Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study

TAKAO KATO and HIROSHI SAKAGAMI
In Vivo March 2023, 37 (2) 830-835; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13149
TAKAO KATO
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: takao{at}kanazawa-med.ac.jp
HIROSHI SAKAGAMI
2Meikai University Research Institute of Odontology, Saitama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sakagami{at}dent.meikai.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Radiation-induced stomatitis is one of the main acute disorders in patients with head and neck cancer. Since its treatment is often delayed or discontinued, the control of perioperative oral function is necessary. It has been reported that Hangeshashinto (Japanese traditional herbal medicine) and cryotherapy (known as frozen therapy) alleviate oral stomatitis and the accompanying pain. In the present study, the combination effect of Hangeshashinto and cryotherapy on radiation-induced stomatitis in patients with head and neck cancers was investigated for the first time. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with head and neck cancer were subjected to radiation therapy with concomitant administration of anticancer drugs. They were separated into two groups, matched according to age, stage of cancer progression, total radiation dose, and type of concomitant anticancer drugs. One group was orally administrated frozen Hangeshashinto, while another group was not. Oral mucosal damage was assessed by the grade classification CTCAE v4.0 of the National Cancer Institute of the United States (Japanese JCOG version). Duration time of radiation-induced stomatitis was determined by the appearance of grade 1 redness to its disappearance. Results: Frozen Hangeshashinto significantly alleviated, delayed the onset, and reduced the duration time of the radiation-induced stomatitis. Conclusion: Cryotherapy in combination with Hangeshashinto can be used for the treatment of radiation-induced oral stomatitis.

Key Words:
  • Radiation
  • oral mucositis
  • Hangeshashinto
  • cryotherapy

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common cancer types with an incidence of more than 5 million cases per year, approximately 90% of which are accounted by oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). As treatments, surgical resection, and radiation therapy, alone or combined, have been used over the past few decades (1, 2).

Radiation therapy improves clinical, morphological, and functional outcomes in cancer patients. Currently, nearly 75% of head and neck cancer patients benefit from radiation therapy, regardless of getting primary or adjuvant therapy after surgical resection. In the early stages of cancer, radiation therapy can replace surgical resection (3-5). Cancer patients can be treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cancer or surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (6). Therefore, it is important to complete the treatment of radiation therapy. Stomatitis caused by radiation therapy is one of the main acute disorders, and treatment is often delayed or discontinued (6). Since radiation-induced stomatitis is inevitable, it is important to control the perioperative oral function in cancer therapy (7). However, despite many approaches tried so far, it has been difficult to control oral function in most cases.

Hangeshashinto is a traditional Japanese medicine composed of seven herbal crude extracts: pinelliae tuber, Scutellariae Radix, Glycyrrhizae Radix, Zizyphi fructus, Ginseng Radix, Zingiberis Processum Rhizoma, and Coptidis Rhizoma. Hangeshashinto has been reported to show potent anti-inflammatory activity in vitro (8-10), and significantly reduce the duration of ≥ grade 2 oral mucositis (11). Among 150 Kampo medicines, only Hangeshashinto, Ourento, and Inchinkouto are used for the treatment of stomatitis (12). Two ingredients of Hangeshashinto, gingerol and shogaol, alleviated oral ulcer-induced pain via inhibition of voltage-activated sodium channels in rat experimentally-induced oral ulcerative mucositis model (13). On the other hand, cryotherapy, known as local cold (low temperature) therapy, reduced the development and duration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced oral stomatitis (14, 15) and as well as the associated severity and pain (16). As far as we know, there is no report on the combination therapy of Hangeshashinto and cryotherapy. In the present study, we evaluated for the first time the possible therapeutic effects of frozen Hangeshashinto in combination with cryotherapy on radiation-induced stomatitis in head and neck cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Subjects. Among the outpatients in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital from August 2014 to December 2022 (8 years and 4 months), 25 patients (20 males and 5 females) (treated group) underwent radiation therapy in the head and neck and perioperative oral function control using frozen Hangeshashinto, after obtaining consent. An untreated (control) group of 25 patients (20 males and 5 females) underwent perioperative oral function management without frozen Hangeshashinto (Table I). This study was approved by the Kanazawa Medical University Clinical Research Ethics Review Committee (approval number: #I456).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Treatment outcome of frozen Hangeshashinto and control groups.

Preparation of frozen Hangeshashinto. Tsumura Hangeshashinto (TJ-14), which contains negligible amounts of endotoxin contamination (8.7 ng/g) (8), was kindly provided by Tsumura & Co. Tokyo, Japan. Hangeshashinto (2.5 g) was dissolved in 100 ml of hot water (to make a final concentration of 86.8 mg/ml) and then frozen into 24 (1.2 cm×1 cm×1 cm) ice blocks (referred to as frozen “Hangeshashinto”).

Application of frozen Hangeshashinto to cancer patients. Fifty cancer patients (with several types of cancer at the indicated stages of cancer progression, total radiation dose, concomitant medication) were subjected to radiation therapy (CLINAC iX, Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) (Table I). Six pieces of Hangeshashinto were placed in the mouth of administrated in each of the 25 patients (treated group), but not to another 25 patients (control group), once a day from Monday to Friday (except for holidays) just after radiation. After 10 min, when the complete dissolution of all six pieces of frozen Hangeshashinto was confirmed, they swallowed them. During treatment, onset of stomatitis from the start date of radiation therapy and duration of stomatitis were checked. Oral mucosal damage was evaluated according to the grade classification CTCAE v4.0 of the National Cancer Institute of the United States (Japanese JCOG version). The duration time of radiation-induced stomatitis was defined as the period (days) from the appearance of grade 1 redness to its disappearance.

Statistical treatments. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to evaluate significant differences between two groups regarding the grade, latent periods, and duration of radiation-induced oral mucositis, using IBM SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The significance level was set at p<0.01.

Results

Under the control of perioperative oral function, twenty-five patients (20 males and 5 females) (treated group), but not another 25 patients (20 males and 5 females) (control group), were treated with frozen Hangeshashinto (Table I). This treatment did not affect the stage of tumor progression (Table I).

Age. The ages of patients were classified into 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. The 25 patients of the treated group were distributed into the following age groups: 1 in 40s, 6 in 50s, 8 in 60s, 9 in 70s and 1 in 80s, yielding the mean age of 66.7 years (upper panel, Figure 1A). Twenty-five patients of the control group were distributed into: 3 in 50s, 4 in 60s, 15 in 70s and 3 in 80s, yielding the mean age of 69.3 years old (lower panel, Figure 1A).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Age distribution (A), male-to-female ratio (B) and total radiation dose (C) of frozen Hangeshashinto-treated group (25 patients) (upper panel) and untreated (control) group (25 patients) (lower panel).

Male-to-female ratio. The male-to-female ratio was the same (20:5) in both treated (upper panel, Figure 1B) and control groups (lower panel in Figure 1B).

Total radiation dose. The distribution of the total radiation dose of patients of the treated group was 70-79 Gy in 13 patients, followed by 60-69 Gy in 5 patients, 50-59 Gy in 4 patients, and 40-49 Gy in 3 patients, yielding the mean of 61.92 Gy (upper panel, Figure 1C). The distribution of the total radiation dose of the control group was 60-68 Gy for 13 patients and 70-79 Gy for 12 patients, yielding a mean of 67.04 Gy (lower panel, Figure 1C).

Alleviation of radiation-stomatitis. The extent of radiation-induced stomatitis was quantified according to grade, which reflects the progression of stomatitis. In the treated group (25 patients), 20, 4, and 1 patients had grade 2, grade 1, and grade 3, respectively, yielding a mean grade of 1.9. In the control group (25 patients), 14, and 11 patients had grade 2, and grade 3, respectively, yielding a mean grade of 2.4, a slightly higher score of stomatitis (Figure 2A). This demonstrates that frozen Hangeshashinto significantly (p<0.01) alleviated radiation-induced stomatitis (Table I).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Grade distribution (A), average latent period (days from the start of radiation therapy to the appearance of oral mucositis) (B) and average duration time of radiation-induced stomatitis (C) in frozen Hangeshashinto-treated and control groups. Each value represents mean±SD of 25 patients. *p<0.01 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Delay of onset of oral mucositis. Oral stomatitis was detected 16.1±10.1 and 9.5±4.9 days after the start of radiation in the treated and control groups, respectively (Figure 2B). Frozen Hangeshashinto significantly (p<0.01) delayed the onset of oral mucositis.

Diminished duration time of radiation stomatitis. The average duration time of radiation-induced stomatitis in the treated and control groups was 33.3±14.6 and 49.2±11.1 days, respectively. Frozen Hangeshashinto significantly (p<0.01) diminished the duration time of radiation-induced stomatitis (Figure 2C).

Discussion

Radiation therapy for head and neck cancer is often performed when tumor cells are found in the resection stumps during the post-surgery pathological examination, or when surgical therapy is judged to be unsuitable (5, 17). Therefore, it is important to complete the treatment of radiation therapy. Radiation-induced stomatitis is one of the main acute disorders, and when treatment is delayed or discontinued (6, 18), stomatitis is inevitably generated (7, 19-21). Therefore, the control of perioperative oral function is very important in cancer chemotherapy (7, 22). However, effective modalities for its prevention have not yet been established (9). We have previously reported that Hangeshashinto (62.5∼250 μg/ml) significantly inhibited prostaglandin E2 production by interleukin-1β-stimulated human gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts via suppression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression (8). This provides the basis for clinical application of Hangeshashinto for the treatment of stomatitis. Although ice has been used as cryotherapy for oral stomatitis (14, 15), no report is available on the combination of Hangeshashinto and cryotherapy. This study was conducted based on the hypothesis that radiation stomatitis will be reduced even further by the combination of Hangeshashinto and cryotherapy.

At the initial stage of the present study, it was necessary to check whether there are significant bias in the age distribution, male to female ratio, total radiation dose, and stage of tumor progression between the frozen Hangeshashinto-treated and control groups. We found that the former group had a relatively higher proportion of younger patients (Figure 1A), but the mean age of the two groups was 65.7 and 69.3 years old, respectively; only a 3.6-year differences was found (Table I). The male to female ratio was the same (80%/20%=4) in both cases (Figure 1B). This is consistent with the fact that oral cancer is more common in men than women, which is largely attributable to more tobacco use, heavier use of alcohol, and longer sun exposure of men (23). As for the total radiation dose, the treated group was exposed to a wider range of doses with a peak at 70-79 Gy, compared to the control group (Figure 1C). However, the average total radiation dose was 61.9 and 67.0 Gy; there was only a small difference between the two groups (Table I). Finally, no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the stage of cancer progression (Table I). Based on these data, we conclude that there was no bias in age distribution, male to female ratio, total radiation dose, and stage of tumor progression between treated and control groups.

The present study demonstrated that frozen Hangeshashinto treatment significantly (p<0.01) alleviated radiation-induced stomatitis (Figure 2A). Frozen Hangeshashinto suppressed the aggravation of radiation-induced stomatitis, possibly due to the anti-inflammation activity of Hangeshashinto (8, 10, 11) and vasoconstriction induced by cooling (1, 15). Frozen Hangeshashinto significantly prolonged the expression time of oral mucositis by 41% (from 9.5 to 16.1 days) (Figure 2B), indicating that it delayed the onset of radiation stomatitis. Furthermore, frozen Hangeshashinto reduced the duration time of stomatitis by 32% (from 49.2 to 33.3 days) (Figure 2C). The combination of Hangeshashinto and cryotherapy reduced the severity, delayed the onset, and shortened the duration of the radiation-induced oral stomatitis, suggesting its possible application as a therapy for radiation-induced oral stomatitis. Since Hangeshashinto can be easily obtained via the internet at a low price, the present study can be reproduced at many medical institutions without any special equipment.

Further study on a higher number of patients is necessary to confirm whether cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto show synergistic effects on oral stomatitis and associated pain.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to TSUMURA & CO. (Tokyo, Japan) for providing Hangeshashinto (JT-14). This work was partially supported by Miyata Research Fund E of Meikai University School of Dentistry (HS), Saitama, Japan.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    TK performed the present study and wrote the manuscript. HS reviewed the manuscript and edited the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

  • Received January 5, 2023.
  • Revision received January 19, 2023.
  • Accepted January 20, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vigneswaran N and
    2. Williams MD
    : Epidemiologic trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 26(2): 123-141, 2014. PMID: 24794262. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chi AC,
    2. Day TA and
    3. Neville BW
    : Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—an update. CA Cancer J Clin 65(5): 401-421, 2015. PMID: 26215712. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21293
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Barton MB,
    2. Jacob S,
    3. Shafiq J,
    4. Wong K,
    5. Thompson SR,
    6. Hanna TP and
    7. Delaney GP
    : Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: a review of changes from 2003 to 2012. Radiother Oncol 112(1): 140-144, 2014. PMID: 24833561. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saloura V,
    2. Langerman A,
    3. Rudra S,
    4. Chin R and
    5. Cohen EE
    : Multidisciplinary care of the patient with head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 22(2): 179-215, 2013. PMID: 23453331. DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2012.12.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. van der Molen L,
    2. van Rossum MA,
    3. Burkhead LM,
    4. Smeele LE and
    5. Hilgers FJ
    : Functional outcomes and rehabilitation strategies in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(6): 889-900, 2009. PMID: 18825400. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0817-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Alfouzan AF
    : Radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Saudi Med J 42(3): 247-254, 2021. PMID: 33632902. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20210660
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kawashita Y,
    2. Hayashida S,
    3. Funahara M,
    4. Umeda M and
    5. Saito T
    : Prophylactic bundle for radiation-induced oral mucositis in oral or oropharyngeal cancer patients. Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy 2(1): 9-13, 2014. DOI: 10.14312/2052-4994.2014-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Kato T,
    2. Segami N and
    3. Sakagami H
    : Anti-inflammatory activity of hangeshashinto in IL-1β-stimulated gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. In Vivo 30(3): 257-263, 2016. PMID: 27107084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kamide D,
    2. Yamashita T,
    3. Araki K,
    4. Tomifuji M and
    5. Shiotani A
    : Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) prevents radiation-induced mucositis by suppressing cyclooxygenase-2 expression and chemotaxis of inflammatory cells. Clin Transl Oncol 19(11): 1329-1336, 2017. PMID: 28516399. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1672-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Miyashita T,
    2. Kono T,
    3. Matsui D,
    4. Yamazaki Y,
    5. Sadatomi D,
    6. Fujitsuka N,
    7. Nakanuma S,
    8. Okamoto K,
    9. Makino I,
    10. Kinoshita J,
    11. Nakamura K,
    12. Oyama K,
    13. Tajima H,
    14. Takamura H,
    15. Ninomiya I,
    16. Fushida S,
    17. Mukaisho K,
    18. Harmon JW and
    19. Ohta T
    : Preventive effect of oral hangeshashinto (TJ-14) on the development of reflux-induced esophageal cancer. Surgery, 2018. PMID: 29576309. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.02.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Taira K,
    2. Fujiwara K,
    3. Fukuhara T,
    4. Koyama S and
    5. Takeuchi H
    : The effect of hangeshashinto on oral mucositis caused by induction chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Yonago Acta Med 63(3): 183-187, 2020. PMID: 32884437. DOI: 10.33160/yam.2020.08.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Masuda M,
    2. Murata K,
    3. Matsuda H,
    4. Honda M,
    5. Honda S and
    6. Tani T
    : [Historical study on traditional Chinese formulations and crude drugs used for bad breath]. Yakushigaku Zasshi 46(1): 5-12, 2011. PMID: 22164685.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hitomi S,
    2. Ujihara I and
    3. Ono K
    : Pain mechanism of oral ulcerative mucositis and the therapeutic traditional herbal medicine hangeshashinto. J Oral Biosci 61(1): 12-15, 2019. PMID: 30929796. DOI: 10.1016/j.job.2019.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Daugėlaitė G,
    2. Užkuraitytė K,
    3. Jagelavičienė E and
    4. Filipauskas A
    : Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced oral mucositis. Medicina (Kaunas) 55(2): 25, 2019. PMID: 30678228. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55020025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Riley P,
    2. Glenny AM,
    3. Worthington HV,
    4. Littlewood A,
    5. Clarkson JE and
    6. McCabe MG
    : Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(12): CD011552, 2015. PMID: 26695736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011552.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. López-González Á,
    2. García-Quintanilla M,
    3. Guerrero-Agenjo CM,
    4. Tendero JL,
    5. Guisado-Requena IM and
    6. Rabanales-Sotos J
    : Eficacy of cryotherapy in the prevention of oral mucosistis in adult patients with chemotherapy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(3): 994, 2021. PMID: 33498628. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pfister DG,
    2. Spencer S,
    3. Adelstein D,
    4. Adkins D,
    5. Anzai Y,
    6. Brizel DM,
    7. Bruce JY,
    8. Busse PM,
    9. Caudell JJ,
    10. Cmelak AJ,
    11. Colevas AD,
    12. Eisele DW,
    13. Fenton M,
    14. Foote RL,
    15. Galloway T,
    16. Gillison ML,
    17. Haddad RI,
    18. Hicks WL,
    19. Hitchcock YJ,
    20. Jimeno A,
    21. Leizman D,
    22. Maghami E,
    23. Mell LK,
    24. Mittal BB,
    25. Pinto HA,
    26. Ridge JA,
    27. Rocco JW,
    28. Rodriguez CP,
    29. Shah JP,
    30. Weber RS,
    31. Weinstein G,
    32. Witek M,
    33. Worden F,
    34. Yom SS,
    35. Zhen W,
    36. Burns JL and
    37. Darlow SD
    : Head and neck cancers, version 2.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18(7): 873-898, 2020. PMID: 32634781. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Sroussi HY,
    2. Epstein JB,
    3. Bensadoun RJ,
    4. Saunders DP,
    5. Lalla RV,
    6. Migliorati CA,
    7. Heaivilin N and
    8. Zumsteg ZS
    : Common oral complications of head and neck cancer radiation therapy: mucositis, infections, saliva change, fibrosis, sensory dysfunctions, dental caries, periodontal disease, and osteoradionecrosis. Cancer Med 6(12): 2918-2931, 2017. PMID: 29071801. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Trotti A,
    2. Bellm LA,
    3. Epstein JB,
    4. Frame D,
    5. Fuchs HJ,
    6. Gwede CK,
    7. Komaroff E,
    8. Nalysnyk L and
    9. Zilberberg MD
    : Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review. Radiother Oncol 66(3): 253-262, 2003. PMID: 12742264. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00404-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Al-Ansari S,
    2. Zecha JA,
    3. Barasch A,
    4. de Lange J,
    5. Rozema FR and
    6. Raber-Durlacher JE
    : Oral mucositis induced by anticancer therapies. Curr Oral Health Rep 2(4): 202-211, 2015. PMID: 26523246. DOI: 10.1007/s40496-015-0069-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Naidu MU,
    2. Ramana GV,
    3. Rani PU,
    4. Mohan IK,
    5. Suman A and
    6. Roy P
    : Chemotherapy-induced and/or radiation therapy-induced oral mucositis—complicating the treatment of cancer. Neoplasia 6(5): 423-431, 2004. PMID: 15548350. DOI: 10.1593/neo.04169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Moslemi D,
    2. Nokhandani AM,
    3. Otaghsaraei MT,
    4. Moghadamnia Y,
    5. Kazemi S and
    6. Moghadamnia AA
    : Management of chemo/radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: A review of the current literature. Radiother Oncol 120(1): 13-20, 2016. PMID: 27113797. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lipsky MS,
    2. Su S,
    3. Crespo CJ and
    4. Hung M
    : Men and oral health: a review of sex and gender differences. Am J Mens Health 15(3): 15579883211016361, 2021. PMID: 33993787. DOI: 10.1177/15579883211016361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (2)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 2
March-April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study
TAKAO KATO, HIROSHI SAKAGAMI
In Vivo Mar 2023, 37 (2) 830-835; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13149

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Efficacy of Cryotherapy and Hangeshashinto for Radiation-induced Oral Stomatitis: Preliminary Study
TAKAO KATO, HIROSHI SAKAGAMI
In Vivo Mar 2023, 37 (2) 830-835; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13149
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS
  • Older Age and Outcomes of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Expression Patterns of T-cell immunoreceptor With Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Radiation
  • Oral mucositis
  • Hangeshashinto
  • cryotherapy
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire