Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Kimura’s Disease Diagnosed in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery Treated With Wide Excision: Report of Two Cases

SEI MORINAGA, NORIO YAMAMOTO, KATSUHIRO HAYASHI, AKIHIKO TAKEUCHI, SHINJI MIWA, KENTARO IGARASHI, YUTA TANIGUCHI, YOHEI ASANO, TAKAYUKI NOJIMA and HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1373-1378; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13219
SEI MORINAGA
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIO YAMAMOTO
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: norinori{at}med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
KATSUHIRO HAYASHI
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIHIKO TAKEUCHI
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINJI MIWA
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENTARO IGARASHI
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTA TANIGUCHI
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOHEI ASANO
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAYUKI NOJIMA
2Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Kimura’s disease is a rare chronic inflammatory disorder that commonly affects the head and neck regions, occurring predominantly in Asian men. Elevated eosinophil count and IgE levels in the peripheral blood examination are suggestive of this disease. In this study we report two cases of Kimura’s disease, treated with wide excision. Case Report: The first case was a 58-year-old man presented with asymptomatic left neck mass. The second case was a 69-year-old man with swelling of the right upper arm, which was suggestive of soft tissue mass. Needle biopsy results were suggestive of Kimura’s disease in both cases. Elevated WBCs at 8,380/μl (neutrophils: 45%, eosinophils: 33%) for the first case and 5,370/μl (neutrophils: 61.8%, eosinophils: 3.5%) for the second one, and serum IgE at 14.988 IU/ml for the first case and 1,315 IU/ml for the second one were observ. For definitive treatment and diagnosis, wide excisions were performed. Final histopathological results revealed Kimura’s disease. Surgical margins were negative even though an ill-demarcated lesion for the first case and high infiltration to the muscle for second case were confirmed. Conclusion: Wide excision was performed in both cases of Kimura’s disease and no recurrence was observed until the final follow-up. Wide excision with negative surgical margin should be recommended for the treatment of Kimura’s disease.

Key Words:
  • Kimura’s disease
  • treatment
  • wide excision

Kimura’s disease was first described in 1948 by Kimura et al. (1). The disease is a rare chronic inflammatory disorder that commonly affects the head and neck regions presenting as a painless soft tissue mass (2-4). Elevated eosinophil count and IgE levels in the peripheral blood examination are suggestive of this disease (5, 6). Definitive diagnosis requires histological examination. There is no established treatment for the disease, while high recurrence rates have been reported (7-9). Surgery allows the greatest diagnostic accuracy and has been the mainstay of treatment (10). However, there is little literature on whether wide or marginal excision is better for Kimura’s disease. Herein, we report two cases of Kimura’s disease that were diagnosed in our institution and treated by wide excision.

Case Report

Case 1. The patient was a 58-year-old Japanese man, who initially presented with painless swelling of the left neck. His past medical history revealed appendicitis and atopic dermatitis. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was requested where malignant soft tissue tumour was suspected, hence, the referral to our department. An elastic and soft palpable mass over the left neck was observ (Figure 1). On MRI, T1-weighted images of the tumour showed intermediate signal intensity and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted images (Figure 2). A needle biopsy was suggestive of Kimura’s disease (Figure 3). Pertinent laboratory results revealed elevated white blood cells (WBCs) at 8,380/μl (neutrophils: 45%, eosinophils: 33%); creatinine, 0.92 mg/dl; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 66.3 ml/min; and serum IgE, 14,988 IU/ml. A wide excision was performed for definitive diagnosis. Final histopathological results revealed Kimura’s disease. Surgical margin was negative for residual disease, although an ill-demarcated lesion was seen (Figure 4). No recurrence was observ 5 years after wide resection.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Patient presented with painless mass (arrows) in the left neck region (Case 1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a soft tissue tumour at left neck (arrow). MRI with the T1-weighted image showed iso-signal (a). MRI with the T2-weighted image showed high signal (b).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Histological result of the needle biopsy for case 1. Lymphoid tissue with eosinophilic infiltration.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Histological result of the surgical specimen for case 1. a: Ill-demarcated lesion measuring 3.5×2.5×1.5 cm was observed. The lesion was an elastic, soft, gray-white mass (a). Histologically, the lesion was composed of lymphoid tissue with follicle and eosinophil infiltration (b).

Case 2. A 69-year-old Japanese man presented with asymptomatic swelling over his right upper arm. An MRI revealed soft tissue tumour over the right upper arm prompting referral to our department. The patient’s past medical history included surgical procedure for kidney tumour, of which details were unknown. His physical examination showed a palpable elastic soft tissue mass over the right upper arm (Figure 5). On MRI, T1-weighted images showed intermediate- and high- signal intensity on T2-weighted images (Figure 6). Core needle biopsy result was suggestive of Kimura’s disease (Figure 7). Laboratory data revealed elevated WBCs 5,370/μl (neutrophils: 61.8%, eosinophils: 3.5%); creatinine, 1.0 mg/dl; eGFR 55.1, ml/min; and serum IgE, 1,315 IU/ml. Wide excision was performed for definitive diagnosis. Final pathological results confirmed Kimura’s disease. Surgical margin was negative even though high infiltration to the muscle was confirmed (Figure 8). No recurrence was reported 1 year after surgery.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Patient presented with painless mass (arrows) in the right upper arm region (Case 2).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Preoperative axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a soft tissue tumour in the right upper arm (arrow). MRI with the T1-weighted image showed iso-signal (a). MRI with the T2-weighted image showed high signal (b).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Histological result of the needle biopsy for case 2. Lymphoid tissue with eosinophilic infiltration.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Histological result of the surgical specimen for case 2. Lesion with well-demarcated subcutaneous area and infiltrative to the muscle measuring 3.5×3.3×2.7 cm was observed. The lesion was an elastic, soft, gray-white mass (a). Histologically, the lesion was composed of lymphoid tissue with follicle and eosinophil infiltration (b).

Discussion

Kimura’s disease is a rare disease often seen in middle-aged Asian men (10-16). The disease is considered as type I allergy based on the increased eosinophil count and IgE levels in peripheral blood examination results, although the pathogenesis of the disease is unclear (17-22). Frequently, renal impairment is concurrent with Kimura’s disease (18, 23-25). Other complications brought about by the disease, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and other allergic symptoms have been reported (20). In this case series, the first patient exhibited increased eosinophil count, IgE levels, and atopic dermatitis. The second patient had elevated IgE levels and renal impairment.

Radiographically, T1-weighted MRI images of Kimura’s disease show intermediate-to-high- and high-signal intensity on T2 (26, 27). Histological features of Kimura’s disease include lymphoid follicle, eosinophil infiltration, and capillary proliferation (12, 18, 19, 28, 29). The disease is commonly misdiagnosed as angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia, where elevated IgE levels and renal impairment are observ (1, 16, 19, 30). Some inflammatory diseases, such as lymphoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, epithelioid haemangioma, and soft tissue sarcoma, are also common differential diagnoses (5, 26, 27, 31-34).

Currently, no standard treatment for Kimura’s disease exists due to its rarity. Other treatment options, such as surgical excision, steroid therapy, and radiotherapy, have been reported (25, 35, 36). In a systematic review by Lee et al. (10), surgical excision showed a recurrence rate of 30.5%, and steroid therapy and radiotherapy alone were 45% and 60%, respectively. Lesions were noted to initially shrink in steroid therapy; however, after steroid discontinuation, recurrence was likely to occur (19, 27, 37). The duration of treatment is also difficult to assess. In addition, long-term steroid treatment can cause numerous adverse effects, such as adrenal insufficiency, increased risk of wound infections, arteriosclerosis, and diabetes mellitus (38-42). Kim et al. (43) described that it was reasonable to use a steroid as a second-line treatment in KD while considering the risk of recurrence and side effects. Radiation therapy is also a complex treatment strategy to utilize because Kimura’s disease is a benign lesion, which does not show significant symptoms. Moreover, radiation can induce secondary malignancy (44). Radiotherapy is considered an appropriate option for recurrent cases or poor surgical candidates (43). Li et al. (31) described that surgery was the most widely used treatment method and is also the treatment option that can help reach a definitive diagnosis. Kimura’s disease, however, commonly presents with ill-defined margin and infiltrative characteristic. A positive surgical margin has been reported as one risk factor for recurrence (4, 10, 36). Some recent reports have shown that surgery was the most common treatment method; however, the surgical margin was not discussed (45, 46). In both patients presented here, wide excisions with negative margins were performed, and no recurrence was observ at final follow-up. Surgical treatment with wide surgical margins was an effective treatment method in these two cases.

Conclusion

The two cases of Kimura’s disease presented here were highly infiltrative with ill-defined borders as other reports described. Our treatment method was wide excision with negative margin and no recurrence was observed until the final follow-up. Hence, when surgery is performed, wide excision with negative surgical margin for the treatment of Kimura’s disease should be recommended.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing and publication support.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    SM, NY, KH, AT, SM, KI, YT, YA, TN, and HT determined the treatment plan. SM and NY conducted the follow-up. SM was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. HT oversaw the study. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have declared that there are no competing interests.

  • Received January 7, 2023.
  • Revision received February 6, 2023.
  • Accepted February 22, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kimura T,
    2. Yoshimura S and
    3. Ishikawa E
    : On the unusual granulation combined with hyperplastic changes of lymphatic tissue. Trans Soc Pathol Jpn 37: 179-180, 1948.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Chun SI and
    2. Ji HG
    : Kimura’s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: clinical and histopathologic differences. J Am Acad Dermatol 27(6 Pt 1): 954-958, 1992. PMID: 1479100. DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70293-o
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gopinathan A and
    2. Tan TY
    : Kimura’s disease: imaging patterns on computed tomography. Clin Radiol 64(10): 994-999, 2009. PMID: 19748005. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sangwan A,
    2. Goyal A,
    3. Bhalla AS,
    4. Kumar A,
    5. Sharma R,
    6. Arava S and
    7. Dawar R
    : Kimura disease: a case series and systematic review of clinico-radiological features. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 51(1): 130-142, 2022. PMID: 33250297. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kim HT
    : Eosinophilic hyperplastic lymphogranuloma, comparison with Mikulicz’s disease. Chin Med J 23: 699-700, 1937.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Day TA,
    2. Abreo F,
    3. Hoajsoe DK,
    4. Aarstad RF and
    5. Stucker FJ
    : Treatment of Kimura’s disease: a therapeutic enigma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112(2): 333-337, 1995. PMID: 7838560. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59989570259-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chen QL,
    2. Li CX,
    3. Shao B,
    4. Gong ZC,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Ling B,
    7. Abasi K,
    8. Hu LL,
    9. Wang B and
    10. Yin XP
    : Expression of the interleukin-21 and phosphorylated extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 in Kimura disease. J Clin Pathol 70(8): 684-689, 2017. PMID: 28108473. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204096
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ye P,
    2. Ma DQ,
    3. Yu GY,
    4. Gao Y and
    5. Peng X
    : Comparison of the efficacy of different treatment modalities for Kimura’s disease. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(3): 350-354, 2017. PMID: 27614905. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ye P,
    2. Wei T,
    3. Yu GY,
    4. Wu LL and
    5. Peng X
    : Comparison of local recurrence rate of three treatment modalities for Kimura disease. J Craniofac Surg 27(1): 170-174, 2016. PMID: 26674917. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lee CC,
    2. Feng IJ,
    3. Chen YT,
    4. Weng SF,
    5. Chan LP,
    6. Lai CS,
    7. Lin SD and
    8. Kuo YR
    : Treatment algorithm for Kimura’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment modalities and prognostic predictors. Int J Surg 100: 106591, 2022. PMID: 35259522. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106591
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gumbs MA,
    2. Pai NB,
    3. Saraiya RJ,
    4. Rubinstein J,
    5. Vythilingam L and
    6. Choi YJ
    : Kimura’s disease: a case report and literature review. J Surg Oncol 70(3): 190-193, 1999. PMID: 10102351. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199903)70:3<190::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Hui PK,
    2. Chan JK,
    3. Ng CS,
    4. Kung IT and
    5. Gwi E
    : Lymphadenopathy of Kimura’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol 13(3): 177-186, 1989. PMID: 2919716. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198903000-00001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Urabe A,
    2. Tsuneyoshi M and
    3. Enjoji M
    : Epithelioid hemangioma versus Kimura’s disease. A comparative clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 11(10): 758-766, 1987. PMID: 3116865. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198710000-00003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Xu X,
    2. Fu J,
    3. Fang Y and
    4. Liang L
    : Kimura disease in children: a case report and a summary of the literature in Chinese. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33(4): 306-311, 2011. PMID: 21436734. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181fce3b0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Francis IC,
    2. Kappagoda MB,
    3. Smith J and
    4. Kneale K
    : Kimura’s disease of the orbit. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 4(4): 235-239, 1988. PMID: 3154745. DOI: 10.1097/00002341-198804040-00007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Seregard S
    : Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79(1): 91-93, 2001. PMID: 11167299. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001091.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Abuel-Haija M and
    2. Hurford MT
    : Kimura disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131(4): 650-651, 2007. PMID: 17425383. DOI: 10.5858/2007-131-650-KD
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kuo TT,
    2. Shih LY and
    3. Chan HL
    : Kimura’s disease. Involvement of regional lymph nodes and distinction from angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Am J Surg Pathol 12(11): 843-854, 1988. PMID: 2461103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Thompson LD,
    3. Aguilera NS and
    4. Abbondanzo SL
    : Kimura disease: a clinicopathologic study of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 28(4): 505-513, 2004. PMID: 15087670. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200404000-00010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kimura Y,
    2. Pawankar R,
    3. Aoki M,
    4. Niimi Y and
    5. Kawana S
    : Mast cells and T cells in Kimura’s disease express increased levels of interleukin-4, interleukin-5, eotaxin and RANTES. Clin Exp Allergy 32(12): 1787-1793, 2002. PMID: 12653173. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01552.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oguz KK,
    2. Ozturk A and
    3. Cila A
    : Magnetic resonance imaging findings in Kimura’s disease. Neuroradiology 46(10): 855-858, 2004. PMID: 15289957. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-004-1248-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Choi JA,
    2. Lee GK,
    3. Kong KY,
    4. Hong SH,
    5. Suh JS,
    6. Ahn JM,
    7. Lee YJ,
    8. Cho KH,
    9. Park JG,
    10. Choi JY and
    11. Kang HS
    : Imaging findings of Kimura’s disease in the soft tissue of the upper extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(1): 193-199, 2005. PMID: 15615973. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Rajpoot DK,
    2. Pahl M and
    3. Clark J
    : Nephrotic syndrome associated with Kimura disease. Pediatr Nephrol 14(6): 486-488, 2000. PMID: 10872190. DOI: 10.1007/s004670050799
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chan TM,
    2. Chan PC,
    3. Chan KW and
    4. Cheng IK
    : IgM nephropathy in a patient with Kimura’s disease. Nephron 58(4): 489-490, 1991. PMID: 1922621. DOI: 10.1159/000186489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Akosa AB,
    2. Sherif A and
    3. Maidment CG
    : Kimura’s disease and membranous nephropathy. Nephron 58(4): 472-474, 1991. PMID: 1922614. DOI: 10.1159/000186482
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Som PM and
    2. Biller HF
    : Kimura disease involving parotid gland and cervical nodes: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16(2): 320-322, 1992. PMID: 1545036. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199203000-00028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Takahashi S,
    2. Ueda J,
    3. Furukawa T,
    4. Tsuda M,
    5. Nishimura M,
    6. Orita H,
    7. Tsujimura T and
    8. Araki Y
    : Kimura disease: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(2): 382-385, 1996. PMID: 8938315.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kung IT,
    2. Gibson JB and
    3. Bannatyne PM
    : Kimura’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 21 cases and its distinction from angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Pathology 16(1): 39-44, 1984. PMID: 6718071. DOI: 10.3109/00313028409067909
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Googe PB,
    2. Harris NL and
    3. Mihm MC Jr.
    : Kimura’s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: two distinct histopathological entities. J Cutan Pathol 14(5): 263-271, 1987. PMID: 3680714. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1987.tb00498.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Iguchi Y,
    2. Inoue T,
    3. Shimono M,
    4. Yamamura T,
    5. Shigematsu T and
    6. Takahashi S
    : Kimura’s disease and its relation to angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: report of three cases and review of the literature. J Oral Pathol 15(3): 132-137, 1986. PMID: 3084736. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1986.tb00593.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Li H and
    4. Zhang M
    : Misdiagnosed recurrent multiple Kimura’s disease: A case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 10(3): 352-356, 2019. PMID: 30847173. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1793
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dong PR,
    2. Seeger LL,
    3. Yao L,
    4. Panosian CB,
    5. Johnson BL Jr. and
    6. Eckardt JJ
    : Uncomplicated cat-scratch disease: findings at CT, MR imaging, and radiography. Radiology 195(3): 837-839, 1995. PMID: 7754017. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hiwatashi A,
    2. Hasuo K,
    3. Shiina T,
    4. Ohga S,
    5. Hishiki Y,
    6. Fujii K and
    7. Ishitoya J
    : Kimura’s disease with bilateral auricular masses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(10): 1976-1978, 1999. PMID: 10588129.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Ginsberg LE and
    2. McBride JA
    : Kimura’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(6): 1508, 1998. PMID: 9843280. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.6.9843280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kim GE,
    2. Kim WC,
    3. Yang WI,
    4. Kim SK,
    5. Oh WY,
    6. Suh HS,
    7. Hahn JS and
    8. Park CS
    : Radiation treatment in patients with recurrent Kimura’s disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38(3): 607-612, 1997. PMID: 9231686. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)89487-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lin YY,
    2. Jung SM,
    3. Ko SF,
    4. Toh CH,
    5. Wong AM,
    6. Chen YR,
    7. Chan SC,
    8. Cheung YC and
    9. Ng SH
    : Kimura’s disease: clinical and imaging parameters for the prediction of disease recurrence. Clin Imaging 36(4): 272-278, 2012. PMID: 22726964. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.11.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Chusid MJ,
    2. Rock AL,
    3. Sty JR,
    4. Oechler HW and
    5. Beste DJ
    : Kimura’s disease: an unusual cause of cervical tumour. Arch Dis Child 77(2): 153-154, 1997. PMID: 9301357. DOI: 10.1136/adc.77.2.153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Busti AJ,
    2. Hooper JS,
    3. Amaya CJ and
    4. Kazi S
    : Effects of perioperative antiinflammatory and immunomodulating therapy on surgical wound healing. Pharmacotherapy 25(11): 1566-1591, 2005. PMID: 16232020. DOI: 10.1592/phco.2005.25.11.1566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bulkley BH and
    2. Roberts WC
    : The heart in systemic lupus erythematosus and the changes induced in it by corticosteroid therapy. A study of 36 necropsy patients. Am J Med 58(2): 243-264, 1975. PMID: 1115070. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(75)90575-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Stern MP,
    2. Kolterman OG,
    3. Fries JF,
    4. McDevitt HO and
    5. Reaven GM
    : Adrenocortical steroid treatment of rheumatic diseases. Effects on lipid metabolism. Arch Intern Med 132(1): 97-101, 1973. PMID: 4541465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu XX,
    2. Zhu XM,
    3. Miao Q,
    4. Ye HY,
    5. Zhang ZY and
    6. Li YM
    : Hyperglycemia induced by glucocorticoids in nondiabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Ann Nutr Metab 65(4): 324-332, 2014. PMID: 25402408. DOI: 10.1159/000365892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Smiley DD and
    2. Umpierrez GE
    : Perioperative glucose control in the diabetic or nondiabetic patient. South Med J 99(6): 580-9; quiz 590-1, 2006. PMID: 16800413. DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000209366.91803.99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Kim WJ and
    2. Kim HK
    : Current concepts of Kimura disease: pathophysiology and evolution of treatment. Arch Craniofac Surg 23(6): 249-255, 2022. PMID: 36596747. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2022.01053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Dracham CB,
    2. Shankar A and
    3. Madan R
    : Radiation induced secondary malignancies: a review article. Radiat Oncol J 36(2): 85-94, 2018. PMID: 29983028. DOI: 10.3857/roj.2018.00290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Fan L,
    2. Mo S,
    3. Wang Y and
    4. Zhu J
    : Clinical, pathological, laboratory characteristics, and treatment regimens of Kimura disease and their relationships with tumor size and recurrence. Front Med (Lausanne) 8: 720144, 2021. PMID: 34660632. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.720144
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Lee CC,
    2. Yu KH and
    3. Chan TM
    : Kimura’s disease: A clinicopathological study of 23 cases. Front Med (Lausanne) 9: 1069102, 2022. PMID: 36643844. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1069102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May-June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kimura’s Disease Diagnosed in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery Treated With Wide Excision: Report of Two Cases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Kimura’s Disease Diagnosed in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery Treated With Wide Excision: Report of Two Cases
SEI MORINAGA, NORIO YAMAMOTO, KATSUHIRO HAYASHI, AKIHIKO TAKEUCHI, SHINJI MIWA, KENTARO IGARASHI, YUTA TANIGUCHI, YOHEI ASANO, TAKAYUKI NOJIMA, HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1373-1378; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13219

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Kimura’s Disease Diagnosed in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery Treated With Wide Excision: Report of Two Cases
SEI MORINAGA, NORIO YAMAMOTO, KATSUHIRO HAYASHI, AKIHIKO TAKEUCHI, SHINJI MIWA, KENTARO IGARASHI, YUTA TANIGUCHI, YOHEI ASANO, TAKAYUKI NOJIMA, HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1373-1378; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13219
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Kimura’s disease
  • treatment
  • wide excision
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire