Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Which SUVmax Value?

PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, MARIA TAMBURO, GIULIA MARLETTA, FRANCESCO SAVOCA, MICHELE PENNISI and FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1318-1322; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13211
PIETRO PEPE
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: piepepe@hotmail.com
LUDOVICA PEPE
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA TAMBURO
2Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIULIA MARLETTA
2Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCO SAVOCA
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELE PENNISI
1Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
3Pathology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and Methods: From January 2021 to December 2022, 160 men (median age: 66 years) with PCa (median PSA of 11.7 ng/ml) before prostate biopsy underwent 68Ga-PET/CT imaging examinations (Biograph 6; Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). The location of focal uptake on 68Ga-PSMA PET/TC and standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were reported on a per-lesion basis for each International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) PCa. Results: Overall, the median intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA SUVmax was 26.1 (range=2.7-164); in the 15 men with not clinically significant PCa (ISUP grade group 1) median SUVmax was 7.5 (range=2.7-12.5). In the 145 men with csPCa (ISUP GG≥2) median SUVmax was 33 (range=7.8-164). A SUVmax cut-off of 8 demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of PCa equal to 87.7% vs. 89.3% vs. 100% in the presence of a GG1 vs. GG2 vs. GG≥3 PCa, respectively. In addition, median SUVmax in the bone and node metastases was 52.7 (range=25.3-92.8) and 47 (range=24.5-65), respectively. Conclusion: 68GaPSMA PET/CT with a SUVmax cut-off of 8 demonstrated a good accuracy in the diagnosis of csPCa (100% in the presence of GG≥3) showing a good cost-benefit ratio as a single procedure for the diagnosis and staging of high-risk PCa.

Key Words:
  • Prostate cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
  • mpMRI
  • SUVmax

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in primitive and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) (1, 2), and PSMA inhibitors conjugated with the radionuclides Gallium 68 (68Ga) and fluoride 18 (18F) are currently used for the diagnosis and staging of PCa (3-8); in fact, 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated to be sensitive for the detection of primary prostatic lesions, regional lymphadenopathy (9) and clinical metastases (10). Recently, tumor uptake, which represents PSMA expression, has been highly correlated with the aggressiveness of the primary prostatic tumor (7, 8), allowing with a single procedure the diagnosis and staging of high-risk PCa.

This study prospectively evaluated the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of PCa.

Patients and Methods

From January 2021 to December 2022, 160 men (median age: 66 years; range=49-84 years) with PCa were evaluated by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT; 63 vs. 97 men were previously submitted to initial vs. repeated biopsy and 25 of them were enrolled in an Active Surveillance (AS) protocol (4). Median PSA was 11.7 ng/ml (range=4.5-160 ng/ml) and 42/160 (26.2%) had abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE); all clinical parameters of men with PCa are listed in Table I. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our Hospital. All patients, before prostate biopsy, underwent mpMRI (11, 12) and 68Ga-PET/CT imaging examinations (1) (Biograph 6; Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). 68Ga-PSMA was prepared with a fully automated radiopharmaceutical synthesis device (Eckert & Ziegler Eurotope, Berlin, Germany); 68Ga-PSMA-11 was administered to patients via an intravenous bolus and scans were acquired in 3-dimensional mode with an acquisition time of 3 min per bed position. Images were processed to obtain PET, CT, and PET-CT fusion sections in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes with a thickness of approximately 0.5 ~ cm. The location of focal uptake on 68Ga-PSMA PET/TC (Figure 1), three-dimensional size, and standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values were reported on a per-lesion basis with a sextant scheme (apex, midgland, and base, each split into left and right) (11). The diagnosis of PCa was previously performed by extended systematic prostate biopsy (median 18 cores) (13,14) combined with four targeted cores in the presence of mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System “PI-RADS version 2”≥3) and 68GaPSMA-PET/CT lesions suspicious for PCa (1,12). The procedure was performed transperineally using a tru-cut 18-gauge needle (Bard, Covington, GA, USA) under sedation and antibiotic prophylaxis. Prostate-targeted cores were obtained using a Hitachi 70 Arietta ecograph (Chiba, Japan) supplied by a bi-planar transrectal probe by one urologist with 10 years of experience in cognitive targeted biopsy. Data were collected following START criteria (15). None of the patients had clinical complications following prostate biopsy (Dindo-Clavien grade1) (16). The intraprostatic SUVmax value was evaluated for each International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) PCa. In addition, the SUVmax value of the metastatic lesions was reported. For the statistical analysis, we used the Student’s t-test with a p-value<0.05 considered as statistically significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical, histological, and 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters in 160 men with prostate cancer.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography: presence of ISUP grade group 5 prostate cancer (SUVmax 18) in the right lobe of the gland (axial evaluation).

Results

Among the 160 men with Pca, 50 (31.2%) were ISUP GG1, 25 (15.6%) ISUP GG 2, 15 (9.5%) ISUP GG3, 20 (12.5%) ISUP GG4, and 50 (31.2%) ISUP GG 5, respectively. In detail, 145/160 (90.7%) were csPCa (ISUP GG≥2): 119/160 (74.3%) and 41 (25.7%) were located in the peripheral and anterior zones of the gland, respectively. Clinical and histological biopsy parameters of men with PCa are reported in Table I. In the 160 men with PCa, the median intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA SUVmax was 26.1 (range=2.7-164): in the 15 men with not clinically significant PCa (ISUP GG1) median SUVmax was 7.5 (range=2.7-12.5); only 1/25 (4%) of patients enrolled in the AS protocol was reclassified. In the 145 men with csPCa, median SUVmax was 33 (range=7.8-164) and significantly correlated with PCa grade group: ISUP GG3 (SUVmax 20.8) vs. ISUP GG4 (SUVmax 40.6) and GG5 (SUVmax 42.8), (p=0.01), respectively (Table I). Median SUVmax in the bone and node metastases was 52.7 (range=25.3-92.8) and 47 (range=24.5-65), respectively.

A SUVmax cut-off equal to 8 demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of csPCa equal to 87.7% vs. 89.3% vs. 100% in the presence of a GG1 PCa vs. GG2 PCa vs. GG≥3 PCa, respectively.

Discussion

68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT is recommended to improve the clinical staging of high-risk PCa and disease recurrence (1, 10, 17); at the same time, PSMA PET/CT has been proposed for the diagnosis of primary intraprostatic cancer because a positive PET/CT scan results from a combination of factors, such as homogeneity and intensity of PSMA expression, tumor volume, and grade. The presence of focal uptake on PSMA-PET/CT, SUVmax, and the maximal dimensions of PET-avid lesions have been correlated with the presence of csPCa (18-21). There is a range of proposed cutoffs to detect csPCa from SUVmax 3.15 to SUVmax 9.1 (22-26). Kalapara et al. (27) compared the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT with mpMRI in 205 men who underwent radical prostatectomy and showed an accuracy of 96% vs. 91% for the detection of csPCa. Demirci et al. (22) in 141 patients submitted to radical prostatectomy showed that the SUVmax values were significantly higher in high-risk patients compared those in low-risk patients (18.9±12.1 vs. 7.16±6.2). Recently, the PRIMARY study (28) evaluated the clinical significance of intraprostatic patterns of PSMA activity, proposing a 5-point PRIMARY score to optimize the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for csPCa; 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was centrally read for pattern [diffuse transition zone (TZ), symmetric central zone (CZ), focal TZ, or focal peripheral zone (PZ) and intensity (SUVmax)]. In this post hoc analysis, a 5-level PRIMARY score was assigned on the basis of analysis of the central read: no pattern (score of 1), diffuse TZ or CZ (not focal) (score of 2), focal TZ (score of 3), focal PZ (score of 4), or an SUVmax of at least 12 (score of 5). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for a PRIMARY score≥3 (high-risk patterns) were 88%, 64%, 76%, and 81%, respectively.

In definitive, in the last years, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT evaluation has been proposed in men with clinically suspicious high risk PCa and/or when mpMRI cannot be performed (claustrophobia, cardiac pacemaker, and severe obesity) (1, 29, 30-32).

In our series, among the 160 men, 68Ga-PSMA was correlated with the aggressiveness of PCa; in detail, a SUVmax of 8 demonstrated the presence of a csPCa in 142/145 (98%) with a false positive rate of 4.8% (7 cases). On the contrary, only 3/25 (12%) men with a ISUP GG2 had a SUVmax below 8. In addition, median SUVmax in the bone and node metastases was 52.7 (range=25.3-92.8) and 47 (range=24.5-65), respectively.

Our study has some limitations. First, a greater number of patients should be evaluated; second, the results should be evaluated in the entire prostate specimen and not in biopsy histology. Finally, the true accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of PCa should be evaluated also based on the biopsy specimen with a benign pathology.

Conclusion

68GaPSMA PET/CT with a SUVmax cut-off of 8 demonstrated a good accuracy in the diagnosis of csPCa (100% in the presence of GG≥3) and metastases and has a good cost-benefit ratio as a single procedure for the diagnosis and staging of high-risk PCa.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Pepe Pietro designed, interpreted clinical data, and wrote the manuscript. Pepe Ludovica, Tamburo Maria, Marletta Giula, Savoca Francesco, Pennisi Michele, and Fraggetta Filippo analyzed and interpreted the clinical data. All Authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and approved its final version.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in regard to this study.

  • Received March 5, 2023.
  • Revision received March 23, 2023.
  • Accepted March 24, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Pepe L,
    3. Cosentino S,
    4. Ippolito M,
    5. Pennisi M and
    6. Fraggetta F
    : Detection rate of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT vs. mpMRI targeted biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 42(6): 3011-3015, 2022. PMID: 35641295. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15785
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Sheikhbahaei S,
    2. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. Solnes LB,
    5. Javadi MS,
    6. Ross AE,
    7. Pienta KJ,
    8. Allaf ME,
    9. Haberkorn U,
    10. Pomper MG,
    11. Gorin MA and
    12. Rowe SP
    : Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44(12): 2117-2136, 2017. PMID: 28765998. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3780-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lopci E,
    2. Lazzeri M,
    3. Colombo P,
    4. Casale P,
    5. Buffi NM,
    6. Saita A,
    7. Peschechera R,
    8. Hurle R,
    9. Marzo K,
    10. Leonardi L,
    11. Morenghi E,
    12. Balzarini L,
    13. Disconzi L,
    14. Guazzoni G,
    15. Chiti A and
    16. Lughezzani G
    : Diagnostic performance and clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT versus mpMRI in patients with a high suspicion of prostate cancer and previously negative biopsy: a prospective trial (PROSPET-BX). Urol Int: 1-7, 2023. PMID: 36724746. DOI: 10.1159/000528720
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Roscigno M,
    3. Pepe L,
    4. Panella P,
    5. Tamburo M,
    6. Marletta G,
    7. Savoca F,
    8. Candiano G,
    9. Cosentino S,
    10. Ippolito M,
    11. Tsirgiotis A and
    12. Pennisi M
    : Could 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT evaluation reduce the number of scheduled prostate biopsies in men enrolled in active surveillance protocols? J Clin Med 11(12): 3473, 2022. PMID: 35743547. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123473
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Perera M,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Roberts M,
    4. Williams M,
    5. Udovicich C,
    6. Vela I,
    7. Christidis D,
    8. Bolton D,
    9. Hofman MS,
    10. Lawrentschuk N and
    11. Murphy DG
    : Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 77(4): 403-417, 2020. PMID: 30773328. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Privé BM,
    2. Israël B,
    3. Schilham MGM,
    4. Muselaers CHJ,
    5. Zámecnik P,
    6. Mulders PFA,
    7. Witjes JA,
    8. Sedelaar M,
    9. Mehra N,
    10. Verzijlbergen F,
    11. Janssen MJR,
    12. Gotthardt M,
    13. Barentsz JO,
    14. van Oort IM and
    15. Nagarajah J
    : Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24(2): 423-430, 2021. PMID: 32999466. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00292-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Uprimny C,
    2. Kroiss AS,
    3. Decristoforo C,
    4. Fritz J,
    5. von Guggenberg E,
    6. Kendler D,
    7. Scarpa L,
    8. di Santo G,
    9. Roig LG,
    10. Maffey-Steffan J,
    11. Horninger W and
    12. Virgolini IJ
    : (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44(6): 941-949, 2017. PMID: 28138747. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3631-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Emmett L,
    2. Buteau J,
    3. Papa N,
    4. Moon D,
    5. Thompson J,
    6. Roberts MJ,
    7. Rasiah K,
    8. Pattison DA,
    9. Yaxley J,
    10. Thomas P,
    11. Hutton AC,
    12. Agrawal S,
    13. Amin A,
    14. Blazevski A,
    15. Chalasani V,
    16. Ho B,
    17. Nguyen A,
    18. Liu V,
    19. Lee J,
    20. Sheehan-Dare G,
    21. Kooner R,
    22. Coughlin G,
    23. Chan L,
    24. Cusick T,
    25. Namdarian B,
    26. Kapoor J,
    27. Alghazo O,
    28. Woo HH,
    29. Lawrentschuk N,
    30. Murphy D,
    31. Hofman MS and
    32. Stricker P
    : The additive diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective multicentre study. Eur Urol 80(6): 682-689, 2021. PMID: 34465492. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Weirich G,
    3. Holzapfel K,
    4. Souvatzoglou M,
    5. Haller B,
    6. Rauscher I,
    7. Beer AJ,
    8. Wester HJ,
    9. Gschwend J,
    10. Schwaiger M and
    11. Maurer T
    : Simultaneous (68)Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol 70(5): 829-836, 2016. PMID: 26795686. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Pepe P and
    2. Pennisi M
    : Should 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT replace CT and bone scan in clinical staging of high-risk prostate cancer? Anticancer Res 42(3): 1495-1498, 2022. PMID: 35220244. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15621
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Pepe P and
    2. Pennisi M
    : Morbidity following transperineal prostate biopsy: Our experience in 8.500 men. Arch Ital Urol Androl 94(2): 155-159, 2022. PMID: 35775338. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2022.2.155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Garufi A,
    3. Priolo GD,
    4. Galia A,
    5. Fraggetta F and
    6. Pennisi M
    : Is it time to perform only magnetic resonance imaging targeted cores? Our experience with 1,032 men who underwent prostate biopsy. J Urol 200(4): 774-778, 2018. PMID: 29679618. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Pennisi M and
    3. Fraggetta F
    : How many cores should be obtained during saturation biopsy in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance? Experience in 875 patients submitted to repeat prostate biopsy. Urology 137: 133-137, 2020. PMID: 31758981. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Pepe P and
    2. Pennisi M
    : Prostate cancer diagnosis and management across twenty years of clinical practice: a single-center experience on 2,500 cases. Anticancer Res 39(3): 1397-1401, 2019. PMID: 30842174. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13254
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Moore CM,
    2. Kasivisvanathan V,
    3. Eggener S,
    4. Emberton M,
    5. Fütterer JJ,
    6. Gill IS,
    7. Grubb Iii RL,
    8. Hadaschik B,
    9. Klotz L,
    10. Margolis DJ,
    11. Marks LS,
    12. Melamed J,
    13. Oto A,
    14. Palmer SL,
    15. Pinto P,
    16. Puech P,
    17. Punwani S,
    18. Rosenkrantz AB,
    19. Schoots IG,
    20. Simon R,
    21. Taneja SS,
    22. Turkbey B,
    23. Ukimura O,
    24. van der Meulen J,
    25. Villers A,
    26. Watanabe Y and START Consortium
    : Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64(4): 544-552, 2013. PMID: 23537686. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Dindo D,
    2. Demartines N and
    3. Clavien PA
    : Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2): 205-213, 2004. PMID: 15273542. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Combes AD,
    2. Palma CA,
    3. Calopedos R,
    4. Wen L,
    5. Woo H,
    6. Fulham M and
    7. Leslie S
    : PSMA PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 12(11): 2594, 2022. PMID: 36359439. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Lawrentschuk N,
    3. Francis RJ,
    4. Tang C,
    5. Vela I,
    6. Thomas P,
    7. Rutherford N,
    8. Martin JM,
    9. Frydenberg M,
    10. Shakher R,
    11. Wong LM,
    12. Taubman K,
    13. Ting Lee S,
    14. Hsiao E,
    15. Roach P,
    16. Nottage M,
    17. Kirkwood I,
    18. Hayne D,
    19. Link E,
    20. Marusic P,
    21. Matera A,
    22. Herschtal A,
    23. Iravani A,
    24. Hicks RJ,
    25. Williams S,
    26. Murphy DG and proPSMA Study Group Collaborators
    : Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet 395(10231): 1208-1216, 2020. PMID: 32209449. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kwan TN,
    2. Spremo S,
    3. Teh AYM,
    4. McHarg D,
    5. Thangasamy I and
    6. Woo HH
    : Performance of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT for diagnosis and grading of local prostate cancer. Prostate Int 9(2): 107-112, 2021. PMID: 34386454. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.07.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Franklin A,
    2. Yaxley WJ,
    3. Raveenthiran S,
    4. Coughlin G,
    5. Gianduzzo T,
    6. Kua B,
    7. McEwan L,
    8. Wong D,
    9. Delahunt B,
    10. Egevad L,
    11. Samaratunga H,
    12. Brown N,
    13. Parkinson R,
    14. Roberts MJ and
    15. Yaxley JW
    : Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and (68) Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan for pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. BJU Int 127(1): 71-79, 2021. PMID: 32524748. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15134
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ma L,
    2. Zhang WC and
    3. Hao YX
    : Current state of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT imaging-targeted biopsy techniques for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 66(6): 776-780, 2022. PMID: 34914195. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Demirci E,
    2. Kabasakal L,
    3. Şahin OE,
    4. Akgün E,
    5. Gültekin MH,
    6. Doğanca T,
    7. Tuna MB,
    8. Öbek C,
    9. Kiliç M,
    10. Esen T and
    11. Kural AR
    : Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun 40(1): 86-91, 2019. PMID: 30395048. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000942
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rüschoff JH,
    2. Ferraro DA,
    3. Muehlematter UJ,
    4. Laudicella R,
    5. Hermanns T,
    6. Rodewald AK,
    7. Moch H,
    8. Eberli D,
    9. Burger IA and
    10. Rupp NJ
    : What’s behind (68)Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer PET? Investigation of histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(12): 4042-4053, 2021. PMID: 34386839. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05501-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang LL,
    2. Li WC,
    3. Xu Z,
    4. Jiang N,
    5. Zang SM,
    6. Xu LW,
    7. Huang WB,
    8. Wang F and
    9. Sun HB
    : (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy: a prospective randomized single-centre study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(2): 483-492, 2021. PMID: 32734457. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04863-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Yu H,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Zhang X,
    5. Lin M,
    6. Schmidt H,
    7. Gao J and
    8. Xu B
    : A pilot study of (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT or PET/MRI and ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy for intra-prostatic PET-positive lesions. Front Oncol 11: 612157, 2021. PMID: 33747927. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.612157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cytawa W,
    2. Kircher S,
    3. Kübler H,
    4. Werner RA,
    5. Weber S,
    6. Hartrampf P,
    7. Bandurski T,
    8. Lass P,
    9. Połom W,
    10. Matuszewski M,
    11. Wester HJ,
    12. Lapa C,
    13. Rosenwald A,
    14. Seitz AK and
    15. Buck AK
    : Diverse PSMA expression in primary prostate cancer: reason for negative [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans? Immunohistochemical validation in 40 surgical specimens. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49(11): 3938-3949, 2022. PMID: 35556160. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05831-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kalapara AA,
    2. Nzenza T,
    3. Pan HYC,
    4. Ballok Z,
    5. Ramdave S,
    6. O’Sullivan R,
    7. Ryan A,
    8. Cherk M,
    9. Hofman MS,
    10. Konety BR,
    11. Lawrentschuk N,
    12. Bolton D,
    13. Murphy DG,
    14. Grummet JP and
    15. Frydenberg M
    : Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using (68) gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy specimen pathology. BJU Int 126(1): 83-90, 2020. PMID: 31260602. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Emmett L,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Buteau J,
    4. Ho B,
    5. Liu V,
    6. Roberts M,
    7. Thompson J,
    8. Moon D,
    9. Sheehan-Dare G,
    10. Alghazo O,
    11. Agrawal S,
    12. Murphy D,
    13. Stricker P,
    14. Hope TA and
    15. Hofman MS
    : The PRIMARY score: Using intraprostatic (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimize prostate cancer diagnosis. J Nucl Med 63(11): 1644-1650, 2022. PMID: 35301240. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263448
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Pepe G,
    3. Pepe L,
    4. Garufi A,
    5. Priolo GD and
    6. Pennisi M
    : Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric MRI in 800 men submitted to repeat prostate biopsy: Results of a public health model. Anticancer Res 38(4): 2395-2398, 2018. PMID: 29599367. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12489
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Pepe L,
    3. Tamburo M,
    4. Marletta G,
    5. Pennisi M and
    6. Fraggetta F
    : Targeted prostate biopsy: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT vs. mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl 94(3): 274-277, 2022. PMID: 36165469. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2022.3.274
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pepe P,
    2. Garufi A,
    3. Priolo G,
    4. Candiano G,
    5. Pietropaolo F,
    6. Pennisi M,
    7. Fraggetta F and
    8. Aragona F
    : Prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy: can pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI replace saturation biopsy? Anticancer Res 33(3): 1195-1199, 2013. PMID: 23482802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Ferda J,
    2. Hes O,
    3. Hora M,
    4. Ferdová E,
    5. Pernický J,
    6. Rudnev V,
    7. Pecen L,
    8. Topolčan O and
    9. Mírka H
    : Assessment of prostate carcinoma aggressiveness: Relation to (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI and Gleason score. Anticancer Res 43(1): 449-453, 2023. PMID: 36585198. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May-June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Which SUVmax Value?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Which SUVmax Value?
PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, MARIA TAMBURO, GIULIA MARLETTA, FRANCESCO SAVOCA, MICHELE PENNISI, FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1318-1322; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Which SUVmax Value?
PIETRO PEPE, LUDOVICA PEPE, MARIA TAMBURO, GIULIA MARLETTA, FRANCESCO SAVOCA, MICHELE PENNISI, FILIPPO FRAGGETTA
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1318-1322; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13211
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Slowly Progressive Bone Marrow Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Followed-up Without Treatment
  • Evaluation of the Time to Onset and Outcome of Lenalidomide-induced Thrombosis and Embolism Using Spontaneous Reporting Database
  • Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Hydrocortisone Combination Therapy: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
  • mpMRI
  • SUVmax
In Vivo

© 2023 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire