. Mandahl N,
    9. Mertens F,
    10. Mitelman F,
    11. Rosai J,
    12. Rydholm A,
    13. Samson I,
    14. Sciot R,
    15. Van den Berghe H,
    16. Vanni R,
    17. Willén H
    : Correlation between clinicopathological features and karyotype in 100 cartilaginous and chordoid tumours. A report from the Chromosomes and Morphology (CHAMP) Collaborative Study Group. J Pathol 196(2): 194-203, 2002. DOI: 10.1002/path.1023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Buddingh EP,
    2. Naumann S,
    3. Nelson M,
    4. Neffa JR,
    5. Birch N,
    6. Bridge JA
    : Cytogenetic findings in benign cartilaginous neoplasms. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 141(2): 164-168, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00726-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Dahlén A,
    2. Mertens F,
    3. Rydholm A,
    4. Brosjö O,
    5. Wejde J,
    6. Mandahl N,
    7. Panagopoulos I
    : Fusion, disruption, and expression of HMGA2 in bone and soft tissue chondromas. Mod Pathol 16(11): 1132-1140, 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000092954.42656.94
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Kao EY,
    2. Chen EY
    : Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin 17(1): 77-82, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2023.06.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Feng X,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Wei J,
    4. Li W,
    5. Wang S,
    6. Guo P,
    7. Guo C,
    8. Hao W,
    9. Dai H,
    10. Gong L
    : Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis. J Clin Pathol, 2025. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2024-209806
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Kallen ME,
    2. Michal M,
    3. Meyer A,
    4. Suster DI,
    5. Olson NJ,
    6. Charville GW,
    7. Perret R,
    8. Gross JM
    : Calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm: exploring the morphologic and clinical features of an emergent entity with a series of 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 47(6): 725-737, 2023. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Fisher Y,
    2. Lacambra MD,
    3. Almohsen SS,
    4. Chow C,
    5. Hornick JL,
    6. To KF,
    7. Dickson BC
    : Expanding the spectrum of tyrosine kinase fusions in calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms: Identification of a novel PDGFRA::USP8 gene fusion. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 63(1): e23197, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Benard C,
    2. Le Loarer F,
    3. Gomez-Mascard A,
    4. Azmani R,
    5. Garcia J,
    6. Perret R,
    7. de Pinieux G,
    8. Miquelestorena-Standley E,
    9. Weingertner N,
    10. Karanian M,
    11. Meurgey A,
    12. Michot A,
    13. Tirode F,
    14. Truffaux N,
    15. Macagno N,
    16. Bouvier C
    : Comprehensive molecular characterization of a large series of calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasms widening their morphologic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol 48(8): 991-1004, 2024. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002260
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Georgantzoglou N,
    2. Shen G,
    3. Jour G,
    4. Linos K
    : A case of FN1-fused calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm of the hand with novel FGFR3 partner gene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 62(4): 237-241, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23115
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Nishino S,
    2. Mori T,
    3. Umezu H,
    4. Eguchi K,
    5. Hirai T,
    6. Yamada R,
    7. Ohshima S,
    8. Yatabe Y,
    9. Yoshimoto S,
    10. Kawai A,
    11. Motoi T,
    12. Yoshida A
    : Nosologic reappraisal of the recently proposed calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm concept in a series of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 38(7): 100762, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100762
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Panagopoulos I,
    2. Andersen K,
    3. Gorunova L,
    4. Lobmaier I
    : Fusion of platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) with ubiquitin specific peptidase 8 (USP8) in a calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm harboring t(4;15) (q12;q21) as a sole aberration. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 21(3): 252-259, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20444
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Yoshida A,
    2. McCarthy EF
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 348-350, 2020.
  53. ↵
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Shinohara Y,
    3. Nakayama S,
    4. Koga M,
    5. Aoki M,
    6. Koga T
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation revisited. In Vivo 39(4): 1799-1809, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13981
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Ulrich G,
    2. Wood R,
    3. Pearson J,
    4. Jiganti M,
    5. Tedesco N
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation with malignant transformation and metastases. Orthopedics 47(6): e322-e326, 2024. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20241016-01
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Nilsson M,
    2. Domanski HA,
    3. Mertens F,
    4. Mandahl N
    : Molecular cytogenetic characterization of recurrent translocation breakpoints in bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora’s lesion). Hum Pathol 35(9): 1063-1069, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.02.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Endo M,
    2. Hasegawa T,
    3. Tashiro T,
    4. Yamaguchi U,
    5. Morimoto Y,
    6. Nakatani F,
    7. Shimoda T
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation with a t(1;17) translocation. Virchows Arch 447(1): 99-102, 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-005-1266-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Teoh KH,
    2. Shortt N,
    3. Wilkinson G,
    4. Salter DM,
    5. Robb JE,
    6. Porter DE
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of the metatarsal: a pediatric case report and archival review. J Foot Ankle Surg 48(6): 690.e7-690.e11, 2009. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2009.06.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Joseph J,
    2. Ritchie D,
    3. MacDuff E,
    4. Mahendra A
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: a locally aggressive benign tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7): 2019-2027, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1898-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kuruvilla S,
    2. Marco R,
    3. Raymond AK,
    4. Al-Ibraheemi A,
    5. Tatevian N
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora’s lesion) with translocation t(1;17)(q32;q21): a case report and role of cytogenetic studies on diagnosis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 41(3): 285-287, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sakamoto A,
    2. Imamura S,
    3. Matsumoto Y,
    4. Harimaya K,
    5. Matsuda S,
    6. Takahashi Y,
    7. Oda Y,
    8. Iwamoto Y
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation with an inversion of chromosome 7. Skeletal Radiol 40(11): 1487-1490, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1173-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Broehm CJ,
    2. M’Lady G,
    3. Bocklage T,
    4. Wenceslao S,
    5. Chafey D
    : Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: a new cytogenetic subgroup characterized by inversion of chromosome 7. Cancer Genet 206(11): 402-405, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2013.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Kao YC,
    2. Yoshida A,
    3. Hsieh TH,
    4. Nord KH,
    5. Saba KH,
    6. Ichikawa H,
    7. Tsai JW,
    8. Huang HY,
    9. Chih-Hsueh Chen P,
    10. Fletcher CDM,
    11. Lee JC
    : Identification of COL1A1/2 mutations and fusions with noncoding RNA genes in bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora lesion). Mod Pathol 36(2): 100011, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 40 (1)
In Vivo
Vol. 40, Issue 1
January-February 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Calcifying Aponeurotic Fibroma: A Review and Update
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Calcifying Aponeurotic Fibroma: A Review and Update
JUN NISHIO, YUKI SHINOHARA, MIKIRO KOGA, KAORI KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI, TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo Jan 2026, 40 (1) 30-38; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14170

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Calcifying Aponeurotic Fibroma: A Review and Update
JUN NISHIO, YUKI SHINOHARA, MIKIRO KOGA, KAORI KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI, TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo Jan 2026, 40 (1) 30-38; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.14170
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Clinical Features
    • Radiological Features
    • Histological and Immunohistochemical Features
    • Pathogenesis
    • Differential Diagnosis
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Fibronectin 1 (FN1)-rearranged Mesenchymal Neoplasms: An Updated Review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pain in Children With ADHD: Mechanisms, Clinical Presentation, and Implications for Assessment and Management
  • The Role of Irisin and Physical Activity in Breast Cancer
  • Lymphocytes and their Involvement in the Foreign Body Response to Biomaterials and Tissue Repair
Show more Review

Keywords

  • Calcifying aponeurotic fibroma
  • calcified chondroid mesenchymal neoplasm
  • lipofibromatosis
  • fibronectin 1
  • epidermal growth factor
  • fusion gene
  • review
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire