Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

Fibroma of Tendon Sheath Revisited

YUKI SHINOHARA, JUN NISHIO, SHIZUHIDE NAKAYAMA, MIKORO KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI and TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo March 2025, 39 (2) 613-620; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13866
YUKI SHINOHARA
1Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUN NISHIO
1Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nishio@fdcnet.ac.jp
SHIZUHIDE NAKAYAMA
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKORO KOGA
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKIKO AOKI
3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAMASA KOGA
4Koga Orthopaedic Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fibroma of tendon sheath (FTS) is a benign fibroblastic/myofibroblastic neoplasm that primarily occurs in the fingers and hands of young and middle-aged adults. The lesion typically presents as a small, firm, slow-growing, painless nodule. Ultrasonography usually shows a focal nodular mass with homogeneous hypoechogenicity. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals a well-defined nodular mass with decreased signal on all pulse sequences. No or minimal peripheral enhancement is often seen after intravenous contrast. Histologically, the lesion is well circumscribed and consists of bland spindle cells in a dense collagenous stroma with slit-like thin-walled vessels at the periphery. A cellular variant of FTS has also been described and shows at least a focal morphological overlap with nodular fasciitis. Immunohistochemistry does not play a significant role in the diagnosis of FTS. Cytogenetic studies have demonstrated the presence of 11q rearrangements. A significant subset of cellular variants of FTS are characterized by ubiquitin specific peptidase 6 (USP6) rearrangements, with a variety of fusion partners. Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice. This review provides an updated overview of the clinical, radiological, histological, cytogenetic and molecular genetic features of FTS and discusses the differential diagnosis of this uncommon entity.

Keywords:
  • Fibroma of tendon sheath
  • desmoplastic fibroblastoma
  • tenosynovial giant cell tumor
  • nodular fasciitis
  • USP6
  • review

Introduction

Fibroma of tendon sheath (FTS) is a rare benign soft-tissue tumor first described in detail by Geschickter and Copeland (1) in 1949. Chung and Enzinger (2) subsequently described the largest series of 138 cases that became the basis of our understanding of this disease. According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue and bone tumors (3), FTS belongs to the fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor group. FTS can show clinical and morphological overlaps with a variety of benign soft-tissue tumors, including desmoplastic fibroblastoma (DF), localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and nodular fasciitis (NF). The etiology of this tumor is unknown. Advances in knowledge of the imaging, histopathology and genomics of FTS are leading to more accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. In this article, we review the clinical, radiological, histological, cytogenetic and molecular genetic features of FTS. In addition, we will discuss the differential diagnosis of this entity.

Clinical Features

FTS has a peak incidence in the third to fifth decades of life, with a male predominance (2). It typically presents as a firm, slow-growing, painless nodule in the distal extremities, particularly the fingers and hands. Although rare, intra-articular involvement has been described (4-6). Tenderness or mild pain is seen in 31% of cases (2). The diameter ranges from 0.5 to 5.5 cm (median of 1.8 cm) (2). Simple excision is the treatment of choice. Local recurrence occurs in up to 24% of cases (2, 3), usually between 1 and 4 months following surgery. In our extensive experience, local recurrence is not aggressive and typically cured by simple re-excision. There is no documented risk for distant metastasis.

Radiological Features

Radiographs are usually unremarkable or may reveal a non-specific soft-tissue mass without calcification. Unlike localized TSGCT, extrinsic erosion/scalloping of the adjacent bone is extremely unusual (2). Ultrasonography will typically show a homogeneous hypoechoic nodule that is attached to the tendon sheath (7, 8). Blood flow patterns are variable on color Doppler imaging (7). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion is well-defined and adjacent to the tendon sheath. FTS typically exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on both T1-weighted (Figure 1A) and T2-weighted (Figure 1B) images. Occasionally, the lesion reveals high signal intensity centrally with slightly low signal peripherally on T2-weighted images (9). Fox et al. (9) suggested that the signal characteristics might vary depending on the degree of cellularity and myxoid change. Contrast-enhanced MRI often demonstrates no or minimal peripheral enhancement (4, 8, 9). Recently, Emori et al. (10) reported that the signal intensity ratio calculated for the tumor and flexor tendon on T2-weighted images was helpful for distinguishing FTS from localized TSGCT. In that study, the T2 signal intensity ratio was significantly higher in localized TSGCT than in FTS.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Axial magnetic resonance images of fibroma of tendon sheath involving the hand. The mass (white arrowheads) shows low to intermediate signal intensity on both T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted (B) sequences.

Histopathology

Grossly, FTS appears as a well-circumscribed, sometimes lobulated mass with a pearly-white or gray-white cut surface. Focal myxoid or cystic change may be present. Histologically, the lesion is well circumscribed and consists of bland spindle cells in a dense collagenous stroma. The characteristic histological finding of FTS is the presence of slit-like thin-walled vessels or clefts (Figure 2). Cytological atypia and necrosis are absent. A cellular variant of this tumor has also been described (2), closely resembling NF. Cellular FTS is generally defined as a tumor having areas of increased cellularity and an NF-like appearance as well as identifiable histological features of classical FTS. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are focally positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and HAM56 (11). Immunostains for CD34, S-100 protein, cytokeratin, β-catenin and FOS like 1 (FOSL1) are typically negative (12-14).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Histological features of fibroma of tendon sheath. The tumor is composed of bland spindle cells in a dense collagenous stroma. Slit-like vessels can be seen (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×100).

Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Features

Clonal chromosomal aberrations have been detected in four cases of classical FTS (4, 15-17). Classical FTS displays mostly simple karyotypes characterized by one or few chromosomal rearrangements. These cytogenetic studies suggest that 11q rearrangements may be characteristic of classical FTS. It is of interest that rearrangements of 11q, in particular 11q12-13, are also seen in DF (18), which shares similar morphological features with classical FTS.

In 2016, Carter et al. (19) reported that ubiquitin specific protease 6 (USP6) (located on 17p13.2) rearrangements were found in 67% (6/9) of cellular FTS but not in classical FTS. Subsequently, Wang et al. (20) also reported that USP6 rearrangements were detected in 88% (7/8) of cellular FTS but not in classical FTS. Moreover, anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/next generation sequencing (NGS) demonstrated the presence of USP6 fusions in 64% (7/11) of cellular FTS (21). On the other hand, Pižem et al. (22) reported that USP6 fusions were found in 94% (17/18) of FTS and classical FTS also showed the presence of USP6 fusions. The authors concluded that FTS, regardless of cellularity, can be defined by USP6 rearrangements/fusions. To date, various fusion partners of USP6 have been identified in FTS, including myosin heavy chain 9 (MYH9), collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1), pyruvate kinase M1/2 (PKM), regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1), asporin, (ASPN), collagen type III alpha 1 chain (COL3A1), MIR22 host gene (MIR22HG), catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1), secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich (SPARC), cyclase associated actin cytoskeleton regulatory protein 1 (CAP1), epithelial membrane protein 1 (EMP1), cytoskeleton regulator RNA (CYTOR), nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (NR1D1), RAB1A, member RAS oncogene family (RAB1A) and tenascin C (TNC) (20-23). Some fusion partners appear to be shared across neoplasms (24, 25). Further studies with a large number of cases are required to better understand the correlation between certain gene fusions and clinicopathological features.

Differential Diagnosis

The major differential diagnosis of FTS includes DF, localized TSGCT and NF. Recent advances in molecular genetics have contributed greatly to our understanding of these benign tumors. The corresponding clinicopathological and molecular characteristics are summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Differential diagnosis of fibroma of tendon sheath.

DF, also known as collagenous fibroma, is a benign fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor that primarily arises in the subcutaneous tissue of upper extremities and limb girdles. It has a peak incidence in the fifth to seventh decades of life, with a male predominance (18). DF typically presents as a firm, slow-growing, painless mass. The diameter ranges from 1.0 to 20.0 cm (median of 3.0 cm) (26). On MRI, the lesion reveals prominent low signal intensity on all pulse sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates mild peripheral and septal enhancement (18). In our experience, it is often difficult to distinguish between DF and FTS by imaging alone. Simple excision is the treatment of choice. Unlike FTS, local recurrence has not been reported (18). Grossly, DF appears as a well-circumscribed mass with a white to gray-gray cut surface. Histologically, DF is hypocellular and consists of bland spindle to stellate-shaped cells in a dense collagenous stroma, closely resembling classical FTS. Most importantly, unlike FTS, DF shows diffuse, strong FOSL1 nuclear immunoreactivity (13). To date, clonal chromosomal aberrations have been identified in 11 cases of DF (27-33). These cytogenetic studies strongly suggest that DF is characterized by 11q12-13 rearrangements. Moreover, recent molecular studies demonstrate that FOSL1 rearrangements are recurrent genetic events in DF (34). The discovery of FOSL1 rearrangements has led to more precise diagnostics of DF.

Localized TSGCT, formerly known as giant cell tumor of tendon sheath, is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor that typically presents as a firm, slow-growing, painless nodule or mass. It has a peak incidence in the third to fifth decades of life, with a female predominance (35). Like FTS, localized TSGCT predominantly occurs in the fingers and hands, in close proximity to the synovium of the tendon sheath. The diameter ranges from 0.5 to 4.0 cm (36). Although extrinsic erosion/scalloping of the adjacent bone is the most radiographic osseous finding associated with localized TSGCT, intraosseous invasion has also been described, suggesting an aggressive neoplasm (37-39). On MRI, the well-circumscribed lesion exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences, variable signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences and relatively high signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI typically demonstrates intense and heterogeneous enhancement (40). Localized TSGCT can be managed by complete marginal excision. Local recurrence occurs in 4-30% of cases (36). Distant metastasis has been reported but is extremely rare (41, 42). Grossly, localized TSGCT appears as a well-circumscribed mass with a variably yellow, tan or whitish cut surface. Histologically, localized TSGCT consists of a mixture of mononuclear cells, osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells, foamy macrophages and inflammatory cells. There are two types of mononuclear cells: small histiocyte-like cells and larger epithelioid cells (36). Diffuse and strong clusterin expression is seen in the large mononuclear cells (43). In addition, desmin is positive in 50% of cases and highlights large mononuclear cells (44). The cytogenetic hallmark of TSGCT is the presence of 1p13 rearrangements (39, 45, 46). The most frequent translocation is t(1;2)(p13;q37), leading to a collagen type VI alpha 3 chain (COL6A3)-colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene fusion. In recent years, there has been a remarkable breakthrough in the molecular profile of TSGCT. CSF1 rearrangements are present in 2-16% of tumor cells (47) and can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (48). TSGCT is caused by upregulation of the CSF1 gene, leading to aberrant CSF1 expression and recruitment of CSF1 receptor (CSF1R)-dependent macrophages. In selected cases, the finding of CSF1 rearrangements by FISH can support the diagnosis.

NF is a benign self-limited fibroblastic/myofibroblastic neoplasm that usually arises in the subcutaneous tissue and underlying fascia of upper extremities. It has a peak incidence in the third and fourth decades of life, with no definite sex predominance (49). Unlike FTS, NF usually presents as a rapidly growing, sometimes painful mass. NF usually measures less than 2 cm at patient presentation (49). On MRI, the lesion reveals low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and intermediate to high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Linear extension along the fascia (facial tail sign) would be helpful to suggest the diagnosis and mild surrounding edema can be seen (50). Contrast-enhanced MRI exhibits diffuse or peripheral enhancement (51). Spontaneous resolution is well documented, and simple excision is sufficient (24). Local recurrence is exceedingly rare and cured by simple re-excision. Distant metastasis and malignant transformation have been reported but are extremely uncommon (52, 53). Grossly, NF may appear as an unencapsulated, circumscribed or infiltrative mass with a variably grayish, tan or whitish cut surface (49). Histologically, NF consists of plump spindle-shaped cells in a collagenous or myxoid stroma. Mitotic activity is easily identified but atypical mitoses are not found. Extravasated erythrocytes, lymphocytes and osteoclast-like giant cells are frequently observed (49). Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells are positive for SMA. Focal desmin expression is occasionally found. To date, clonal chromosomal aberrations have been detected in five cases of NF (54-58). These cytogenetic studies indicate that rearrangements involving 3q21 and 15q22-26 are recurrent in NF. In 2011, Erickson-Johnson et al. (59) reported that USP6 rearrangements were found in 92% (44/48) of NF. In that study, MYH9 was identified as a novel fusion partner. Since then, various USP6 fusion partners have been detected in NF (24, 25, 60, 61). These molecular studies indicate that MYH9 is the most common fusion partner for USP6 in NF. Remarkably, it may be possible that amplifications of protein phosphatase 6 regulatory subunit 3 (PPP6R3)-USP6 fusion gene act as a driver of malignant transformation and progression in NF (52, 53).

Conclusion

FTS is a distinctive benign fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor with a low but non-negligible risk for local recurrence and no metastatic risk. MRI reveals a well-defined nodular mass with decreased signal on all pulse sequences which demonstrates no or minimal peripheral enhancement. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for FTS, and local recurrence can usually be managed with re-excision. The characteristic histological finding of FTS is the presence of slit-like thin-walled vessels or clefts. Notably, it should be kept in mind that the histological features of the cellular type are identical to those of NF. 11q rearrangements are prominent in classical FTS, whereas a subset of FTSs, in particular the cellular type, are characterized by USP6 rearrangements. Further investigations are required to better delineate the relationship between cellular FTS and NF.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    YS researched the literature and was a major contributor to writing the article. JN drafted the article. SN and MK collected the data. MA performed the histological evaluation. TK reviewed the article. All Authors read and approved the final article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this article.

  • Funding

    No funding was received for conducting this study.

  • Received December 9, 2024.
  • Revision received December 18, 2024.
  • Accepted December 19, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2025, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Geschickter CF,
    2. Copeland MM
    : Tumors of bone. Philadelphia, PA, USA, J.B. Lippincott, pp. 693-695, 1949.
  2. ↵
    1. Chung EB,
    2. Enzinger FM
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath. Cancer 44(5): 1945-1954, 1979. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197911)44:5<1945::aid-cncr2820440558>3.0.co;2-t
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sciot R,
    2. Cunha IW
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 67-68, 2020.
  4. ↵
    1. Suzuki K,
    2. Yasuda T,
    3. Suzawa S,
    4. Watanabe K,
    5. Kanamori M,
    6. Kimura T
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath around large joints: clinical characteristics and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1): 376, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1736-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Korcek L,
    2. Hoch B,
    3. Richter D
    : Hip arthroscopic resection of an intra-articular fibroma of the tendon sheath. Case Rep Orthop 2018: 4549836, 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4549836
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Leal J,
    2. Rizk P,
    3. Nasri E,
    4. Roach RP
    : Arthroscopic treatment for intra-articular fibroma of the tendon sheath in a teenager. BMJ Case Rep 15(9): e248887, 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-248887
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Ding Y,
    3. Chen T
    : Ultrasonography of fibroma of the tendon sheath in the hand and wrist. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24(1): 144, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06250-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Haseli S,
    2. Mansoori B,
    3. Christensen D,
    4. Abadi A,
    5. Pooyan A,
    6. Shomal Zadeh F,
    7. Mau B,
    8. Khalili N,
    9. Murphey M,
    10. Chalian M
    : Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic soft-tissue tumors: imaging spectrum and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 43(8): e230005, 2023. DOI: 10.1148/rg.230005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Fox MG,
    2. Kransdorf MJ,
    3. Bancroft LW,
    4. Peterson JJ,
    5. Flemming DJ
    : MR imaging of fibroma of the tendon sheath. Am J Roentgenol 180(5): 1449-1453, 2003. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801449
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Emori M,
    2. Takashima H,
    3. Iba K,
    4. Sonoda T,
    5. Oda T,
    6. Hasegawa T,
    7. Yamashita T
    : Differential diagnosis of fibroma of tendon sheath and giant cell tumor of tendon sheath in the finger using signal intensity on T2 magnetic resonance imaging. Acra Radiol 62(12): 1632-1638, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0284185120976915
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Maluf HM,
    2. DeYoung BR,
    3. Swanson PE,
    4. Wick MR
    : Fibroma and giant cell tumor of tendon sheath: a comparative histological and immunohistological study. Mod Pathol 8(2): 155-159, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Carlson JW,
    2. Fletcher CDM
    : Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell lesions: analysis of a series and review of the literature. Histopathology 51(4): 509-514, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02794.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kato I,
    2. Yoshida A,
    3. Ikegami M,
    4. Okuma T,
    5. Tonooka A,
    6. Horiguchi S,
    7. Funata N,
    8. Kawai A,
    9. Goto T,
    10. Hishima T,
    11. Aoki I,
    12. Motoi T
    : FOSL1 immunohistochemistry clarifies the distinction between desmoplastic fibroblastoma and fibroma of tendon sheath. Histopathology 69(6): 1012-1020, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/his.13042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Al-Gattan M
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath of the hand: a series of 20 patients with 23 tumours. J Hand Surg Eur 39(3): 300-305, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412469146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Dal Cin P,
    2. Sciot R,
    3. De Smet L,
    4. Van den Berghe H
    : Translocation 2;11 in a fibroma of tendon sheath. Histopathology 32(5): 433-435, 1998. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00390.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Iwasaki H,
    3. Nagatomo M,
    4. Naito M
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath with 11q rearrangements. Anticancer Res 34(9): 5159-5162, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Rubinstein A,
    2. Fitzhugh V,
    3. Ahmed I,
    4. Vosbikian M
    : A case of 14-year-old male with fibroma of tendon sheath of the hand with novel chromosomal translocation 4;10. Case Rep Orthop 2019: 3514013, 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3514013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Nakayama S,
    2. Nishio J,
    3. Aoki M,
    4. Nabeshima K,
    5. Yamamoto T
    : An update on clinicopathological, imaging and genetic features of desmoplastic fibroblastoma (collagenous fibroma). In Vivo 35(1): 69-73, 2021. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12233
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Carter JM,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Dong J,
    4. Westendorf J,
    5. Chou MM,
    6. Oliveira AM
    : USP6 genetic rearrangements in cellular fibroma of tendon sheath. Mod Pathol 29(8): 865-869, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.83
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wang JC,
    2. Li WS,
    3. Kao YC,
    4. Lee JC,
    5. Lee PH,
    6. Huang SC,
    7. Tsai JW,
    8. Chen CC,
    9. Chang CD,
    10. Yu SC,
    11. Huang HY
    : Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of USP6-rearranged soft tissue neoplasms: the evidence of genetic relatedness indicates an expanding family with variable bone-forming capacity. Histopathology 78(5): 676-689, 2021. DOI: 10.1111/his.14268
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Mantilla JG,
    2. Gross JM,
    3. Liu YJ,
    4. Hoch BL,
    5. Ricciotti RW
    : Characterization of novel USP6 gene rearrangements in a subset of so-called cellular fibroma of tendon sheath. Mod Pathol 34(1): 13-19, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0621-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Pižem J,
    2. Matjašič A,
    3. Zupan A,
    4. Luzar B,
    5. Šekoranja D,
    6. Dimnik K
    : Fibroma of tendon sheath is defined by a USP6 gene fusion—morphologic and molecular reappraisal of the entity. Mod Pathol 34(10): 1876-1888, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00836-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Eisenberg JM,
    2. Buckwalter V JA,
    3. Snow AN,
    4. Davick J
    : Cellular fibroma of tendon sheath with novel TNC-USP6 gene fusion clinically mimicking arthritis in a 7-year-old boy. Pediatr Dev Pathol 25(2): 192-196, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/10935266211043869
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nakayama S,
    2. Nishio J,
    3. Aoki M,
    4. Koga K,
    5. Nabeshima K,
    6. Yamamoto T
    : Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 6 (USP6)-associated fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors: evolving concepts. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 18(2): 93-101, 2021. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20244
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Legrand M,
    2. Jourdan ML,
    3. de Pinieux G
    : Histopathogeneis of bone- and soft-tissue tumor spectrum with USP6 gene rearrangement: multiple partners involved in the tissue repair process. Histol Histopathol 38(3): 247-260, 2023. DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Miettinen M,
    2. Fetsch JF
    : Collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma): A clinicopathologic analysis of 63 cases of a distinctive soft tissue lesion with stellate-shaped fibroblasts. Hum Pathol 29(7): 676-682, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90275-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Sciot R,
    2. Samson I,
    3. Van Den Berghe H,
    4. Van Damme B,
    5. Dal Cin P
    : Collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma): genetic link with fibroma of tendon sheath? Mod Pathol 12(6): 565-568, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bernal K,
    2. Nelson M,
    3. Neff JR,
    4. Nielsen SM,
    5. Bridge JA
    : Translocation (2;11)(q31;q12) is recurrent in collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 149(2): 161-163, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4608(03)00298-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sakamoto A,
    2. Yamamoto H,
    3. Yoshida T,
    4. Tanaka K,
    5. Matsuda S,
    6. Oda Y,
    7. Tsuneyoshi M,
    8. Iwamoto Y
    : Desmoplastic fibroblastoma (collagenous fibroma) with a specific breakpoint of 11q12. Histopathology 51(6): 859-860, 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02861.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Maghari A,
    2. Ma N,
    3. Aisner S,
    4. Benevenia J,
    5. Hameed M
    : Collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma) with a new translocation involving 11q12: a case report. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 192(2): 73-75, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.03.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Akiho S,
    3. Iwasaki H,
    4. Naito M
    : Translocation t(2;11) is characteristic of collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma). Cancer Genet 204(10): 569-571, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Macchia G,
    2. Trombetta D,
    3. Möller E,
    4. Mertens F,
    5. Storlazzi CT,
    6. Debiec-Rychter M,
    7. Sciot R,
    8. Nord KH
    : FOSL1 as a candidate target gene for 11q12 rearrangements in desmoplastic fibroblastoma. Lab Invest 92(5): 735-743, 2012. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.46
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Nishio J,
    2. Iwasaki H,
    3. Yano S,
    4. Naito M
    : Collagenous fibroma (desmoplastic fibroblastoma) with trisomy 8 as the sole cytogenetic abnormality. Anticancer Res 33(8): 3259-3262, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. De Noon S,
    2. Piggott R,
    3. Trotman J,
    4. Tadross JA,
    5. Fittall M,
    6. Hughes D,
    7. Ye H,
    8. Munasinghe E,
    9. Murray M,
    10. Tirabosco R,
    11. Amary F,
    12. Coleman N,
    13. Watkins J,
    14. Hubank M,
    15. Tarpey P,
    16. Behjati S,
    17. Flanagan AM
    : Recurrent FOSL1 rearrangements in desmoplastic fibroblastoma. J Pathol 259(2): 119-124, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/path.6038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Siegel M,
    2. Bode L,
    3. Südkamp N,
    4. Kühle J,
    5. Zwingmann J,
    6. Schmal H,
    7. Herget GW
    : Treatment, recurrence rates and follow-up of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) of the foot and ankle-A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16(12): e0260795, 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260795
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N,
    2. van de Rijn M
    : Tenosynovial giant cell tumour. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 133-136, 2020.
  30. ↵
    1. De Schepper AM,
    2. Hogendoorn PCW,
    3. Bloem JL
    : Giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath may present radiologically as intrinsic osseous lesions. Eur Radiol 17(2): 499-502, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0320-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang CS,
    2. Duan Q,
    3. Xue YJ,
    4. Huang XM,
    5. Wang LL,
    6. Chen ZY,
    7. Chen JH,
    8. Sun B
    : Giant cell tumour of tendon sheath with bone invasion in extremities: analysis of clinical and imaging findings. Radiol Med 120(8): 745-752, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0520-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Nakayama S,
    2. Nishio J,
    3. Aoki M,
    4. Nabeshima K,
    5. Yamamoto T
    : t(1;2)-positive localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor with bone invasion. In Vivo 36(5): 2525-2529, 2022. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12989
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Kitagawa Y,
    2. Ito H,
    3. Amano Y,
    4. Sawaizumi T,
    5. Takeuchi T
    : MR imaging for preoperative diagnosis and assessment of local tumor extent on localized giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Skeletal Radiol 32(11): 633-638, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-003-0689-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Christanto AG,
    2. Kuntara A
    : Tenosynovial giant cell tumor, localized type, with recurrence, and lung metastases: A case report. Radiol Case Rep 17(6): 1946-1950, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.02.073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Shaik AA,
    2. Panigrahi MK,
    3. Patro M,
    4. Sushmita V,
    5. Mishra P
    : Localized type tenosynovial giant cell tumor with metastases to lungs and pleura: a case report and literature review. J Med Case Rep 18(1): 452, 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04768-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Boland JM,
    2. Folpe AL,
    3. Hornick JL,
    4. Grogg KL
    : Clusterin is expressed in normal synoviocytes and in tenosynovial giant cell tumors of localized and diffuse types. Am J Surg Pathol 33(8): 1225-1229, 2009. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181a6d86f
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Folpe AL,
    2. Weiss SW,
    3. Fletcher CD,
    4. Gown AM
    : Tenosynovial giant cell tumors: evidence for a desmin-positive dendritic cell subpopulation. Hum Pathol 11(10): 939-944, 1998.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Nishio J
    : Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetics of benign and intermediate soft tissue tumors. Oncol Lett 5(1): 12-18, 2013. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.1002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Nakayama S,
    2. Nishio J,
    3. Nakatani K,
    4. Nabeshima K,
    5. Yamamoto T
    : Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath with a t(1;1)(p13;p34) chromosomal translocation. Anticancer Res 40(8): 4373-4377, 2020. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14440
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. West RB,
    2. Rubin BP,
    3. Miller MA,
    4. Subramanian S,
    5. Kaygusuz G,
    6. Montgomery K,
    7. Zhu S,
    8. Marinelli RJ,
    9. De Luca A,
    10. Downs-Kelly E,
    11. Goldblum JR,
    12. Corless CL,
    13. Brown PO,
    14. Gilks CB,
    15. Nielsen TO,
    16. Huntsman D,
    17. van de Rijn M
    : A landscape effect in tenosynovial giant-cell tumor from activation of CSF1 expression by a translocation in a minority of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(3): 690-695, 2006. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507321103
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Ho J,
    2. Peters T,
    3. Dickson BC,
    4. Swanson D,
    5. Fernandez A,
    6. Frova-Seguin A,
    7. Valentin MA,
    8. Schramm U,
    9. Sultan M,
    10. Nielsen TO,
    11. Demicco EG
    : Detection of CSF1 rearrangements deleting the 3′ UTR in tenosynovial giant cell tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 59(2): 96-105, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Oliveira AM,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Wang WL
    : Nodular fasciitis. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp. 49-50, 2020.
  42. ↵
    1. Broski SM,
    2. Wenger DE
    : Multimodality imaging features of USP6-associated neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol 52(3): 297-313, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04146-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Wang XL,
    2. De Schepper AM,
    3. Vanhoenacker F,
    4. De Raeve H,
    5. Gielen J,
    6. Aparisi F,
    7. Rausin L,
    8. Somville J
    : Nodular fasciitis: correlation of MRI findings and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol 31(3): 155-161, 2002. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-001-0462-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Guo R,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Chou MM,
    4. Asmann Y,
    5. Wenger DE,
    6. Al-Ibraheemi A,
    7. Molavi DW,
    8. Aboulafia A,
    9. Jin L,
    10. Fritchie K,
    11. Oliveira JL,
    12. Jenkins RB,
    13. Westendorf JJ,
    14. Dong J,
    15. Oliveira AM
    : PPP6R3-USP6 amplification: novel oncogenic mechanism in malignant nodular fasciitis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55(8): 640-649, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22366
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Teramura Y,
    2. Yamazaki Y,
    3. Tanaka M,
    4. Sugiura Y,
    5. Takazawa Y,
    6. Takeuchi K,
    7. Nakayama T,
    8. Kaneko T,
    9. Musha Y,
    10. Funauchi Y,
    11. Ae K,
    12. Matsumoto S,
    13. Nakamura T
    : Case of mesenchymal tumor with the PPP6R3-USP6 fusion, possible nodular fasciitis with malignant transformation. Pathol Int 69(12): 706-709, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/pin.12851
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Sawyer JR,
    2. Sammartino G,
    3. Baker GF,
    4. Bell JM
    : Clonal chromosome aberrations in a case of nodular fasciitis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 76(2): 154-156, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(94)90469-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Birdsall SH,
    2. Shipley JM,
    3. Summersgill BM,
    4. Black AJ,
    5. Jackson P,
    6. Kissin MW,
    7. Gusterson BA
    : Cytogenetic findings in a case of nodular fasciitis of the breast. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 81(2): 166-168, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(94)00229-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Weibolt VM,
    2. Buresh CJ,
    3. Roberts CA,
    4. Suijkerbuijk RF,
    5. Pickering DL,
    6. Neff JR,
    7. Bridge JA
    : Involvement of 3q21 in nodular fasciitis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 106(2): 177-179, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(98)00066-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Donner LR,
    2. Silva T,
    3. Dobin SM
    : Clonal rearrangement of 15p11.2, 16p11.2, and 16p13.3 in a case of nodular fasciitis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 139(2): 138-140, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00613-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Velagaleti GV,
    2. Tapper JK,
    3. Panova NE,
    4. Miettinen M,
    5. Gatalica Z
    : Cytogenetic findings in a case of nodular fasciitis of subclavicular region. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 141(2): 160-163, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00725-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Erickson-Johnson MR,
    2. Chou MM,
    3. Evers BR,
    4. Roth CW,
    5. Seys AR,
    6. Jin L,
    7. Ye Y,
    8. Lau AW,
    9. Wang X,
    10. Oliveira AM
    : Nodular fasciitis: a novel model of transient neoplasia induced by MYH9-USP6 gene fusion. Lab Invest 91(10): 1427-1433, 2011. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Cordier F,
    2. Creytens D
    : Unravelling the USP6 gene: an update. J Clin Pathol 76(9): 573-577, 2023. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208896
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Balko J,
    2. Stanek M,
    3. Krskova L,
    4. Zamecnik J
    : Unusual fusion gene rearrangements in patients with nodular fasciitis: a study of rare and novel USP6 fusion partners with a review of the literature. J Clin Pathol 77(6): 411-416, 2024. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208768
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 39 (2)
In Vivo
Vol. 39, Issue 2
March-April 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fibroma of Tendon Sheath Revisited
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Fibroma of Tendon Sheath Revisited
YUKI SHINOHARA, JUN NISHIO, SHIZUHIDE NAKAYAMA, MIKORO KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI, TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo Mar 2025, 39 (2) 613-620; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13866

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Fibroma of Tendon Sheath Revisited
YUKI SHINOHARA, JUN NISHIO, SHIZUHIDE NAKAYAMA, MIKORO KOGA, MIKIKO AOKI, TAKAMASA KOGA
In Vivo Mar 2025, 39 (2) 613-620; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13866
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Clinical Features
    • Radiological Features
    • Histopathology
    • Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Features
    • Differential Diagnosis
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Body Fat, Skeletal Muscle Mass, and Body Mass Index in Individuals ≥45 Years Old: A Systematic Review
  • Cutaneous Cryosurgery in Dermatology: Evolving Principles and Clinical Applications for Benign, Premalignant, and Malignant Lesions
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmologists Residents Well-being and Training Programs: A Systematic Review
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Fibroma of tendon sheath
  • desmoplastic fibroblastoma
  • tenosynovial giant cell tumor
  • nodular fasciitis
  • USP6
  • review
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire