Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Pre-treatment Emotional Distress in Patients Irradiated for Malignant Glioma

DIRK RADES, AHMED AL-SALOOL, NATHAN Y. YU, PETER TRILLENBERG, MATTEO M. BONSANTO and JAN LEPPERT
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1198-1204; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13196
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dirk.rades@uksh.de
AHMED AL-SALOOL
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NATHAN Y. YU
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PETER TRILLENBERG
3Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MATTEO M. BONSANTO
4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAN LEPPERT
4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: A recommendation of radiotherapy for patients with malignant gliomas may trigger emotional distress. Frequency and risk factors of this complication were investigated. Patients and Methods: Prevalence of six emotional problems and 11 potential risk factors were evaluated in 103 patients irradiated for grade II-IV gliomas. p-Values <0.0045 were considered significant. Results: Seventy-six patients (74%) had ≥1 emotional problem. Prevalence of specific emotional problems ranged between 23% and 63%. Associations were found between ≥5 physical problems and worry (p=0.0010), fear (p=0.0001), sadness (p=0.0023), depression (p=0.0006), and loss of interest (p=0.0006), and Karnofsky performance score ≤80 and depression (p=0.0002). Trends were found for physical problems and nervousness (p=0.040), age ≥60 years and depression (p=0.043) or loss of interest (p=0.045), grade IV glioma and sadness (p=0.042), and ≥2 involved sites and loss of interest (p=0.022). Conclusion: Three-fourths of glioma patients had pre-radiotherapy emotional distress. Psychological support should be offered very soon, particularly for high-risk patients.

Key Words:
  • Malignant glioma
  • glioblastoma multiforme
  • irradiation
  • emotional distress
  • risk factors

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant gliomas often lead to significant distress (1). Distress may be more pronounced if the patients are assigned to radiation therapy. Radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy is an integral part of the treatment for many glioma patients (2-5). Recommended radiation therapy may cause worry and fear regarding “unnecessary” radiation exposure, unknown technology, or potential adverse events (6-8). Patients may require early psycho-oncologic support to be able to sufficiently tolerate and complete the recommended treatment. In the literature, the prevalence of emotional or psychological distress varies considerably for patients with gliomas (6-61%) (1, 9-15). In our previous study, 67% of patients scheduled for radiotherapy of a malignant glioma reported sleep disorders prior to the start of their treatment, which may be correlated with emotional distress (16). However, there is little data focusing particularly on emotional distress prior to a course of radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Our study evaluates the frequency of six emotional problems and potential risk factors in patients with gliomas of WHO (World Health Organization) grades II, III, or IV, who were recommended for radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

The data of 103 patients assigned to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for a WHO grade II-IV glioma between January 2018 and March 2022 were analyzed regarding emotional distress prior to their course of treatment (17, 18). Emotional distress was assessed according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer and represented by six qualities including worry, fear, sadness, depression, nervousness, and loss of interest in usual activities (19). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee at the University of Lübeck, Germany (identifier 2022-412).

The patients were irradiated using modern 3D treatment planning and volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Thirteen patients (12.6%) had a WHO grade II glioma, 10 patients (9.7%) a WHO grade III lesion, and 77 patients (74.8%) a WHO grade IV lesion (glioblastoma multiforme). In three patients (2.9%), the WHO grade was not specified. Of the 13 patients with a WHO grade II glioma, 11 patients received 54.0 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week), and two patients 59.4 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week). Eight patients were treated with upfront resection, and five patients received sequential (n=4) or concurrent (n=1) chemotherapy. Of the 10 patients with a WHO grade III glioma, four patients received 59.4 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week), three patients 60.0 Gy (5×2.0 Gy per week), two patients 55.8 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week), and one patient 30.4 of planned 59.4 Gy. Eight patients received upfront resection, and all patients chemoradiation, either sequential (n=9) or concurrent (n=1). Of the 77 patients with a WHO grade IV glioma, 58 patients (75%) were treated with 59.4 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week), five patients with 60.0 Gy (5×2.0 Gy per week), five patients 55.8-57.6 Gy (5×1.8 Gy per week), and nine patients with other dose-fractionation regimens. Upfront resection was performed in 61 patients (79%), and chemoradiation with temozolomide in 70 patients (91%) (20).

Eleven potential risk factors of emotional distress were analyzed including Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (before vs. during the pandemic), number of physical problems (0-4 vs. ≥5), age (≤59 vs. ≥60 years), sex (female vs. male), Karnofsky performance score (KPS ≤80 vs. >80), number of cerebral sites involved by glioma (1 vs. ≥2 sites), WHO grade (II-III vs. IV), upfront resection (no vs. yes), chemoradiation (no vs. yes), treatment with dexamethasone corticosteroids at the time of assessment of pre-radiotherapy emotional distress (no vs. yes), and history of another malignancy (no vs. yes).

For statistical analyses, we used the Chi-square test or, if the number of patients was n<5 in one or more subgroups, the Fisher’s exact test. Following the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple tests, a p-value <0.0045 was regarded significant (alpha level of <0.05). In addition, p<0.05 were considered to indicate a trend.

Results

Seventy-six patients (74%) showed at least one of the six investigated emotional problems. Prevalence of the emotional problems worry, fear, sadness, depression, nervousness, and loss of interest in usual activities was 53%, 63%, 49%, 21%, 40% and 23%, respectively. Significant associations were found between ≥5 physical problems and worry (p=0.0010), fear (p=0.0001), sadness (p=0.0023), depression (p=0.0006), and loss of interest in usual activities (p=0.0006), and between a KPS ≤80 and depression (p=0.0002). Moreover, trends were found for ≥5 physical problems and nervousness (p=0.040), age ≥60 years and depression (p=0.043) or loss of interest (p=0.045), grade IV glioma and sadness (p=0.042), and for ≥2 sites involved by glioma and loss of interest (p=0.022). All the results of the associations between the 11 potential risk factors and the six qualities of emotional distress are given in Table I, Table II, Table III, Table IV, Table V, and Table VI.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and worry.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and fear.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and sadness.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and depression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and nervousness.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Associations of the investigated characteristics and loss of interest in usual activities.

Discussion

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant brain tumors can lead to significant emotional and psychological distress. In the literature, emotional distress is often represented by anxiety and depression, or by the six qualities included in the NCCN Distress Thermometer, namely worry, fear, sadness, depression, nervousness, and loss of interest in usual activities (19). The prevalence of emotional distress shows considerable variations, depending on the patients’ situation. In a prospective observational study of 149 patients with low-grade glioma, an increased level of distress was found in 20.8% of these patients (9). In a pilot study including 32 patients with high-grade glioma and 31 caregivers, 19 of the patients (60%) reported clinically significant distress (10). In another study considering both patients and caregivers, 37.5% of the patients with a primary brain tumor had distress scores above the cut-off value at the time of diagnoses (12). The study of Randazzo et al. used the NCCN Distress Thermometer to evaluate psychosocial distress in a series of 829 patients with a primary brain tumor (11, 19). The prevalence of worry, fear, and nervousness was 29.4%, 17.5%, and 22.4%, respectively. In the study of Mainio et al., 35% of the patients reported depression prior to resection of a primary brain tumor (15). Rooney et al. assessed five qualities of emotional distress using the Distress Thermometer at different time points (13). At the earliest time point, i.e., shortly after the start of radiotherapy or chemotherapy, worry, fear, sadness, depression, and nervousness were stated by 29%, 14%, 15%, 6%, and 19%, respectively. Moreover, in a systematic review that considered 92 articles, a prevalence of 60.9% was found for mental health disorders (1). No study so far focused specifically on the prevalence of emotional distress prior to radiotherapy or chemoradiation for malignant gliomas. In our study addressing this situation, 74% of the patients indicated at least one emotional problem. Moreover, the prevalence of the six investigated qualities of emotional distress was higher than that in the studies of Randazzo et al. and Rooney et al. (11, 13). These results support the hypothesis that upcoming radiotherapy is particularly stressful for glioma patients.

In our study, emotional distress was significantly associated with a greater number of physical problems and a lower KPS. In addition, trends were found for older age (≥60 years), glioblastoma multiforme, and involvement of ≥2 cerebral sites. The prognostic role of physical problems was previously described in other studies. In the study of Osoba et al., deteriorating neurologic status was associated with increase in emotional distress in patients with brain tumors (21). Halkett et al. found that poor physical function was related to multiple domains of distress in a cohort of 116 patients with high-grade gliomas (22). In the study of Aprile et al., mental aspects of quality of life were significantly related to fatigue, which is one of the physical problems addressed in the NCCN Distress Thermometer (19, 23). Moreover, in our preceding study, the number of physical problems were positively correlated with sleep disorders that might have been a consequence of emotional distress (13). Associations between a worse KPS and a higher prevalence of distress was previously reported by Mainio et al. (15). In addition, Rooney et al. found a significant association between KPS ≤70 and depressive disorders shortly after the start of radiotherapy for cerebral glioma (14). In the study of Abete-Fornara et al., the probability to experience severe psychological distress was significantly associated with older age (odds ratio=1.17, p=0.0004) in patients with brain tumors (24). The fact that distress was correlated with more aggressive gliomas (higher WHO grades) was shown by Trad et al. (distress assessed at the time of diagnosis) and Leonetti et al. (distress assessed 6 months following resection) (12, 25). An association between emotional distress and involvement of ≥2 cerebral sites was not explicitly stated before. However, since this situation is associated with a significantly worse survival prognosis than a single lesion, one can understand that affected patients experience a higher level of distress (5).

In conclusion, approximately 75% of patients with a malignant glioma reported at least one aspect of emotional distress prior to their course of radiotherapy or chemoradiation. High-risk patients, namely those with ≥5 physical problems, KPS ≤80, age ≥60 years, glioblastoma multiforme, or involvement of ≥2 cerebral sites should be offered psychological support very soon.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    All Authors participated in the study design. A. A.-L. and D.R. collected the data. Data analysis was performed by D.R. The article was drafted by D.R. and N.Y.Y.; it was reviewed and approved by all Authors.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors report no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received March 8, 2023.
  • Revision received March 20, 2023.
  • Accepted March 21, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Young JS,
    2. Al-Adli N,
    3. Sibih YE,
    4. Scotford KL,
    5. Casey M,
    6. James S and
    7. Berger MS
    : Recognizing the psychological impact of a glioma diagnosis on mental and behavioral health: a systematic review of what neurosurgeons need to know. J Neurosurg 1-9, 2022. PMID: 36334288. DOI: 10.3171/2022.9.JNS221139
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Anami S,
    2. Fukai J,
    3. Hama M,
    4. Awaya A,
    5. Inagaki T,
    6. Chiba T,
    7. Noda Y,
    8. Kanemura Y,
    9. Nakao N and
    10. Sonomura T
    : Brainstem infiltration predicts survival in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res 41(5): 2583-2589, 2021. PMID: 33952487. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15037
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Witteler J,
    2. Schild SE and
    3. Rades D
    : Clinical prognostic factors for local control and survival after irradiation of grade II gliomas. In Vivo 34(6): 3719-3722, 2020. PMID: 33144489. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12220
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rades D,
    2. Witteler J and
    3. Schild SE
    : Radiotherapy of grade III gliomas: Identification of clinical prognostic factors for local tumor control and survival. In Vivo 34(6): 3627-3630, 2020. PMID: 33144477. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12208
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Witteler J,
    3. Schild SE,
    4. Trillenberg P,
    5. Bonsanto MM and
    6. Leppert J
    : A new survival score for patients receiving radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Res 41(1): 379-384, 2021. PMID: 33419834. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14786
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Yang F,
    2. Dinakaran D,
    3. Heikal AA,
    4. Yaghoobpour Tari S,
    5. Ghosh S,
    6. Amanie J,
    7. Murtha A,
    8. Rowe LS,
    9. Roa WH and
    10. Patel S
    : Dosimetric predictors of toxicity in a randomized study of short-course vs conventional radiotherapy for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 177: 152-157, 2022. PMID: 36273738. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fleischmann DF,
    2. Schön R,
    3. Corradini S,
    4. Bodensohn R,
    5. Hadi I,
    6. Hofmaier J,
    7. Forbrig R,
    8. Thon N,
    9. Dorostkar M,
    10. Belka C and
    11. Niyazi M
    : Multifocal high-grade glioma radiotherapy safety and efficacy. Radiat Oncol 16(1): 165, 2021. PMID: 34454558. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01886-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Witteler J,
    3. Trillenberg P,
    4. Olbrich D,
    5. Schild SE,
    6. Tvilsted S and
    7. Kjaer TW
    : Increasing seizure activity during radiation treatment for high-grade gliomas - final results of a prospective interventional study. In Vivo 36(5): 2308-2313, 2022. PMID: 36099095. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12961
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Ley A,
    2. Kamp M,
    3. von Sass C,
    4. Hänggi D,
    5. Sabel M and
    6. Rapp M
    : Psychooncological distress in low-grade glioma patients-a monocentric study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 164(3): 713-722, 2022. PMID: 34159449. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04863-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Philip J,
    2. Collins A,
    3. Panozzo S,
    4. Staker J and
    5. Murphy M
    : Mapping the nature of distress raised by patients with high-grade glioma and their family caregivers: a descriptive longitudinal study. Neurooncol Pract 7(1): 103-110, 2020. PMID: 32257289. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Randazzo DM,
    2. McSherry F,
    3. Herndon JE 2nd.,
    4. Affronti ML,
    5. Lipp ES,
    6. Flahiff C,
    7. Miller E,
    8. Woodring S,
    9. Freeman M,
    10. Healy P,
    11. Minchew J,
    12. Boulton S,
    13. Desjardins A,
    14. Vlahovic G,
    15. Friedman HS,
    16. Keir S and
    17. Peters KB
    : A cross sectional analysis from a single institution’s experience of psychosocial distress and health-related quality of life in the primary brain tumor population. J Neurooncol 134(2): 363-369, 2017. PMID: 28669010. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2535-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Trad W,
    2. Koh ES,
    3. Daher M,
    4. Bailey A,
    5. Kastelan M,
    6. Legge D,
    7. Fleet M,
    8. Simpson GK and
    9. Hovey E
    : Screening for psychological distress in adult primary brain tumor patients and caregivers: considerations for cancer care coordination. Front Oncol 5: 203, 2015. PMID: 26442215. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Rooney AG,
    2. McNamara S,
    3. Mackinnon M,
    4. Fraser M,
    5. Rampling R,
    6. Carson A and
    7. Grant R
    : The frequency, longitudinal course, clinical associations, and causes of emotional distress during primary treatment of cerebral glioma. Neuro Oncol 15(5): 635-643, 2013. PMID: 23444258. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Rooney AG,
    2. McNamara S,
    3. Mackinnon M,
    4. Fraser M,
    5. Rampling R,
    6. Carson A and
    7. Grant R
    : Frequency, clinical associations, and longitudinal course of major depressive disorder in adults with cerebral glioma. J Clin Oncol 29(32): 4307-4312, 2011. PMID: 21990406. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8466
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Mainio A,
    2. Hakko H,
    3. Niemelä A,
    4. Koivukangas J and
    5. Räsänen P
    : Depression and functional outcome in patients with brain tumors: a population-based 1-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg 103(5): 841-847, 2005. PMID: 16304988. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kopelke S,
    2. Kjaer TW,
    3. Tvilsted S,
    4. Schild SE,
    5. Bartscht T and
    6. Rades D
    : Risk factors for sleep problems prior to radiochemotherapy for malignant gliomas. In Vivo 36(1): 325-329, 2022. PMID: 34972729. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12705
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Wesseling P,
    4. Brat DJ,
    5. Cree IA,
    6. Figarella-Branger D,
    7. Hawkins C,
    8. Ng HK,
    9. Pfister SM,
    10. Reifenberger G,
    11. Soffietti R,
    12. von Deimling A and
    13. Ellison DW
    : The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23(8): 1231-1251, 2021. PMID: 34185076. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G,
    4. von Deimling A,
    5. Figarella-Branger D,
    6. Cavenee WK,
    7. Ohgaki H,
    8. Wiestler OD,
    9. Kleihues P and
    10. Ellison DW
    : The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131(6): 803-820, 2016. PMID: 27157931. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Holland JC,
    2. Andersen B,
    3. Breitbart WS,
    4. Buchmann LO,
    5. Compas B,
    6. Deshields TL,
    7. Dudley MM,
    8. Fleishman S,
    9. Fulcher CD,
    10. Greenberg DB,
    11. Greiner CB,
    12. Handzo GF,
    13. Hoofring L,
    14. Hoover C,
    15. Jacobsen PB,
    16. Kvale E,
    17. Levy MH,
    18. Loscalzo MJ,
    19. McAllister-Black R,
    20. Mechanic KY,
    21. Palesh O,
    22. Pazar JP,
    23. Riba MB,
    24. Roper K,
    25. Valentine AD,
    26. Wagner LI,
    27. Zevon MA,
    28. McMillian NR and
    29. Freedman-Cass DA
    : Distress management. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11(2): 190-209, 2013. PMID: 23411386. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0027
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Stupp R,
    2. Mason WP,
    3. van den Bent MJ,
    4. Weller M,
    5. Fisher B,
    6. Taphoorn MJ,
    7. Belanger K,
    8. Brandes AA,
    9. Marosi C,
    10. Bogdahn U,
    11. Curschmann J,
    12. Janzer RC,
    13. Ludwin SK,
    14. Gorlia T,
    15. Allgeier A,
    16. Lacombe D,
    17. Cairncross JG,
    18. Eisenhauer E,
    19. Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
    : Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10): 987-996, 2005. PMID: 15758009. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Osoba D,
    2. Aaronson NK,
    3. Muller M,
    4. Sneeuw K,
    5. Hsu MA,
    6. Yung WK,
    7. Brada M and
    8. Newlands E
    : The development and psychometric validation of a brain cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for use in combination with general cancer-specific questionnaires. Qual Life Res 5(1): 139-150, 1996. PMID: 8901377. DOI: 10.1007/BF00435979
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Halkett GK,
    2. Lobb EA,
    3. Rogers MM,
    4. Shaw T,
    5. Long AP,
    6. Wheeler HR and
    7. Nowak AK
    : Predictors of distress and poorer quality of life in High Grade Glioma patients. Patient Educ Couns 98(4): 525-532, 2015. PMID: 25638306. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Aprile I,
    2. Chiesa S,
    3. Padua L,
    4. Di Blasi C,
    5. Arezzo MF,
    6. Valentini V,
    7. Di Stasio E and
    8. Balducci M
    : Occurrence and predictors of the fatigue in high-grade glioma patients. Neurol Sci 36(8): 1363-1369, 2015. PMID: 25698127. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2111-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Abete-Fornara G,
    2. Mameli F,
    3. Ruggiero F,
    4. Meessen J,
    5. Blanda A,
    6. Ampollini A,
    7. Locatelli M,
    8. Salmaggi A,
    9. Di Cristofori AC,
    10. Mauri I and
    11. Caroli M
    : Brain tumours in the time of COVID-19: An online survey on patients’ disease experience in one Italian region. Front Oncol 13: 1002895, 2023. PMID: 36776343. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1002895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Leonetti A,
    2. Puglisi G,
    3. Rossi M,
    4. Viganò L,
    5. Conti Nibali M,
    6. Gay L,
    7. Sciortino T,
    8. Howells H,
    9. Fornia L,
    10. Riva M,
    11. Cerri G and
    12. Bello L
    : Factors influencing mood disorders and health related quality of life in adults with glioma: a longitudinal study. Front Oncol 11: 662039, 2021. PMID: 34094955. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.662039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (3)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 3
May-June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pre-treatment Emotional Distress in Patients Irradiated for Malignant Glioma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pre-treatment Emotional Distress in Patients Irradiated for Malignant Glioma
DIRK RADES, AHMED AL-SALOOL, NATHAN Y. YU, PETER TRILLENBERG, MATTEO M. BONSANTO, JAN LEPPERT
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1198-1204; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13196

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Pre-treatment Emotional Distress in Patients Irradiated for Malignant Glioma
DIRK RADES, AHMED AL-SALOOL, NATHAN Y. YU, PETER TRILLENBERG, MATTEO M. BONSANTO, JAN LEPPERT
In Vivo May 2023, 37 (3) 1198-1204; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13196
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of Distress During a Radiotherapy Course in Patients Irradiated for Breast Cancer
  • Final Results of a Study Evaluating the Course of Distress Scores During Radiotherapy for Malignant Diseases
  • Comparison of Distress Scores Before and After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of the Setup Accuracy of a Skin-markerless Positioning Using Surface-guided Radiotherapy in Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
  • Conversion Surgery Performed Following Durvalumab Combined With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report
  • The Effectiveness of Live Birth Rate of Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention for Infertile Women Undergoing a Second Round of IVF Is Influenced by Age
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Malignant glioma
  • Glioblastoma multiforme
  • irradiation
  • emotional distress
  • risk factors
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire