Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Laparoscopic Approach in Bladder Endometriosis, Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes

ELVIN PIRIYEV, SVEN SCHIERMEIER and THOMAS RÖMER
In Vivo January 2023, 37 (1) 357-365; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13086
ELVIN PIRIYEV
1University Witten-Herdecke, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: piriyev.elvins{at}gmail.com
SVEN SCHIERMEIER
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Witten-Herdecke, Marien-Hospital, Witten, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THOMAS RÖMER
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Endometriosis is a benign condition affecting 10-20% of women at reproductive age. The urinary tract is affected in 0.3-12.0% of women with endometriosis and in 19.0-53.0% of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. The bladder is the most commonly affected organ in the urinary tract with a prevalence of up to 80%. Bladder endometriosis is defined as the occurrence of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle. The aim of the study was to present the detailed technique and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic resection of bladder endometriosis. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study analyzing all surgical procedures, carried out at the Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal between January 2014 and December 2022. In total 23,862 surgical reports were analyzed, and only patients (n=33 patients) with bladder endometriosis were included in the study. Results: Follow-up was performed in 25 patients by phone contact. Twenty-three patients (92%) reported an improvement of symptoms, especially of dysuria, and an increase of quality of life. Only two patients (8%) reported no change in symptoms (dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia). Two patients (8%) reported bladder dysfunction. Mild postoperative pollakiuria was reported by two patients (8%). Four patients (with mild bladder dysfunction and pollakiuria) were satisfied with postoperative results owing significant improvement of symptoms and increasing the quality of life. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of bladder endometriosis can be performed by a gynecologist. In cases where a ureteroneocystostomy is required or the localization of endometriosis nodule is unfavorable, an intervention by a multidisciplinary team is recommended. Laparoscopic partial cystectomy and shaving seem to be an appropriate method for improving urinary symptoms. This surgical approach requires excellent laparoscopic skills.

Key Words:
  • Endometriosis
  • bladder endometriosis
  • laparoscopy
  • cystectomy
  • bladder shaving

Endometriosis is a common benign condition that affects 10-20% of women of reproductive age (1). There are three main forms of endometriosis: superficial peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) (2). DIE is defined as infiltration of endometriotic lesions into the peritoneum >5 mm (3). DIE occurs in 1% of women of reproductive age and is the most severe form (2). The urinary tract is one of the most common extragenital organ systems affected by endometriosis. The prevalence ranges from 0.3-12% in all women affected by endometriosis and 19-53% in women with DIE (4-6). The bladder is the most commonly affected organ in the urinary tract with a prevalence of up to 80% of cases, followed by ureteral involvement with an occurrence of 9-23% (4, 7). Bladder endometriosis is defined as the occurrence of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle. The most frequently affected parts of the bladder are the base and the dome (8). However, in the majority of cases, the mucosa of bladder is not affected (9). There are two theories regarding the origin of bladder endometriosis: primary or spontaneous development and secondary development. The primary development includes two theories: 1) implantation of endometrial cells due to retrograde menstruation and development of adhesions; 2) metaplasia of adenomyosis. The secondary theory explains the development of bladder endometriosis due to bladder injury after pelvic surgery (e.g., caesarean section, hysterectomy etc.) and following a contamination of endometrial cells (8). The symptoms caused by bladder endometriosis include suprapubic pain accompanied by polyuria (41%), dysuria (21%), hematuria (19%), as well as repeated urinary tract infections (10). Bladder endometriosis is classified by the ENZIAN/#ENZIAN classification as “FB” (11). For the treatment of bladder endometriosis, several options, such as a hormonal therapy and surgery [laparoscopic/laparotomic partial bladder resection, “shaving” and transurethral resection (TUR)] are suggested (12). The aim of the study was to present the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic management for bladder endometriosis.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective study that analyzed all surgeries, that were carried out at the Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal between January 2014 and December 2022. Academic Hospital Cologne Weyertal is a level III endometriosis Center where 750-1,000 laparoscopic endometriosis surgeries are performed annually. In total 23,862 surgical reports were analyzed. In this study only patients (n=33) with bladder endometriosis were included. Preoperative assessment was performed by vaginal sonography. To assess the bladder mucosa, as well as the distance between the endometriosis nodule and the ureteral orifices, a cystoscopy was performed in all cases. Histological confirmation of the resected endometriosis nodules was mandatory. It was investigated in which cases a urological intervention was necessary. The surgical approach was divided into shaving and partial cystectomy. The follow-up was performed by phone contact. The patients were asked regarding improvement of symptoms, postoperative bladder dysfunction, as well as reintervention. The size of endometriosis nodule was evaluated using the histological examination report. To classify peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis, the rASRM classification was used, and ENZIAN was used to classify DIE lesions.

Procedure. All surgeries were performed by experienced certificated laparoscopic surgeons [minimal invasive surgery (MIS) level II and III, certificated by the German society for gynecological endoscopy]. We divided the bladder endometriosis surgical procedure into sequential steps. The first step was the cystoscopy for evaluating the mucosa and ureteral orifices (Figure 1A and B). The second step was laparoscopic visualization. During the laparoscopy adenomyosis, adhesions and endometriosis in other localization were evaluated (Figure 2A and B). Step three: Complete adhesiolysis in case of any adhesions between the bladder and the uterus, as well as round ligament of the uterus, which enables a sufficient resection of endometriosis nodule.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cystoscopy for the determination of the endometriosis nodule and distance between nodule and ureteral orifices. (A) Active endometrium, the entire bladder wall is affected by endometriosis. (B) Protrusion of mucosa by the endometriosis nodule without infiltration of mucosa.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Laparoscopic visualization of the bladder endometriosis nodule. (A) Adhesion between the bladder, uterus, and the left round ligament of the uterus, (B) severe adenomyosis with bladder endometriosis.

The fourth step was resection of the endometriosis nodule. For this reason, either partial cystectomy or shaving can be used (Figure 3A and B). We defined shaving as the resection of the bladder layer without involvement of mucosa.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Laparoscopic resection of bladder endometriosis. (A) Laparoscopic partial cystectomy, (B) laparoscopic bladder shaving.

After successful endometriosis resection, the distance between ureters/ureteral orifices and the resection edge should be evaluated (Figure 4): step five. The final step, step six, was the suture (Figure 5). Postoperatively all patients retained a bladder catheter for 10 days.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Laparoscopic visualization of ureters (A) and ureteral orifices (B).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Suture of bladder incision after resection of the endometriosis nodule.

Results

Patient characteristics. Thirty-three patients with bladder endometriosis, who underwent a laparoscopy, were included in this retrospective analysis. The age ranged from 25 to 48 years. All patients were symptomatic. The majority of patients had symptoms, such as dysmenorrhea and dysuria. Dyschezia and dyspareunia were less common. Only two patients had hematuria. Twelve patients had symptoms despite hormonal therapy. 23 patients had previous surgery, whereby 16 patients had one surgery and seven patients ≥2 surgeries. The main patient characteristics are presented in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Intraoperative outcomes. A cystoscopy for evaluating affected mucosa and the distance between the endometriosis nodule and “golden triangle” was performed. In the majority of cases, the endometriosis nodule bulged into or infiltrated the mucosa. The size of the endometriosis nodule ranged from 1 to 4.5 cm and was verified according to histopathological reports. The majority of patients had a nodule of 2-4 cm. Adenomyosis, adhesions and other endometriosis locations were determined by laparoscopy. The resection of bladder endometriosis took place in thirty cases. In 3 cases, patients did not require bladder surgery. However, these three cases were included, in order to evaluate other statistical data (symptoms, adhesions, other endometriosis etc.). Partial cystectomy was the procedure most commonly used in contrast to “shaving”, which was performed only in a few cases. A urologist involvement was necessary in three cases, whereby in two cases a ureteroneocystostomy was performed. For the bladder suture Vicryl, V-Loc as well as polydioxanone suture (PDS) thread were used. The main intraoperative outcomes are presented in Table II and Figure 6.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

intraoperative outcomes

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Number of patients according to rASRM and ENZIAN classification. rASRM, Revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine, classification of endometriosis; ENZIAN, classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Postoperative outcomes. In three out of 23 cases after partial cystectomy, postoperative bleeding occurred. Two of the patients had a 4-cm nodule and one patient a 2-cm nodule. In two cases a re-laparoscopy was necessary and in one case the bleeding stopped spontaneously. One patient had ureteral stenosis after partial cystectomy with a 3.5 cm endometriosis nodule, therefore a urological reintervention was necessary. No complications after shaving were observed.

Follow-up was performed in 25 patients by phone contact. Twenty-three patients (92%) reported an improvement of symptoms, especially of dysuria, and increase of quality of life. Only two patients (8%) reported no change in symptoms (dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia). Two patients (8%) reported bladder dysfunction. However, in one case, the patient reported mild bladder dysfunction and it did not affect her quality of life. In another case, the patient had had the bladder dysfunction already before the surgery and it did not increase after surgery. Mild postoperative pollakiuria was reported by two patients (8%). Four patients (with mild bladder dysfunction and pollakiuria) were satisfied with postoperative results owing significant improvement of symptoms and increasing the quality of life. No patient underwent reintervention because of endometriosis recurrence until follow-up.

Discussion

Bladder endometriosis is a rare condition, but it should be taken into account in patients with bladder symptoms and in the absence of urine infection (10). There are certain theories about the origin of bladder endometriosis. Some authors attribute the origin to retrograde menstrual bleeding and implantation of endometrial cells on the bladder peritoneum. After implantation, the inflammatory process facilitates the development of adhesions between the bladder and the uterus, and the formation of a fibrotic nodule, apparently of the vesicovaginal septum, that is buried under the peritoneum (10, 13). Another theory is that the lesions are an extension of adenomyotic lesions arising from the myometrium (14, 15). The occurrence of adenomyosis, and adhesions between the bladder and uterus, in our case series, confirm these theories (Table II).

Bladder endometriosis can be treated both with hormonal therapy and surgery. For medical therapy, combined hormonal contraceptives and progestogens should be regarded as first-line therapy (16-18). However, it has been reported, that the bladder endometriosis nodule itself and associated symptoms may respond suboptimally to hormone therapy (19). The data of our case series are in line with this conclusion (Table I). Furthermore, the medical therapy is effective in temporarily suppressing, but not curing of bladder endometriosis. If hormone therapy is chosen, patients should be informed about long-term treatment and that bladder endometriosis may progress under therapy, so a regular control is advisable (12, 17). For this reason, surgery may be required. For surgery, an accurate diagnosis using ultrasound and cystoscopy is mandatory. Depending on the size and location, an interdisciplinary procedure with a urologist may be required. The goal should be complete resection of the endometriosis nodule, which on the one hand facilitates significant improvements in pain and urinary symptoms and on the other minimizes the recurrence risk (20-25). Certain techniques are suggested for surgical treatment: transurethral resection (TUR), partial resection, as well as shaving (12, 26). However, there exist concerns about TUR. A complete resection with TUR is unachievable, since the nodule develops from the outer layer towards to the inner layer of the bladder wall. Furthermore, the data of this study show that an endometriosis nodule is not always detectable with cystoscopy (Table II). TUR has a high risk of bladder perforation and a recurrence of endometriosis (25, 27-29). For this reason, TUR cannot be considered as an efficient treatment of bladder endometriosis (12). In contrast, many authors reported that a partial cystectomy is an effective method with excellent long-term results in terms of symptom relief and recurrence (12).

In our case series, partial cystectomy was performed in 23 cases. The average nodule size was 2.5 cm. Many authors stated that partial cystectomy can be performed by a gynecologist if the distance between the endometriosis nodule and ureteral orifices is at least 2 cm (30). The authors of this study agree with this statement. In our study, in three cases the involvement of a urologist was necessary. However, in two cases, patients had ureter obliteration caused by endometriosis and a ureteroneocystostomy was planned. In one case, the distance between nodule and ureteral orifices was less than 2cm.

Inserting D-J stents is optional for primary surgery of bladder endometriosis (12). We could not find any publication, showing an advantage of D-J stents in surgery of DIE. However, two studies reported no difference in terms of ureter injury in patients with and without D-J stents, who had undergone surgery for DIE. The risk of bladder infection, on other hand, is significantly higher in patients with D-J stents (31, 32).

Rich bladder vascularization and sterile content enable a good healing process after partial cystectomy. Another important point, which should be taken into account, is prolonged urine drainage (~10 d) (33). However, rich bladder vascularization can increase the risk of bleeding. Three out of 30 patients in our case series had postoperative bleeding. In two cases, a re-laparoscopy was necessary. In one case, the bleeding stopped spontaneously, and a bladder tamponade was treated using an irrigation catheter.

Shaving is defined as an extramucosal dissection of the bladder wall. Many authors reported good results after shaving in terms of improvement of symptoms and safety of the method (9, 34-36). In our case series, seven patients underwent shaving. In all cases the cystoscopy showed no mucosa infiltration. In three cases bladder suture after deep shaving was carried out, in order to prevent a fistula. There were neither intraoperative, nor postoperative complications.

In our case series, only resorbable thread was used (Table II). In 55% of cases polyglactin thread, in 15% barbed and in 9% PDS was used for bladder suture. No difference in suture time, postoperative complication in terms of bleeding and bladder dysfunction, as well as improvement of symptoms were observed in our analysis. The above thread materials have been used/suggested by several authors (26, 37). Follow-up revealed improvement of symptoms in 92% of cases.

The risk of endometriosis-associated malignancies of the urinary tract is very low. Only a few cases of endometriosis-associated malignancies in the urinary tract have been reported in the literature, and most of these involved the bladder (38).

Conclusion

This analysis showed that surgical treatment of bladder endometriosis can be performed by a gynecologist. In cases where a ureteroneocystostomy is required or the localization of endometriosis nodule is unfavorable, an intervention by multidisciplinary team, including a gynecologist and a urologist, is recommended. Laparoscopic partial cystectomy and shaving seem to be an appropriate method for improving urinary symptoms, with a low rate of intra- and postoperative complications even in patients with large endometriosis nodules. However, such complications as bleeding, pollakiuria, bladder dysfunction as well as incomplete healing of the bladder or suture leakage can occur and should be taken into account. This surgical approach requires excellent laparoscopic skills.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    EP: Manuscript writing, data management, data analysis. SS and TR: project development and administration.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Received November 30, 2022.
  • Revision received December 10, 2022.
  • Accepted December 16, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vessey MP,
    2. Villard-Mackintosh L and
    3. Painter R
    : Epidemiology of endometriosis in women attending family planning clinics. BMJ 306(6871): 182-184, 1993. PMID: 8338516. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6871.182
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Koninckx PR,
    2. Ussia A,
    3. Adamyan L,
    4. Wattiez A and
    5. Donnez J
    : Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril 98(3): 564-571, 2012. PMID: 22938769. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Koninckx PR and
    2. Martin DC
    : Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa? Fertil Steril 58(5): 924-928, 1992. PMID: 1426377. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55436-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Maccagnano C,
    2. Pellucchi F,
    3. Rocchini L,
    4. Ghezzi M,
    5. Scattoni V,
    6. Montorsi F,
    7. Rigatti P and
    8. Colombo R
    : Ureteral endometriosis: proposal for a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm with a review of the literature. Urol Int 91(1): 1-9, 2013. PMID: 23689345. DOI: 10.1159/000345140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kołodziej A,
    2. Krajewski W,
    3. Dołowy Ł and
    4. Hirnle L
    : Urinary Tract Endometriosis. Urol J 12(4): 2213-2217, 2015. PMID: 26341760.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Knabben L,
    2. Imboden S,
    3. Fellmann B,
    4. Nirgianakis K,
    5. Kuhn A and
    6. Mueller MD
    : Urinary tract endometriosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management, and proposal for a new clinical classification. Fertil Steril 103(1): 147-152, 2015. PMID: 25439849. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gabriel B,
    2. Nassif J,
    3. Trompoukis P,
    4. Barata S and
    5. Wattiez A
    : Prevalence and management of urinary tract endometriosis: a clinical case series. Urology 78(6): 1269-1274, 2011. PMID: 21962747. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Somigliana E,
    2. Vercellini P,
    3. Gattei U,
    4. Chopin N,
    5. Chiodo I and
    6. Chapron C
    : Bladder endometriosis: getting closer and closer to the unifying metastatic hypothesis. Fertil Steril 87(6): 1287-1290, 2007. PMID: 17336966. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.090
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kovoor E,
    2. Nassif J,
    3. Miranda-Mendoza I and
    4. Wattiez A
    : Endometriosis of bladder: outcomes after laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(5): 600-604, 2010. PMID: 20656568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Vercellini P,
    2. Meschia M,
    3. De Giorgi O,
    4. Panazza S,
    5. Cortesi I and
    6. Crosignani PG
    : Bladder detrusor endometriosis: clinical and pathogenetic implications. J Urol 155(1): 84-86, 1996. PMID: 7490905. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66550-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Keckstein J,
    2. Saridogan E,
    3. Ulrich UA,
    4. Sillem M,
    5. Oppelt P,
    6. Schweppe KW,
    7. Krentel H,
    8. Janschek E,
    9. Exacoustos C,
    10. Malzoni M,
    11. Mueller M,
    12. Roman H,
    13. Condous G,
    14. Forman A,
    15. Jansen FW,
    16. Bokor A,
    17. Simedrea V and
    18. Hudelist G
    : The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100(7): 1165-1175, 2021. PMID: 33483970. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Leone Roberti Maggiore U,
    2. Ferrero S,
    3. Candiani M,
    4. Somigliana E,
    5. Viganò P and
    6. Vercellini P
    : Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation. Eur Urol 71(5): 790-807, 2017. PMID: 28040358. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Vercellini P,
    2. Frontino G,
    3. Pisacreta A,
    4. De Giorgi O,
    5. Cattaneo M and
    6. Crosignani PG
    : The pathogenesis of bladder detrusor endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(3): 538-542, 2002. PMID: 12237623. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.124286
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fedele L,
    2. Piazzola E,
    3. Raffaelli R and
    4. Bianchi S
    : Bladder endometriosis: deep infiltrating endometriosis or adenomyosis? Fertil Steril 69(5): 972-975, 1998. PMID: 9591511. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00048-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Donnez J,
    2. Spada F,
    3. Squifflet J and
    4. Nisolle M
    : Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 74(6): 1175-1181, 2000. PMID: 11119746. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01584-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Tafi E,
    2. Leone Roberti Maggiore U,
    3. Alessandri F,
    4. Bogliolo S,
    5. Gardella B,
    6. Vellone VG,
    7. Grillo F,
    8. Mastracci L and
    9. Ferrero S
    : Advances in pharmacotherapy for treating endometriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 16(16): 2465-2483, 2015. PMID: 26569155. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1085510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ferrero S,
    2. Alessandri F,
    3. Racca A and
    4. Leone Roberti Maggiore U
    : Treatment of pain associated with deep endometriosis: alternatives and evidence. Fertil Steril 104(4): 771-792, 2015. PMID: 26363387. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Vercellini P,
    2. Buggio L,
    3. Berlanda N,
    4. Barbara G,
    5. Somigliana E and
    6. Bosari S
    : Estrogen-progestins and progestins for the management of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 106(7): 1552-1571.e2, 2016. PMID: 27817837. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Maccagnano C,
    2. Pellucchi F,
    3. Rocchini L,
    4. Ghezzi M,
    5. Scattoni V,
    6. Montorsi F,
    7. Rigatti P and
    8. Colombo R
    : Diagnosis and treatment of bladder endometriosis: state of the art. Urol Int 89(3): 249-258, 2012. PMID: 22813980. DOI: 10.1159/000339519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Nezhat CR,
    2. Nezhat F,
    3. Admon D,
    4. Seidman D and
    5. Nezhat CH
    : Laparoscopic Management of Genitourinary Endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(4, Part 2): S25, 1994. PMID: 9073728.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chapron C and
    2. Dubuisson JB
    : Laparoscopic management of bladder endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78(10): 887-890, 1999. PMID: 10577619.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Seracchioli R,
    2. Mabrouk M,
    3. Montanari G,
    4. Manuzzi L,
    5. Concetti S and
    6. Venturoli S
    : Conservative laparoscopic management of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE): surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Fertil Steril 94(3): 856-861, 2010. PMID: 19481740. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chapron C,
    2. Bourret A,
    3. Chopin N,
    4. Dousset B,
    5. Leconte M,
    6. Amsellem-Ouazana D,
    7. de Ziegler D and
    8. Borghese B
    : Surgery for bladder endometriosis: long-term results and concomitant management of associated posterior deep lesions. Hum Reprod 25(4): 884-889, 2010. PMID: 20129993. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Soriano D,
    2. Bouaziz J,
    3. Elizur S,
    4. Zolti M,
    5. Orvieto R,
    6. Seidman D,
    7. Goldenberg M and
    8. Eisenberg VH
    : Reproductive outcome is favorable after laparoscopic resection of bladder endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(5): 781-786, 2016. PMID: 27016123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Pérez-Utrilla Pérez M,
    2. Aguilera Bazán A,
    3. Alonso Dorrego JM,
    4. Hernández A,
    5. de Francisco MG,
    6. Martín Hernández M,
    7. de Santiago J and
    8. de la Peña Barthel J
    : Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Urology 73(1): 47-51, 2009. PMID: 18950841. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.470
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Tomasi MC,
    2. Ribeiro PAA,
    3. Farah D,
    4. Vidoto Cervantes G,
    5. Nicola AL and
    6. Abdalla-Ribeiro HS
    : Symptoms and surgical technique of bladder endometriosis: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(12): 1294-1302, 2022. PMID: 36252916. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Fedele L,
    2. Bianchi S,
    3. Zanconato G,
    4. Bergamini V,
    5. Berlanda N and
    6. Carmignani L
    : Long-term follow-up after conservative surgery for bladder endometriosis. Fertil Steril 83(6): 1729-1733, 2005. PMID: 15950643. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.047
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Antonelli A,
    2. Simeone C,
    3. Zani D,
    4. Sacconi T,
    5. Minini G,
    6. Canossi E and
    7. Cunico SC
    : Clinical aspects and surgical treatment of urinary tract endometriosis: our experience with 31 cases. Eur Urol 49(6): 1093-7; discussion 1097-8, 2006. PMID: 16630689. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Fuentes Pastor J,
    2. Ballestero Diego R,
    3. Correas Gómez MÁ,
    4. Torres Díez E,
    5. Fernández Flórez A,
    6. Ballesteros Olmos G and
    7. Gutierrez Baños JL
    : Bladder endometriosis and endocervicosis: presentation of 2 cases with endoscopic management and review of literature. Case Rep Urol 2014: 296908, 2014. PMID: 25184072. DOI: 10.1155/2014/296908
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kempers RD,
    2. Cohen J,
    3. Haney AF,
    4. Younger JB
    1. Vercellini P,
    2. Pisacreta A,
    3. De Giorgi O,
    4. Yaylayan L,
    5. Zaina B and
    6. Crosignani PG
    : Management of advanced endometriosis. In: Fertility and reproductive medicine. Kempers RD, Cohen J, Haney AF, Younger JB (eds). Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Elsevier Science, pp. 369-386, 1998.
  25. ↵
    1. Borghese G,
    2. Raimondo D,
    3. Esposti ED,
    4. Aru AC,
    5. Raffone A,
    6. Orsini B,
    7. Ambrosio M,
    8. Iodice R,
    9. Lenzi J,
    10. Del Forno S,
    11. Casadio P and
    12. Seracchioli R
    : Preoperative ureteral stenting in women with deep posterior endometriosis and ureteral involvement: Is it useful? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 158(1): 179-186, 2022. PMID: 34606100. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13959
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Piriyev E,
    2. Schiermeier S and
    3. Römer T
    : Are double-J stents in surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis always necessary? A retrospective analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 17(3): 533-539, 2022. PMID: 36187054. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.116325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vercellini P,
    2. Carmignani L,
    3. Rubino T,
    4. Barbara G,
    5. Abbiati A and
    6. Fedele L
    : Surgery for deep endometriosis: a pathogenesis-oriented approach. Gynecol Obstet Invest 68(2): 88-103, 2009. PMID: 19478525. DOI: 10.1159/000219946
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Granese R,
    2. Candiani M,
    3. Perino A,
    4. Venezia R and
    5. Cucinella G
    : Bladder endometriosis: laparoscopic treatment and follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 140(1): 114-117, 2008. PMID: 18462860. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.03.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gonçalves DR,
    2. Galvão A,
    3. Moreira M,
    4. Morgado A,
    5. Ramos M and
    6. Ferreira H
    : Endometriosis of the bladder: Clinical and surgical outcomes after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Technol Int 34: 275-281, 2019. PMID: 30888677.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Villa G,
    2. Mabrouk M,
    3. Guerrini M,
    4. Mignemi G,
    5. Montanari G,
    6. Fabbri E,
    7. Venturoli S and
    8. Seracchioli R
    : Relationship between site and size of bladder endometriotic nodules and severity of dysuria. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5): 628-632, 2007. PMID: 17848326. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Chamsy D,
    2. King C and
    3. Lee T
    : The use of barbed suture for bladder and bowel repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(4): 648-652, 2015. PMID: 25659867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Gadducci A and
    2. Zannoni GF
    : Endometriosis-associated extraovarian malignancies: a challenging question for the clinician and the pathologist. Anticancer Res 40(5): 2429-2438, 2020. PMID: 32366386. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14212
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (1)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 1
January-February 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Laparoscopic Approach in Bladder Endometriosis, Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Laparoscopic Approach in Bladder Endometriosis, Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes
ELVIN PIRIYEV, SVEN SCHIERMEIER, THOMAS RÖMER
In Vivo Jan 2023, 37 (1) 357-365; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13086

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Laparoscopic Approach in Bladder Endometriosis, Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes
ELVIN PIRIYEV, SVEN SCHIERMEIER, THOMAS RÖMER
In Vivo Jan 2023, 37 (1) 357-365; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13086
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of Partial Splenic Embolization on Immune Environment and Hepatic Function in Cirrhosis Patients With Portal Hypertension
  • Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Malignancies: Where Do We Stand? A Retrospective Single-center Study
  • Modified Subtraction Technique for the Middle Hepatic Vein Tributary and Glissonean Pedicle in Right Lobe Graft Procurement
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • bladder endometriosis
  • laparoscopy
  • cystectomy
  • bladder shaving
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire