Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Chasing Hippos: Implications of YAP1 and TAZ Expression in Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis

ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU, ANNA-MARIA KORAKITI, ALKISTIS-MARIA PAPATHEODORIDI, KLEONIKI APOSTOLIDOU, AFRODITI NONNI, ELENI ZOGRAFOS, GARYFALIA BLETSA, DIMITRIS TSAKOGIANNIS, MELETIOS-ATHANASIOS DIMOPOULOS and FLORA ZAGOURI
In Vivo November 2022, 36 (6) 2869-2874; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13027
ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA-MARIA KORAKITI
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tassoskyr@gmail.com
ALKISTIS-MARIA PAPATHEODORIDI
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KLEONIKI APOSTOLIDOU
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AFRODITI NONNI
2First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELENI ZOGRAFOS
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GARYFALIA BLETSA
3Hellenic Anticancer Institute, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIS TSAKOGIANNIS
3Hellenic Anticancer Institute, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MELETIOS-ATHANASIOS DIMOPOULOS
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FLORA ZAGOURI
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The Hippo pathway is a molecular pathway recently associated with tumorigenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is the most common malignancy diagnosed during gestation; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying PABC are largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate Hippo pathway transducers TAZ and YAP1 expression in PABC in relation to the clinicopathological characteristics of the disease. Patients and Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from 21 PABC patients treated at Alexandra Hospital in Athens, Greece, were analyzed with immunohistochemistry. Results: Strong nuclear TAZ/YAP1 stanning was found in 48% of the PABC patients analyzed. Hormone receptor negative patients had a statistically significant correlation with strong positive expression of TAZ/YAP1 co-transcription factors. No association was observed with overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion: The Hippo pathway is de-regulated in a subset of PABC patients, highlighting the complex molecular background of the disease, which certainly requires further investigation.

Key Words:
  • Hippo pathway
  • TAZ
  • YAP1
  • pregnancy-associated breast cancer

The Hippo signaling pathway was firstly identified in genetic studies of Drosophila melanogaster and classified as a major suppressor of tissue overgrowth (1, 2). The Hippo pathway maintains tissue homeostasis and regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by a well conserved kinase cascade, which cross-talks with several cellular signaling pathways (3, 4). The core component of the Hippo signaling mammalian Ste20-like kinase 1/2 (MST1/2) phosphorylates and thus activates large tumor suppressor 1/2 (LATS1/2), which further phosphorylates two transcriptional coactivators named yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) that comprise the main effectors of the Hippo pathway. YAP1 and TAZ are normally retained in the cytoplasm through binding to 14-3-3 proteins and ubiquitination followed by proteasomal degradation is the final cellular destination (4, 5). Deregulation of the Hippo pathway includes translocation of the key transducers TAZ and YAP1 to the nucleus in combination with the transcriptional enhanced associated domain (TEAD) transcription factors 1-4, thus demonstrating significant oncogenic function (5, 6). Multiple theories have evolved regarding Hippo signaling de-regulation and crosstalk with several pathways (e.g., Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, JNK) leading to carcinogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance (7, 8). Additionally, the Hippo signaling pathway has been extensively explored in various tumors including metastatic breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and male breast cancer (7, 9, 10). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating YAP1 and TAZ expression in pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC), a truly challenging situation with significantly increasing incidence rate.

PABC is generally defined as breast cancer diagnosed anytime during gestation, lactation, or within one year after delivery (11). Every year, 1 in 3,000-10,000 women is diagnosed with PABC, which represents the most frequently diagnosed pregnancy-related malignancy (12). As women tend to defer childbearing to a later age, PABC incidence is expected to increase substantially in the upcoming years. Additionally, the application of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in all pregnant women, aiming to detect fetal abnormalities, has unquestionably increased the identification of asymptomatic PABC patients (13, 14). The genomic profile of PABC has recently been addressed in a systematic review, but the underlying mechanisms of the disease still require further investigation in order to explain PABC aggressiveness; advanced T stage in diagnosis, nodal involvement, high histologic grade, negative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, and HER-2 over-expression (15, 16).

Toward this effort, the study of the Hippo pathway transducers TAZ and YAP1 in PABC aimed to further elucidate the oncogenic mechanism of PABC and to detect signal molecules that may serve as novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of anticancer drugs.

Patients and Methods

This cohort study of patients diagnosed with PABC was conducted at the Alexandra Hospital that is affiliated with the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece. All participants were required to sign the informed consent form according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, to have completed the 18th year of age, and to have attended the Breast Unit of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology or the Department of Clinical Therapeutics at Alexandra Hospital in Athens, Greece. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Alexandra Hospital (Protocol code: 908/15.11.2019; Date of approval: 15.11.2019).

Participants. By the time the written informed consent was granted, all medical records of women diagnosed with PABC in our Institution according to the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed for the period 2000-2019. Additionally, all women diagnosed with the disease from January 2020 until December 2020 were also prospectively included in our study. The following clinicopathological data regarding PABC, and the patients’ demographic characteristics were extracted from the medical files of each eligible patient; date of birth, gestational age at diagnosis, family cancer history, histopathologic evaluation (tumor size, stage, grade, lymph node status, hormone receptor and HER-2 expression), genetic testing, PABC treatment (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormonotherapy, radiotherapy), and follow-up data. Furthermore, for each patient enrolled in the study, a sample of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue was obtained from the Department of Pathology in Alexandra Hospital to evaluate Hippo pathway transducers expression.

Immunohistochemistry. TAZ and YAP1 transducers expression in PABC was detected on FFPE tissue using the rabbit anti-YAP and anti-TAZ antibodies, clone D24E4 of the ImmPress REAGENT KIT, UNIVERSAL, Anti-mouse/rabbit Ig, VECTOR, at the dilution 1:50 and according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Their expression was reported both in terms of percentage of tumor-expressing cells and staining intensity (0=absent, 1+=weak, 2+=moderate, 3+=strong). The topographic TAZ and YAP1 expression were evaluated in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of tumor cells, and in the main cellular components, namely endothelial cells, non-lymphocytic stromal cells, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS) that were morphologically identified (9). Nuclear staining, which demonstrated variable expression, was further classified as negative/weak positive or strong positive following the study by Rodríguez-Núñez et al.; tissue was given a score which resulted from multiplying the nuclear staining intensity from 0 (no staining) to 3 (strong staining) by the extension based on the percentage of positive cells (from 0-3). Thus, samples were grouped as negative or weak positive (scores 0-2), and strong positive (scores 3-9) (17).

Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study participants’ characteristics. The Pearson’s Chi-Squared and Fisher Exact Tests, when appropriate, for categorical variables were used to investigate the correlation among the immunohistochemical YAP1/TAZ expression and the clinicopathological characteristics. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. All the statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS v24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA, SPSS Statistics) software. p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics. Overall, 21 women diagnosed with PABC were enrolled in this study and screened for the expression of the Hippo signaling transducers TAZ and YAP1. Detailed data regarding the demographic variables and pregnancy characteristics of the patients including age, gestational age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and family cancer history are demonstrated in Table I. The age at diagnosis ranged from 28 to 42 years, with a mean age of 35.1 years (SD=3.83; range=28.0-42.0). Six patients (38%) were diagnosed with PABC within the first year after delivery, whereas 10 patients (63%) were diagnosed during pregnancy. Most of the participants reported a negative family cancer history (76%), whereas only 5 patients (24%) had a positive family history of lung, prostate, breast, or colorectal cancer among first degree relatives.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

No association was observed between YAP1/TAZ nuclear expression, the gestational age at diagnosis, and the family cancer history.

Histopathological characteristics. The histopathological features of the 21 PABC patients examined in this study are summarized in Table II. The most frequently diagnosed histopathological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (81%), whereas a few cases of invasive lobular (ILC) and metaplastic carcinoma were also identified. The vast majority of tumors were of high grade (81%) and the mean value of tumor size was 4.21 cm (SD=3.01; range=0.8-12.0 cm). In most cases analyzed, high levels of Ki-67 >20% were detected (75%). Only two women (10%) were diagnosed with primary metastatic PABC. Nineteen patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (90%). The majority had a diagnosis of stage II disease (52.4%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Histopathological characteristics.

The nuclear YAP1/TAZ staining was classified as negative/weak positive in 52% (11/21) and as strong positive in 48% (10/21) of the patients analyzed. As far as the expression of hormone receptors (HRs) is concerned, HR negative status was associated with strong nuclear expression of the Hippo pathway transducers TAZ and YAP1 in tumor cells (p-value=0.006). Furthermore, when evaluating separately the ER and the PR expression, a statistically significant correlation was identified solely among the PR negative status and the strong positive nuclear YAP1/TAZ expression (p-value=0.007). Representative patterns of TAZ and YAP1 immunohistochemical staining are illustrated in Figure 1. No significant association was observed with the histopathological type, tumor grade and size, HER-2 and Ki-67 expression, molecular subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B - HER-2 positive/negative, TNBC, HER-2 positive) and stage of the disease.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

TAZ and YAP1 immunohistochemical staining. A) No nuclear staining of the neoplastic cells (´200). B) Weak nuclear staining of some neoplastic cells (´200). C) YAP1/TAZ strong nuclear staining of the neoplastic cells (´50). D) YAP1/TAZ strong nuclear staining of the neoplastic cells (´200).

YAP1/TAZ nuclear expression and prognosis. We next investigated the impact of TAZ and YAP1 expression on the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rate of PABC patients. Follow-up data were retrieved from the medical files of 15 out of 21 PABC patients enrolled in this study; 2 deaths were recorded, and the remaining 13 patients demonstrated a mean OS rate of 172.348 months (Figure 2A, 95%CI=134.305-210.392). Furthermore, as far as progression-free disease is concerned, the following events were reported; local breast relapse was observed in four patients, liver and bone metastases developed in three patients, lung metastasis in two, and brain metastasis in a single patient. In total, 6 patients were characterized as metastatic; 2 primary metastatic PABC patients, one of which showed further signs of relapse with bone and lung metastases 5 months after the initial diagnosis, and 4 secondary metastatic patients. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate was not estimated as the cohort was too small to draw any conclusions. Additionally, the mean DFS rate was estimated to be 86.453 months (Figure 2B, 95%CI=54.283-118.622). Even though most patients characterized by strong positive nuclear YAP1/TAZ staining relapsed or passed away, no statistically significant correlation was identified with the OS and DFS rates.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B).

Discussion

PABC is the most common malignancy accompanying pregnancy (16). The distinct clinical and genetic data of PABC are not fully elucidated (15). Herein, we have conducted a translational study of Hippo pathway transducers in relation to the clinicopathological characteristics of PABC.

The Hippo pathway was found to be de-regulated in 10/21 cases (48%), implying that almost half of PABC patients may present with this abnormality. When we further studied the correlation between HR status and Hippo pathway activity, we observed a statistically significant result for HR negative patients and YAP1/TAZ strong nuclear positivity (p=0.006). This result was also prominent for PR negative cases (p=0.007). These findings are in accordance with previous publications showing that PABC are commonly tumors with low HR status (16, 18). Additionally, our data confer a possibly crucial molecular mechanism for the development of a subset of PABC cases, which are generally shown to have a complex genetic and molecular background (8, 15).

When we tested the histopathological type, tumor grade and size, HER-2 status and Ki-67 expression, molecular subtype, and stage of the disease, we did not find any statistically significant results. Possibly, these findings depict the molecular complexity of the disease (15, 19-21). Hippo signaling seems not to be present and meaningfully active in all PABC cases. Furthermore, Hippo signaling positivity did not have a statistically significant correlation with the gestational age at diagnosis of PABC during or after pregnancy. Here, it should be highlighted that our data show a higher percentage of patients being diagnosed during pregnancy than postpartum, as is published by others (16).

Our study did not reveal any correlations between OS, DFS, and Hippo pathway. Even though most patients with Hippo pathway de-regulation experienced relapse or died from the disease, no statistically significant correlations were found. However, a longer follow up may be needed to extract more accurate conclusions regarding these clinical parameters.

The characteristics of our study population are representative of PABC patients (16, 18). The majority harbor an aggressive disease with high Ki-67 levels, low HR status, and grade 3 tumors. Only 2 (9.5%) patients were primarily metastatic, 4 developed metastases at a later course of their disease, while 4 patients experienced local relapse. Stage II and III patients were the majority, in agreement with previous publications. Furthermore, luminal B and TNBC patients were most commonly found in our cohort, also in accordance with previous publications (16).

The present study had several limitations that need to be addressed. Meaningful information was not reported in 6 cases, thus decreasing the number of our patients with clinical data to 15 included cases and as a result, the statistical power was limited and anticipated associations were not observed. Even though our study is limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis and its small number of patients, it adds an important amount of clinical data regarding the clinical characteristics and outcome of PABC, as well as the significance of the Hippo pathway in the development of this rare disease.

Conclusion

To conclude, Hippo pathway signaling is de-regulated in a subset of PABC patients. We are the first to report that almost half of PABC patients had strong nuclear immune-positivity for YAP1/TAZ co-transcription factors, implying high activity and de-regulation of the Hippo pathway. HR negative tumors were associated with the Hippo pathway, depicting an important role of this molecular signaling in the development of these PABC tumors. PABC remains a rare tumor entity with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics, with the Hippo pathway playing a significant role in the molecular complexity of these tumors.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), grant number 7392/19.2.2019. The sponsors of the study were not involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos and Flora Zagouri; Data curation, Anna-Maria Korakiti, Alkistis-Maria Papatheodoridi, Eleni Zografos, Garyfalia Bletsa and Dimitris Tsakogiannis; Funding acquisition, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos and Flora Zagouri; Methodology, Alkistis-Maria Papatheodoridi, Kleoniki Apostolidou and Afroditi Nonni; Supervision, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos and Flora Zagouri; Validation, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Anna-Maria Korakiti and Flora Zagouri; Writing – original draft, Anastasios Kyriazoglou and Anna-Maria Korakiti; Writing – review & editing, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Anna-Maria Korakiti, Alkistis-Maria Papatheodoridi, Kleoniki Apostolidou, Afroditi Nonni, Eleni Zografos, Garyfalia Bletsa, Dimitris Tsakogiannis, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos and Flora Zagouri.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests: FZ has received honoraria for lectures and served in an advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. MAD has received honoraria from participation in advisory boards from Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. The remaining Authors (AK, AMK, MAP, KA, AN, EZ, GB, DT) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

  • Received August 31, 2022.
  • Revision received September 24, 2022.
  • Accepted September 28, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jia J,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Wang B,
    4. Trinko R and
    5. Jiang J
    : The Drosophila Ste20 family kinase dMST functions as a tumor suppressor by restricting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis. Genes Dev 17(20): 2514-2519, 2003. PMID: 14561774. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1134003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Pantalacci S,
    2. Tapon N and
    3. Léopold P
    : The Salvador partner Hippo promotes apoptosis and cell-cycle exit in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol 5(10): 921-927, 2003. PMID: 14502295. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Meng Z,
    2. Moroishi T and
    3. Guan KL
    : Mechanisms of Hippo pathway regulation. Genes Dev 30(1): 1-17, 2016. PMID: 26728553. DOI: 10.1101/gad.274027.115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Varelas X
    : The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development 141(8): 1614-1626, 2014. PMID: 24715453. DOI: 10.1242/dev.102376
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Moroishi T,
    2. Hansen CG and
    3. Guan KL
    : The emerging roles of YAP and TAZ in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15(2): 73-79, 2015. PMID: 25592648. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3876
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ehmer U and
    2. Sage J
    : Control of proliferation and cancer growth by the Hippo signaling pathway. Mol Cancer Res 14(2): 127-140, 2016. PMID: 26432795. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0305
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Wei C,
    2. Wang Y and
    3. Li X
    : The role of Hippo signal pathway in breast cancer metastasis. Onco Targets Ther 11: 2185-2193, 2018. PMID: 29713187. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S157058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kyriazoglou A,
    2. Liontos M,
    3. Zakopoulou R,
    4. Kaparelou M,
    5. Tsiara A,
    6. Papatheodoridi AM,
    7. Georgakopoulou R and
    8. Zagouri F
    : The role of the Hippo pathway in breast cancer carcinogenesis, prognosis, and treatment: a systematic review. Breast Care (Basel) 16(1): 6-15, 2021. PMID: 33716627. DOI: 10.1159/000507538
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Vici P,
    2. Ercolani C,
    3. Di Benedetto A,
    4. Pizzuti L,
    5. Di Lauro L,
    6. Sperati F,
    7. Terrenato I,
    8. Gamucci T,
    9. Natoli C,
    10. Di Filippo F,
    11. Botti C,
    12. Barba M,
    13. Mottolese M,
    14. De Maria R and
    15. Maugeri-Saccà M
    : Topographic expression of the Hippo transducers TAZ and YAP in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 35: 62, 2016. PMID: 27039292. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-016-0338-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Di Benedetto A,
    2. Mottolese M,
    3. Sperati F,
    4. Ercolani C,
    5. Di Lauro L,
    6. Pizzuti L,
    7. Vici P,
    8. Terrenato I,
    9. Sperduti I,
    10. Shaaban AM,
    11. Sundara-Rajan S,
    12. Barba M,
    13. Speirs V,
    14. De Maria R and
    15. Maugeri-Saccà M
    : The Hippo transducers TAZ/YAP and their target CTGF in male breast cancer. Oncotarget 7(28): 43188-43198, 2016. PMID: 27248471. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9668
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lee GE,
    2. Mayer EL and
    3. Partridge A
    : Prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163(3): 417-421, 2017. PMID: 28365832. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4224-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. de Haan J,
    2. Verheecke M,
    3. Van Calsteren K,
    4. Van Calster B,
    5. Shmakov RG,
    6. Mhallem Gziri M,
    7. Halaska MJ,
    8. Fruscio R,
    9. Lok CAR,
    10. Boere IA,
    11. Zola P,
    12. Ottevanger PB,
    13. de Groot CJM,
    14. Peccatori FA,
    15. Dahl Steffensen K,
    16. Cardonick EH,
    17. Polushkina E,
    18. Rob L,
    19. Ceppi L,
    20. Sukhikh GT,
    21. Han SN,
    22. Amant F and International Network on Cancer and Infertility Pregnancy (INCIP)
    : Oncological management and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of 1170 patients. Lancet Oncol 19(3): 337-346, 2018. PMID: 29395867. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30059-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Amant F,
    2. Verheecke M,
    3. Wlodarska I,
    4. Dehaspe L,
    5. Brady P,
    6. Brison N,
    7. Van Den Bogaert K,
    8. Dierickx D,
    9. Vandecaveye V,
    10. Tousseyn T,
    11. Moerman P,
    12. Vanderstichele A,
    13. Vergote I,
    14. Neven P,
    15. Berteloot P,
    16. Putseys K,
    17. Danneels L,
    18. Vandenberghe P,
    19. Legius E and
    20. Vermeesch JR
    : Presymptomatic identification of cancers in pregnant women during noninvasive prenatal testing. JAMA Oncol 1(6): 814-819, 2015. PMID: 26355862. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1883
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lenaerts L,
    2. Jatsenko T,
    3. Amant F and
    4. Robert Vermeesch J
    : Noninvasive prenatal testing and detection of occult maternal malignancies. Clin Chem 65(12): 1484-1486, 2019. PMID: 31604758. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.306548
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Korakiti AM,
    2. Moutafi M,
    3. Zografos E,
    4. Dimopoulos MA and
    5. Zagouri F
    : The genomic profile of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a systematic review. Front Oncol 10: 1773, 2020. PMID: 33014874. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01773
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Wang B,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Jiang Z,
    4. Zhao J,
    5. Mao Y,
    6. Liu J and
    7. Zhang J
    : Clinicopathological characteristics, diagnosis, and prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Thorac Cancer 10(5): 1060-1068, 2019. PMID: 30920126. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Núñez P,
    2. Romero-Pérez L,
    3. Amaral AT,
    4. Puerto-Camacho P,
    5. Jordán C,
    6. Marcilla D,
    7. Grünewald TG,
    8. Alonso J,
    9. de Alava E and
    10. Díaz-Martín J
    : Hippo pathway effectors YAP1/TAZ induce an EWS-FLI1-opposing gene signature and associate with disease progression in Ewing sarcoma. J Pathol 250(4): 374-386, 2020. PMID: 31880317. DOI: 10.1002/path.5379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Reed W,
    2. Sandstad B,
    3. Holm R and
    4. Nesland JM
    : The prognostic impact of hormone receptors and c-erbB-2 in pregnancy-associated breast cancer and their correlation with BRCA1 and cell cycle modulators. Int J Surg Pathol 11(2): 65-74, 2003. PMID: 12754622. DOI: 10.1177/106689690301100201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lehn S,
    2. Tobin NP,
    3. Sims AH,
    4. Stål O,
    5. Jirström K,
    6. Axelson H and
    7. Landberg G
    : Decreased expression of Yes-associated protein is associated with outcome in the luminal A breast cancer subgroup and with an impaired tamoxifen response. BMC Cancer 14: 119, 2014. PMID: 24559095. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Maugeri-Saccà M,
    2. Barba M,
    3. Pizzuti L,
    4. Vici P,
    5. Di Lauro L,
    6. Dattilo R,
    7. Vitale I,
    8. Bartucci M,
    9. Mottolese M and
    10. De Maria R
    : The Hippo transducers TAZ and YAP in breast cancer: oncogenic activities and clinical implications. Expert Rev Mol Med 17: e14, 2015. PMID: 26136233. DOI: 10.1017/erm.2015.12
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Díaz-Martín J,
    2. López-García MÁ,
    3. Romero-Pérez L,
    4. Atienza-Amores MR,
    5. Pecero ML,
    6. Castilla MÁ,
    7. Biscuola M,
    8. Santón A and
    9. Palacios J
    : Nuclear TAZ expression associates with the triple-negative phenotype in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 22(3): 443-454, 2015. PMID: 25870251. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-14-0456
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo: 36 (6)
In Vivo
Vol. 36, Issue 6
November-December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chasing Hippos: Implications of YAP1 and TAZ Expression in Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Chasing Hippos: Implications of YAP1 and TAZ Expression in Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis
ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU, ANNA-MARIA KORAKITI, ALKISTIS-MARIA PAPATHEODORIDI, KLEONIKI APOSTOLIDOU, AFRODITI NONNI, ELENI ZOGRAFOS, GARYFALIA BLETSA, DIMITRIS TSAKOGIANNIS, MELETIOS-ATHANASIOS DIMOPOULOS, FLORA ZAGOURI
In Vivo Nov 2022, 36 (6) 2869-2874; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Chasing Hippos: Implications of YAP1 and TAZ Expression in Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis
ANASTASIOS KYRIAZOGLOU, ANNA-MARIA KORAKITI, ALKISTIS-MARIA PAPATHEODORIDI, KLEONIKI APOSTOLIDOU, AFRODITI NONNI, ELENI ZOGRAFOS, GARYFALIA BLETSA, DIMITRIS TSAKOGIANNIS, MELETIOS-ATHANASIOS DIMOPOULOS, FLORA ZAGOURI
In Vivo Nov 2022, 36 (6) 2869-2874; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13027
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of the Setup Accuracy of a Skin-markerless Positioning Using Surface-guided Radiotherapy in Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
  • Conversion Surgery Performed Following Durvalumab Combined With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report
  • The Effectiveness of Live Birth Rate of Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention for Infertile Women Undergoing a Second Round of IVF Is Influenced by Age
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Hippo pathway
  • TAZ
  • YAP1
  • pregnancy-associated breast cancer
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire