Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

PSMA PET/CT Accuracy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer Nodes Metastases

PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, VINCENZO FIORENTINO, MARA CURDUMAN, MICHELE PENNISI and FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo November 2024, 38 (6) 2880-2885; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13769
PIETRO PEPE
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: piepepe{at}hotmail.com
LUDOVICA PEPE
2Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VINCENZO FIORENTINO
2Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age “Gaetano Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARA CURDUMAN
3Pathology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE PENNISI
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
4Pathology Unit, ASP Catania, “Gravina” Hospital, Caltagirone, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in pelvic nodal staging, using postoperative histopathology data as the reference standard. Patients and Methods: From January 2020 to June 2024, 78 patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) (ISUP Grade Group 2) underwent radical prostatectomy plus extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND): 60 (77%) vs. 18 (23%) men had an intermediate vs. high risk PCa. All the patients underwent PSMA PET/TC before surgery for clinical staging and nodes focal uptake (standardized uptake value “SUVmax) was evaluated to rule out the presence of metastases. Results: PSMA PET/CT was suspicious for nodes metastases in 16/78 (20.5%) men (median SUVmax 26.2), conversely, histology demonstrated nodes metastases in 18/78 (23.1%). PSMA PET/CT was negative for nodal involvement in all Grade Group 2 (GG2) PCa, positive in 4/4 (100%) GG3 PCa, and in 10/14 (71.4%) GG5 PCa. In detail, PSMA PET/CT was false negative in 2/4 PCa, characterized by GG5 plus ductal adenocarcinoma. Overall, PSMA PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing nodal metastases were equal to 87.5, 96.8, 87.5 96.7, and 92.3%, respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.3% in nodal staging (100% in GG2 PCa), which decreased to 63.6% in GG5 PCa. In high-risk patients or in case of ductal adenocarcinoma, a negative PSMA PET/CT does not rule out the need for ePLND.

Key Words:
  • PSMA PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • nodes metastases
  • extended PNLD
  • Received September 1, 2024.
  • Revision received September 14, 2024.
  • Accepted September 16, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 38 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 38, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PSMA PET/CT Accuracy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer Nodes Metastases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
PSMA PET/CT Accuracy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer Nodes Metastases
PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, VINCENZO FIORENTINO, MARA CURDUMAN, MICHELE PENNISI, FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo Nov 2024, 38 (6) 2880-2885; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13769

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
PSMA PET/CT Accuracy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer Nodes Metastases
PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, VINCENZO FIORENTINO, MARA CURDUMAN, MICHELE PENNISI, FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo Nov 2024, 38 (6) 2880-2885; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13769
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Cost-Effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT as Single Procedure for Diagnosis and Staging High-Grade Prostate Cancer: A Single Center Experience
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of Cement Leakage and Complications After Cement-augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Retrospective Case Series
  • Comparison of Early Response to Selumetinib Therapy in Adolescents and Children With NF1-related Plexiform Neurofibromas
  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • PSMA PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • nodes metastases
  • extended PNLD
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire