Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Association of Clinicopathological Factors With MMP13 (rs2252070) Gene Polymorphism in Swedish Patients With Colorectal Cancer

SONG VAN NGUYEN, LEVAR SHAMOUN, KALLE LANDERHOLM, DICK WÅGSÄTER and JAN DIMBERG
In Vivo July 2024, 38 (4) 1775-1782; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13628
SONG VAN NGUYEN
1Department of Medical Laboratory, Danang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy, Danang, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LEVAR SHAMOUN
2Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Levar.Shamoun{at}rjl.se
KALLE LANDERHOLM
3Department of Surgery, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden;
4Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DICK WÅGSÄTER
5Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAN DIMBERG
6Department of Natural Science and Biomedicine, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) has been reported to be involved in tumor development and progression, including of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed at evaluating whether the MMP13 rs2252070 gene polymorphism is associated with clinicopathological factors and its influence on long-term survival in Swedish patients with CRC. Patients and Methods: A total of 723 patients with CRC were genotyped using TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphism assays based on polymerase chain reaction. Results: Assessing clinicopathological factors, we demonstrated that having the G/G genotype for MMP13 rs2252070 was significantly associated with poor differentiation, higher serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen and higher lymph node status. Moreover, the presence of a G allele was significantly related to larger tumor size in rectal cancer but had a significantly protective role against mucinous cancer, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between genotypes regarding cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the potential of MMP13 rs2252070 polymorphism as a useful predictor of poor differentiation, serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen, lymph node status, tumor size, mucinous cancer, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion in patients with CRC.

Key Words:
  • MMP13
  • SNP
  • colorectal cancer
  • clinical parameters

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide (1). The initiation and progression of CRC are not completely known but accumulated insights have increased our understanding of diverse genetic and epigenetic changes (2, 3). Moreover, inflammatory processes and interactions between various cell types, in the tumor microenvironment (TME), such as lymphocytes, macrophages and fibroblasts have been linked to the initiation, progression and metastasis of CRC (4, 5). Through its interpatient and intratumor heterogeneity, CRC can have a pronounced effect on both treatment and prognosis (6). Therefore, it is important to improve patient diagnosis and prognosis through the selection of personalized therapy for patients with CRC by identification of new molecular biomarkers (7).

The composition of the TME is complex and, in addition to varying cell types, includes extracellular matrix (ECM) which, among other things, consists of proteins that can undergo remodeling and degradation (4, 8). These processes play an essential role not only in a wide range of physiological events such as tissue morphogenesis and wound healing but also during pathophysiological events such as tumor progression, including angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis (8).

One specific group of proteolytic enzymes, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), has a dominant role during degradation of ECM, resulting in numerous biological activities including signaling pathway modification, cell migration, proliferation, tumor promotion and inflammatory responses (8, 9). According to their substrate specificities, MMPs are divided into different subtypes (9). MMP13 (also known as collagenase-3) as a member of the collagenase subfamily can degrade a variety of collagens but also non-collagenous compounds such as fibronectin and laminin (10). Several studies have investigated the relationship between MMP13 and cancer, proposing that MMP13 is involved in tumor progression in head and neck, oral, renal, bladder, breast, and colorectal cancer (9-11).

Genetic variations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), have been shown to be associated with gastrointestinal cancer, including CRC, and play a role in susceptibility as well as survival of patients with CRC (11-13). Several MMP-encoding SNPs have been discovered that affect gene and protein expression, as well as the enzymatic activity of MMP, and some of them constitute a risk factor (12-14).

The polymorphism rs2252070 (−70A/G) in MMP13 gene on the human chromosome 11q22 is located in the promotor region and is known to influence MMP13 transcription (14). The A allele is associated with two-fold higher transcriptional activity of the gene compared with that of the G allele (14). Overall, the expression and activation of MMP13 in cancer is regulated at multiple levels and by many factors including genetic components, cytokines, and proteases.

In the present study, we analyzed the MMP13 rs2252070 polymorphism and its link with various clinical features and long-term survival in Swedish patients with CRC.

Patients and Methods

Patients and controls. The study utilized blood samples from 723 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinomas collected between 1996 and 2021 at the Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden. The samples were collected according to availability in strict chronological order and the patient data were prospectively recorded in a database. Follow-up for the estimation of cancer-specific survival ended on the date of death or in February 2022. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table I and the tumors were classified according to The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification system (15).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer (n=723).

Blood samples were collected at the start of surgery and were centrifuged to separate plasma and blood cells and then stored at −70°C until analysis.

The investigation was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping, Linköping, Sweden (Dnr. 2013/271-31) and informed consent was obtained from each of the participants.

Genotyping of MMP13 gene polymorphism. Genomic DNA was isolated from all blood samples using QiaAmp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genotyping was analyzed using TaqMan SNP genotype assays for MMP13 rs2252070 (ID C-254740883_10; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Ten nanograms of DNA was mixed with TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and was analyzed with the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The polymerase chain reaction was performed using an initial cycle at 50°C for 2 min followed by one cycle at 95°C for 10 min and finally 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and at 60°C for 1 min. The manual calling option in the allelic discrimination application ABI PRISM 7500 SDS software version 1.3.1 (Applied Biosystems) was used to assign the genotypes.

Statistical analysis. The genotype associations according to clinicopathological characteristics within the CRC subgroups were analyzed using the chi-squared test. The strength of association was assessed by calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval using logistic regression. The ORs were adjusted for potential covariates in accordance with Table I by multiple logistic regression models. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and Cox’s regression. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software Release 15 (Stata Corp. College Station, TX, USA) and SPSS software for Windows, version 14.0 for (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Associations with values of p<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Correlation between MMP13 rs2252070 polymorphism and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with CRC. MMP13 genotypes were evaluated in the CRC cohort to clarify the role of MMP13 polymorphism in clinicopathological characteristics. We found several statistically significant associations with the genotypic variants of MMP13 rs2252070 including tumor differentiation (Table II), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (Table III), mucinous cancer (Table IV), perineural invasion (PNI) (Table V), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (Table VI), tumor size (Table VII) and lymph node status (Table VIII). No association was found between MMP13 rs2252070 and patent age, sex, depth of tumor, TNM stage, tumor location or recurrence (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and tumor differentiation in 723 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and the serum level of carcinoembryonic (CEA) in 470 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and mucinous cancer in 723 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and perineural invasion (PNI) in 503 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in 454 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VII.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and tumor size in 289 patients with colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VIII.

Association between matrix metalloproteinase 13 gene polymorphism rs2252070 and lymph node status in 684 patients with colorectal cancer.

When we evaluated all the associations between MMP13 rs2252070 and clinicopathological features, we compared patients carrying the G/A or G/G genotype with those carrying the A/A genotype.

Individuals carrying the G/G genotype were significantly more likely to have poorly differentiated cancer (OR=1.50, p=0.010) and a higher level of preoperative serum CEA (OR=2.20, p=0.027) (Table II and Table III). Moreover, we noted that carrying a G allele had a protective role against developing mucinous cancer (G/A+G/G: OR=0.78, p=0.037), PNI (G/A: OR=0.75, p=0.032; G/A+G/G: OR=0.77, p=0.039) and LVI (G/A: OR=0.53, p=0.004; G/A+G/G: OR=0.64, p=0.016) (Table IV, Table V and Table VI, respectively). Further, our study established that tumor size ≥4 cm in rectal cancer was more common in patients carrying a G allele (G/A: OR=1.91, p=0.012; G/A+G/G: OR=1.79, p=0.017; Table VII).

Regarding the presence of metastatic lymph nodes, we found that the genotype distribution between the different lymph node status was statistically different (p=0.027) and that G/G was markedly more common in patients with a higher lymph node status (N2) (OR=3.82, p=0.009; Table VII).

MMP13 gene polymorphism and cancer-specific survival. Follow-up data were available for 684 patients and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that cancer-specific survival did not significantly differ according to genotype (Figure 1). Moreover, stratification analysis with regard to clinical parameters showed no significant survival difference controlled by the genotypes for MMP13 rs2252070 (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of the effect of matrix metalloproteinase 13 rs2252070 polymorphism on cancer-specific survival among patients with colorectal cancer. Follow-up data for 684 patients were available; the numbers of carriers of genotype A/A, G/A and G/G were 333, 286 and 65, respectively. Log-rank test, p>0.05.

Discussion

Mucinous cancer is an aggressive subtype of CRC and the factors involved in the development of mucinous CRC are not yet known (16).

PNI is defined as tumor growth in, around and through nerves, and has been identified as an important pathological feature of a number of malignancies, including tumors of the pancreas, colon, rectum, prostate and stomach (17). PNI has been shown to be a marker of poor prognosis and reduced survival, including in CRC (18). The molecular mechanisms of PNI have not been successfully identified but the migration of tumors into the nerve sheath requires degradation of the ECM, which can be facilitated by MMPs (17).

The lymphatic system is an important metastatic pathway for CRC. LVI is defined as the presence of tumor cells in the lymphatic system and vascular structures and has gained acceptance as a predictor of poor outcome in patients affected by CRC (19, 20).

Accumulating evidence has established that SNPs of MMPs are associated with gastrointestinal cancer, including CRC (11, 13). Several SNPs in genes encoding MMPs influence MMP gene expression, protein production and thereby the enzymatic activity (11).

In the present study, we examined the association of MMP13 rs2252070 gene polymorphism with various clinical features and long-term survival in Swedish patients with CRC. Our data showed an association with mucinous cancer, PNI and LVI, where we found that carrying a G allele has a protective role against these clinical features. Yoon et al. (14) concluded that the A allele in MMP13 rs2252070 is associated with two-fold higher transcriptional activity of the gene compared with that of the G allele. One could speculate that our data regarding mucinous cancer, PNI and LVI reflect the transcriptional activity and therefore the level and activity of MMP13. In that case, however, our data contradict a study by Foda et al. (21) in which the protein expression of MMP13 was found to be significantly higher in non-mucinous carcinomas compared to mucinous carcinomas.

The promoter of MMP13 contains several binding sites for transcription factors e.g., activating protein-1 (AP1), inhibitor of growth family member 2 (ING2) and polyomavirus enhancer activator 3 (PEA3) (10). Besides the regulation of expression by transcription, the activity of MMP13 is controlled by presence of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases in the TME (8). Moreover, intrinsic mechanisms, such as changes of expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressors, seem to directly activate MMP13 expression (10, 22). Thus, the activity of MMP13 can be modulated in different ways.

According to the AJCC classification system (15), T stage, i.e., the depth of tumor invasion, is used rather than tumor size defined as the maximum diameter of the horizontal tumor extension. One study suggests that in patients with tumors at the same T stage, the prognosis of those with a larger tumor size is worse than that of patients with a smaller tumor size, which may be due to the larger tumor burden and higher possibility of invading vascular and lymphatic channels by larger tumors (23). The tumor size has been reported to be prognostic in CRC and has an impact on survival (23-25), but it remains controversial.

Previous studies have investigated the relationship between MMP13 and CRC and proposed that MMP13 is involved in tumor progression [reviewed in (10)] and indicate that the MMP13 expression in tumor tissue is significantly higher than in the corresponding normal mucosa (26). However, no association with tumor size has been found (26). In our study, in terms of genotypes of MMP13 rs2252070, we established that the tumor size ≥4 cm was more common in both G allele carriers regarding rectal cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to show an association between MMP13 gene polymorphism and tumor size in rectal cancer. The resulting difference here between the colon and rectum may be the obvious difference in molecular carcinogenesis, pathology, and expression of distinguishable genes for these locations (27). The underlying molecular mechanism involved in this process is unclear and requires detailed analyses. Regardless of the mechanism, our findings suggest a role for MMP13 gene polymorphism in modulating tumor size.

CEA is a large glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion and is secreted by a variety of tumors, including CRC (28). Both preoperative and postoperative serum levels of CEA are used in clinical practice as a prognostic factor and to monitor recurrence for patients with CRC. However, controversy exists, and previous studies have noted different effectiveness regarding its associations with stage and prognosis (28-30). In this study, we found that individuals carrying the G/G genotype in MMP13 rs2252070 had a higher preoperative level (≥5 ng/ml) of CEA in serum. Furthermore, we noted that the carriers of the G/G genotype were more likely to have poorly differentiated cancer. One research group demonstrated that preoperative serum levels of CEA did not correlate with tumor differentiation, but multivariate analysis revealed that the preoperative serum level of CEA was a significant independent prognostic factor (31). It remains to be clarified whether our results regarding the G/G genotype are related to the preoperative serum level of CEA and poorly differentiated cancer.

Lymph node involvement is an important variable of the AJCC system (15). The classification of lymph node status, N0-N2, represents tumor aggressiveness and progression of CRC, and is a predictor of worse outcome (32). In a previous report, a positive correlation between MMP13 expression and lymph node status was found (33). In our study, the genotypes of MMP13 rs2252070 were evaluated in a CRC cohort to clarify their role in lymph node status. We observed that the lymph node status by genotype distribution was statistically different, and that the G/G genotype was markedly more common in patients with N2 tumors. The underlying mechanisms should be further investigated.

In the present study, we examined the relationship between MMP13 rs2252070 polymorphism and clinicopathological factors in patients with CRC and demonstrated that the presence of G/G was significantly associated with poor differentiation, higher serum level of CEA and increased lymph node status. Moreover, the presence of a G allele was significantly related to larger tumor size in rectal cancer but had a protective role against mucinous cancer, PNI and LVI. For other parameters, such as age, sex, depth of tumor, TNM stage, tumor location and recurrence, no relation to MMP13 rs2252070 gene polymorphism were identified.

MMP13 rs2252070 (−70A/G) is associated with altered transcriptional activity, with twice as much transcriptional activity with the A allele compared to the G allele in the same position (14). It is possible that the gene expression of MMP13 is concomitant with other gene–gene or gene–environmental interactions. The effects of the G/G genotype may not be attributed to a reduced level of MMP13 per se, but a possible change in the balance between different MMPs. MMP13 has as a central role in the MMP activation cascade by the activation of other MMPs, such as MMP2 and MMP9, which has been suggested to be a pivotal event in the development of CRC (8, 10). However, much remains unknown about the possible coordination of MMP13 action with other MMP family members during cancer pathogenesis. Tumor necrosis factor-α is an inflammatory mediator, one of several present at high levels in solid tumors and the serum of patients with CRC and is implicated in the progression and metastatic development of CRC (8, 10). A previous study has reported the regulation of MMP13 through the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase–nuclear factor Embedded ImageB–MMP13 pathway promotes by the chemokine receptor CCR4 resulting in up-regulation of tumor necrosis factor-α in CRC (34).

In CRC development, intrinsic mechanisms include changes of expression of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes (2, 3). Suppression of tumor-suppressor gene p53 increases MMP13 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (22). Recently, a study indicated that MMP13 plays a key role in the context of the TWIST family bHLH transcription factor 1–CD44–MMP13 axis in tumor aggressiveness in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and in epithelial–mesenchymal transition driven tumor progression (35). Further studies may confirm whether the results can be translated to CRC.

Some limitations of this study are worth noting. This study was of an exploratory nature. Factors influencing carcinogenesis such as environmental and lifestyle factors were not considered. The patients were selected from one hospital and therefore the generalizability of our results is limited, and they should be validated in another cohort. Moreover, further studies are required in which a larger number of samples must be examined.

In conclusion, as described in previous studies, there is an involvement of MMP13 in CRC progression and metastasis. The exact mechanisms of its regulation and actions are still not fully understood. The current study is, to our knowledge the first to investigate the relationship between MMP13 rs2252070 and a large number of clinicopathological factors in Swedish patients with CRC.

We noted that MMP13 rs2252070 is a useful predictor of differentiation, serum level of CEA, lymph node status and tumor size in rectal cancer, and the presence of a G allele has a protective role against mucinous cancer, PNI and LVI in CRC. Considering the multifaceted role of MMP13 in CRC, more in-depth research is needed for further understanding of the significance of MMP13 rs2252070 in CRC.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Division of Medical Diagnostics, Region Jönköping County, Sweden. No. Futurum-970572 and Futurum-989025.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Research design and prepared the manuscript: SVN, DW and JD. Statistical analysis: SVN and JD. Performed the laboratory work: LS and SVN. Responsible for patient data and follow-up: KL and LS. Review and revision: SVN, LS, KL, DW and JD.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Received January 29, 2024.
  • Revision received March 11, 2024.
  • Accepted March 19, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A,
    7. Bray F
    : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kasi A,
    2. Handa S,
    3. Bhatti S,
    4. Umar S,
    5. Bansal A,
    6. Sun W
    : Molecular pathogenesis and classification of colorectal carcinoma. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 16(5): 97-106, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11888-020-00458-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Alzahrani SM,
    2. Al Doghaither HA,
    3. Al-Ghafari AB
    : General insight into cancer: An overview of colorectal cancer (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 15(6): 271, 2021. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2433
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Brassart-Pasco S,
    2. Brézillon S,
    3. Brassart B,
    4. Ramont L,
    5. Oudart JB,
    6. Monboisse JC
    : Tumor microenvironment: extracellular matrix alterations influence tumor progression. Front Oncol 10: 397, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00397
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Mager LF,
    2. Wasmer MH,
    3. Rau TT,
    4. Krebs P
    : Cytokine-induced modulation of colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 6: 96, 2016. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00096
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Molinari C,
    2. Marisi G,
    3. Passardi A,
    4. Matteucci L,
    5. De Maio G,
    6. Ulivi P
    : Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer: a challenge for personalized medicine? Int J Mol Sci 19(12): 3733, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123733
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Yiu AJ,
    2. Yiu CY
    : Biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 36(3): 1093-1102, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kessenbrock K,
    2. Plaks V,
    3. Werb Z
    : Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 141(1): 52-67, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Laronha H,
    2. Caldeira J
    : Structure and function of human matrix metalloproteinases. Cells 9(5): 1076, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/cells9051076
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Pritchard DM,
    3. Yu LG
    : Regulation and function of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 14(13): 3263, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133263
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Langers AM,
    2. Verspaget HW,
    3. Hommes DW,
    4. Sier CF
    : Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(6): 79-98, 2011. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i6.79
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wen J,
    2. Xu Q,
    3. Yuan Y
    : Single nucleotide polymorphisms and sporadic colorectal cancer susceptibility: a field synopsis and meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int 18: 155, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-018-0656-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Moreno-Ortiz JM,
    2. Gutiérrez-Angulo M,
    3. Partida-Pérez M,
    4. Peregrina-Sandoval J,
    5. Ramírez-Ramírez R,
    6. Muñiz-Mendoza R,
    7. Suárez-Villanueva S,
    8. Centeno-Flores M,
    9. Maciel-Gutiérrez V,
    10. Cabrales-Vazquez JE,
    11. Ayala-Madrigal ML
    : Association of MMP7-181A/G and MMP13-77A/G polymorphisms with colorectal cancer in a Mexican population. Genet Mol Res 13(2): 3537-3544, 2014. DOI: 10.4238/2014.February.14.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Yoon S,
    2. Kuivaniemi H,
    3. Gatalica Z,
    4. Olson JM,
    5. Butticè G,
    6. Ye S,
    7. Norris BA,
    8. Malcom GT,
    9. Strong JP,
    10. Tromp G
    : MMP13 promoter polymorphism is associated with atherosclerosis in the abdominal aorta of young black males. Matrix Biol 21(6): 487-498, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0945-053x(02)00053-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. Greene FL,
    3. Edge SB,
    4. Compton CC,
    5. Gershenwald JE,
    6. Brookland RK,
    7. Meyer L,
    8. Gress DM,
    9. Byrd DR,
    10. Winchester DP
    : The Eighth Edition AJJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 67(2): 93-99, 2017. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21388
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. O’Connell E,
    2. Reynolds IS,
    3. McNamara DA,
    4. Burke JP,
    5. Prehn JHM
    : Resistance to cell death in mucinous colorectal cancer-a review. Cancers (Basel) 13(6): 1389, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061389
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Liu Q,
    2. Ma Z,
    3. Cao Q,
    4. Zhao H,
    5. Guo Y,
    6. Liu T,
    7. Li J
    : Perineural invasion-associated biomarkers for tumor development. Biomed Pharmacother 155: 113691, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113691
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Yang L,
    3. Jiang S,
    4. Yu M
    : Nerve dependence in colorectal cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol 10: 766653, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.766653
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Lim SB,
    2. Yu CS,
    3. Jang SJ,
    4. Kim TW,
    5. Kim JH,
    6. Kim JC
    : Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4): 377-384, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181cf8ae5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Bianchi G,
    2. Annicchiarico A,
    3. Morini A,
    4. Pagliai L,
    5. Crafa P,
    6. Leonardi F,
    7. Dell’Abate P,
    8. Costi R
    : Three distinct outcomes in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma and lymphovascular invasion: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Int J Colorectal Dis 36(12): 2671-2681, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04004-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Foda AAM,
    2. El-Hawary AK,
    3. Abdel-Aziz A
    : Differential expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in mucinous and nonmucinous colorectal carcinomas. Ann Diagn Pathol 17(4): 347-351, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.04.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Ala-aho R,
    2. Grénman R,
    3. Seth P,
    4. Kähäri VM
    : Adenoviral delivery of p53 gene suppresses expression of collagenase-3 (MMP-13) in squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene 21(8): 1187-1195, 2002. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Liang Y,
    2. Li Q,
    3. He D,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Li J
    : Tumor size improves the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of T4a stage colon cancer. Sci Rep 11(1): 16264, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95828-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Yirgin H,
    2. Sibic O,
    3. Tatlidil YE,
    4. Bozdag E,
    5. Bozkurt MA,
    6. Devecioglu EG,
    7. Aziret M,
    8. Ercan M
    : Effect of tumor size on prognosis in colorectal cancer. Ann Ital Chir 94: 63-72, 2023.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Alese OB,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Jiang R,
    4. Zakka K,
    5. Huang Z,
    6. Okoli C,
    7. Shaib WL,
    8. Akce M,
    9. Diab M,
    10. Wu C,
    11. El-Rayes BF
    : Predictive and prognostic effects of primary tumor size on colorectal cancer survival. Front Oncol 11: 728076, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728076
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Yamada T,
    2. Oshima T,
    3. Yoshihara K,
    4. Tamura S,
    5. Kanazawa A,
    6. Inagaki D,
    7. Yamamoto N,
    8. Sato T,
    9. Fujii S,
    10. Numata K,
    11. Kunisaki C,
    12. Shiozawa M,
    13. Morinaga S,
    14. Akaike M,
    15. Rino Y,
    16. Tanaka K,
    17. Masuda M,
    18. Imada T
    : Overexpression of MMP13 gene in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. Anticancer Res 30(70): 2693-2700, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Paschke S,
    2. Jafarov S,
    3. Staib L,
    4. Kreuser ED,
    5. Maulbecker-Armstrong C,
    6. Roitman M,
    7. Holm T,
    8. Harris CC,
    9. Link KH,
    10. Kornmann M
    : Are colon and rectal cancer two different tumor entities? A proposal to abandon the term colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci 19(9): 2577, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Tong G,
    2. Xu W,
    3. Zhang G,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Zheng Z,
    6. Chen Y,
    7. Niu P,
    8. Xu X
    : The role of tissue and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in stages I to III of colorectal cancer-A retrospective cohort study. Cancer Med 7(11): 5327-5338, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1814
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Margalit O,
    2. Mamtani R,
    3. Yang YX,
    4. Reiss KA,
    5. Golan T,
    6. Halpern N,
    7. Aderka D,
    8. Giantonio B,
    9. Shacham-Shmueli E,
    10. Boursi B
    : Assessing the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in stage I and II colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 94: 1-5, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.112
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Morimoto Y,
    2. Takahashi H,
    3. Arita A,
    4. Itakura H,
    5. Fujii M,
    6. Sekido Y,
    7. Hata T,
    8. Fujino S,
    9. Ogino T,
    10. Miyoshi N,
    11. Uemura M,
    12. Matsuda C,
    13. Yamamoto H,
    14. Mizushima T,
    15. Doki Y,
    16. Eguchi H
    : High postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen as an indicator of high-risk stage II colon cancer. Oncol Lett 23(5): 167, 2022. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13287
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Su BB,
    2. Shi H,
    3. Wan J
    : Role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in the detection of colorectal cancer before and after surgical resection. World J Gastroenterol 18(17): 2121-2126, 2012. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ong ML,
    2. Schofield JB
    : Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 8(3): 179-192, 2016. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i3.179
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Yang B,
    2. Gao J,
    3. Rao Z,
    4. Shen Q
    : Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of MMP-13 expression in colorectal cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 72(6): 501-505, 2012. DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2012.699638
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Ou B,
    2. Zhao J,
    3. Guan S,
    4. Feng H,
    5. Wangpu X,
    6. Zhu C,
    7. Zong Y,
    8. Ma J,
    9. Sun J,
    10. Shen X,
    11. Zheng M,
    12. Lu A
    : Correction: CCR4 promotes metastasis via ERK/NF-κB/MMP13 pathway and acts downstream of TNF-α in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 8(25): 41779, 2017. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18562
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Mahmoudian RA,
    2. Gharaie ML,
    3. Abbaszadegan MR,
    4. Alasti A,
    5. Forghanifard MM,
    6. Mansouri A,
    7. Gholamin M
    : Crosstalk between MMP-13, CD44 and TWIST1 and its role in regulation of EMT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem 476(6): 2465-2478, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-021-04089-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 38 (4)
In Vivo
Vol. 38, Issue 4
July-August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Clinicopathological Factors With MMP13 (rs2252070) Gene Polymorphism in Swedish Patients With Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Association of Clinicopathological Factors With MMP13 (rs2252070) Gene Polymorphism in Swedish Patients With Colorectal Cancer
SONG VAN NGUYEN, LEVAR SHAMOUN, KALLE LANDERHOLM, DICK WÅGSÄTER, JAN DIMBERG
In Vivo Jul 2024, 38 (4) 1775-1782; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13628

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Association of Clinicopathological Factors With MMP13 (rs2252070) Gene Polymorphism in Swedish Patients With Colorectal Cancer
SONG VAN NGUYEN, LEVAR SHAMOUN, KALLE LANDERHOLM, DICK WÅGSÄTER, JAN DIMBERG
In Vivo Jul 2024, 38 (4) 1775-1782; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13628
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Exploring the Genetic Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-13 Variants in Pterygium Risk
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Observational Study on the Effectiveness of L-Arginine Plus Vitamin C in the Management of Cancer-related Fatigue
  • Signal Detection Analysis of Hypnotic-induced Respiratory Depression
  • Development and Validation of an EHR-based Algorithm for Identifying Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • MMP13
  • SNP
  • colorectal cancer
  • clinical parameters
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire