Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

The Effect of Ceratonia siliqua Supplement on Bone Mineral Density in Ovariectomy-induced Osteoporosis in Rats

ANNA AIKATERINI NERI, DIMITRIOS GALANIS, ANTONIS GALANOS, ANGELIKI EIRINI PEPE, KONSTANTINOS SOULTANIS, ALEXANDROS ZERVAS, SPYRIDON ZOITSIS, STAVROS K. KOURKOULIS, ERMIONI D. PASIOU, ARGYRO VONTZALIDOU, DIMITRIS MICHAILIDIS, SOFIA MITAKOU, EFSTATHIOS CHRONOPOULOS, GEORGIOS KARAMANOLIS, ISMENE A. DONTAS and THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo January 2023, 37 (1) 270-285; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13077
ANNA AIKATERINI NERI
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anaikneri{at}gmail.com
DIMITRIOS GALANIS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIS GALANOS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANGELIKI EIRINI PEPE
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KONSTANTINOS SOULTANIS
2First Department of Orthopaedics, Attiko Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDROS ZERVAS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SPYRIDON ZOITSIS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STAVROS K. KOURKOULIS
3Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biomedical Physics, Department of Mechanics, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ERMIONI D. PASIOU
3Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biomedical Physics, Department of Mechanics, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARGYRO VONTZALIDOU
4Department of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIS MICHAILIDIS
4Department of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOFIA MITAKOU
4Department of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EFSTATHIOS CHRONOPOULOS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGIOS KARAMANOLIS
5Gastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISMENE A. DONTAS
1Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System (LRMS) “Th. Garofalidis”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THEODORE KARATZAS
6N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
7Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Ceratonia siliqua on bone mineral density (BMD) as a non-pharmaceutical alternative treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: Thirty mature female Wistar rats were randomly separated into three groups of 10: Control, ovariectomized (OVX), and ovariectomized-plus-C. siliqua (OVX+CS). Total and proximal BMD were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in all groups before ovariectomy, and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. At the end of the study, the femurs were subjected to a three-point bending test. Results: DEXA revealed no statistically significant difference in absolute values or percentage changes for total tibial BMD between OVX+CS and OVX groups throughout the study. In the proximal tibia, both absolute values and BMD percentage changes from baseline were higher in the OVX+CS group compared to the OVX group after 3 and 6 months of C. siliqua administration. Three-point bending test revealed a significantly higher thickness index in the OVX+CS group compared to the OVX group and a higher cross-sectional area index compared to the control group. Conclusion: Long-term administration of C. siliqua may be considered a non-pharmaceutical alternative treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Further research is required to properly investigate the effects, and suitable treatment dose and schedule.

Key Words:
  • Ceratonia siliqua
  • osteoporosis
  • rat
  • bone mineral density

Osteoporosis is a multifactorial skeletal disorder that is a public health concern and a heavy economic burden (1-3). After 35-40 years of age, osteoclasts are more active than osteoblasts. As a result, bone mass is lost, which occurs faster in postmenopausal women depending on lifestyle, diet, and other factors, because of their decreasing sex hormones (4). In osteoporosis, the thickness and density of bone tissue are reduced and its microarchitectural structure is disrupted. This structural degeneration of bone tissue (deterioration of trabecular architecture) in combination with a low bone mass results in the bones becoming weaker, and porous, reducing their mechanical strength and flexural stress tolerance, increasing their fragility, as well as making them prone to fracturing (5). It is a ‘silent’ condition that does not warn of symptoms until a fracture occurs (6-9).

Early diagnosis of osteoporosis is particularly important, given the ever-increasing annual number of patients and the enormous consequences it has for their quality of life, society, and the economy (10). Because of the many consequences of osteoporosis, early and valid management is required. Osteoporosis management includes muscle strengthening, proper nutrition i.e., adequate calcium, vitamin D and protein intake, and medications/drugs. Postmenopausal osteoporosis, where bone resorption exceeds bone formation, is mainly treated by drugs with antiresorptive properties. Estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab are clinically used as successful therapies against postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nevertheless, their usage is linked to an established risk of side-effects after even a short period of administration. This, and patients’ lack of compliance, make it imperative to expand the existing treatment options and develop new and alternative therapies. For these reasons, nutritional measures, either as alternatives or as supplements to pharmaceutical treatments, are being researched and proposed for postmenopausal women, such as fruits, vegetables, high protein diets, calcium, and vitamin D administration (4, 5, 11-13). Non-pharmaceutical products to support or provide alternate current treatments (5, 14) were the result of studying plant extracts, usually originating from folk medicine, with estrogenic, antioxidant and other beneficial properties regarding the prevention of diseases (2, 3, 15).

The use of phytoestrogens to replace hormone therapy is also being studied as an alternative treatment. Phytoestrogens imitating the action of estrogen hormones are thus considered natural selective estrogen receptor modifiers that are nevertheless weaker in terms of biological activity. Phytoestrogens such as isoflavones, lignans, and coumestans, have been found to affect bones by augmenting their strength and quality in a rat osteopenia model. Furthermore, phytoestrogens reduce the levels of bone turnover markers, augment bone mineral density (BMD), alleviate spinal bone loss in menopausal, and potentially protect from osteoporosis. Isoflavones restrain breast and prostate cancer. Flavonoids specifically have been found by many in vitro and in vivo studies to inhibit osteoclastogenesis and promote osteoblastogenesis (16-20). Up-regulation of estrogen receptor β, resulting in augmented production of RUNT-related transcription factor 2/core-binding factor alpha 1 (21), activation of the signaling pathways that are mediated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (22, 23), suppression of TNF superfamily member 11-mediated signaling pathways (24, 25), and enhanced intestinal calcium absorption (26), are considered possible mechanisms by which phytoestrogens achieve the aforementioned effects.

Despite continuous research on postmenopausal osteoporosis, its underlying pathogenic mechanism remains unclear. As a result, both its prevention and treatment are difficult to manage. Studies suggest that postmenopausal-induced endocrine derangement affects redox homeostasis, which is assumed to contribute, probably along with inflammation, to the development of associated diseases, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ceratonia siliqua (carob) is a shrub with great amounts of antioxidant compounds, such as flavonoids and polyphenols, which have robust radical-scavenging activity (27-31). This is also implied by the protective effects of its extract and pods against oxidative stress in several organs (32-39). Thus, products from C. siliqua may be able to combat the damaging effects of free radicals, oxidative stress, and the reduced inflammation-induced response of antioxidants. In another study, a hydro-alcoholic extract from carob seeds increased levels of sex hormones (39). In Persian traditional medicine, carob fruit are used as an aphrodisiac and a treatment for male infertility (38). Aside from being beneficial for male fertility, traditional Turkish medicine considers it beneficial for health (38, 40, 41). It has also been correlated to the treatment of bleeding, and gastrointestinal, and kidney problems in Traditional Iranian Medicine (40, 42, 43). As well as its antioxidant and anti-diarrheal properties, a literature study by Karim and Azlan stated that C. siliqua also has anxiolytic/sedative, antidepressant, chemopreventive, and anticancer properties (44).

This study aimed to evaluate the osteoprotective effect of the C. siliqua beans on ovariectomized rats, which are the most widely used animal model for the study of postmenopausal osteoporosis (45-47). Ovariectomized animals are the most appropriate animal model available being representative of post-menopausal women. Such animal studies are pivotal for successful clinical trials and subsequent complication-free management of osteoporosis (16, 48-52). After the age of 10 months, bone remodeling is observed in female rats, which combined with post-ovariectomy bone loss, is ideal for the study of potentially osteoprotective substances. Twelve weeks post-ovariectomy, a decrease in trabecular bone volume is anticipated at the proximal tibia due to the rapid loss of trabecular microarchitecture caused by the declined ovarian production of estrogens. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of C. siliqua on BMD in 10-month-old, ovariectomized female Wistar rats, as a non-pharmaceutical alternative treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Materials and Methods

Laboratory animals. In compliance with the European Directive 2010/63/EU, the present experimental protocol was approved by the General Directorate of Veterinary Services (permit no. 4505/10-7-2014). The PREPARE (53) and ARRIVE (54) guidelines were taken into consideration.

Thirty 3-month-old female Wistar rats with minimal body weight differences were purchased from the registered breeding unit of the Hellenic Pasteur Institute.

The animals were caged in groups of three or four, considering their body weight, in transparent polycarbonate open-top cages (dimensions 45×30×20 cm), under standard laboratory conditions (19-22°C, 55-65% relative humidity, 15 air changes per hour, 12-hour light/dark cycle). Standard maintenance rodent chow and tap water were supplied ad libitum. From the beginning to the end of the study, the rats were observed daily, with regular veterinary inspection and weekly body weight and food consumption measurements.

Study design. At the age of 10 months, the rats were allocated randomly into three groups of 10 rats each: Control, ovariectomy (OVX), and ovariectomy plus C. Siliqua (OVX+CS). Baseline body weight and BMD were measured. The control group provided information about the corresponding BMD changes in the same animal group (strain, origin, age, etc.), unaffected by ovariectomy or treatment. Bodyweight, food, and water consumption were measured every 2 weeks.

Two days postoperatively, all animals began to receive a diet free from soy and soy by-products. Food access of both OVX and OVX+CS groups was adjusted according to the control group’s food intake to prevent obesity (55). Although pair feeding is not imperative, possible body weight deviations or post-ovariectomy obesity through ad libitum feeding can affect bone density and strength (56). Furthermore, pair feeding contributes to establishing the effect of C. siliqua on body weight or body composition free from alterations in energy intake (57).

All rats underwent three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements using a GE Lunar Prodigy Densitometer (General Electric Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) which includes special software for small animals, for assessing total and proximal tibial BMD. The first DEXA measurement was performed before ovariectomy for all animals at the age of 10 months; the next two measurements were conducted in the third and sixth month after the first measurement (resulting in timepoints of 0, 3, and 6 months). DEXA was performed under general anesthesia. After the third DEXA measurement, the animals were not allowed to recover but were subsequently euthanized with an additional dose (half of the initial dose) of anesthetic and blood was collected. The femurs were removed, dissected clean of tissues, and subjected to a three-point bending test. The experimental design is summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A brief outline of the experimental design. DEXA: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

One rat in the OVX group was euthanized according to our humane endpoints 6 days before the final DEXA measurement due to weight loss. Necropsy was not conclusive.

All procedures took place in the morning.

Rat chow preparation and administration. To avoid any potential bias, such as the potent estrogenic effect of the diet on BMD, all groups were provided with chow that was soy- and soy byproduct-free (4RF21; Mucedola S.r.l., Milan, Italy). The rat chow that was administered to the OVX+CS group was supplemented with C. siliqua (Locust beans, Haitoglou Family Foods, Thessaloniki, Greece). Ceratonia siliqua was mixed with food at a dose of 3 g/kg/day/rat, taking into consideration that a rat consumes about 20 g of food per day. The C. siliqua rat dose was calculated using the formula for the Human equivalent dose (HED): HED (mg/kg)=animal dose (mg/kg)×(animal Km/human Km), where the human Km is 37 for a 60 kg human, animal Km is G for rats; 0.5 g/kg/day was used as the HED (58-60). Its administration in food was preferred due to the composition of C. siliqua and the lack of the stress that other methods of administration are associated with; chronic physical stress is known to affects sex hormones. The rat chow was ground in a hammer mill through a 5-mm screen to become mash-like. This was mixed with powdered C. siliqua in a rotary mixer and pelleted using a Lister pellet press (Lister Co., Hardwicke, UK). Ceratonia siliqua was added to OVX+CS’ food at a gradually increasing concentration on the third and fourth postoperative days for the animals to acclimatize to its taste.

Anesthesia for DEXA. The rats were anesthetized to remain immobile during the DEXA measurement. In the surgical preparation room, animals received intramuscular injections of low doses of dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor; Zoetis Hellas SA, Athens, Greece) and ketamine (Ketaset; Pfizer Hellas AE, Athens, Greece) (at 0.25 mg/kg and 50 mg, respectively). At the end of the measurements, the rats were transported back to the surgical preparation room, where anesthesia was reversed by intramuscular administration of atipamezole (Antisedan; Zoetis Hellas SA) at a dose of 1 mg/kg. The animals were then kept under close supervision until they were fully recovered. After the clinical confirmation of their recovery, they were transferred back to their cages.

Throughout each anesthesia, the rats’ eyes were protected by regular application of lubricant eye ointment, as their eyes remained open during anesthesia, which could cause dryness and injury to the cornea.

DEXA. After anesthesia was established, the rats were transferred to the DEXA machine bed. In advance of each group’s measurement, the system was calibrated (45).

DEXA software estimates the bone mineral content in a region of interest (ROI) and divides it by the area of the ROI (cm2) to determine the BMD (61, 62). In the current study, two ROIs were determined using the software’s corresponding ROI tool. The entire tibia consisted of the first ROI (ROI1), including both cortical and trabecular bone. A region near (3 mm) the tibial plateau comprised the second ROI (ROI2: 0.19×0.19 mm2) to represent the proximal tibial metaphysis that is rich in trabecular bone. The same, blinded operator performed the selection of all ROIs at the end of the DEXA study. The in vitro precision (coefficient of variation) of the system was 0.5%.

Ovariectomy. Ovariectomy was performed under aseptic procedures, 10 days after the first DEXA measurement, so that the rats had fully recovered. The control group was sham-operated. The animals underwent the same anesthesia as for the DEXA measurements. In addition, rats were subcutaneously administered preoperative analgesia by carprofen (Rimadyl; Zoetis Hellas SA), and chemoprophylaxis by enrofloxacin (Baytril; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) at doses of 4 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively.

The rats were placed on a warming pad on the surgical table to prevent hypothermia due to anesthesia. An incision was made at the prepared surgical site (clipped, scrubbed/disinfected, and draped) midway between the umbilicus and pubis. Once the subcutaneous connective tissue was cut open, another incision was made in the linea alba. After entering the peritoneal cavity, the left ovary was located, the ovarian fat pad surrounding the ovaries was retracted, the broad ligament was separated, and two ligations were placed in the corresponding ovarian and suspensory ligaments, with an absorbable 4-0 suture. The ovary was then removed. The same procedure was repeated for the right ovary. The surgical wound was then closed in layers, with simple interrupted sutures, using an absorbable 4-0 suture. On the skin though, non-absorbable sutures were used.

Ovariectomy was confirmed at the end of the study, at necropsy, by the presence of uterine atrophy and the absence of ovarian tissue.

Euthanasia and tissue sampling. Following general anesthesia at the final DEXA measurement, the animals were euthanized and blood was collected via the posterior vena cava. Blood was collected in EDTA-coated tubes and centrifuged. The plasma was stored at −80°C in Eppendorf tubes. Necropsy followed, to assess the OVX surgery and check for potential pathological findings.

The following organs were collected, examined, and weighed when euthanasia was confirmed, in a single-blind procedure: Liver, brain, bladder, heart, right kidney, uterus, small intestine, and breast. Organs were weighed because a change in the weight of an internal organ can be the only sign of pathogeny. Special care was given to handling the tissues quickly since once removed from the body, they desiccate and lose weight, which is especially important for small organs like the uterus (63, 64). Furthermore, to determine whether C. siliqua had a direct effect on an organ, the ratio of the organ weight to the animal’s final body weight, known as the relative organ weight, was calculated and analyzed.

The tibias were extracted and after quickly removing the surrounding tissues, the right tibia was placed in an alcohol vial and the left tibia in formalin solution. The dissected femurs were also folded with gauze, soaked in isotonic saline (0.9%) to retain their moisture, placed in special containers and preserved at −20°C. The femurs were sent to the Unit of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, to assess their mechanical strength through a three-point bending test.

The plasma and the organs remain available for further research, reducing the number of animals used in research.

Three-point-bending test. Ex vivo, a three-point bending test was used to evaluate the bone’s mechanical properties. This test determines the bending strength of the bone or in other words the maximum load that can be sustained by the bone before its fracture. Furthermore, this test was selected because it is easy to apply to rats, the distribution of the internal loading is similar to the physiological one, and it produces robust measurements with low variation of the callus shape.

On the day of the test, the packaged femurs were left at ambient temperature to thaw, which does not significantly affect the bone’s mechanical properties. As before with DEXA, the equipment was calibrated ahead of every test.

The three-point bending test was carried out using a Materials Test System (Eden Prairie, MN, USA) electromechanical frame. The bones were placed on two cylindrical supports (their distance was equal to 16 mm) while a rounded punch was used to apply the load at the bone’s mid-span. A displacement-control loading scheme was adopted. The loading rate was constant throughout all the experiments, equal to 0.1 mm/min, definitely ensuring quasi-static loading conditions.

Before each test, the line of action of the force applied concerning the orientation of the loaded cross section was marked. During the tests, the deflection at the central cross-section of the bones (i.e., the section at which the load was applied) was recorded with the aid of a properly calibrated video-extensometer (RTSS video-extensometer; Limess Messtechnik & Software GmbH, Krefeld, Germany). In addition, the load applied was also measured (with the aid of a calibrated load cell) and recorded as a function of time, continuously up to the fracture of the specimens.

After each test, one of the two bone fragments was used for further biomechanical study. The fragment was vertically placed in a plastic cup which was then filled with molten resin. After curing the resin, the construct (bone fragment and resin) was removed from the cup and its free surface was carefully polished using increasingly fine abrasive papers. The polished surface was then photographed using a stereoscope.

Biomechanical analysis. The photographs from the stereoscope were processed using commercially available software. As a first step, the geometry of the cross-section of fractured bone (i.e., outer and inner perimeters) and the loading axis, were drawn. Proper elaboration of these drawings provided the: (i) Cross-sectional area, (ii) coordinates of the centroid of the cross-section with respect to an auxiliary reference system, (iii) eccentricity of the loading axis with respect to the centroid, (iv) average thickness of the cortical bone, and (v) area enclosed by the median line.

As a second step, a centroidal reference system xcCyc was introduced, with its yc-axis parallel to the loading line, as it is the standardized procedure for the analysis of bending tests according to the classical Bernoulli-Euler technical theory (65). Then, the tensor of the second moments of area (namely, the quantities Ixcxc, Iycyc, Ixcyc) and the corresponding principal second moments of area (i.e., Ixpxp=Imin, Iypyp=Imax) were determined, together with the orientation of the respective axes.

The bending moments, Mx and My, about the principal axes were then calculated by means of equations:Embedded Image Eq. 1

where Px and Py are the Cartesian components along the two principal axes of the force P applied and L is the distance between the two supports.

In addition, the respective (parasitic) torsional moment was calculated as:Embedded Image Eq. 2

where e is the eccentricity of the load line with respect to the centroid of the cross-section.

Assuming the linear response of the bones (an assumption quite reasonable for a brittle material like bone tissue) and adopting the technical bending theory introduced by Bernoulli and Euler (65), the equation of the neutral line (i.e. the line on which the axial normal stress is zero) was determined as:Embedded Image Eq. 3

where the “+” and “−” signs are interchanged, depending on whether the respective stress component is of tensile or compressive nature. Finally, the maximum normal (tensile) stress, namely the stress developed at the critical point of the section (i.e., the point most distanced from the neutral line) was calculated as follows:Embedded Image Eq. 4

where xk and yk correspond to the coordinates of the critical point. The respective (parasitic) shear stress was calculated as:Embedded Image Eq. 5

where Am is the area encircled within the mean line of the specimen’s cross-section (65).

It is recalled here that the generation of parasitic shear stresses given by Eq. 5 is caused by the inevitable eccentricity between the loading axis and the centroid of the cross-section, and (as will be seen in the next sections) their magnitude is by no means negligible. On the contrary, the shear stresses caused by the shear force itself are ignored, given that the restrictions of the technical bending theory concerning the length-over-height ratio, are definitely fulfilled by all the specimens of the present experimental protocol.

Statistical analysis. The number of rats required for the study was determined by sample size estimation using G*Power 3.1.9.2 program (G*Power - Universität Düsseldorf: Psychologie - HHU, Düsseldorf, Germany) (66). A sample size of 10 animals per group offers an 80% probability of showing a statistically significant difference of 15% between groups (OVX: −35% versus OVX+CS: −20%, standard deviation 10%), in the percentage change from baseline to 6 months for proximal tibial BMD with a significance level of 1.7% (Bonferroni correction for three groups). The individual rat was used as the experimental unit.

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Shapiro-Wilks test confirmed the parameters’ normal distribution.

We used the two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) model using the intervention (between groups) and time (within a group) as factors for the analysis of BMD measurements using the Bonferroni correction for all pairwise comparisons whether between or within groups.

The comparison of three-point bending results for each femur, body weight, the organs weight, and the relative organ weight between groups were performed using the one-way ANOVA model. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Bonferroni test.

Sensitivity analysis of BMD measurements, concerning baseline balance between groups, was performed using two methods:

  • i) The mean percentage change from baseline after 3 and 6 months respectively where comparison of percentage change from baseline of BMD parameters during the observation period between groups was analyzed using the one-way ANOVA model, and pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni test. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used in the case of violation of normality.

  • ii) The absolute change from baseline after 3 and 6 months using analysis of covariance model using the absolute change from baseline as the dependent variable, the groups as a factor, and the baseline value of the measures as covariate.

All tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All analyses were carried out using the statistical package SPSS VR 21.00 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA).

Results

DEXA measurements. The DEXA results for total tibial BMD are presented in Table I. Throughout the study, there was a statistically significant interaction between the factors intervention and time (p<0.005) for total and proximal tibial BMD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Comparison of tibial bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) between control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups during the study period.

Total tibial BMD. Differences within groups: In the control group, there was no significant difference between measurements over time. In the OVX group, the value decreased significantly in both the third (p<0.005) and sixth (p<0.005) month. The decrease between third and sixth month was also significant (p<0.005). The total tibial BMD value of the OVX+CS group at baseline was significantly higher compared to those at both 3 (p<0.005) and 6 (p<0.005) months. Additionally, the total tibial BMD of the OVX+CS group at 3 months was significantly higher than that at 6 months (p<0.005).

Differences among groups: At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. The control group presented statistically significant higher values compared to the other two groups at both the third (p<0.005) and sixth (p<0.005) month, whilst there were no significant differences noted between the OVX and OVX+CS groups throughout the study period (p>0.99). Independently of time, the control group presented higher BMD values (0.233±0.004) compared to both OVX (0.219±0.004, p=0.040) and OVX+CS (0.217±0.004, p=0.016) groups, while there were no significant differences noted between the last two groups (p>0.99).

Change in total tibial BMD from baseline. The control group displayed a significantly increased BMD compared to the other groups both at 3 (p<0.005) and at 6 (p<0.005) months. The change in BMD for the OVX+CS group did not differ significantly from that of the OVX group at 3 months (−6.84±4.96 vs. −7.62±4.97, p>0.99) nor at 6 months (−11.98±2.75 vs. −13.53±4.94, p>0.99) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of mean percentage change from baseline in total tibial bone mineral density (BMD) in control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups during the study period.

The absolute differences in total tibial BMD from baseline during the observation period (Table II) followed a similar pattern to that shown in the analysis of the mean percentage change in total tibial BMD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Comparison of absolute differences from baseline at 3 and 6 months in total and proximal tibial bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) between control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups during the study period.

Proximal tibial BMD. Differences within groups: In the control group, there were no significant differences noted for the proximal tibial BMD during the observation period. The baseline value of the OVX group was significantly higher compared to that at both 3 (p<0.005) and 6 (p<0.005) months. Within the OVX+CS group, the value of the proximal tibial BMD was significantly higher at baseline compared to those at 3 and 6 months (both p<0.005). For both OVX (p=0.235) and OVX+CS (p=0.076) groups, there were no significant differences noted between the BMD values in the third and sixth month.

Differences among groups: At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. The control group had a significantly higher value compared to OVX and OVX+CS at 3 and 6 months (both p<0.005). Likewise, the proximal tibial BMD value of the OVX+CS group was higher than OVX’s group at 3 months (p<0.005) and at 6 months (p=0.009). Regardless of time, the control group (0.375±0.008) presented significantly higher BMD values compared to both OVX (0.291±0.008, p<0.005) and OVX+CS (0.312±0.008, p<0.005) groups, and there were no significant differences noted between the last two groups (p=0.225).

Change in proximal tibial BMD from baseline. The proximal tibial BMD of the control group was significantly higher compared to the other groups at 3 and 6 months (both p<0.005) (Figure 3). The BMD for the OVX+CS group was statistically significantly higher compared to the OVX group at both 3 months (−15.14±7.56 vs. −30.72±13.64, p=0.009) and 6 months (−19.79±7.42 vs. −34.37±9.44, p<0.005).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Comparison of mean percentage change from baseline in proximal tibial bone mineral density (BMD) in control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups during the study period.

The absolute differences in proximal tibial BMD from baseline during the observation period (Table II) followed a similar pattern to that shown in the analysis of the mean percentage change in proximal tibial BMD.

Three-point-bending test. The between-group comparison did not show a difference for von Mises stress, bending stress, torsional stress, and cross-sectional area. The test results are displayed in Table III. The thickness index was significantly higher in the OVX+CS (p=0.026) and control (p=0.029) groups compared to the OVX group for the right femur. Regarding the left femur, the cross-sectional area index (p=0.037) was marginally significantly higher in the OVX+CS group (p=0.041) than that of the control group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Results of the three-point-bending test in control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups.

Body, organ, and relative weights.

Bodyweight. From baseline until the 10th week, there was no statistically significant difference in body weights between groups. In contrast, from the 12th week until the end of the study, there was a statistically significant difference in body weights between the groups: The rats in the control group presented statistically significantly lower body weight compared to those of the OVX group (p<0.05). From the 12th week onwards, animals in the OVX+CS group had similar body weights to animals of the control and OVX groups. Mean body weight changes over the duration of the study are displayed in Table IV.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Comparison of bodyweight results (g) in control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups.

Organ and abdominal fat weight. Uterine, liver, and kidney weights did not differ between OVX and OVX+CS groups. The significantly lower uterine weight of the OVX (p<0.005) and OVX+CS (p<0.005) groups in comparison to that of the control group confirmed that OVX was successful (Table V). The brain weighed significantly less in the control (p=0.046) and OVX+CS (p=0.014) groups compared to the OVX group, whilst the abdominal fat had a similar weight in the control and OVX+CS groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Comparison of organ weights (g) in control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups.

Relative weights. The relative abdominal fat weight was significantly higher in the OVX group compared to the control (p=0.001) and OVX+CS (p=0.009) groups, which were similar (Table VI). No difference was noted in the relative weights of the uterus, liver, and kidneys between OVX and OVX+CS groups either, meaning that C. siliqua does not appear to affect them. Relative heart and brain weights were also similar among all groups. The OVX+CS group had a lower relative organ weight compared to the control group regarding the kidneys (p<0.005), uterus (p<0.005), and liver (p<0.005). The OVX group had lower relative weight compared to the control group regarding the kidneys (p<0.005), uterus (p<0.005), liver (p<0.005), and gastrocnemius (p<0.005).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Comparison of relative organ weight (organ weight/body weight) between control, ovariectomized (OVX) and ovariectomized plus Ceratonia siliqua-treated (OVX+CS) groups.

Discussion

The role of estrogens in regulating menopause symptoms is supported by increasing data (67, 68). In menopause, estrogen levels decrease, bone resorption exceeds bone formation, BMD decreases, and, subsequently, the risk of fracture increases. Most current therapies exert mainly antiresorptive effects (68-71). However, estrogen administration is associated with major side-effects such as stroke, thromboembolism, breast cancer, and vascular diseases (17, 68, 72). Therefore, plant-extracted non-steroidal, bioactive substances that resemble, or modulate endogenous estrogens and are devoid of the aforementioned hazards, are considered a safe and effective complementary medicine for managing postmenopausal symptoms (73, 74). Women’s preference for phytoestrogens along with their health benefits have led to increased attention to these compounds (67, 75).

Isoflavone aglycones have already been found to have a positive effect on estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss (76). Ceratonia siliqua is rich in flavonoids (free and glycosylated aglycone). Vaya and Mahmood identified nine different flavonoids in its leaves (77). Hence, here C. siliqua was studied for a 6-month period for its potential osteoprotective effect against postmenopausal BMD loss in an ovariectomized rat model, commonly used for that purpose in research on postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The impact of ovariectomy on bone mineral and microarchitecture differs among skeletal sites (78) and maybe this is the reason for some diverse reactions of sites to osteoporosis management (79). The proximal tibia of the rat is the first to display differences after ovariectomy, as well as the greatest changes, compared to the spine, distal femur, and proximal femur. The proximal tibia also presents the highest BMD values before ovariectomy, and the greatest BMD loss after. Specifically, the microarchitecture of the metaphysis of the proximal tibia deteriorates. Rat tibial metaphyseal trabeculae are more prone to estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss (not its thickness) and strength changes by trabecular hypertrophy or hyper-mineralization (78, 80). Trabecular bone is highly correlated with mechanical performance and bone strength. In particular, trabecular number and connectivity density [number of trabecular connections per cubic millimeter (81)] are more closely related to BMD than trabecular thickness is. In contrast, epiphyseal trabeculae are primarily strengthened by thickening and their greater BMD is unaffected by time. Such variations may result from different mechanical loads (80, 82, 83). The reaction of each trabecular bone region also depends on age. In a study by Francisco et al., 24- and 44-week-old rats presented a more reliable osteoporotic reaction to ovariectomy (reduced bone mineral and microarchitectural properties) than younger ones (reduced trabecular connectivity and trabecular morphological change from plate-like to rod-like) (78, 84-88).

Similarly to the findings of Francisco et al., significant amelioration was found for proximal tibial BMD loss in our study whilst there were no significant differences between OVX and OVX+CS groups regarding total tibial BMD. Both in the third and sixth month, C. siliqua administration better maintained proximal tibial BMD, whose absolute value was higher in the OVX+CS group especially in the third month, in comparison to the OVX group. Protection of proximal tibial BMD after C. siliqua administration was also confirmed by its percentage changes that showed augmentation compared to the OVX group in the third month, which became significantly higher in the sixth month of administration. Thus, this inhibition of the loss of trabecular bone volume in the proximal tibia may represent a potentially protective effect of C. siliqua against postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Bone strength is determined by its quantitative (bone mass, bone density, and modulus of elasticity) and qualitative properties such as trabecular bone structure features (trabecular orientation and thickness, length, number, and separation distances of trabeculae). Specifically, in the three-point bending test, the cortical mineral content at the middle of the diaphysis, the cortical bone cross-section surface, the percentage cortical bone cross-section surface to whole cross-section surface, the cortical density, and the thickness of the cortical bone, are considered to be markers of bone mechanical strength (89-91). Cortical and trabecular thinning are noted in studies of both ovariectomized animals and postmenopausal women (92-95). According to Jiang et al., ovariectomy in rats causes a considerable decrease in the total BMD but does not affect the cortical bone thickness, cortical BMD, or cortical bone area (96). Nevertheless, total BMD, cortical bone area, and cortical bone thickness were significantly correlated to femoral failure load, implying that they can be used as its indicators. Cortical bone thickness exhibited the greatest association with failure load in the same study. It has also been reported that dimple fracture is affected by bone thickness (97). This highlights the significance of the three-point bending test result that administration of C. siliqua significantly increased the thickness index compared to the OVX group for the right femur, even though it remained significantly lower compared to the control group when the index was examined regardless of the foot factor. Moreover, femurs are considered the optimal rodent bone for evaluating fracture toughness properties in small animal model studies (98).

The bone cross-sectional area is an indicator of axial strength, and cortical bone mass, and greatly influences the bone strength determination. The cross-sectional cortical area at the midshaft is considered the best predictor for the elastic modulus of the femur (99, 100). Thus, the significantly lowered cross-sectional area index of the control group compared to the OVX+CS group for the left femur may be another indication of the potent osteoprotective effect of C. siliqua. This result becomes more significant considering that the three-point bending test assesses mechanical properties of femoral cortical bone since it consists of the greatest part of the femoral midshaft (101-103). In rats, cortical bone responds slowly to ovariectomy in comparison to trabecular bone, especially in rats more than 9 months old (104). Consequently, longer (>6 months) study periods and a more sensitive detection approach in the case of older animals may be the reasons that no other statistically significant changes regarding biomechanical testing were observed among groups in such osteoporotic studies (105-107). The limited duration of study as a possible cause of the three-point bending results has been well-discussed by Zervas et al. (102). However, a transient rise in cortical bone strength of the femoral diaphysis that declines after 9 months has been reported (45). Likewise, an increase in cortical thickness with aging has been reported and associated with the “cortical drift” phenomenon (108, 109). It has also been reported that the cross-sectional area index increases as animals age (100, 107) and that it is affected by the bodyweight of animals (101).

All animals displayed similar body weights from the 12th week on; animals in the control group weighed significantly less than the animals in the OVX group but there was no significant difference when comparing the weights of the animals of the OVX+CS group to those of the control and OVX groups. Bodyweight is mainly affected by growth factors. Consequently, it is not correlated to uterine weight, which is influenced by hormones such as estrogens (64). The uterus reacts to estrogens by increasing its weight, initially due to water imbibition, which is succeeded by tissue growth (64, 110). In laboratory rodents specifically, estrogens stimulate the uterus to grow rapidly and vigorously, especially so since their estrous cycle lasts about 4 days. Hence, the rat uterus is appropriate for screening for estrogen agonists and antagonists. Following successful ovariectomy, reduced uterine weight would be expected in the OVX group, as early us 1 to 3 weeks postoperatively, and in our study of 6 months, the uterus did weigh significantly more in the control group (104). A statistically significantly higher mean uterine weight of the OVX+CS group in our results would indicate a positive response to C. siliqua but that was not the case, neither for its absolute weight nor its relative weight (64). Ceratonia siliqua was found not to affect the weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, as well.

A statistically significant difference among the three groups was noted for abdominal fat and brain weight. As anticipated, these tissues weighed significantly more in the OVX group compared to the OVX+CS group, but their weights were alike for control and OVX+CS groups. Perhaps the lack of estrogens modifies adipose tissue metabolism and abdominal fat distribution (111). The relative abdominal fat weight was also significantly higher in the OVX group but did not differ between the control and OVX+CS groups. These results concur with those of Fujita et al. showing that C. siliqua may be used against obesity since carob pod polyphenols suppressed the differentiation of adipocytes through the posttranscriptional regulation of CCAAT enhancer binding protein beta (112). The relative weights of the heart and brain were unaffected by C. siliqua in our study. Nonetheless, the methanolic extract of carob pods has been found to prevent the short-term memory impairment in rats caused by chronic stress, probably due to inhibiting the decrease in the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus (113). Moreover, pre- and post-treatment with aqueous carob extract ameliorated the effects of amiodarone (in a lung toxicity model in rats), and waterpipe smoke exposure (passive smoking) on the brain and lung (32), probably because of its antioxidant impact.

Apart from the 6-month duration of the study, the time of beginning C. siliqua administration may be considered another limitation of this study to consider. During early menopause, bone may be less responsive to nutritional intervention due to hormonal alterations (114). Moreover, the guideline of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for the testing of chemicals in rodents for estrogenic properties refers that substance administration in rats should begin not less than 2 weeks after ovariectomy so that the uterus will have regressed. In addition, at least two dose groups are recommended with administration for more than 3 days as this duration of administration surpasses the uterine response time to endogenous estrogens, and weakly active substances may be more easily recognized. Frequency of administration, C. siliqua’s pharmacokinetics, means of administration, and dosage per se are other points for consideration. The possible exposure of the animals to other estrogens was not investigated. For example, the bedding (for example corncob demonstrates anti-estrogenic effects), or the cage material (animals maintained in polycarbonate and polysulfone cages, especially for old cages, are exposed to bisphenol A, a monomer with estrogenic activity), should also have been examined. Finally, according to the OECD, the absence of estrous should have been confirmed by the observation of epithelial cells swabbed from the rat vaginas, for example, 10-14 days after ovariectomy, for at least 5 consecutive days (64, 115, 116), which was not considered during our study.

Conclusion

Ceratonia siliqua exerts beneficial effects on proximal tibial BMD and abdominal fat. Nevertheless, C. siliqua failed to improve biomechanical strength in the femoral diaphysis during the three-point bending test. Further research is required, for example regarding the C. siliqua administration period, its dosage, and frequency of administration, in order to determine the efficacy of C. siliqua as an osteoprotective agent.

Acknowledgements

The Authors wish to thank Mrs. C. Kapsi and Mrs. G. Mastrogianni for their assistance in performing the ovariectomies and the autopsies, and to Mr. G. Kiniklis for assisting in the DEXA scans.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    The Authors of this article made the following contributions: AAN, DG, AG, AEP, KS, AZ, SZ, SKK, EDP, EC, GK, TK and IAD contributed to project design and data analysis; AG to statistical analysis; AAN, DG, AG, SKK, GK, IAD and TK to the final review, article presentation and critical review of the article for important intellectual content; AAN, DG, AEP, AZ, SZ, EDP and IAD to the conduct of experiments and laboratory tests; and SM, DM and AV to chow preparation.

  • Conflict of Interest

    The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

  • Received September 24, 2022.
  • Revision received October 17, 2022.
  • Accepted October 31, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hernlund E,
    2. Svedbom A,
    3. Ivergård M,
    4. Compston J,
    5. Cooper C,
    6. Stenmark J,
    7. McCloskey EV,
    8. Jönsson B and
    9. Kanis JA
    : Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8: 136, 2013. PMID: 24113837. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sandhu SK and
    2. Hampson G
    : The pathogenesis, diagnosis, investigation and management of osteoporosis. J Clin Pathol 64(12): 1042-1050, 2011. PMID: 21896577. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2010.077842
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lien CY,
    2. Chih-Yuan Ho K,
    3. Lee OK,
    4. Blunn GW and
    5. Su Y
    : Restoration of bone mass and strength in glucocorticoid-treated mice by systemic transplantation of CXCR4 and cbfa-1 co-expressing mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Miner Res 24(5): 837-848, 2009. PMID: 19113920. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gartner LP and
    2. Hiatt JL
    : Color Textbook of Histology. Second Edition. Philadelphia, PA, USA, W.B. Saunders, 2001.
  5. ↵
    1. Cameron JR,
    2. Skofronick JG,
    3. Grant RM and
    4. Cameron JR
    : Physics of the Body. Second Edition. Madison, WI, USA, Medical Physics Pub Corp, 1999.
  6. ↵
    1. Sotiropoulou P
    : Physical-mathematical methodology for the determination of new characteristic parameters of osteoporosis using X-ray radiation of two actions (kVp) with the aim of optimizing the diagnosis and time monitoring of the disease. Patras, University of Patras, 2016. Available at: https://nemertes.library.upatras.gr/bitstreams/13d34cb2-c444-4f64-a780-05a8aecb44bb/download [Last accessed on October 31, 2022]
    1. Shanb AA and
    2. Youssef EF
    : The impact of adding weight-bearing exercise versus nonweight bearing programs to the medical treatment of elderly patients with osteoporosis. J Family Community Med 21(3): 176-181, 2014. PMID: 25374469. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.142972
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. McMillan LB,
    2. Zengin A,
    3. Ebeling PR and
    4. Scott D
    : Prescribing physical activity for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in older adults. Healthcare (Basel) 5(4): 85, 2017. PMID: 29113119. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare5040085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Senderovich H and
    2. Kosmopoulos A
    : An insight into the effect of exercises on the prevention of osteoporosis and associated fractures in high-risk individuals. Rambam Maimonides Med J 9(1): e0005, 2018. PMID: 29406844. DOI: 10.5041/RMMJ.10325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Burge R,
    2. Dawson-Hughes B,
    3. Solomon DH,
    4. Wong JB,
    5. King A and
    6. Tosteson A
    : Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3): 465-475, 2007. PMID: 17144789. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.061113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Moini J
    : Anatomy and Physiology for Health Professionals. Third edition. Burlington, MA, USA, Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2020.
    1. Cohen AJ and
    2. Roe FJ
    : Review of risk factors for osteoporosis with particular reference to a possible aetiological role of dietary salt. Food Chem Toxicol 38(2-3): 237-253, 2000. PMID: 10717363. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00145-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Sambrook P
    (ed.): The musculoskeletal system: basic science and clinical conditions. Second Edition. Edinburgh, UK, Churchill Livingstone, 2010.
  11. ↵
    1. Ganesan K,
    2. Jandu JS and
    3. Roane D
    : Secondary Osteoporosis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL, USA, StatPearls Publishing, 2022.
  12. ↵
    1. Marcucci G and
    2. Brandi ML
    : Rare causes of osteoporosis. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 12(2): 151-156, 2015. PMID: 26604941. DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2015.12.2.151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fu SW,
    2. Zeng GF,
    3. Zong SH,
    4. Zhang ZY,
    5. Zou B,
    6. Fang Y,
    7. Lu L and
    8. Xiao DQ
    : Systematic review and meta-analysis of the bone protective effect of phytoestrogens on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats. Nutr Res 34(6): 467-477, 2014. PMID: 25026913. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.05.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Poluzzi E,
    2. Piccinni C,
    3. Raschi E,
    4. Rampa A,
    5. Recanatini M and
    6. De Ponti F
    : Phytoestrogens in postmenopause: the state of the art from a chemical, pharmacological and regulatory perspective. Curr Med Chem 21(4): 417-436, 2014. PMID: 24164197. DOI: 10.2174/09298673113206660297
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lagari VS and
    2. Levis S
    : Phytoestrogens for menopausal bone loss and climacteric symptoms. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 139: 294-301, 2014. PMID: 23246986. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.12.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Atmaca A,
    2. Kleerekoper M,
    3. Bayraktar M and
    4. Kucuk O
    : Soy isoflavones in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Menopause 15(4 Pt 1): 748-757, 2008. PMID: 18277912. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31815c1e7f
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Poulsen RC and
    2. Kruger MC
    : Soy phytoestrogens: impact on postmenopausal bone loss and mechanisms of action. Nutr Rev 66(7): 359-374, 2008. PMID: 18667012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00046.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. De Wilde A,
    2. Lieberherr M,
    3. Colin C and
    4. Pointillart A
    : A low dose of daidzein acts as an ERbeta-selective agonist in trabecular osteoblasts of young female piglets. J Cell Physiol 200(2): 253-262, 2004. PMID: 15174095. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Jiang X,
    2. Chen W,
    3. Shen F,
    4. Xiao W,
    5. Guo H,
    6. Su H,
    7. Xiu J and
    8. Sun W
    : Pinoresinol promotes MC3T3 E1 cell proliferation and differentiation via the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 20(3): 2143-2150, 2019. PMID: 31322181. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Jia TL,
    2. Wang HZ,
    3. Xie LP,
    4. Wang XY and
    5. Zhang RQ
    : Daidzein enhances osteoblast growth that may be mediated by increased bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) production. Biochem Pharmacol 65(5): 709-715, 2003. PMID: 12628484. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01585-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kanno S,
    2. Hirano S and
    3. Kayama F
    : Effects of the phytoestrogen coumestrol on RANK-ligand-induced differentiation of osteoclasts. Toxicology 203(1-3): 211-220, 2004. PMID: 15363596. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Karieb S and
    2. Fox SW
    : Phytoestrogens directly inhibit TNF-α-induced bone resorption in RAW264.7 cells by suppressing c-fos-induced NFATc1 expression. J Cell Biochem 112(2): 476-487, 2011. PMID: 21268069. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zafar TA,
    2. Weaver CM,
    3. Jones K,
    4. Moore DR 2nd. and
    5. Barnes S
    : Inulin effects on bioavailability of soy isoflavones and their calcium absorption enhancing ability. J Agric Food Chem 52(10): 2827-2831, 2004. PMID: 15137821. DOI: 10.1021/jf035080f
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Soleimanzadeh A,
    2. Kian M,
    3. Moradi S and
    4. Mahmoudi S
    : Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) fruit hydro-alcoholic extract alleviates reproductive toxicity of lead in male mice: Evidence on sperm parameters, sex hormones, oxidative stress biomarkers and expression of Nrf2 and iNOS. Avicenna J Phytomed 10(1): 35-49, 2020. PMID: 31921606.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Custódio L,
    2. Fernandes E,
    3. Escapa AL,
    4. López-Avilés S,
    5. Fajardo A,
    6. Aligué R,
    7. Alberício F and
    8. Romano A
    : Antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibition of tumor cell growth by leaf extracts from the carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua). Pharmaceut Biol 47: 721-728, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/13880200902936891
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kumazawa S,
    2. Taniguchi M,
    3. Suzuki Y,
    4. Shimura M,
    5. Kwon MS and
    6. Nakayama T
    : Antioxidant activity of polyphenols in carob pods. J Agric Food Chem 50(2): 373-377, 2002. PMID: 11782210. DOI: 10.1021/jf010938r
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Owen RW,
    2. Haubner R,
    3. Hull WE,
    4. Erben G,
    5. Spiegelhalder B,
    6. Bartsch H and
    7. Haber B
    : Isolation and structure elucidation of the major individual polyphenols in carob fibre. Food Chem Toxicol 41(12): 1727-1738, 2003. PMID: 14563398. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(03)00200-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Papagiannopoulos M,
    2. Wollseifen HR,
    3. Mellenthin A,
    4. Haber B and
    5. Galensa R
    : Identification and quantification of polyphenols in carob fruits (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and derived products by HPLC-UV-ESI/MSn. J Agric Food Chem 52(12): 3784-3791, 2004. PMID: 15186098. DOI: 10.1021/jf030660y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Abdel-Rahman M,
    2. Bauomy AA,
    3. Salem FEH and
    4. Ahmed Khalifa M
    : Carob extract attenuates brain and lung injury in rats exposed to waterpipe smoke. Egyptian J Basic Appl Sci 5: 31-40, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbas.2018.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Abdel-Rahman M,
    2. Salem FE,
    3. Bauomy A and
    4. Khalifa A
    : Ameliorative effect of carob aqueous extract on waterpipe smoke induced-toxicity in adult male albino rats. Int J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 9(1): 246-253, 2017. DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i1.15470
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rtibi K,
    2. Jabri MA,
    3. Selmi S,
    4. Souli A,
    5. Sebai H,
    6. El-Benna J,
    7. Amri M and
    8. Marzouki L
    : Gastroprotective effect of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) against ethanol-induced oxidative stress in rat. BMC Complement Altern Med 15: 292, 2015. PMID: 26289579. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0819-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rtibi K,
    2. Selmi S,
    3. Jabri MA,
    4. El-Benna J,
    5. Amri M,
    6. Marzouki L and
    7. Sebai H
    : Protective effect of Ceratonia siliqua L. against a dextran sulfate sodium-induced alterations in liver and kidney in rat. J Med Food 19(9): 882-889, 2016. PMID: 27627702. DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2016.0020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rtibi K,
    2. Selmi S,
    3. Jabri M-A,
    4. Mamadou G,
    5. Limas-Nzouzi N,
    6. Sebai H,
    7. El-Benna J,
    8. Marzouki L,
    9. Eto B and
    10. Amri M
    : Effects of aqueous extracts from Ceratonia siliqua L. pods on small intestinal motility in rats and jejunal permeability in mice. RSC Adv 6: 44345-44353, 2016. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA03457H
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Suzek H,
    2. Celik I and
    3. Doğan A
    : Nephroprotective hepatoprotective potential and antioxidant role of carob pods (Ceratonia siliqua L.) against carbon tetrachloride-induced toxicity in rats. Indian J Pharmaceut Edu Res 51: 312-320, 2017. DOI: 10.5530/ijper.51.2.37
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Vafaei A,
    2. Mohammadi S,
    3. Fazel A,
    4. Soukhtanloo M,
    5. Mohammadipour A and
    6. Beheshti F
    : Effects of carob (Ceratonia siliqua) on sperm quality, testicular structure, testosterone level and oxidative stress in busulfan-induced infertile mice. Pharmaceut Sci 24: 104-111, 2018. DOI: 10.15171/PS.2018.16
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Mokhtari M,
    2. Sharifi E and
    3. Azadian Sh
    : The effects of hydro-alcoholic extract of Ceratonia siliqua L. seeds on pituitary—testis hormones and spermatogenesis in rat. Advances in Environmental Biology, pp. 2778-2784, 2012. Available at: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA336176005&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=19950756&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E268b28ac [Last accessed on October 31, 2022]
  27. ↵
    1. Ebrahimpour N,
    2. Khazaneha M,
    3. Mehrbani M,
    4. Rayegan P and
    5. Raeiszadeh M
    : Efficacy of Herbal Based Syrup on male sexual experiences: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Tradit Complement Med 11(2): 103-108, 2020. PMID: 33728269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2020.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mahdiani E,
    2. Khadem Haghighian H,
    3. Javadi M,
    4. Karami AA and
    5. Kavianpour M
    : Effect of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) oral supplementation on changes of semen parameters, oxidative stress, inflammatory biomarkers and reproductive hormones in infertile men. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 23: 56-66, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Aghili MH
    : Makhzan-al-Advia, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2009.
  30. ↵
    1. Avicenna H
    : al-Qanun fi al-Tibb [The Canon of Medicine]. Beirut, Ehyaol Toras al-Arabi Press, 2010.
  31. ↵
    1. Karim AA and
    2. Azlan A
    : Fruit pod extracts as a source of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. Molecules 17(10): 11931-11946, 2012. PMID: 23052712. DOI: 10.3390/molecules171011931
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Jee WS and
    2. Yao W
    : Overview: animal models of osteopenia and osteoporosis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 1(3): 193-207, 2001. PMID: 15758493.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lelovas PP,
    2. Xanthos TT,
    3. Thoma SE,
    4. Lyritis GP and
    5. Dontas IA
    : The laboratory rat as an animal model for osteoporosis research. Comp Med 58(5): 424-430, 2008. PMID: 19004367.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Turner RT,
    2. Maran A,
    3. Lotinun S,
    4. Hefferan T,
    5. Evans GL,
    6. Zhang M and
    7. Sibonga JD
    : Animal models for osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2(1): 117-127, 2001. PMID: 11704974. DOI: 10.1023/a:1010067326811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Gambacciani M and
    2. Levancini M
    : Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures. Panminerva Med 56(2): 115-131, 2014. PMID: 24942322.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Messina M
    : Soy foods, isoflavones, and the health of postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 100 Suppl 1: 423S-430S, 2014. PMID: 24898224. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Torella M,
    2. La Rezza F,
    3. Labriola D,
    4. Ammaturo FP,
    5. Ambrosio D,
    6. Zarcone R,
    7. Trotta C,
    8. Schettino MT and
    9. De Franciscis P
    : [Phytoestrogens and menopause]. Minerva Ginecol 65(6): 679-696, 2013. PMID: 23881390.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Wang C,
    2. Meng M-X,
    3. Tang X-L,
    4. Chen K-M,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Liu W-N and
    7. Zhao Y-Y
    : The proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization effects of puerarin on osteoblasts in vitro. Chin J Natural Med 12: 436-442, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/S1875-5364(14)60068-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Xiao HH,
    2. Fung CY,
    3. Mok SK,
    4. Wong KC,
    5. Ho MX,
    6. Wang XL,
    7. Yao XS and
    8. Wong MS
    : Flavonoids from Herba epimedii selectively activate estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and stimulate ER-dependent osteoblastic functions in UMR-106 cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 143: 141-151, 2014. PMID: 24607839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.02.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Smith AJ,
    2. Clutton RE,
    3. Lilley E,
    4. Hansen KEA and
    5. Brattelid T
    : PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Lab Anim 52(2): 135-141, 2018. PMID: 28771074. DOI: 10.1177/0023677217724823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Percie du Sert N,
    2. Hurst V,
    3. Ahluwalia A,
    4. Alam S,
    5. Avey MT,
    6. Baker M,
    7. Browne WJ,
    8. Clark A,
    9. Cuthill IC,
    10. Dirnagl U,
    11. Emerson M,
    12. Garner P,
    13. Holgate ST,
    14. Howells DW,
    15. Karp NA,
    16. Lazic SE,
    17. Lidster K,
    18. MacCallum CJ,
    19. Macleod M,
    20. Pearl EJ,
    21. Petersen OH,
    22. Rawle F,
    23. Reynolds P,
    24. Rooney K,
    25. Sena ES,
    26. Silberberg SD,
    27. Steckler T and
    28. Würbel H
    : The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 18(7): e3000410, 2020. PMID: 32663219. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Ellacott KL,
    2. Morton GJ,
    3. Woods SC,
    4. Tso P and
    5. Schwartz MW
    : Assessment of feeding behavior in laboratory mice. Cell Metab 12(1): 10-17, 2010. PMID: 20620991. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.06.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Jiang JM,
    2. Sacco SM and
    3. Ward WE
    : Ovariectomy-induced hyperphagia does not modulate bone mineral density or bone strength in rats. J Nutr 138(11): 2106-2110, 2008. PMID: 18936205. DOI: 10.3945/jn.108.093781
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Iwaniec UT and
    2. Turner RT
    : Influence of body weight on bone mass, architecture and turnover. J Endocrinol 230(3): R115-R130, 2016. PMID: 27352896. DOI: 10.1530/JOE-16-0089
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Nair AB and
    2. Jacob S
    : A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm 7(2): 27-31, 2016. PMID: 27057123. DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. EFSA Panel on Food Additives Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS),
    2. Mortensen A,
    3. Aguilar F,
    4. Crebelli R,
    5. Di Domenico A,
    6. Frutos MJ,
    7. Galtier P,
    8. Gott D,
    9. Gundert-Remy U,
    10. Lambré C,
    11. Leblanc JC,
    12. Lindtner O,
    13. Moldeus P,
    14. Mosesso P,
    15. Oskarsson A,
    16. Parent-Massin D,
    17. Stankovic I,
    18. Waalkens-Berendsen I,
    19. Woutersen RA,
    20. Wright M,
    21. Younes M,
    22. Brimer L,
    23. Peters P,
    24. Wiesner J,
    25. Christodoulidou A,
    26. Lodi F,
    27. Tard A and
    28. Dusemund B
    : Re-evaluation of locust bean gum (E 410) as a food additive. EFSA J 15(1): e04646, 2017. PMID: 32625248. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4646
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kotrotsios N,
    2. Christaki E,
    3. Bonos E and
    4. Florou-Paneri P
    : Dietary carob pods on growth performance and meat quality of fattening pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 25(6): 880-885, 2012. PMID: 25049640. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Dontas IA,
    2. Lelovas PP,
    3. Kourkoulis SK,
    4. Aligiannis N,
    5. Paliogianni A,
    6. Mitakou S,
    7. Galanos A,
    8. Kassi E,
    9. Mitousoudis A,
    10. Xanthos TT,
    11. Papaioannou N and
    12. Lyritis GP
    : Protective effect of Sideritis euboea extract on bone mineral density and strength of ovariectomized rats. Menopause 18(8): 915-922, 2011. PMID: 21505372. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31820ce580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Choplin RH,
    2. Lenchik L and
    3. Wuertzer S
    : A Practical approach to interpretation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for assessment of bone density. Curr Radiol Rep 2: 48, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s40134-014-0048-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Thigpen JE,
    2. Li LA,
    3. Richter CB,
    4. Lebetkin EH and
    5. Jameson CW
    : The mouse bioassay for the detection of estrogenic activity in rodent diets: II. Comparative estrogenic activity of purified, certified and standard open and closed formula rodent diets. Lab Anim Sci 37(5): 602-605, 1987. PMID: 3695394.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. OECD
    : Test No. 440: Uterotrophic Bioassay in Rodents: A short-term screening test for oestrogenic properties. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Paris, France, OECD Publishing, 2007. DOI: 10.1787/9789264067417-en
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Gere JM and
    2. Timoshenko SP
    : Mechanics of Materials. Stanley Thornes, 1999.
  48. ↵
    1. Faul F,
    2. Erdfelder E,
    3. Buchner A and
    4. Lang AG
    : Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4): 1149-1160, 2009. PMID: 19897823. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Jieyun L,
    2. Li H,
    3. Peijing Y,
    4. Li J,
    5. Qiu J,
    6. Han J and
    7. Yang K
    : Effects of phytoestrogens in the treatment of postmenopausal depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Authorea, 2020. DOI: 10.22541/au.159526961.10587876. Available at: https://www.authorea.com/users/344317/articles/470895-effects-of-phytoestrogens-in-the-treatment-of-postmenopausal-depressive-disorders-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis?commit=c0cc21a0493fef9c4bd2a9f4c51daca5b954de36 [Last accessed on October 31, 2022]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Kanis JA,
    2. Cooper C,
    3. Rizzoli R,
    4. Reginster JY and Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF)
    : European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30(1): 3-44, 2019. PMID: 30324412. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Słupski W,
    2. Jawień P and
    3. Nowak B
    : Botanicals in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nutrients 13(5): 1609, 2021. PMID: 34064936. DOI: 10.3390/nu13051609
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tella SH and
    2. Gallagher JC
    : Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 142: 155-170, 2014. PMID: 24176761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Platzer W
    : Color Atlas of Human Anatomy: Locomotor system. Thieme, 2009.
  52. ↵
    1. Al-Safi ZA and
    2. Santoro N
    : Menopausal hormone therapy and menopausal symptoms. Fertil Steril 101(4): 905-915, 2014. PMID: 24613533. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Lee HW,
    2. Jun JH,
    3. Kil KJ,
    4. Ko BS,
    5. Lee CH and
    6. Lee MS
    : Herbal medicine (Danggui Shaoyao San) for treating primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Maturitas 85: 19-26, 2016. PMID: 26857875. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.11.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Atteritano M,
    2. Mazzaferro S,
    3. Bitto A,
    4. Cannata ML,
    5. D’Anna R,
    6. Squadrito F,
    7. Macrì I,
    8. Frisina A,
    9. Frisina N and
    10. Bagnato G
    : Genistein effects on quality of life and depression symptoms in osteopenic postmenopausal women: a 2-year randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Osteoporos Int 25(3): 1123-1129, 2014. PMID: 24114397. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2512-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Mareti E,
    2. Abatzi C,
    3. Vavilis D,
    4. Lambrinoudaki I and
    5. Goulis DG
    : Effect of oral phytoestrogens on endometrial thickness and breast density of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 124: 81-88, 2019. PMID: 31097185. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Lambert MNT,
    2. Hu LM and
    3. Jeppesen PB
    : A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of isoflavone formulations against estrogen-deficient bone resorption in peri- and postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 106(3): 801-811, 2017. PMID: 28768649. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.151464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Vaya J and
    2. Mahmood S
    : Flavonoid content in leaf extracts of the fig (Ficus carica L.), carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and pistachio (Pistacia lentiscus L.). Biofactors 28(3-4): 169-175, 2006. PMID: 17473377. DOI: 10.1002/biof.5520280303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Francisco JI,
    2. Yu Y,
    3. Oliver RA and
    4. Walsh WR
    : Relationship between age, skeletal site, and time post-ovariectomy on bone mineral and trabecular microarchitecture in rats. J Orthop Res 29(2): 189-196, 2011. PMID: 20722002. DOI: 10.1002/jor.21217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Kishi T,
    2. Hagino H,
    3. Kishimoto H and
    4. Nagashima H
    : Bone responses at various skeletal sites to human parathyroid hormone in ovariectomized rats: effects of long-term administration, withdrawal, and readministration. Bone 22(5): 515-522, 1998. PMID: 9600786. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00045-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Sheng ZF,
    2. Dai RC,
    3. Wu XP,
    4. Fang LN,
    5. Fan HJ and
    6. Liao EY
    : Regionally specific compensation for bone loss in the tibial trabeculae of estrogen-deficient rats. Acta Radiol 48(5): 531-539, 2007. PMID: 17520429. DOI: 10.1080/02841850701283761
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Ito M,
    2. Nishida A,
    3. Aoyagi K,
    4. Uetani M,
    5. Hayashi K and
    6. Kawase M
    : Effects of risedronate on trabecular microstructure and biomechanical properties in ovariectomized rat tibia. Osteoporos Int 16(9): 1042-1048, 2005. PMID: 15711780. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1802-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Gong H,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. Yeung HY and
    4. Qin L
    : Regional variations in microstructural properties of vertebral trabeculae with aging. J Bone Miner Metab 23(2): 174-180, 2005. PMID: 15750697. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-004-0557-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Lai YM,
    2. Qin L,
    3. Yeung HY,
    4. Lee KK and
    5. Chan KM
    : Regional differences in trabecular BMD and micro-architecture of weight-bearing bone under habitual gait loading—a pQCT and microCT study in human cadavers. Bone 37(2): 274-282, 2005. PMID: 15961358. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.04.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Boyd SK,
    2. Davison P,
    3. Müller R and
    4. Gasser JA
    : Monitoring individual morphological changes over time in ovariectomized rats by in vivo micro-computed tomography. Bone 39(4): 854-862, 2006. PMID: 16757220. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. SkyScan
    : SkyScan Structural parameters of trabecular bone measured by the SkyScan micro-CT. Aartselaar, Belgium, SkyScan, 2004.
    1. Laib A,
    2. Kumer JL,
    3. Majumdar S and
    4. Lane NE
    : The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by MicroCT. Osteoporos Int 12(11): 936-941, 2001. PMID: 11804020. DOI: 10.1007/s001980170022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ikeda S,
    2. Tsurukami H,
    3. Ito M,
    4. Sakai A,
    5. Sakata T,
    6. Nishida S,
    7. Takeda S,
    8. Shiraishi A and
    9. Nakamura T
    : Effect of trabecular bone contour on ultimate strength of lumbar vertebra after bilateral ovariectomy in rats. Bone 28(6): 625-633, 2001. PMID: 11425651. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00462-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Hildebrand T and
    2. Rüegsegger P
    : Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1(1): 15-23, 1997. PMID: 11264794. DOI: 10.1080/01495739708936692
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Stenström M,
    2. Olander B,
    3. Lehto-Axtelius D,
    4. Erik Madsen J,
    5. Nordsletten L and
    6. Alm Carlsson G
    : Bone mineral density and bone structure parameters as predictors of bone strength: an analysis using computerized microtomography and gastrectomy-induced osteopenia in the rat. J Biomech 33: 289-297, 2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00181-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Harash G,
    2. Richardson KC,
    3. Alshamy Z,
    4. Hünigen H,
    5. Hafez HM,
    6. Plendl J and
    7. Al Masri S
    : Basic morphometry, microcomputed tomography and mechanical evaluation of the tibiotarsal bone of a dual-purpose and a broiler chicken line. PLoS One 15(3): e0230070, 2020. PMID: 32160230. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Prodinger PM,
    2. Foehr P,
    3. Bürklein D,
    4. Bissinger O,
    5. Pilge H,
    6. Kreutzer K,
    7. von Eisenhart-Rothe R and
    8. Tischer T
    : Whole bone testing in small animals: systematic characterization of the mechanical properties of different rodent bones available for rat fracture models. Eur J Med Res 23(1): 8, 2018. PMID: 29444703. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-018-0307-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. de Mello-Sampayo C,
    2. Agripino AA,
    3. Stilwell D,
    4. Vidal B,
    5. Fernando AL,
    6. Silva-Lima B,
    7. Vaz MF,
    8. Canhão H and
    9. Marques MC
    : Chronic hyperglycemia modulates rat osteoporotic cortical bone microarchitecture into less fragile structures. Int J Endocrinol 2017: 4603247, 2017. PMID: 29081798. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4603247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhao Q,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Shen X,
    5. Qi J,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Qian N and
    8. Deng L
    : Bone selective protective effect of a novel bone-seeking estrogen on trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats. Calcif Tissue Int 93(2): 172-183, 2013. PMID: 23780350. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-013-9739-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Muhammad N,
    2. Luke DA,
    3. Shuid AN,
    4. Mohamed N and
    5. Soelaiman IN
    : Two different isomers of vitamin e prevent bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis rat model. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012: 161527, 2012. PMID: 23118785. DOI: 10.1155/2012/161527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Seeman E
    : Structural basis of growth-related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47 Suppl 4: iv2-iv8, 2008. PMID: 18556646. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken177
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Jiang GZ,
    2. Matsumoto H,
    3. Hori M,
    4. Gunji A,
    5. Hakozaki K,
    6. Akimoto Y and
    7. Fujii A
    : Correlation among geometric, densitometric, and mechanical properties in mandible and femur of osteoporotic rats. J Bone Miner Metab 26(2): 130-137, 2008. PMID: 18301968. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-007-0811-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Kikuchi M and
    2. Ishihara T
    : Study on thickness effect of three-point-bend specimen. JSME Int J A-Solid M 49(3): 411-417, 2006. DOI: 10.1299/jsmea.49.411
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. ↵
    1. Ritchie RO,
    2. Koester KJ,
    3. Ionova S,
    4. Yao W,
    5. Lane NE and
    6. Ager JW 3rd.
    : Measurement of the toughness of bone: a tutorial with special reference to small animal studies. Bone 43(5): 798-812, 2008. PMID: 18647665. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Jämsä T,
    2. Jalovaara P,
    3. Peng Z,
    4. Väänänen HK and
    5. Tuukkanen J
    : Comparison of three-point bending test and peripheral quantitative computed tomography analysis in the evaluation of the strength of mouse femur and tibia. Bone 23: 155-161, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00076-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Sieklucka B,
    2. Pawlak D,
    3. Domaniewski T,
    4. Hermanowicz J,
    5. Lipowicz P,
    6. Doroszko M and
    7. Pawlak K
    : Serum PTH, PTH1R/ATF4 pathway, and the sRANKL/OPG system in bone as a new link between bone growth, cross-sectional geometry, and strength in young rats with experimental chronic kidney disease. Cytokine 148: 155685, 2021. PMID: 34411988. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Hogan HA,
    2. Groves JA and
    3. Sampson HW
    : Long-term alcohol consumption in the rat affects femur cross-sectional geometry and bone tissue material properties. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23(11): 1825-1833, 1999. PMID: 10591600.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Zervas AS,
    2. Lelovas PP,
    3. Galanos A,
    4. Galanis D,
    5. Makropoulou M,
    6. Beteinakis S,
    7. Patsaki A,
    8. Passali C,
    9. Kourkoulis SK,
    10. Triantafyllou A,
    11. Chronopoulos E,
    12. Skaltsounis AL and
    13. Dontas IA
    : The effect of table olive wastewater extract administration on the adult ovariectomised rat model of osteoporosis. Br J Nutr 126(12): 1761-1770, 2021. PMID: 33550996. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521000465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Galanis D,
    2. Soultanis K,
    3. Lelovas P,
    4. Zervas A,
    5. Papadopoulos P,
    6. Galanos A,
    7. Argyropoulou K,
    8. Makropoulou M,
    9. Patsaki A,
    10. Passali C,
    11. Tsingotjidou A,
    12. Kourkoulis S,
    13. Mitakou S and
    14. Dontas I
    : Protective effect of Glycyrrhiza glabra roots extract on bone mineral density of ovariectomized rats. Biomedicine (Taipei) 9(2): 8, 2019. PMID: 31124454. DOI: 10.1051/bmdcn/2019090208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Yousefzadeh N,
    2. Kashfi K,
    3. Jeddi S and
    4. Ghasemi A
    : Ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis: a practical guide. EXCLI J 19: 89-107, 2020. PMID: 32038119. DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Rocabado JMR,
    2. Kaku M,
    3. Nozaki K,
    4. Ida T,
    5. Kitami M,
    6. Aoyagi Y and
    7. Uoshima K
    : Response to Letter to the Editor: Concerns on modeling postmenopausal osteoporosis in young female rats. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1): 451, 2019. PMID: 31852490. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1485-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Danielsen CC,
    2. Mosekilde L and
    3. Svenstrup B
    : Cortical bone mass, composition, and mechanical properties in female rats in relation to age, long-term ovariectomy, and estrogen substitution. Calcif Tissue Int 52(1): 26-33, 1993. PMID: 8453502. DOI: 10.1007/BF00675623
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Gajos-Michniewicz A,
    2. Pawlowska E,
    3. Ochedalski T and
    4. Piastowska-Ciesielska A
    : The influence of follistatin on mechanical properties of bone tissue in growing mice with overexpression of follistatin. J Bone Miner Metab 30(4): 426-433, 2012. PMID: 22311089. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-011-0347-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Puelker SM,
    2. Ribeiro de Castro SR,
    3. de Souza RR,
    4. Maifrino LBM,
    5. Nucci RAB and
    6. Sitta M do C
    : Age-related effects on right femoral bone of male Wistar rats: A morphometric and biomechanical study. J Health Allied Sci NU 12: 67-70, 2022. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730107
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. ↵
    1. Boskey AL and
    2. Coleman R
    : Aging and bone. J Dent Res 89(12): 1333-1348, 2010. PMID: 20924069. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510377791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Jones RC and
    2. Edgren RA
    : The effects of various steroids on the vaginal histology in the rat. Fertil Steril 24(4): 284-291, 1973. PMID: 4694503. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)39613-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Saleh N,
    2. Nassef NA,
    3. Shawky MK,
    4. Elshishiny MI and
    5. Saleh HA
    : Novel approach for pathogenesis of osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats as a model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Exp Gerontol 137: 110935, 2020. PMID: 32339647. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.110935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Fujita K,
    2. Norikura T,
    3. Matsui-Yuasa I,
    4. Kumazawa S,
    5. Honda S,
    6. Sonoda T and
    7. Kojima-Yuasa A
    : Carob pod polyphenols suppress the differentiation of adipocytes through posttranscriptional regulation of C/EBPβ. PLoS One 16(3): e0248073, 2021. PMID: 33684156. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Alzoubi KH,
    2. Alibbini S,
    3. Khabour OF,
    4. El-Elimat T,
    5. Al-Zubi M and
    6. Alali FQ
    : Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) prevents short-term memory deficit induced by chronic stress in rats. J Mol Neurosci 66(3): 314-321, 2018. PMID: 30218423. DOI: 10.1007/s12031-018-1161-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Hohman EE and
    2. Weaver CM
    : A grape-enriched diet increases bone calcium retention and cortical bone properties in ovariectomized rats. J Nutr 145(2): 253-259, 2015. PMID: 25644345. DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.198598
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. EPA US
    : Appendix A: Mammalian studies describing the effects of chemicals that disrupt the estrogen signaling pathways, 2013. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-01/documents/appendix_a_estrogen_7.1.pdf [Last accessed on October 27, 2022]
  89. ↵
    1. Howdeshell KL,
    2. Peterman PH,
    3. Judy BM,
    4. Taylor JA,
    5. Orazio CE,
    6. Ruhlen RL,
    7. Vom Saal FS and
    8. Welshons WV
    : Bisphenol A is released from used polycarbonate animal cages into water at room temperature. Environ Health Perspect 111(9): 1180-1187, 2003. PMID: 12842771. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 37 (1)
In Vivo
Vol. 37, Issue 1
January-February 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Ceratonia siliqua Supplement on Bone Mineral Density in Ovariectomy-induced Osteoporosis in Rats
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Ceratonia siliqua Supplement on Bone Mineral Density in Ovariectomy-induced Osteoporosis in Rats
ANNA AIKATERINI NERI, DIMITRIOS GALANIS, ANTONIS GALANOS, ANGELIKI EIRINI PEPE, KONSTANTINOS SOULTANIS, ALEXANDROS ZERVAS, SPYRIDON ZOITSIS, STAVROS K. KOURKOULIS, ERMIONI D. PASIOU, ARGYRO VONTZALIDOU, DIMITRIS MICHAILIDIS, SOFIA MITAKOU, EFSTATHIOS CHRONOPOULOS, GEORGIOS KARAMANOLIS, ISMENE A. DONTAS, THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo Jan 2023, 37 (1) 270-285; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13077

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
The Effect of Ceratonia siliqua Supplement on Bone Mineral Density in Ovariectomy-induced Osteoporosis in Rats
ANNA AIKATERINI NERI, DIMITRIOS GALANIS, ANTONIS GALANOS, ANGELIKI EIRINI PEPE, KONSTANTINOS SOULTANIS, ALEXANDROS ZERVAS, SPYRIDON ZOITSIS, STAVROS K. KOURKOULIS, ERMIONI D. PASIOU, ARGYRO VONTZALIDOU, DIMITRIS MICHAILIDIS, SOFIA MITAKOU, EFSTATHIOS CHRONOPOULOS, GEORGIOS KARAMANOLIS, ISMENE A. DONTAS, THEODORE KARATZAS
In Vivo Jan 2023, 37 (1) 270-285; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13077
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-apoptotic Effects of Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors Against Streptozocin-induced Diabetic Nephropathy
  • Nutritional Assessment of Pesticide-associated Metabolic Stress in Plant-based Diets
  • Temporal Progression of Tracheal Wound Healing After Partial-thickness Rat Injury Analyzed by Histology and qRT-PCR
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Ceratonia siliqua
  • osteoporosis
  • rat
  • bone mineral density
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire