Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Sarcopenia Is Associated With Aggressive Clinicopathological Outcomes and Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator for Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

TOMOYUKI MAKINO, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO and ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1304-1311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13209
TOMOYUKI MAKINO
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOUJI IZUMI
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: azuizu2003{at}yahoo.co.jp
HIROAKI IWAMOTO
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUGURU KADOMOTO
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIFUMI KADONO
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: We aimed to describe the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on the oncological outcome of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after surgical treatment. Patients and Methods: Data on 299 Japanese patients with non-metastatic RCC who underwent radical treatment at Kanazawa University Hospital between October 2007 and December 2018 were extracted. Clinicopathological features and survival prognosis of patients stratified by the presence or absence of sarcopenia as indicated by the psoas muscle mass index (PMI) were retrospectively analyzed. PMI <516.8 and <235.1 mm2/m2 at the L3 level for male and female were defined as the cutoff values for sarcopenia, respectively. Results: Of 299 patients, 113 (37.8%) were classified as sarcopenic. The sarcopenia group showed a larger tumor size, worse pathological tumor stage and histological grade, and more frequent lymphovascular invasion than the non-sarcopenia group. According to Kaplan-Meier curves, sarcopenia was associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (p=0.0174 and 0.0306, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia as a significant and independent prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval=1.09-6.08; p=0.030). Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a significant factor indicating worse pathological outcomes and poor survival prognosis in surgically treated non-metastatic RCC.

Key Words:
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • sarcopenia
  • psoas muscle mass index
  • survival
  • metastasis

Sarcopenia is a progressive and widespread skeletal muscle disease characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass and muscle function (1). Although the mechanisms and pathophysiology of sarcopenia are not yet clearly understood, a declining trend in hormone levels, number of neuromuscular junctions, activity, and adequate nutrition, as well as inflammation, have been suggested (2, 3). Several recent studies have confirmed that the development of sarcopenia is closely related to the treatment and prognosis of many resectable malignancies, such as colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreaticobiliary, and urothelial carcinomas (4, 5). However, few studies on the relationship between sarcopenia and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been conducted in Japan. Several different muscle strength measures are used to quantify sarcopenia. The psoas muscle mass index (PMI) is one relatively simple way of expressing total body skeletal muscle mass and is often used to quantify sarcopenia.

In this study, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the clinicopathological features of RCC and preoperative PMI and evaluated the prognosis after curative surgical treatment in a Japanese population.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Patients with non-metastatic RCC (T1-T4, N0, M0) who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy at Kanazawa University Hospital between October 2007 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were set according to our previous study (6). Also, this study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Kanazawa University (2018-116) (6).

Data collection and variable definitions. Baseline clinical data at the time of surgical treatment, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), PMI, smoking and alcohol use history, medical conditions such as hypertension and diabetes, method of diagnosing RCC, and preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP), were collected. Additionally, baseline oncological data, including pathological tumor stage and size, histological subtype, histological nuclear grade, lymphovascular invasion, and concomitant of sarcomatoid changes were obtained. Pathological stage evaluation was performed according to the tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors (eighth edition) by the Union for International Cancer Control (2017).

Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined as the time from the date of the surgical treatment to death from any cause and to death from RCC, respectively. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was measured as the time from the date of surgical treatment to the first detection of metastasis from RCC.

Assessment of the PMI. Preoperative computed tomography images were manually traced to measure the total psoas muscle cross-sectional area at the L3 level, and PMI (mm2/m2) was calculated by normalizing the total psoas muscle area (mm2) by the square of the patient’s height (m2). The optimal cutoff value for PMI in this study was determined using the point closest to (0,1) on the receiver operating curve (ROC) (7). Sarcopenia was defined as any measurement below each cutoff value for PMI.

Statistical analyses. Differences in the patients’ characteristics were compared using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate. OS, CSS, and MFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log–rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association of sarcopenia with MFS and OS. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.07 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Patient background. Data on 299 patients with T1-T4, N0, M0 RCC who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy were extracted. The demographics of overall patients are shown in Table I. The median follow-up period for the study population was 4.43 years (range=0.02-14.71 years). Of the 299 patients, 113 (37.8%) and 186 (62.2%) were identified with sarcopenia and without sarcopenia, respectively. A significant difference in age at diagnosis of RCC was found between the sarcopenia group [67 years, interquartile range (IQR)=62.0-75.0 years] and non-sarcopenia group (60 years, IQR=50.3-67.8 years; p<0.001). A significant difference was also observed in sex between the sarcopenia group [102 (90.3%) for male patients and 11 (9.7%) for female patients] and non-sarcopenia group [114 (61.3%) for male and 72 (38.7%) for female; p<0.001]. In addition, the sarcopenia group showed a lower BMI (p<0.001) and a higher value of preoperative serum CRP (p=0.012) and rate of coexisting hypertension (p=0.006) than the non-sarcopenia group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

The optimal thresholds for PMI. Using OS as the end point for PMI, the optimal cutoff value was determined by ROC analysis. The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of PMI was 516.8 mm2/m2 for male [area under the curve (AUC)=0.576; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.459-0.692; p=0.2893, with sensitivity of 61.1% and specificity of 54.0%] and 235.1 mm2/m2 for female patients (AUC=0.684; 95%CI=0.432-0.935; p=0.2175, with sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 88.6%).

Correlations of PMI with age and BMI. PMI was correlated with several clinical values. Median PMI was 520.8 mm2/m2 (IQR=440.5-618.0 mm2/m2) for male and 300.3 mm2/m2 (IQR=249.9-380.5 mm2/m2) for female patients. In linear regression, a weakly negative correlation was observed between PMI and age (all patients: r2=0.1322, p<0.0001; male: r2=0.2015, p<0.0001; female: r2=0.0866, p=0.0060) (Figure 1A-C), whereas a weakly positive correlation was observed with BMI (all patients: r2=0.1677, p<0.0001; male: r2=0.1515, p<0.0001; female: r2=0.1264, p=0.0010) (Figure 1D-F).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Relationship between psoas muscle mass index (PMI), age, and body mass index (BMI) in all (A, D), male (B, E), and female (C, F) patients, respectively.

Oncological parameters. A summary of the oncological parameters was evaluated as shown in Table II. The tumor size tended to be larger in the sarcopenia group (median, 3.0 cm; IQR=2.2-5.5 cm) than that in the non-sarcopenia group (median, 2.8 cm; IQR=1.9-4.8 cm; p=0.063). Pathological T-stage determined according to the TNM classification system and histological grade were significantly worse in the sarcopenia group than those in the non-sarcopenia group (p=0.042 and 0.009, respectively). Otherwise, a trend toward a significant difference in the incidence of lymphovascular invasion between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups was observed (p=0.072).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Oncological parameters.

Survival rates and prognostic factors. During the observation period, 48 patients developed metastatic recurrence, and 22 patients died, nine of them from RCC. The results of Kaplan-Meier analysis for OS, CSS, and MFS in all patients with or without sarcopenia are shown in Figure 2. A significant difference in OS was found between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups (p=0.0174, Figure 2A). The 5-year OS values in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups were 93.0% and 94.5%, respectively. Although no significant difference was seen in CSS between the two groups (p=0.2069, Figure 2B), the MFS varied significantly between the two groups (p=0.0306, Figure 2C). The 5-year MFS values in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups were 74.3% and 86.9%, respectively. The results of the multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors showed that the presence of sarcopenia was not an independent predictor associated with MFS (Table III) but was the only independent prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio=2.58; 95%CI=1.09-6.08; p=0.030) (Table IV).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier analyses for (A) overall survival, (B) cancer-specific survival, and (C) metastasis-free survival in all patients based on the presence or absence of sarcopenia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association between clinicopathological characteristics and metastasis-free survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the association between clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival.

Discussion

The need for improved preoperative prediction in localized RCC has remained significantly unmet. Several previous studies have reported that sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of death and recurrence after nephrectomy in both localized and metastatic RCC (8-10). In addition, a recent meta-analysis showed that patients with malignant neoplasms, including RCC and sarcopenia, at preimmunotherapy had worse clinical outcomes than those without (11).

The present study examined the relationship between preoperative sarcopenia and oncological outcomes and survival. The results confirmed that the presence of sarcopenia, as indicated by low PMI, was associated not only with significantly worse pathological features, such as tumor stage, histological grade, and lymphovascular invasion incidence, but also with an increased rate of metastasis and decreased survival after radical surgery for non-metastatic RCC, and that sarcopenia was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS.

Although sarcopenia is a consequence of atrophy from disuse, its molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unknown. Altogether, sarcopenia is considered to be a multifactorial process; malnutrition, alterations in muscle structure, altered muscle signaling, and decreased physical activity (12). Another proposed explanation is sarcopenia as a marker of an increased cancer-related inflammatory response (13). In particular, accumulating evidence demonstrated that serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and CRP are elevated in sarcopenia, usually up to 2-4-fold higher than those in young controls (14). Additionally, high CRP is also associated with a number of poor prognostic indicators, including tumor size, higher grade and stage, lymphatic involvement, microvascular invasion, and aggressive histopathologic findings such as spindle or sarcomatoid morphology (15). Therefore, these biomechanical backgrounds may support the present study’s findings of worse pathological outcomes and poor survival in the sarcopenia group. On the basis of these findings, a notable advantage of identifying patients with high preoperative sarcopenic status is the opportunity for early intervention to alter the disease trajectory (16). Early intervention with exercise programs designed to build muscle may offset the long-term risk of sarcopenia and thus may improve survival. Several studies have shown the benefit of preoperative exercise regimens in reducing the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and costs for patients with cancer undergoing surgery (17, 18). Interestingly, a recent study reported that pre- and postoperative sarcopenia dynamics were significant predictors of survival outcomes, indicating that the maintenance of a good pre- and postoperative nutritional status was essential for long-term survival in patients with RCC (19). Therefore, a multimodal approach to body composition at all stages of the disease may benefit those at high risk for developing metastatic disease.

This study has several limitations. Data collected on PMI were determined using manual tracing, but the correlation between PMI and total skeletal muscle mass was not determined. In addition, the cutoff value for PMI depended on race, and the exact cutoff values for different races were not established. However, previous studies have reported a cutoff value of PMI of 545 mm2/m2 in men and 385 mm2/m2 in women, as defined by an international consensus of experts on cancer cachexia (20), as well as 538 mm2/m2 in men and 346 mm2/m2 in women in Japanese populations (21). Therefore, the cutoff value for PMI set in this study is considered to be generally similar to those of previous reports. Moreover, no details of systemic treatment for patients with recurrent metastatic RCC after radical surgery were included in this study because of complicated sequential treatment using various agents available presently. In addition, recent significant advances in surgical treatment may have influenced these prognostic analyses. Finally, the sample size and observation period may be insufficient to determine precise statistical significance. However, the present study confirms that the presence of sarcopenia, defined here as low PMI, is an independent predictor of survival in Japanese patients surgically treated for non-metastatic RCC. Further research investigating the dose relationship of sarcopenia and validating optimal criteria would help to accurately define the role of sarcopenia in the oncologic outcome of RCC.

Conclusion

The results of this retrospective analysis showed that Japanese patients with non-metastatic RCC and concurrent sarcopenia tend to have a larger tumor size, worse pathological tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, higher incidence of metastasis, and poor life expectancy. The PMI can be easily measured as an indicator of patient sarcopenia and may be useful for prognostic risk stratification of patients with non-metastatic RCC undergoing surgical treatment.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.com) for the English language review (accessed on 30 May 2022).

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization, T.M.; methodology, T.M.; validation, T.M.; formal analysis, T.M.; investigation, T.M.; resources, T.M.; data curation, T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M.; writing—review and editing, K.I., H.I., S.K., and Y.K.; visualization, T.M.; supervision, A.M.; project administration, T.M. and K.I. All Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received March 3, 2023.
  • Revision received March 15, 2023.
  • Accepted March 16, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ,
    2. Bahat G,
    3. Bauer J,
    4. Boirie Y,
    5. Bruyère O,
    6. Cederholm T,
    7. Cooper C,
    8. Landi F,
    9. Rolland Y,
    10. Sayer AA,
    11. Schneider SM,
    12. Sieber CC,
    13. Topinkova E,
    14. Vandewoude M,
    15. Visser M,
    16. Zamboni M and Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2
    : Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48(1): 16-31, 2019. PMID: 30312372. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Santilli V,
    2. Bernetti A,
    3. Mangone M and
    4. Paoloni M
    : Clinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 11(3): 177-180, 2014. PMID: 25568649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Peixoto da Silva S,
    2. Santos JMO,
    3. Costa E Silva MP,
    4. Gil da Costa RM and
    5. Medeiros R
    : Cancer cachexia and its pathophysiology: links with sarcopenia, anorexia and asthenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11(3): 619-635, 2020. PMID: 32142217. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Joglekar S,
    2. Nau PN and
    3. Mezhir JJ
    : The impact of sarcopenia on survival and complications in surgical oncology: A review of the current literature. J Surg Oncol 112(5): 503-509, 2015. PMID: 26310812. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shachar SS,
    2. Williams GR,
    3. Muss HB and
    4. Nishijima TF
    : Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer 57: 58-67, 2016. PMID: 26882087. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Makino T,
    2. Izumi K,
    3. Iwamoto H,
    4. Kadomoto S,
    5. Kadono Y and
    6. Mizokami A
    : Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammatory and nutritional indices in nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. Biomedicines 11(2): 533, 2023. PMID: 36831069. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Akobeng AK
    : Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96(5): 644-647, 2007. PMID: 17376185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Psutka SP,
    2. Boorjian SA,
    3. Moynagh MR,
    4. Schmit GD,
    5. Costello BA,
    6. Thompson RH,
    7. Stewart-Merrill SB,
    8. Lohse CM,
    9. Cheville JC,
    10. Leibovich BC and
    11. Tollefson MK
    : Decreased skeletal muscle mass is associated with an increased risk of mortality after radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell cancer. J Urol 195(2): 270-276, 2016. PMID: 26292038. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sharma P,
    2. Zargar-Shoshtari K,
    3. Caracciolo JT,
    4. Fishman M,
    5. Poch MA,
    6. Pow-Sang J,
    7. Sexton WJ and
    8. Spiess PE
    : Sarcopenia as a predictor of overall survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 33(8): 339.e17-339.e23, 2015. PMID: 26094169. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Fukushima H,
    2. Nakanishi Y,
    3. Kataoka M,
    4. Tobisu K and
    5. Koga F
    : Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 195(1): 26-32, 2016. PMID: 26292042. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Wang T,
    3. Tong G,
    4. Li X,
    5. You D and
    6. Cong M
    : Prognostic impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 11: 726257, 2021. PMID: 34513704. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Pascual-Fernández J,
    2. Fernández-Montero A,
    3. Córdova-Martínez A,
    4. Pastor D,
    5. Martínez-Rodríguez A and
    6. Roche E
    : Sarcopenia: Molecular pathways and potential targets for intervention. Int J Mol Sci 21(22): 8844, 2020. PMID: 33266508. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228844
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Williams GR,
    2. Dunne RF,
    3. Giri S,
    4. Shachar SS and
    5. Caan BJ
    : Sarcopenia in the older adult with cancer. J Clin Oncol 39(19): 2068-2078, 2021. PMID: 34043430. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Mankhong S,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Moon S,
    4. Kwak HB,
    5. Park DH and
    6. Kang JH
    : Experimental models of sarcopenia: Bridging molecular mechanism and therapeutic strategy. Cells 9(6): 1385, 2020. PMID: 32498474. DOI: 10.3390/cells9061385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. O’Brian D,
    2. Prunty M,
    3. Hill A and
    4. Shoag J
    : The role of C-reactive protein in kidney, bladder, and prostate cancers. Front Immunol 12: 721989, 2021. PMID: 34512646. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.721989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Higgins MI,
    2. Martini DJ,
    3. Patil DH,
    4. Nabavizadeh R,
    5. Steele S,
    6. Williams M,
    7. Joshi SS,
    8. Narayan VM,
    9. Sekhar A,
    10. Psutka SP,
    11. Ogan K,
    12. Bilen MA and
    13. Master VA
    : Sarcopenia and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score predict postsurgical outcomes in localized renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 127(12): 1974-1983, 2021. PMID: 33760232. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Englesbe MJ,
    2. Grenda DR,
    3. Sullivan JA,
    4. Derstine BA,
    5. Kenney BN,
    6. Sheetz KH,
    7. Palazzolo WC,
    8. Wang NC,
    9. Goulson RL,
    10. Lee JS and
    11. Wang SC
    : The Michigan Surgical Home and Optimization Program is a scalable model to improve care and reduce costs. Surgery 161(6): 1659-1666, 2017. PMID: 28174000. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Santa Mina D,
    2. van Rooijen SJ,
    3. Minnella EM,
    4. Alibhai SMH,
    5. Brahmbhatt P,
    6. Dalton SO,
    7. Gillis C,
    8. Grocott MPW,
    9. Howell D,
    10. Randall IM,
    11. Sabiston CM,
    12. Silver JK,
    13. Slooter G,
    14. West M,
    15. Jack S and
    16. Carli F
    : Multiphasic prehabilitation across the cancer continuum: a narrative review and conceptual framework. Front Oncol 10: 598425, 2021. PMID: 33505914. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. He T,
    3. Sun S,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Xu B,
    6. Mao W and
    7. Chen M
    : Prognostic significance of pre- to postoperative dynamics of sarcopenia for patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. Front Surg 9: 871731, 2022. PMID: 35529912. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.871731
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Fearon K,
    2. Strasser F,
    3. Anker SD,
    4. Bosaeus I,
    5. Bruera E,
    6. Fainsinger RL,
    7. Jatoi A,
    8. Loprinzi C,
    9. MacDonald N,
    10. Mantovani G,
    11. Davis M,
    12. Muscaritoli M,
    13. Ottery F,
    14. Radbruch L,
    15. Ravasco P,
    16. Walsh D,
    17. Wilcock A,
    18. Kaasa S and
    19. Baracos VE
    : Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12(5): 489-495, 2011. PMID: 21296615. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ouchi A,
    2. Asano M,
    3. Aono K,
    4. Watanabe T and
    5. Oya S
    : Laparoscopic colorectal resection in patients with sarcopenia: a retrospective case-control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(5): 366-370, 2016. PMID: 26982506. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May-June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sarcopenia Is Associated With Aggressive Clinicopathological Outcomes and Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator for Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Sarcopenia Is Associated With Aggressive Clinicopathological Outcomes and Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator for Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
TOMOYUKI MAKINO, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1304-1311; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13209

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Sarcopenia Is Associated With Aggressive Clinicopathological Outcomes and Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator for Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
TOMOYUKI MAKINO, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1304-1311; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13209
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
  • Unveiling the Intricate Dance: How Cancer Orchestrates Muscle Wasting and Sarcopenia
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Sarcopenia
  • psoas muscle mass index
  • survival
  • metastasis
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire