Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Case ReportCase Reports
Open Access

Large Complex Odontoma in the Angulus Mandibulae – Intraoral Enucleation as an Alternative to Mandibular Continuity Resection

FLORIAN DUDDE, FILIP BARBAREWICZ, WILKEN BERGMANN, ADRIAN ZU KNYPHAUSEN and KAI-OLAF HENKEL
In Vivo September 2024, 38 (5) 2535-2539; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13726
FLORIAN DUDDE
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: floriandudde{at}gmx.de
FILIP BARBAREWICZ
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WILKEN BERGMANN
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ADRIAN ZU KNYPHAUSEN
2Private Practice of Pathology, Practice MVZ Lademannbogen, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAI-OLAF HENKEL
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Odontomas are among the most common odontogenic tumors and are generally considered as hamartomatous odontogenic lesions. These tumors can be histopathologically divided into complex odontomas and compound odontomas based on their composition. Odontomas show a slow growing behavior and typically lack characteristic symptoms. The standard surgical treatment for large odontogenic tumors is a mandibular (continuity) resection followed by primary or secondary plastic reconstruction. Case Report: A 22-year-old male presented to the Department of maxillofacial surgery with an increasing feeling of pressure in the left mandible. An orthopantomogram revealed a large complex odontoma rg 038. Instead of mandible continuity resection an alternative minimally invasive technique/approach (intraoral) with a trapezoidal bone flap for the enucleation of an odontoma of the mandibular angle with subsequent flap reimplantation and osteosynthesis was performed. Conclusion: Surgical enucleation of large mandibular odontoma with a continuity resection through an extraoral approach represents the surgical standard treatment of this entity. The present case report describes an alternative minimally invasive technique/approach. This technique may reduce surgical risks of the continuity resection through an extraoral approach (nerve damage, scarring) and can improve the long-term stability of the mandible by bone preservation.

Key Words:
  • Complex odontoma
  • mandible
  • intraoral approach

Along with ameloblastomas, odontomas are among the most common odontogenic tumors (1). Odontomas are benign tumors with a mixed epithelial-ectomesenchymal origin and are considered hamartomatous odontogenic lesions (2). Odontomas usually develop in a late stage of false odontogenesis and therefore consist of different odontogenic components. Consequently, odontomas can be histopathologically divided into complex odontomas and compound odontomas based on their composition (2). Odontomas can be found in both the maxilla and mandible. The compound odontoma in particular is often located in the anterior maxilla, whereas the complex odontoma is primarily located in the posterior mandible (2, 3).

A large proportion of these benign odontogenic tumors are diagnosed around the age of 20. As a rule, these tumors show a slow growing behavior while lacking characteristic symptoms. Odontomas may become clinically noticeable in the context of tooth eruption disorders (4). In individual cases, this can lead to an increased feeling of pressure with subsequent development of pain in the respective anatomical region (4). If an odontoma is suspected, radiological imaging (orthopantomogram, cone beam computed tomography scan, computed tomography-scan) can represent added value throughout the diagnostical process. Odontoma often appears radiologically as a sharply demarcated bony shadowing tumor within the respective jawbone, often associated with an impacted tooth (4, 5). The complex odontoma appears as an unorganized, inhomogeneous, partly cloudy mass in the orthopantomogram (5). The compound odontoma can present itself as an organized tumor made up of all natural tooth components (3-5). The final diagnosis can be reached through histopathological tissue processing. As an odontogenic tumor, the odontoma consists in particular of enamel, dentin, cementum, and pulp with a surrounding connective tissue capsule (2). Depending on the symptoms and severity of the odontoma, a distinction can be made between a conservative approach (clinical and radiological follow-up) and a surgical approach in the sense of enucleation (6, 7).

Depending on the location and extent of the odontoma, in some cases prophylactic osteosynthesis must be carried out in the respective jaw section as part of surgical enucleation. In the case of large odontogenic tumors of the mandibular angle in particular, a mandibular (continuity) resection with primary/secondary plastic reconstruction is sometimes necessary (8).

However, the present case report demonstrates that even with extensive odontomas of the mandibular angle, a minimally invasive technique using a crestal bone flap through an intraoral approach is an alternative for the surgical therapy of this entity. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Case Report

The present case report describes a 22-year-old male who presented to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Army Hospital Hamburg for the surgical removal of wisdom teeth. In the last few weeks, the patient has felt an increasing feeling of pressure, especially in the area of the lower left jaw. The patient’s extended medical history was unremarkable. The clinical examination revealed an adult set of teeth with a clearly thickened, indolent bone structure in the area of the lower jaw rg 037 with vestibular emphasis. An orthopantomogram showed the impacted teeth 18, 28, 38, and 48 as well as a sharply defined bone-dense shadow coronal to tooth 38 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Orthopantomogram showing the impacted teeth 18, 28, 38, and 48. Furthermore, in the area of the left mandible in position 037, a sharply delineated bone-dense shading can be found coronal to tooth 38.

In addition, a cone beam computed tomography of the affected region was performed, which revealed the spread of the finding rg 038 with close relation to the inferior alveolar nerve (Figure 2). Due to the clear radiological findings, a complex odontoma rg 038 was suspected. Squamous cell carcinoma, ameloblastoma and/or metastasis were considered as differential diagnosis for this finding. The odontoma as well as the impacted teeth 18, 28, and 48 and the new growth in the area of the jaw angle were removed under general anesthesia.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Preoperative cone beam computed tomography in an axial section shows the spread of the odontoma rg 038 close to the inferior alveolar nerve.

Due to the young age of the patient, a mandibular continuity resection was avoided and a minimally invasive intraoral approach was chosen instead (Figure 3, Figure 4). Using a crestal trapezoidal bone window rg 038, the odontoma, along with the impacted tooth 38, was extracted through enucleation, with exposure and protection of the inferior alveolar nerve (Figure 4). Furthermore, after tumor removal, the trapezoidal bone flap was reinserted and a prophylactic mini-plate osteosynthesis was carried out in the area of the left jaw angle (Figure 5). Histopathological tissue processing revealed a complex odontoma with no signs of malignancy (Figure 6). Tubular dentin with surrounding and enclosed fibrous stroma (black arrows) with nests and strands of ameloblastic epithelium (asterisks) and production of enamel matrix (red arrow) were found, ruling out the remaining differential diagnosis.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Intraoperative picture showing the odontoma in left mandibular angle after removal of the trapezoidal bone flap through an intraoral approach.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Intraoperative picture showing the status after complete removal of the odontoma. The trapezoidal shape of the osseous approach before flap reinsertion can be observed.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Postoperative orthopantomogram showing the complete removal of the impacted teeth 18, 28, 38, and 48 as well as the removed odontoma in the area of the left mandibular angle with inserted mini plate osteosynthesis along the linea obliqua. The two screws in the middle of the plate fix the trapezoidal bone flap.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Histopathology. Tubular dentin with surrounding and enclosed fibrous stroma (black arrows) with nests and strands of ameloblastic epithelium (asterisks) and production of enamel matrix (red arrow). The cleft-like empty structures (white arrow) correspond to originally mature enamel that was demineralized during histological processing. (Hematoxylin and Eosin after EDTA-demineralization, 20× magnification).

Initially, postoperatively, the patient showed slight hypesthesia of the left inferior alveolar nerve. Throughout the clinical follow-up, the hypesthesia showed signs of resolution, with no evidence of recurrence of the odontoma six months postoperative.

Discussion

The incidence of odontogenic tumors is up to 2% (9). Since the odontoma is a benign tumor, the prognosis for this odontogenic tumor after complete resection is very good. Recurrences after complete enucleation of odontoma are unlikely due to the fact that these benign tumors result from a malformation in the late phase of odontogenesis (2, 4, 6). This also often requires self-limiting growth, which can form the basis for a conservative approach (watchful-waiting strategy). Should the findings and symptoms progress during the conservative treatment of odontoma, surgical therapy can be carried out at any time. The spectrum of enucleation ranges from a partly mandibular resection to mandibular continuity resection (6, 8). 3D virtual operation planning with the production of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) planned resection templates can add value with regard to surgically precise tumor removal while preserving the bone, nerve, and other soft tissue structures (10, 11).

However, in the case of large odontomas, an extraoral approach is often required (e.g., submandibular) with the typical surgical risks (e.g., damage to the ramus marginalis mandibulae) and visible cervical scars. An alternative surgical treatment with regard to the described complications is the intraoral approach using a crestal-marginal incision in the area of the mandibular molars up to the area of the ramus mandibulae. Histologically, the morphology of a complex odontoma consists of tubular dentin, aggregates of enamel (matrix) as well as pulp tissue, slightly differentiating it from other benign tumors of the head and neck (5, 8).

Furthermore, in this case report, the enucleation was achieved via a trapezoidal designed crestal bone window with subsequent osteosynthesis of the reimplanted bone flap in the mandible. With regard to the preservation of bone structures, this can provide added value in terms of long-term stability of the mandible. However, these favorable conditions cannot always be achieved, especially in large odontomas. Sometimes complex and large osteotomies are required in order to achieve a complete excochleation.

Both the minimally invasive approach and the 3-D planned mandibular box resection can sometimes ensure that the inferior alveolar nerve is preserved (10). Regardless of the surgical technique, postoperative complications can include wound dehiscence, infections of the bone and surrounding soft tissue, as well as loosening of the osteosynthesis material and/or secondary fractures of the respective jaw area. The follow up of this entity usually consists of a clinical and radiological imaging (orthopantomogram). However, recurrences after complete enucleation are rare.

Conclusion

Odontomas are among the most common benign odontogenic tumors. Surgical enucleation of a mandibular odontoma with a continuity resection through an extraoral approach represents the surgical gold standard of this entity. The present case report describes an alternative minimally invasive technique/approach (intraoral) with a trapezoidal bone flap for the enucleation of an odontoma of the mandibular angle with subsequent flap reimplantation and osteosynthesis. In this manner, well-known surgical risks associated with the extraoral approach, such as nerve damage and scarring, can be avoided, and long-term mandibular stability can be enhanced through bone preservation.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    KOH, WB, FB, and FD treated the patient and revised the article. FD researched the scientific literature, provided radiological findings, and wrote the article. AZK provided histopathological findings. All Authors gave final approval for publication.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose in relation to this report.

  • Funding

    The Authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

  • Received May 4, 2024.
  • Revision received May 30, 2024.
  • Accepted May 31, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lima-Verde-Osterne R,
    2. Turatti E,
    3. Cordeiro-Teixeira R,
    4. Barroso-Cavalcante R
    : The relative frequency of odontogenic tumors: A study of 376 cases in a Brazilian population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 22(2): e193-e200, 2017. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21285
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Soluk Tekkesin M,
    2. Pehlivan S,
    3. Olgac V,
    4. Aksakallı N,
    5. Alatli C
    : Clinical and histopathological investigation of odontomas: review of the literature and presentation of 160 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(6): 1358-1361, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Cheng FC,
    2. Yu-Fong Chang J,
    3. Chen MH,
    4. Chen YC,
    5. Chen HY,
    6. Wang YL,
    7. Chiang CP
    : Radiographic characteristics of odontomas in patients in the National Taiwan University Children’s Hospital. J Dent Sci 18(1): 392-399, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Gervasoni C,
    2. Tronchet A,
    3. Spotti S,
    4. Valsecchi S,
    5. Palazzolo V,
    6. Riccio S,
    7. D Aiuto A,
    8. Azzi L,
    9. Di Francesco A
    : Odontomas: review of the literature and case reports. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 31(2 Suppl 1): 119-125, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Nguyen DK,
    2. Van Huynh D
    : Clinical and radiological characteristics of odontomas: A retrospective study of 90 cases. Imaging Sci Dent 53(2): 117-126, 2023. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20220184
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Mazur M,
    2. Di Giorgio G,
    3. Ndokaj A,
    4. Jedliński M,
    5. Corridore D,
    6. Marasca B,
    7. Salucci A,
    8. Polimeni A,
    9. Ottolenghi L,
    10. Bossù M,
    11. Guerra F
    : Characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of compound odontoma associated with impacted teeth. Children (Basel) 9(10): 1509, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/children9101509
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Boffano P,
    2. Cavarra F,
    3. Brucoli M,
    4. Ruslin M,
    5. Forouzanfar T,
    6. Ridwan-Pramana A,
    7. Rodríguez-Santamarta T,
    8. de Vicente JC,
    9. Starch-Jensen T,
    10. Pechalova P,
    11. Pavlov N,
    12. Doykova I,
    13. Konstantinovic VS,
    14. Jezdić Z,
    15. Barrabé A,
    16. Louvrier A,
    17. Meyer C,
    18. Snäll J,
    19. Hagström J,
    20. Dovšak T,
    21. Birk A,
    22. Rocchetti V
    : The epidemiology and management of odontomas: a European multicenter study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 27(3): 479-487, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01091-w
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Scheuer H,
    2. Höltje WJ
    : Interdisciplinary treatment of a 3 1/2-year-old child with extensive ameloblastic fibro-odontoma. Case report and follow-up documentation over 21 1/2 years. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5(6): 367-371, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/s100060100329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Nalabolu GR,
    2. Mohiddin A,
    3. Hiremath SK,
    4. Manyam R,
    5. Bharath TS,
    6. Raju PR
    : Epidemiological study of odontogenic tumours: An institutional experience. J Infect Public Health 10(3): 324-330, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.05.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Ricotta F,
    2. Battaglia S,
    3. Sandi A,
    4. Pizzigallo A,
    5. Marchetti C,
    6. Tarsitano A
    : Use of a CAD-CAM inferior alveolar nerve salvage template during mandibular resection for benign lesions. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(2): 117-121, 2019. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-2408
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Myers PL,
    2. Nelson JA,
    3. Rosen EB,
    4. Allen RJ Jr.,
    5. Disa JJ,
    6. Matros E
    : Virtual surgical planning for oncologic mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(9): e3672, 2021. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003672
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 38 (5)
In Vivo
Vol. 38, Issue 5
September-October 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Large Complex Odontoma in the Angulus Mandibulae – Intraoral Enucleation as an Alternative to Mandibular Continuity Resection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Large Complex Odontoma in the Angulus Mandibulae – Intraoral Enucleation as an Alternative to Mandibular Continuity Resection
FLORIAN DUDDE, FILIP BARBAREWICZ, WILKEN BERGMANN, ADRIAN ZU KNYPHAUSEN, KAI-OLAF HENKEL
In Vivo Sep 2024, 38 (5) 2535-2539; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13726

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Large Complex Odontoma in the Angulus Mandibulae – Intraoral Enucleation as an Alternative to Mandibular Continuity Resection
FLORIAN DUDDE, FILIP BARBAREWICZ, WILKEN BERGMANN, ADRIAN ZU KNYPHAUSEN, KAI-OLAF HENKEL
In Vivo Sep 2024, 38 (5) 2535-2539; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13726
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of a Complex Orbital Post-transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Case Report and Literature Review
  • Adjunctive Molecular Hydrogen Capsule Therapy in Empyema Complicated by Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Case Report
  • Effects of a Greek Yoghurt-based Complex on the Human Facial Skin Microbiome
Show more Case Reports

Keywords

  • Complex odontoma
  • mandible
  • intraoral approach
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire