Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Colon Cancer With Bladder Invasion: A Single Center Experience

TZU-WEI CHIANG, LI-WEN CHANG, FENG-FAN CHIANG, JIAN-RI LI and SHENG-CHUN HUNG
In Vivo November 2024, 38 (6) 2990-3001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13782
TZU-WEI CHIANG
1Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
2Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LI-WEN CHANG
3Department of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
4Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
5Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FENG-FAN CHIANG
1Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JIAN-RI LI
3Department of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
4Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
5Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
6Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHENG-CHUN HUNG
3Department of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
4Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
5Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: weshong1118{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate the outcome of colon cancer with bladder invasion after surgical intervention. Patients and Methods: Between 2011 and 2022, a total of 41 patients diagnosed with colon cancer and bladder invasion underwent surgical procedures at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The impact of various risk factors on overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among the enrolled patients, 21 underwent radical cystectomy, while 20 underwent partial cystectomy. Twelve had tumors located in the rectum, 19 in the sigmoid colon, and 10 in both the rectum and sigmoid colon. The median OS was 71.8 months in stage 2, 50.8 months in stage 3, and 11.2 months in stage 4 (p=0.061). Median OS was 71.8 months in patients with negative surgical margins and 10.5 months in those with positive surgical margins (p=0.003). In multivariate regression analysis, positive surgical margins [hazard ratio (HR)=3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.28-10.34, p=0.015] and emergency operations (HR=4.57, 95%CI=1.34-15.55, p=0.015) significantly impacted OS. Conclusion: Complete resection of colon cancer with bladder invasion can yield excellent oncologic outcomes. The decision between partial and radical cystectomy should balance surgical margin clearance and the preservation of quality of life. Both surgical margin involvement and emergency operations are independent risk factors for OS.

Key Words:
  • Colon cancer
  • bladder invasion
  • overall survival

Colon cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide (1). Approximately 20% of primary colorectal cancers extend to adjacent organs, with approximately 30% of these cases involving the urinary tract (2-5). Despite advances in diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT) and cystoscopy, preoperative identification of true bladder invasion remains challenging, with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity (6-8). In most cases, bladder invasion is identified during surgery. However, intraoperative biopsy of the affected organ or adjacent tissue carries significant risks, including sampling error and the potential for tumor spillage (9, 10). Consequently, the gold standard treatment involves en bloc resection of the primary colonic tumor along with either partial or radical cystectomy, followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (11, 12). Decisions between partial and total cystectomy must weigh the need for clear margins, the risk of local recurrence, and the patient’s quality of life. Pathological bladder invasion and the completeness of resection have been proposed as critical factors influencing local recurrence and survival (13). Additionally, the method of urinary tract reconstruction can potentially impact renal function deterioration post-surgery (14, 15). The aim of our study was to investigate the prognosis of advanced colon cancer cases with suspected bladder invasion, focusing on surgical and oncological outcomes.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective chart review study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (IRB No. CE13240A-3). From 2011 to 2022, a total of 41 patients with advanced colon cancer suspected of bladder invasion underwent surgical intervention at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Patients with missing data, incomplete follow-up, or non-colorectal cancer pathology reports were excluded from the study. The patients were categorized into two groups: radical cystectomy and partial cystectomy. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor stage, pathological characteristics, tumor markers, colorectal surgery methods, and bladder surgery methods, were recorded. A negative surgical margin was defined as no tumor involvement in the pathological specimen, either at the metastatic or primary tumor site. Renal function changes were evaluated by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the different reconstruction methods, including primary bladder repair, ureterostomy, and ileal conduit.

The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS) following colorectal surgery. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, while categorical variables were assessed using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Survival outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. To explore the association between various factors, hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. All statistical analyses were conducted using version 22.0 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The characteristics of patients with colon cancer suspected of bladder invasion are summarized in Table I. Among the 41 patients, 21 underwent radical cystectomy and 20 underwent partial cystectomy. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, ECOG performance status, comorbidities, or BMI. A greater number of patients with rectal tumors underwent radical cystectomy (n=12), while more patients with sigmoid tumors underwent partial cystectomy (n=16). Consequently, a higher proportion of patients in the radical cystectomy group underwent abdominoperineal resection (n=15), compared to those who underwent anterior resection (n=10) and low anterior resection (n=7) in the partial cystectomy group. Additionally, high-grade hydronephrosis was more prevalent in the radical cystectomy group compared to the partial cystectomy group (p=0.013). Pathological staging revealed a higher number of stage III and stage IV tumors in the radical cystectomy group compared to the partial cystectomy group (p=0.021). There was also a higher incidence of surgical margin involvement in the radical cystectomy group compared to the partial cystectomy group (p=0.002). The median follow-up time was 10.55 months for the radical cystectomy group and 31.15 months for the partial cystectomy group (p=0.064).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Colon cancer with bladder invasion (n=41).

Table II presents the estimated renal function deterioration based on different urinary tract reconstruction methods. In the partial cystectomy group, 20 patients underwent primary bladder repair. In the radical cystectomy group, 10 patients received ureterostomy reconstruction, and 11 patients underwent ileal conduit reconstruction. There were no significant differences in renal function, as measured by serum creatinine levels or eGFR, between the different reconstruction methods.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Renal function change among different bladder surgery.

OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves across different comparison groups. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS between the radical cystectomy and partial cystectomy groups, although there was a trend toward better survival outcomes in the partial cystectomy group. Figure 1A shows that the median OS was 50.8 months in the partial cystectomy group compared to 16.7 months in the radical cystectomy group (p=0.244). Figure 1B illustrates that the median RFS was not reached in the partial cystectomy group compared to 5.2 months in the radical cystectomy group (p=0.110).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival between partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy. A) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing overall survival between partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median overall survival was 50.8 months in the partial cystectomy group compared to 16.7 months in the radical cystectomy group, p=0.244. B) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing recurrence-free survival between partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median recurrence-free survival was non-reached in the partial cystectomy group compared to 5.2 months in the radical cystectomy group, p=0.110.

Figure 2 illustrates the OS and RFS across different pathological stages. The median OS was 71.8 months for stage II, 50.8 months for stage III, and 11.2 months for stage IV (Figure 2A, p=0.064). The median RFS was 49.6 months for stage III and 3.2 months for stage IV (Figure 2B, p<0.001). Figure 3 demonstrates the impact of surgical margin involvement on both OS and RFS. Patients with surgical margin involvement had significantly worse OS (10.5 months vs. 71.8 months, p=0.003, Figure 3A) and RFS (4.7 months vs. not reached, p=0.003, Figure 3B) compared to those without margin involvement. Figure 4 indicates that tumors located in the rectum were associated with poorer OS and RFS compared to those located in the sigmoid colon.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival between different pathologic stages. A) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing overall survival among different pathologic stages in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median overall survival was 71.8 months in stage 2, 50.8 months in stage 3 and 11.2 months in stage 4, p=0.064. B) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing recurrence-free survival among different pathologic stages in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median recurrence-free survival was non-reached in stage 2, 49.6 months in stage 3 and 3.2 months in stage 4, p<0.001.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival between surgical margin positive and negative. A) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing overall survival among surgical margin positive and negative patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median overall survival was 71.8 months in the surgical margin negative group and 10.5 months in the surgical margin positive group, p=0.003. B) Kaplan-Meier curve comparing recurrence-free survival between surgical margin positive and negative patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median recurrence-free survival was non-reached in the surgical margin negative group and 4.7 months in the surgical margin positive group, p=0.003.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Overall survival and recurrence-free survival between different tumor locations. Kaplan-Meier curve comparing overall survival based on different tumor location (rectum, sigmoid or rectum plus sigmoid) in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median overall survival was 50.8 months in the sigmoid, 19.7 months in the rectum plus sigmoid and 10.5 months in the rectum, p=0.181. B) Kaplan- Meier curve comparing recurrence-free survival based on different tumor location (rectum, sigmoid or rectum plus sigmoid) in patients with colon cancer involving bladder invasion. The median recurrence free survival was 49.6 months in the sigmoid, non-reached in the rectum plus sigmoid and 4.7 months in the rectum, p=0.112.

In the univariate and multivariate analyses of OS, Table III shows that positive surgical margins (HR=3.64, 95%CI=1.28-10.34, p=0.015) and emergency operations (HR=4.57, 95%CI=1.34-15.55, p=0.015) are independent risk factors for patients with colon cancer and bladder invasion undergoing radical excision.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Uni-multivariant for overall survival.

Discussion

Advanced colon cancer has the potential to invade adjacent visceral organs, presenting serious clinical conditions and therapeutic challenges for both patients and colorectal surgeons. Due to the urinary bladder’s close proximity to the colon, it is one of the most commonly affected organs by locally advanced colon cancer (4, 16). Patients may present with lower urinary tract symptoms or gross hematuria; however, the majority do not experience urinary tract symptoms, and these may only become evident during colorectal surgery (17). In reality, the presence of urinary symptoms does not reliably indicate the severity of bladder invasion, and previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the reliability of urinary symptoms as indicators of bladder infiltration (7). When urinary bladder involvement is discovered during colorectal surgery, a urologist is consulted for tumor excision and potential reconstruction. However, patients remain at high risk for tumor recurrence or disease progression (18).

When patients present with gross hematuria, cystoscopy is the standard diagnostic tool, which may reveal a submucosal tumor on the posterior wall of the bladder. If a biopsy result indicates adenocarcinoma, it is potentially indicative of colorectal adenocarcinoma as the primary origin (19). However, cystoscopy revealed a mass in only one-third of our patients and the reported sensitivity in predicting true bladder invasion ranges from 57% to 87%, with specificity reported to be as low as 25% (7, 20). Preoperative CT scans demonstrate high sensitivity in detecting colon cancer invasion of the bladder. It may reveal gross tumor invasion, abnormal enhancing masses on the bladder wall, irregular bladder mucosa, and loss of the perivesical fat plane (21). Additionally, CT urography may reveal a colovesical fistula, indicating advanced bladder invasion by the cancer (22). In our study, all patients underwent preoperative CT scans. Prior to surgery, 85% of the patients were classified as clinical T4 colon cancer. However, the pathological findings revealed that 26.8% of the cases were pT3, while 73.2% were pT4. All patients had tumors originating from the sigmoid colon or rectum. These results suggest that rectal or sigmoid colon cancers classified as T4 on CT scans warrant careful consideration for potential bladder invasion.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in advanced colon cancer have demonstrated promising prognostic outcomes, including significant tumor regression, improved pathological tumor response, and prolonged overall survival (23-26). In our study population, 85.7% of patients in the radical cystectomy group had tumors originating from the rectum, and 42.86% of these patients had received neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, among patients in the partial cystectomy group, only 20.0% had rectal-origin tumors, and only 5.0% had received neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy achieved a significant survival benefit for locally advanced colon cancer (27, 28). However, this result was not observed in our cohort. Several factors may contribute to this discrepancy, including potential selection bias and the fact that more than half of the patients did not have rectal-origin tumors. Additionally, the presence of 26.8% of patients with pT3 tumors and 46.3% with tumors originating from the sigmoid colon may have influenced the outcomes. These variables could have impacted the observed results and contributed to the differences noted in our study.

The decision between partial and total cystectomy during colorectal surgery should be carefully balanced, taking into account factors, such as surgical margin clearance, the risk of local recurrence, and the patient’s life expectancy and quality of life (13). In our study population, the radical cystectomy group exhibited poorer clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival and recurrence-free survival compared to the partial cystectomy group. This discrepancy may be attributed to the more advanced pathological stages, higher prevalence of rectal tumors, and involvement of surgical margins in the radical cystectomy group. These factors reflect the more challenging clinical conditions faced by patients undergoing radical cystectomy and highlight the complex decision-making process required by surgeons. Our results also indicate that a positive surgical margin is associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Moreover, it appears to be an independent risk factor for overall survival, even after adjusting for other risk factors.

A study conducted by the Federation de Recherche EN CHirurgie (FRENCH) Group, which included 117 patients, reported a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 82.9% and a 3-year OS rate of 59.5% (2). The R0 resection rate in the study was reported as 87.2%, which is significantly higher than that observed in our population. It is important to note that mid and low rectal cancers were excluded from that study. In contrast, our cohort, which included these cases, experienced worse survival outcomes. This discrepancy may be attributed to a higher rate of positive surgical margins and a greater prevalence of rectal tumors in our population. Another study involving 90 patients documented a 5-year relapse-free survival rate of 62.9% and a 5-year OS rate of 62.5% (29). This study also suggested that patients undergoing en bloc total cystectomy for locally advanced colorectal cancers experience worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes compared to those undergoing partial cystectomy. These findings are consistent with the results observed in our study. In summary, achieving a negative surgical margin is a crucial factor for long-term outcomes. The decision between partial or radical cystectomy should ideally be guided by the potential for R0 resection, as this significantly impacts patient prognosis (13).

Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer is recognized as an independent risk factor influencing prognosis, accounting for 17.1% of cases in our population. Many colorectal carcinomas present emergently due to complications, such as obstruction, perforation, and hemorrhage. Such emergency interventions are correlated with poor short- and long-term outcomes (30). Though most colorectal cancer cases are identified through elective diagnosis, a significant fraction, approximately 10% to 30%, presents in emergency situations (31, 32). A large prospective study indicated that in patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, the presence of obstruction was linked to increased recurrence rates and decreased survival (33). Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of stage II and stage III colorectal cancer revealed that emergency surgery independently affected DFS (34). Patients presenting with emergent colorectal cancer in conjunction with bladder invasion are at heightened risk for locally advanced disease and potential distal metastasis, contributing to a poorer prognosis.

This study has several limitations. Primarily, the small sample size is a significant constraint, which stems from the fact that colonic tumor invasion into the bladder is a relatively rare condition. Conducting a randomized controlled trial in this context poses considerable challenges, including slow patient recruitment due to the rarity of the disease, as well as ethical concerns related to the feasibility of randomization and intervention. Additionally, the high proportion of emergency surgeries, the inconsistent protocols for neoadjuvant therapy, and the high incidence of rectal cancer contribute to outcomes that may be inferior compared to those reported in existing studies. Nevertheless, our results present real-world experiences of colorectal cancer with bladder invasion, reflecting conditions outside the context of randomized trials

Conclusion

Complete resection of colon cancer with bladder invasion can yield excellent oncologic outcomes. The decision between partial and radical cystectomy should balance surgical margin clearance and the preservation of quality of life. Both surgical margin involvement and emergency operations are independent risk factors for overall survival.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Study design and protocol development: TWC and SCH. Manuscript writing and editing: TWC and SCH. Statistical analysis: LWC and SCH. Data collection and patient management: TWC, LWC, FFC, JRL, and SCH.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None of the contributing Authors have any conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests or relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

  • Received August 6, 2024.
  • Revision received August 27, 2024.
  • Accepted August 29, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bray F,
    2. Laversanne M,
    3. Sung H,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Siegel RL,
    6. Soerjomataram I,
    7. Jemal A
    : Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 74(3): 229-263, 2024. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Vuillermet C,
    2. Meillat H,
    3. Manceau G,
    4. Creavin B,
    5. Eveno C,
    6. Benoist S,
    7. Parc Y,
    8. Lefevre JH, FRENCH research group
    : Advanced colonic cancer with clinically suspected bladder invasion: Outcomes and prognosis from a multicentric study of 117 patients from the FRENCH research group. Surgery 168(5): 786-792, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Carne PWG,
    2. Frye JNR,
    3. Kennedy-Smith A,
    4. Keating J,
    5. Merrie A,
    6. Dennett E,
    7. Frizelle FA
    : Local invasion of the bladder with colorectal cancers: surgical management and patterns of local recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1): 44-47, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-003-0011-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Kamoto T,
    3. Sugino Y,
    4. Takeuchi H,
    5. Habuchi T,
    6. Ogawa O
    : High incidence of urinary bladder involvement in carcinomas of the sigmoid and rectum: A retrospective review of 580 patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 84(4): 209-214, 2003. DOI: 10.1002/jso.10322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Klaver CE,
    2. Gietelink L,
    3. Bemelman WA,
    4. Wouters MW,
    5. Wiggers T,
    6. Tollenaar RA,
    7. Tanis PJ, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit Group
    : Locally advanced colon cancer: Evaluation of current clinical practice and treatment outcomes at the population level. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15(2): 181-190, 2017. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Yoshida T,
    2. Shida D,
    3. Taniguchi H,
    4. Tsukamoto S,
    5. Kanemitsu Y
    : Long-term outcomes following partial versus complete cystectomy in advanced colorectal cancer with regarding to the extent of bladder invasion. Ann Surg Oncol 26(5): 1569-1576, 2019. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07276-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Li JC,
    2. Chong CC,
    3. Ng SS,
    4. Yiu RY,
    5. Lee JF,
    6. Leung KL
    : En bloc urinary bladder resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a 17-year experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(9): 1169-1176, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1210-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Winter DC,
    2. Walsh R,
    3. Lee G,
    4. Kiely D,
    5. O’Riordain MG,
    6. O’Sullivan GC
    : Local involvement of the urinary bladder in primary colorectal cancer: Outcome with en bloc resection. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2): 441-446, 2007. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9144-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gao F,
    2. Cao YF,
    3. Chen LS,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Tang ZJ,
    6. Liang JL
    : Outcome of surgical management of the bladder in advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(1): 21-24, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-006-0106-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Tsang YP,
    2. Lau CW
    : Outcomes of partial or total cystectomy in advanced colon cancer with suspected bladder invasion—our 8-year experience and literature review. J Gastrointest Cancer 53(2): 394-402, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00623-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hunter JA,
    2. Ryan JA Jr.,
    3. Schultz P
    : En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 154(1): 67-71, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90292-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ri H,
    2. Kang H,
    3. Xu Z,
    4. Gong Z,
    5. Jo H,
    6. Amadou BH,
    7. Xu Y,
    8. Ren Y,
    9. Zhu W,
    10. Chen X
    : Surgical treatment of locally advanced right colon cancer invading neighboring organs. Front Med (Lausanne) 9: 1044163, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1044163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Suh JW,
    2. Kim DW,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Yang IJ,
    5. Ahn HM,
    6. Oh HK,
    7. Kim JK,
    8. Lee H,
    9. Oh JJ,
    10. Lee S,
    11. Jeong SJ,
    12. Hong SK,
    13. Byun SS,
    14. Kang SB
    : Comparison of partial and total cystectomy for colorectal cancer with histologically confirmed bladder invasion. Surgery 176(3): 652-659, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Creta M,
    2. Fusco F,
    3. La Rocca R,
    4. Capece M,
    5. Celentano G,
    6. Imbimbo C,
    7. Imperatore V,
    8. Russo L,
    9. Mangiapia F,
    10. Mirone V,
    11. Russo D,
    12. Longo N
    : Short- and long-term evaluation of renal function after radical cystectomy and cutaneous ureterostomy in high-risk patients. J Clin Med 9(7): 2191, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hatakeyama S,
    2. Koie T,
    3. Narita T,
    4. Hosogoe S,
    5. Yamamoto H,
    6. Tobisawa Y,
    7. Yoneyama T,
    8. Yoneyama T,
    9. Hashimoto Y,
    10. Ohyama C
    : Renal function outcomes and risk factors for stage 3B chronic kidney disease after urinary diversion in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer [corrected]. PLoS One 11(2): e0149544, 2016. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149544
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mohan HM,
    2. Evans MD,
    3. Larkin JO,
    4. Beynon J,
    5. Winter DC
    : Multivisceral resection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 20(9): 2929-2936, 2013. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2967-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Nerli RB,
    2. Ghagane SC,
    3. Ram P,
    4. Shimikore SS,
    5. Vinchurkar K,
    6. Hiremath MB
    : Bladder invasion in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Indian J Surg Oncol 9(4): 547-551, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0788-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Yagi Y,
    2. Shoji Y,
    3. Sasaki S,
    4. Yoshikawa A,
    5. Tsukioka Y,
    6. Fukushima W,
    7. Hirosawa H,
    8. Izumi R,
    9. Saito K
    : Sigmoid colon cancer arising in a diverticulum of the colon with involvement of the urinary bladder: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Gastroenterol 14: 90, 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Yun EJ,
    2. Meng MV,
    3. Carroll PR
    : Evaluation of the patient with hematuria. Med Clin North Am 88(2): 329-343, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00172-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Luo HL,
    2. Tsai KL,
    3. Lin SE,
    4. Chiang PH
    : Outcome of urinary bladder recurrence after partial cystectomy for en bloc urinary bladder adherent colorectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(5): 631-635, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1690-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Woranisarakul V,
    2. Ramart P,
    3. Phinthusophon K,
    4. Chotikawanich E,
    5. Prapasrivorakul S,
    6. Lohsiriwat V
    : Accuracy of preoperative urinary symptoms, urinalysis, computed tomography and cystoscopic findings for the diagnosis of urinary bladder invasion in patients with colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(17): 7241-7244, 2014. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.17.7241
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Golabek T,
    2. Szymanska A,
    3. Szopinski T,
    4. Bukowczan J,
    5. Furmanek M,
    6. Powroznik J,
    7. Chlosta P
    : Enterovesical fistulae: aetiology, imaging, and management. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013: 617967, 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/617967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. de Gooyer JM,
    2. Verstegen MG,
    3. ‘t Lam-Boer J,
    4. Radema SA,
    5. Verhoeven RHA,
    6. Verhoef C,
    7. Schreinemakers JMJ,
    8. de Wilt JHW
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: A nationwide propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Dig Surg 37(4): 292-301, 2020. DOI: 10.1159/000503446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Huang CM,
    2. Huang MY,
    3. Ma CJ,
    4. Yeh Y-,
    5. Tsai HL,
    6. Huang CW,
    7. Huang CJ,
    8. Wang JY
    : Neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy followed by radical resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Radiat Oncol 12(1): 48, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0790-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gosavi R,
    2. Chia C,
    3. Michael M,
    4. Heriot AG,
    5. Warrier SK,
    6. Kong JC
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 36(10): 2063-2070, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03945-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Ebata Y,
    2. Nakanishi R,
    3. Tanaka Y,
    4. Kawazoe T,
    5. Tajiri H,
    6. Zaitsu Y,
    7. Nakashima Y,
    8. Ota M,
    9. Oki E,
    10. Yoshizumi T
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T4b or obstructive colon cancer: a single center retrospective cohort study. Anticancer Res 44(3): 1281-1287, 2024. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Papaccio F,
    2. Roselló S,
    3. Huerta M,
    4. Gambardella V,
    5. Tarazona N,
    6. Fleitas T,
    7. Roda D,
    8. Cervantes A
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12(12): 3611, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123611
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hawkins AT,
    2. Ford MM,
    3. Geiger TM,
    4. Hopkins MB,
    5. Kachnic LA,
    6. Muldoon RL,
    7. Glasgow SC
    : Neoadjuvant radiation for clinical T4 colon cancer: A potential improvement to overall survival. Surgery 165(2): 469-475, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kondo A,
    2. Sasaki T,
    3. Kitaguchi D,
    4. Tsukada Y,
    5. Nishizawa Y,
    6. Ito M
    : Resection of the urinary bladder for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of partial versus total cystectomy. BMC Surg 19(1): 63, 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0522-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Baer C,
    2. Menon R,
    3. Bastawrous S,
    4. Bastawrous A
    : Emergency presentations of colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 97(3): 529-545, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kingston RD,
    2. Walsh SH,
    3. Jeacock J
    : Physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency admission of patients with colorectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(5): 335-338, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sikka V,
    2. Ornato JP
    : Cancer diagnosis and outcomes in Michigan EDs vs other settings. Am J Emerg Med 30(2): 283-292, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Dahdaleh FS,
    2. Sherman SK,
    3. Poli EC,
    4. Vigneswaran J,
    5. Polite BN,
    6. Sharma MR,
    7. Catenacci DV,
    8. Maron SB,
    9. Turaga KK
    : Obstruction predicts worse long-term outcomes in stage III colon cancer: A secondary analysis of the N0147 trial. Surgery 164(6): 1223-1229, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.044
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Böckelman C,
    2. Engelmann BE,
    3. Kaprio T,
    4. Hansen TF,
    5. Glimelius B
    : Risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer stage II and III: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature. Acta Oncol 54(1): 5-16, 2015. DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.975839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 38 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 38, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Colon Cancer With Bladder Invasion: A Single Center Experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Colon Cancer With Bladder Invasion: A Single Center Experience
TZU-WEI CHIANG, LI-WEN CHANG, FENG-FAN CHIANG, JIAN-RI LI, SHENG-CHUN HUNG
In Vivo Nov 2024, 38 (6) 2990-3001; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13782

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Colon Cancer With Bladder Invasion: A Single Center Experience
TZU-WEI CHIANG, LI-WEN CHANG, FENG-FAN CHIANG, JIAN-RI LI, SHENG-CHUN HUNG
In Vivo Nov 2024, 38 (6) 2990-3001; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13782
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Effect of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System for Colorectal Cancer Surgery With Multivisceral Resection on Long-term Outcomes: Japanese Multicenter Analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Observational Study on the Effectiveness of L-Arginine Plus Vitamin C in the Management of Cancer-related Fatigue
  • Signal Detection Analysis of Hypnotic-induced Respiratory Depression
  • Development and Validation of an EHR-based Algorithm for Identifying Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • colon cancer
  • bladder invasion
  • overall survival
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire