Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReview
Open Access

Primary Omental Torsion in Children in the Laparoscopy Era: What Have we Learned so far?

VASILEIOS ALEXOPOULOS, XENOPHON SINOPIDIS, ASPASIA LOUTA, CHRISTOS DAMASKOS, NIKOLAOS GARMPIS, GERASIMOS TSOUROUFLIS, STYLIANOS KYKALOS, KATERINA KAMBOURI, EVANGELOS BLEVRAKIS, STYLIANOS ROUPAKIAS, ANTONIOS PANAGIDIS and DIMITRIOS DIMITROULIS
In Vivo May 2024, 38 (3) 1030-1041; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13536
VASILEIOS ALEXOPOULOS
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Patras Children’s Hospital, Patras, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
XENOPHON SINOPIDIS
2Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xsinopid@upatras.gr
ASPASIA LOUTA
3Endoscopy Unit, Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTOS DAMASKOS
4Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (M.I.R.S.) Study Group, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
5Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece;
6N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NIKOLAOS GARMPIS
4Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (M.I.R.S.) Study Group, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
7Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GERASIMOS TSOUROUFLIS
4Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (M.I.R.S.) Study Group, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
7Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STYLIANOS KYKALOS
4Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (M.I.R.S.) Study Group, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
7Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATERINA KAMBOURI
8Department of Pediatric Surgery, Alexandroupolis University Hospital, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EVANGELOS BLEVRAKIS
9Department of Pediatric Surgery, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STYLIANOS ROUPAKIAS
2Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIOS PANAGIDIS
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Patras Children’s Hospital, Patras, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIOS DIMITROULIS
4Hellenic Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (M.I.R.S.) Study Group, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
7Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Primary omental torsion is uncommon, mimicking appendicitis and other acute abdominal pathologies. It often escapes diagnosis on imaging investigation or conventional open laparotomy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopy on the various parameters of this entity, including incidence, diagnosis, and treatment. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed, including PubMed and Scopus databases, without a time limit, following the PRISMA principles. A total of 16 articles from January 2000 to December 2023, corresponding to 56 children with primary omental torsion, complied with the research criteria. Results: Primary omental torsion was associated with obesity. Symptoms were right abdomen oriented, often compared to those of acute appendicitis. Preoperative ultrasound displayed low diagnostic accuracy, whereas computerized tomography diagnosed only two thirds of cases. In all patients, the vermiform appendix was normal. Conclusion: Laparoscopy affected both diagnosis and treatment of primary omental torsion in children. Easy peritoneal cavity access rendered possible the diagnosis of cases previously discharged as abdominal pain of unknown etiology. Combined with the increased pediatric obesity, it also affected primary omental torsion incidence. The recent pathogenetic theories may be better supported today, as laparoscopy provides a detailed view in situ, and facilitates harvesting of fat tissue from the omentum for molecular investigation. The diagnostic efficiency of laparoscopy is superior to ultrasonography and computerized tomography. Finally, the removal of the ischemic omentum is technically easier compared to the open laparotomy alternative with all the technical difficulties of traction of a vulnerable hemorrhagic tissue through a small incision.

Key Words:
  • Primary omental torsion
  • laparoscopy
  • laparoscopic surgery
  • abdominal pain
  • greater omentum
  • children

Omental pathology is uncommon, with a reported incidence of 1:600 appendectomies during a period of 20 years in Australia (1), and 1:800 appendectomies in 30 years in the United States (2). Bush was the first to describe the idiopathic omental infarction in 1896 (3). Three years later, Eitel described the primary omental torsion (POT) as a cause of abdominal pain (4). Since then, approximately 400 patients with POT have been reported worldwide, with an age peak of 40-50 years, and with two thirds being males (5-7). POT incidence in the pediatric population is 0.1-0.5%, extracted mostly through surgical intervention for acute abdominal pain, attributed to possible appendicitis (8-12).

The omentum is the main defensive organ of the abdominal cavity, adopting an adhesive behavior to seal an impaired area (13). Increase of the omental blood flow and expansion of the omental stromal tissue occur as a response to stimulation (14, 15). Cells which express stem cell markers, inflammatory, and chemotactic factors, are produced (16-18). The activated stromal cells engraft onto the irritated sites and lead to the recruitment of inflammatory cells within the peritoneal cavity. The result is the formation of adhesive bridges (14, 19, 20).

The omentum may rotate along the axis of the distal right epiploic artery (2), either in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction (21, 22). Congenital developmental abnormalities and variations (bifid omentum, tongue-like projections, redundant omental veins, local fat accumulation) may facilitate torsion (23-27). The right part of the omentum, which is larger, heavier, and with independent mobility, is affected more frequently (22, 28). The aggressive omental behavior in association with anatomical and physiological factors (acute alteration of posture, digestion of excessive food, visceral fat associated inflammation) favor torsion, infarction, and finally necrosis.

POT symptoms are nonspecific. They mainly mimic appendicitis while older children and adults may also present with symptoms indicative of cholecystitis, perforation or peptic ulcer, and ovarian torsion (29, 30). During the early phases of torsion, traction of the omental root occurs, causing initially periumbilical pain, or pain at the xiphoid process (30). As congestion, ischemia and necrosis of the rotated segment develop, the pain adopts the characteristics of appendicitis, in many instances without the typical symptoms of appendiceal bacterial infection, such as nausea, vomiting, fever, tension, emergency, or diarrhea (31). Furthermore, the progress of the symptoms is slower compared to appendicitis (31). The clinical differential diagnosis in children may also include Meckel’s diverticulitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, gastroduodenitis, or Crohn’s disease (22).

Diagnosis of POT may be performed using ultrasonography (US) and computerized tomography (CT) (32-35). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used sporadically as well (36). Omental infarction imaging was first described by Puylaert (37). US nonspecific results may include free fluid in the pelvis or the right iliac fossa, or a hyperechoic mesentery (38, 39). The sonographic criterion for the diagnosis of omental infarct is the identification of an oval hyperechoic mass, adherent to the abdominal wall with a hypoechoic rim, located mainly at the right side of the abdomen, with the presence of a normal appendix (40, 41). In the CT, the density of the omental mass is not different from that of the abdominal wall fat (30). The location of a fatty soft tissue structure between the colon and the rectus abdominis sheath has been considered specific for the diagnosis with CT (30, 40). The infracted omentum is delineated as a fatty mass immediately deep to the parietal peritoneum, with secondary thickening and inflammation of the overlying anterior abdominal wall (24, 37, 42, 43). The presence of a vascular pedicle, and the whirl of the omentum are characteristic signs (30). A variety of diseases are included in the imaging differential diagnoses of omental torsion, such as mesenteric panniculitis, lipoma, liposarcoma, teratoma, angiomyolipoma, epiploic appendagitis, gossypiboma and tumours containing fat (44). Operative management is the gold standard treatment method. With the advent of laparoscopy, both diagnosis and treatment of POT have been affected. The first two reports of POT laparoscopic treatment in adults were published by Chung et al., and Gassner et al., (45, 46) while Gul et al., reported the first pediatric laparoscopic excision of necrotic omentum after POT, in a case series which included a 14-years-old boy (26).

In this systematic review, we aimed to investigate the impact of laparoscopy on the diagnosis and treatment of POT in children and discussed issues such as pathogenesis and clinical presentation of this uncommon entity. We also aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of laparoscopy with that of US and CT, and its therapeutic efficiency compared to conservative treatment and open laparotomy in this easy to treat morbidity, however until recently often escaping diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature review with the following criteria for article types: original articles, case studies, case series, articles obtained in full text, articles in English, and articles in humans. No time limit was set for articles related to their research or publication. The databases used were PubMed and Scopus. The keyword combinations included [omental torsion], [omental infarct], [primary omental torsion], [children], [pediatric], [laparoscopic surgery], [laparoscopy].

The principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology were used for the analysis of the retrieved information (47, 48). A total of 16 articles published during a period of 23 years (January 2001-December 2023) were considered suitable for inclusion in the study (Figure 1, Table I). The chi-square test was employed to determine the correlation between qualitative independent variables. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS Statistical Software Package version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The threshold for statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow diagram of literature search and article selection process according to the PRISMA guidelines.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Summary of the main findings of the articles included in the study.

Results

The study population included 56 children with a predominance of boys (n=44, 78.5%) (Table I). The sex of two patients was not reported in one study (49). The age range of the patients was 4-16 years. All articles were case reports or case series. The largest series from a single center included 17 patients (30).

The main clinical symptom which was present in every child with POT was abdominal pain. The initial distribution of pain involved the right lower (n=33 patients, 58.9%), right middle (n=8, 14.3%), right upper (n=7, 12.5%), left lower abdomen (n=2, 3.5%), the epigastrium (n=3, 5.3%), and the periumbilical (n=3, 5.3%) region. Few patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea (n=9, 16.0%), vomiting (n=13, 23.2%), and clinical signs, such as rebound tenderness (n=6, 10.7%), and abdominal muscle guarding (n=21, 37.5%). It is of note that there were studies which mentioned the presence of a good appetite regardless of the presence of pain (9, 50). Low grade fever was reported in 15 (26.7%) patients. White blood cell count was moderately elevated in 20 (35.7%) patients, while c-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated in 21 (37.5%). A total of 46 (82.1%) patients were characterized as overweight or obese.

The outcomes of preoperative radiological investigation are shown in Table II. Preoperative US was performed in 44 (78.5%) patients. However, its diagnostic accuracy was low, as an inflammatory mass was diagnosed in only 5/44 (11.3%) patients. The most commonly reported outcome was the presence of free fluid in the peritoneal cavity (n=8, 18.1%). CT examination was conducted in 33 (58.9%) patients with a positive diagnosis in 24/33 (72.7%). MRI was recruited once, with a positive diagnostic outcome (36) (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) examination outcomes compared.

All patients of the study were submitted to laparoscopy. The main finding was a mass corresponding to the rotated, infarcted and gangrenous omentum. It was either pending free in the peritoneal cavity or adhered to various structures in the abdomen, i.e., the anterior or right abdominal wall, the lower abdomen or higher at the hypochondrium, near the hepatic margin, behind the liver, or at a right lumbar location. It was also adhered to the ascending colon, the cecum, even the sigmoid colon (21). Anatomic redundancy of the rotated right omental portion was mentioned (51). A total of 720° was the most severe twist described (22). The presence of free serosanguineous fluid in the abdominal cavity was characteristic (52). The vermiform appendix was found without inflammation in all 56 children. Except for one study (30) which reported a mean postoperative hospital stay of five days, the patients were discharged from the first to the third postoperative day. No significant postoperative complications were reported. One patient presented relapse of torsion after eight months (30).

Discussion

Though the outcomes of this systematic review were obtained from a limited study population, interesting insights on POT were obtained. It became obvious that laparoscopy created new perspectives which affected epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

How laparoscopy affected POT incidence. POT incidence has increased during the last twenty years. While older studies on large numbers of children reported an incidence of one case of omental infarction in 800 operations (2) for possible appendicitis, in more recent series the incidence was one in 275 operations (11). Moreover, Valioulis et al., reported two patients with primary omental torsion among 54 exploratory laparoscopies for acute abdominal pain (28), while Jukic et al., reported four cases among 244 children who underwent negative appendectomy (53). PubMed database search using the key words “primary omental torsion” and “children”, during the period 1950-2000 yielded 38 articles found on POT (rate 0.7 per year), while between 2001 and 2023, actually a half-time period, the rate of studies was doubled, (33 articles, rate 1.4 per year).

Increased childhood obesity is associated with increased POT incidence (7, 11, 39, 40). Furthermore, during the same period, the advent of laparoscopy rendered POT diagnosis more effective, favoring the balance between diagnosed and undiagnosed cases towards the first. Open laparotomy presents limited exposure of the peritoneal cavity (9), often accessing the ischemic omentum accidentally, during an excision of a normal appendix. This may result in the loss of undiagnosed cases of omental pathology. Presumably, as pediatric surgeons become more familiar with the use of the fine laparoscopic means, and as more pediatric centers adopt minimal invasive techniques, more cases previously labeled as abdominal pain of unknown origin on hospital discharge will be diagnosed properly.

Association of laparoscopy with insights on POT pathogenesis. Congenitally anomalous fragile blood supply to the right lower portion of the greater omentum renders this region easier to infarct (53). Venous engorgement after heavy meals or venous elongation produced by excessive weight of the greater omentum have been proposed as risk factors, since there is a higher prevalence of the syndrome in the obese population (54). Excessive gravitational traction is exerted by a larger omentum as well (24, 55). In these patients, the increased fat deposition may also outstrip the blood supply to the developing omentum. It has been proposed that not only the total amount of omental fat but the irregular distribution in obesity leads to the development of torsion (50). Children older than three years present increased fat deposition in the developing omentum in association with growth, which may be considered as a major predisposing factor (11). Furthermore, the greater accumulation of omental fat in males compared to females, may be associated with POT preponderance in obese boys (56). By the advent of laparoscopy, the theories described herein are easier to examine, as the panoramic view of the peritoneal cavity renders the diseased omentum visible in situ.

It is of note that the findings of this systematic review are in accordance with the relevant literature, as the younger patients were four-year-old, and most of them belonged to the spectrum of obesity. Moreover, POT was four times more common in the boys of the study, compared to girls. A total of 82.1% of children were found obese, verifying the association of obesity and torsion probability. It is obvious that laparoscopy offers, in particular in obese patients, a more convenient and less traumatic access to the diagnosis and treatment of POT, compared to a constricted access through a small incision in a thick abdominal wall.

Sudden alteration of the abdominal position and immediate increase of the abdominal pressure may induce rotation of the omentum (11). Mainly in children with the characteristics described previously, overeating, intestinal hyperperistalsis, overextension, sudden changes of body position, excessive exercise, and trauma may trigger omental torsion (25, 27, 57). We infer that such small torsions along the longitudinal axis may be asymptomatic, or with mild symptoms, such as recurrent moderate abdominal pain, affecting omental physiological reaction. Thus, in some cases a congestion and blood supply impairment, even small, may trigger the omental biological cataract of inflammation and adhesion. These conditions with a milder clinical presentation, may be definitively diagnosed with laparoscopy today.

We know that visceral fat is associated with the production of inflammatory response (58). The homeostasis of the visceral adipose regulatory T cell population, in the human omental fat, is a field of contemporary research. These cells play a critical role in controlling visceral fat inflammation by alleviating metabolic disease (58). However, this cell population is disrupted by obesity, which exacerbates inflammation and metabolic abnormalities. Studies support that these cells are even lost in obesity (59). Maybe the answer to our question on POT pathophysiology lies in these fatty omental cells. We suggest tissue sample acquisition in situ during laparoscopic surgery, for molecular investigation, in collaboration with molecular biologists specialized in obesity.

Verification of clinical presentation outcomes by laparoscopy. The POT symptoms depend on the degree and duration of torsion (30). The pain is usually sudden at onset with progressive exacerbation (7, 39, 50, 60). In approximately 90% of patients, the pain is located at the right side of the abdomen (27, 28). In the series of this review, most children (n=48, 85%) presented with a right abdominal distribution of symptoms.

Nausea and vomiting are encountered in 50% of patients with POT (55). In the series of our review, nausea was reported in one out of ten patients, while one out of four patients presented with vomiting. POT has also been presented as a hip pain and limp (61). Patients with POT may not seem as ill as those with acute appendicitis. Children with omental infarction are constitutionally well, hungry, afebrile and without elevated white blood cell count. This accounts for the delay in seeking surgical evaluation (24). Finally, in this study the right abdominal preponderance of symptoms is verified, as well as the fact that patients have a good appetite (9, 50).

The superiority of laparoscopy against US and CT as a diagnostic tool in POT. We must correlate the variability of the results with ultrasonography with two factors, both regarding the operator. The first is personal experience, ability and subjectivity. The ultrasound imaging findings are subtle and operator dependent (49). Second, we must not forget the operator’s subjective tendency in diagnosing acute appendicitis. No operator starts a pediatric abdominal ultrasound having in mind that certain patients might present an omental torsion, but the first asset of differential diagnosis is acute appendicitis. The overall diagnostic rate of omental torsion has been estimated at approximately 10% (62, 63). CT has proven to be the most accurate radiological diagnostic tool so far (30). Recently, Chen et al., reported a diagnostic accuracy of 70.59% in the largest series of POT cases in children reported in a single center (30).

US was accurate in 11.3% and CT in 72.7% in the study population of this review, where POT was confirmed with laparoscopy in 100% (Table II). In a statistical analysis performed in the study population of our review, CT proved to be a more reliable diagnostic tool compared to US (χ2=30.24441, p<0.001). Nevertheless, it missed one third of cases, which is a fair proportion. The diagnostic deficiency of both radiological methods renders laparoscopy a valuable tool not only from the aspect of therapy but also from that of diagnosis.

Practical operative benefits of laparoscopy. Conservative treatment with observation and supportive measures is an alternative option of management (32, 49). It has been advocated when diagnosis is made with CT (49, 64). Patients who benefit from this approach usually have localized moderate abdominal pain. It includes overnight observation, serial abdominal examinations, and continuous adjustment of the administered pain medications (49). In the absence of peritoneal signs, children with POT have been reported to be treated conservatively with complete resolution of abdominal pain. We must not forget that this is the point which in the past created cases of undiagnosed abdominal pain who had a favorable conservative outcome in the absence of radiological diagnosis. This deficiency ends with the advent of laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy can be effectively and safely performed in children (50, 65). The twisted omentum may be easily and safely excised laparoscopically. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications encountered in the research articles included in this review, and a rapid recovery with good cosmetic results was universally observed (50). Only one patient of the 56 of those included in our systematic review, with relapse of torsion after eight months, might be considered as the only long-term complication (30).

A great advantage of laparoscopic surgery is the adaptation of trocar placement for the achievement of the best and easier performance (51, 66). In conventional laparotomy all the work must be done through a small incision with restrictive optical ability that may lead to misdiagnosis and forces the surgeon to perform elaborate movements and manipulations either with instruments or with the fingers, especially in obese children. With laparoscopy, the trocars are placed after the localization of the lesion, with the most convenient result. Although removal of the intact lesion is the rule, segmental (piecemeal) removal has also been reported (45).

With laparoscopy, other common pathologies, such as the primary clinical target of acute appendicitis, secondary torsion, or infarction without torsion which presents similar radiological characteristics, were effectively diagnosed and treated (36, 40, 49). In the study population of this review, the treatment of the patients with the most serious clinical presentation who were initially treated conservatively, was switched to laparoscopic exploration (40, 49).

A final comment should be made on the postoperative course and hospital stay. Although patients who were submitted to laparoscopy were those who presented more serious clinical symptoms and signs, their postoperative stay in the hospital was short (67, 68). Most of the patients were discharged from the hospital from the first to the third postoperative day. Delayed surgical or conservative treatment may lead to complications, such as abdominal abscess, sepsis and adhesion formation (22, 68).

Study limitations. The main limitation of the study is the small population, as POT has been considered as a rare disease so far, and laparoscopy is actually a novel technique in children. However, we believe that in the next years, with the widespread performance of minimal invasive surgery, even robotic surgery in pediatric patients, the epidemiological indexes will be modified to more representative numbers. Finally, with the inclusion of articles only written in the English language, we may have excluded some interesting articles in other languages.

Conclusion

POT diagnosis in children has become easier with the advent of laparoscopy in pediatric surgery during the last twenty years. The identification of the twisted ischemic omentum is timely feasible, with minimal surgical tissue damage and early hospital discharge, together with a full inspection of the peritoneal cavity. The possibility of diagnosing different pathologies is more efficient as well. Although CT presents a certain accuracy, it may miss a fair number of POT cases. Management is also easier, with the safe removal of the gangrenous omental tissue without the difficulty, stretching, and elaborate manipulations of conventional open surgery, through a small incision, that is frequent in an obese child. Finally, pathogenesis theories may be postulated more definitively with immediate visualization of the entire peritoneal cavity. Furthermore, targeted acquisition of in situ material for histopathological and molecular investigation will shed more light on the pathogenesis of the primary omental reaction that leads to torsion.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    VA and XS designed this study. Data collection and literature searches were performed by VA, XS, and AL. VA, XS, AL, CD, and DD performed the data analysis and interpretation. All researchers interpreted the data and contributed to the draft of the manuscript and figures. Finally, the article was revised and approved by all Authors.

  • Funding

    There is no funding for the article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties in relation to this study.

  • Received January 12, 2024.
  • Revision received February 20, 2024.
  • Accepted February 21, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kimber CP,
    2. Westmore P,
    3. Hutson JM,
    4. Kelly JH
    : Primary omental torsion in children. J Paediatr Child Health 32(1): 22-24, 1996. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb01535.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Rich RH,
    2. Filler RM
    : Segmental infraction of the great omentum: A cause of acute abdomen in children. Can J Surg 26(3): 241-243, 1983.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sakellaris G,
    2. Stathopoulos E,
    3. Kafousi M,
    4. Arbiros J,
    5. Bitsori M,
    6. Charissis G
    : Primary idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum: Two cases of acute abdomen in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 39(8): 1264-1266, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.04.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Eitel GG
    : Rare omental torsion. New York Med Rec w55: 715, 1899.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Buell KG,
    2. Burke-Smith A,
    3. Patel V,
    4. Watfah J
    : Omental infarction: The great impersonator. Cureus 9(12): e1940, 2017. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1940
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Basson ES,
    2. Jones PA
    : Primary torsion of the omentum. Am R Coll Surg Engl 63(2): 132-134, 1981.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Madha ES,
    2. Kane TD,
    3. Manole MD
    : Primary omental torsion in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Emerg Care 34(2): e32-e34, 2018. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001230
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Maclean DA
    : Primary torsion of the omentum in children: J R Col Surg Edinb 22(6): 430-432, 1977.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Elscherbeny MS,
    2. Arafa AB,
    3. Gadallah MA,
    4. Eldebaikey MS
    : Primary torsion of the greater omentum: an overlooked cause of acute abdomen. Ann Pediatr Surg 14: 208-210, 2018. DOI: 10.1097/01.XPS.0000535050.32444.f2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sweeney MJ,
    2. Blestel GA,
    3. Ancelmo N
    : Primary torsion of the greater omentum. A rare cause of abdominal pain in children. JAMA 249(22): 3073, 1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Theriot JA,
    2. Sayat J,
    3. Franco S,
    4. Buchino JJ
    : Childhood obesity: a risk factor for omental torsion. Pediatrics 112(6 Pt1): e460-e462, 2003. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.6.e460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lugo B,
    2. Emil S
    : Omental torsion. J Pediatr Surg 41(2): 458-459, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sinopidis X,
    2. Panagidis A,
    3. Alexopoulos V,
    4. Karatza A,
    5. Mitropoulou K,
    6. Varvarigou A,
    7. Georgiou G
    : Omentum in the pediatric umbilical hernia: is it a potential alarm for the appearance of complications? Case Rep Pediatr 2012: 463628, 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/463628
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Collins D,
    2. Hogan AM,
    3. O’Shea D,
    4. Winter DC
    : The Omentum: Anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects. J Gastrointest Surg 13(6): 1138-1146, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0855-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Vernik J,
    2. Singh A
    : Omentum: Power to heal and regenerate. Int J Artific Org 30(2): 95-100, 2007. DOI: 10.1177/039139880703000203
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Singh AK,
    2. Patel J,
    3. Litbarg NO,
    4. Gudehithlu KP,
    5. Sethupathi P,
    6. Arruda JA,
    7. Dunea G
    : Stromal cells cultured from omentum express pluripotent markers, produce high amounts of VEGF, and engraft to injured sites. Cell Tissue Res 332(1): 81-88, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-007-0560-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang QX,
    2. Magovern CJ,
    3. Mack CA,
    4. Budenbender KT,
    5. Ko W,
    6. Rosengart TK
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor is the major angiogenic factor in omentum: mechanism of the omentum-mediated angiogenesis. J Surg Res 67(2): 147-154, 1997. DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1996.4983
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. García-Gómez I,
    2. Goldsmith HS,
    3. Angulo J,
    4. Prados A,
    5. López-Hervás P,
    6. Cuevas B,
    7. Dujovny M,
    8. Cuevas P
    : Angiogenic capacity of human omental stem cells. Neurol Res 27(8): 807-811, 2005. DOI: 10.1179/016164105X63674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Logmans A,
    2. Schoenmakers CHH,
    3. Haensel SM,
    4. Koolhoven I,
    5. Trimbos JB,
    6. van Lent M,
    7. van Ingen HE
    : High tissue factor concentration in the omentum, a possible cause of its hemostatic properties. Eur J Clin Invest 26(1): 82-83, 1996. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1996.107247.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Litbarg NO,
    2. Gudehithlu KP,
    3. Sethupathi P,
    4. Arruda JAL,
    5. Dunea G,
    6. Singh AK
    : Activated omentum becomes rich in factors that promote healing and tissue regeneration. Cell Tissue Res 328(3): 487-497, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-006-0356-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Elsayed AZ,
    2. Alhadeethi AR,
    3. Khan S,
    4. Hassan ME,
    5. Al Ali K
    : Omental torsion, an overlooked differential diagnosis of acute abdomen in children. A case series. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep 64: 101684, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsc.2020.101684
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Pogorelić Z,
    2. Katić J,
    3. Gudelj K,
    4. Mrklić I,
    5. Vilović K,
    6. Perko Z
    : Unusual cause of acute abdomen in a child – torsion of greater omentum: report of two cases. Scott Med J 60(3): e1-e4, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0036933015581129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Borgaonkar V,
    2. Deshpande S,
    3. Rathod M,
    4. Khan I
    : Primary omental torsion is a diagnostic challenge in acute abdomen-a case report and literature review. Indian J Surg 75(4): 255-257, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0807-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Mallick MS,
    2. Al-Bassam AA
    : Primary omental torsion in children the predisposing factors and role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment. Saudi Med J 27(2): 194-197, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Varjavandi V,
    2. Lessin M,
    3. Kooros K,
    4. Fusunyan R,
    5. McCauley R,
    6. Gilchrist B
    : Omental infarction: Risk factors in children. J Pediatr Surg 38(2): 233-235, 2003. DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Gul YA,
    2. Jabbar MF,
    3. Moissinac K
    : Primary torsion of the greater omentum. Acta Chir Belg 101(6): 312-314, 2001. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2001.12098992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Leitner MJ,
    2. Jordan CG,
    3. Spinner MH,
    4. Reese EC
    : Torsion, infarction and hemorrhage of the omentum as a cause of acute abdominal distress. Ann Surg 135(1): 103-110, 1952. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-195201000-00014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Valioulis I,
    2. Tzallas D,
    3. Kallintzis N
    : Primary torsion of the greater omentum in children-a neglected cause of acute abdomen? Eur J Pediatr Surg 13(5): 341-343, 2003. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-43572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Panagidis A,
    2. El Salam S,
    3. Al Marzauqi A,
    4. Hobeldin M,
    5. Mahomed A
    : The emerging role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of primary omental torsion in children. J Laparoendoscop Adv Surg Tech A 18(2): 324-326, 2008. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2007.0122
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Chen F,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Fan F,
    4. Xu W,
    5. Lv Z
    : Primary omental torsion in children: single-center experience of 17 cases. Abdom Radiol 47(4): 1291-1297, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03445-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Yagnik VD
    : Primary omental torsion. ANZ J Surg 89(11): 1515-1516, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/ans.14952
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Abadir JS,
    2. Cohen AJ,
    3. Wilson SE
    : Accurate diagnosis of infarction of omentum and appendices epiploicae by computed tomography. Am Surg 70(10): 854-857, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kerem M,
    2. Bedirli A,
    3. Mentes BB,
    4. Sakrak O,
    5. Pala I,
    6. Oguz M
    : Torsion of the greater omentum: preoperative computed tomography diagnosis and therapeutic laparoscopy. JSLS 9(4):494-496, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Baldisserotto M,
    2. Maffazzoni DR,
    3. Dora MD
    : Omental infarction in children: Color doppler sonography correlated with surgery and pathology findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(1): 156-162, 2005. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Sasmal PK,
    2. Tantia O,
    3. Patle N,
    4. Khanna S
    : Omental torsion and infarction: a diagnostic dilemma and its laparoscopic management. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(3): 225-229, 2010. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Wertheimer J,
    2. Galloy MA,
    3. Régent D,
    4. Champigneulle J,
    5. Lemelle JL
    : Radiological, clinical and histological correlations in a right segmental omental infarction due to primary torsion in a child. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(3): 325-331, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.05.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Puylaert JB
    : Right-sided segmental infarction of the omentum: clinical, US, and CT findings. Radiology 185(1): 169-172, 1992. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Oğuzkurt P,
    2. Kotiloğlu E,
    3. Tanyel F,
    4. Hiçsönmez A
    : Primary omental torsion in a 6-year-old girl. J Pediatr Surg 30(12): 1700-1701, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90456-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Mavridis G,
    2. Livaditi E,
    3. Baltogiannis N,
    4. Vasiliadou E,
    5. Christopoulos-Geroulanos G
    : Primary omental torsion in children: ten-year experience. Pediatr Surg Int 23(9): 879-882, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-1961-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Nubi A,
    2. McBride W,
    3. Stringel G
    : Primary omental infarct: conservative vs. operative management in the era of ultrasound, computerized tomography, and laparoscopy. J Pediatr Surg 44(5): 953-956, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Bahar GN,
    2. Shafir G,
    3. Postnikov V,
    4. Belenky A,
    5. Benjaminov O
    : Sonographic diagnosis of right segmental omental infarction. J Clin Ultrasound 33(2): 76-79, 2005. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Vriesman ACV,
    2. Lohle PNM,
    3. Coerkamp EG,
    4. Puylaert JBCM
    : Infarction of omentum and epiploic appendage: diagnosis, epidemiology and natural history. Eur Radiol 9(9): 1886-1892, 1999. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050942
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Naffaa LN,
    2. Shabb NS,
    3. Haddad MC
    : CT findings of omental torsion and infarction. Clin Imaging 27(2): 116-118, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00524-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Stella DL,
    2. Schellwman TG
    : Segmental infraction of the omentum secondary to torsion: Ultrasound and computed tomography diagnosis. Aus Radiol 44(2): 212-215, 2000. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00787.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Chung SCS,
    2. Ng KW,
    3. Li AKC
    : Laparoscopic resection for primary omental torsion. Aust N Z J Surg 62(5): 400-401, 1992. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1992.tb07212.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Gassner PE,
    2. Cox MR,
    3. Cregan PC
    : Torsion of the omentum: Diagnosis and resection at laparoscopy. Aust N Z J Surg 69(6): 466-467, 1999. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01601.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Moher D,
    2. Liberati A,
    3. Tetzlaff J,
    4. Altman DG, PRISMA Group
    : Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097, 2009. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. McKenzie JE,
    3. Bossuyt PM,
    4. Boutron I,
    5. Hoffmann TC,
    6. Mulrow CD,
    7. Shamseer L,
    8. Tetzlaff JM,
    9. Akl EA,
    10. Brennan SE,
    11. Chou R,
    12. Glanville J,
    13. Grimshaw JM,
    14. Hróbjartsson A,
    15. Lalu MM,
    16. Li T,
    17. Loder EW,
    18. Mayo-Wilson E,
    19. McDonald S,
    20. McGuinness LA,
    21. Stewart LA,
    22. Thomas J,
    23. Tricco AC,
    24. Welch VA,
    25. Whiting P,
    26. Moher D
    : The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 18(3): e1003583, 2021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Lesher AP,
    2. Hebra A
    : Primary torsion of the omentum and epiploic appendix in children. Am Surg 76(1): 110-112, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Chan KW,
    2. Chow C,
    3. Tam Y,
    4. Lee KH
    : Laparoscopy: An excellent tool in the management of primary omental torsion in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(6): 821-824, 2007. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2007.0034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Costi R,
    2. Cecchini S,
    3. Randone B,
    4. Violi V,
    5. Roncoroni L,
    6. Sarli L
    : Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of primary torsion of the greater omentum. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(1): 102-105, 2008. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181576902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Adams JT
    : Primary torsion of the omentum. Am J Surg 126(1): 102-105, 1973. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(73)80104-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Sánchez J,
    2. Rosado R,
    3. Ramírez D,
    4. Medina P,
    5. Mezquita S,
    6. Gallardo A
    : Torsion of the greater omentum: Treatment by laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(6): 443-445, 2002. DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200212000-00012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Tolenaar PL,
    2. Blast TJ
    : Idiopathic segmental infarction of the omentum. Br J Surg 74(12): 1182, 1987. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800741234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Mainzer RA,
    2. Simoes A
    : Primary idiopathic torsion of the omentum. Arch Surg 88(6): 974, 1964. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1964.01310240070014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Dixon AK
    : Abdominal fat assessed by computed tomography: Sex difference in distribution. Clin Radiol 34(2): 189-191, 1983. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(83)80303-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Joshi S,
    2. Cuthbert GA,
    3. Kerwat R
    : Omental torsion, a rare cause of acute abdomen. BMJ Case Rep 2016: bcr2015213118, 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213118
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Elkins C,
    2. Li C
    : Cytokine and metabolic regulation of adipose tissue Tregs. Immunometabolism (Cobham) 4(4): e00013, 2022. DOI: 10.1097/IN9.0000000000000013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Feuerer M,
    2. Herrero L,
    3. Cipolletta D,
    4. Naaz A,
    5. Wong J,
    6. Nayer A,
    7. Lee J,
    8. Goldfine AB,
    9. Benoist C,
    10. Shoelson S,
    11. Mathis D
    : Lean, but not obese, fat is enriched for a unique population of regulatory T cells that affect metabolic parameters. Nat Med 15(8): 930-939, 2009. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Kepertis C,
    2. Koutsoumis G
    : Primary torsion of the greater omentum. Indian Pediatr 42(6): 613-614, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Crandall WV,
    2. Langer JC
    : Primary omental torsion presenting as hip pain and limp. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 28(1): 95-96, 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199901000-00021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Zaleta-Cruz JL,
    2. Rojas-Méndez J,
    3. Garza-Serna U,
    4. González-Ruvalcaba R,
    5. Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga J,
    6. Flores-Villalba E
    : [Omental torsion. Case Report]. Cirugia y Cirujanos 85(1): 49-53, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Singh AK,
    2. Gervais DA,
    3. Lee P,
    4. Westra S,
    5. Hahn PF,
    6. Novelline RA,
    7. Mueller PR
    : Omental infarct: CT imaging features. Abdom Imaging 31(5): 549-554, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-005-0251-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Cianci R,
    2. Filippone A,
    3. Basilico R,
    4. Storto ML
    : Idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum diagnosed by unenhanced multidetector-row CT and treated successfully by laparoscopy. Emerg Radiol 15(1): 51-56, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-007-0631-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Grewal H,
    2. Sweat J,
    3. Vazquez WD
    : Laparoscopic appendectomy in children can be done as a fast-track or same day surgery. JSLS 8(2): 151-154, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Al Tokhais TI,
    2. Bokhari AA,
    3. Noureldin OH
    : Primary omental torsion: A rare cause of acute abdomen. Saudi J Gastroenterol 13(3): 144, 2007. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.33469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Tang R,
    3. Duan G
    : Laparoscopic treatment of primary omental torsion in children: A case report. Asian J Surg 46(9): 4046-4047, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.04.047
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Zanchi C,
    2. Salierno P,
    3. Bellomo R
    : Primary acute omental torsion in an overweight girl. J Pediatr 160(3): 525-525.e1, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 38 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 38, Issue 3
May-June 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Omental Torsion in Children in the Laparoscopy Era: What Have we Learned so far?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Omental Torsion in Children in the Laparoscopy Era: What Have we Learned so far?
VASILEIOS ALEXOPOULOS, XENOPHON SINOPIDIS, ASPASIA LOUTA, CHRISTOS DAMASKOS, NIKOLAOS GARMPIS, GERASIMOS TSOUROUFLIS, STYLIANOS KYKALOS, KATERINA KAMBOURI, EVANGELOS BLEVRAKIS, STYLIANOS ROUPAKIAS, ANTONIOS PANAGIDIS, DIMITRIOS DIMITROULIS
In Vivo May 2024, 38 (3) 1030-1041; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13536

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Primary Omental Torsion in Children in the Laparoscopy Era: What Have we Learned so far?
VASILEIOS ALEXOPOULOS, XENOPHON SINOPIDIS, ASPASIA LOUTA, CHRISTOS DAMASKOS, NIKOLAOS GARMPIS, GERASIMOS TSOUROUFLIS, STYLIANOS KYKALOS, KATERINA KAMBOURI, EVANGELOS BLEVRAKIS, STYLIANOS ROUPAKIAS, ANTONIOS PANAGIDIS, DIMITRIOS DIMITROULIS
In Vivo May 2024, 38 (3) 1030-1041; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13536
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Body Fat, Skeletal Muscle Mass, and Body Mass Index in Individuals ≥45 Years Old: A Systematic Review
  • Cutaneous Cryosurgery in Dermatology: Evolving Principles and Clinical Applications for Benign, Premalignant, and Malignant Lesions
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmologists Residents Well-being and Training Programs: A Systematic Review
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Primary omental torsion
  • laparoscopy
  • laparoscopic surgery
  • Abdominal pain
  • greater omentum
  • children
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire