Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prevalence and Determinants of Vaginal Infection With Human Papillomavirus Among Female University Students in Vietnam

NGUYEN VAN TRANG, KIESHA PREM, ZHENG QUAN TOH, BUI THI VIET HA, PHAM THI NGOC LAN, HAU PHUC TRAN, QUANG DUY PHAM, NGHIA VAN KHUU, MARK JIT, DUNG THI LUU, LE THI KHANH LY, VAN CAO, TAM-DUONG LE-HA, KATHRYN BRIGHT, SUZANNE M. GARLAND, DANG DUC ANH and KIM MULHOLLAND
In Vivo January 2022, 36 (1) 241-250; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12697
NGUYEN VAN TRANG
1National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIESHA PREM
2Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ZHENG QUAN TOH
3Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
4Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BUI THI VIET HA
5Department of Microbiology, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PHAM THI NGOC LAN
6Department of Natural Science, Vietnam National University of Hue, Hue, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HAU PHUC TRAN
7Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
QUANG DUY PHAM
7Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NGHIA VAN KHUU
7Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARK JIT
2Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K.;
8School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, P.R. China;
9Public Health England, Modelling and Economics Unit, London, U.K.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DUNG THI LUU
10National Institute for Control of Vaccines and Biologicals, Hanoi, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LE THI KHANH LY
1National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VAN CAO
7Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAM-DUONG LE-HA
7Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATHRYN BRIGHT
3Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUZANNE M. GARLAND
3Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
11Centre for Women’s Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
12Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANG DUC ANH
1National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dda@nihe.org.vn
KIM MULHOLLAND
2Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K.;
3Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
4Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kim.mulholland@mcri.edu.au
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy among women in Vietnam, but the country is yet to introduce a national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine programme targeted at adolescents. We determined HPV prevalence and HPV vaccine knowledge among female university students in Vietnam. Patients and Methods: We surveyed and screened 1,491 female university students in Hanoi, Hue, and Ho Chi Minh City for their sexual behaviours, HPV knowledge and low- and high-risk HPV infection. Results: The prevalence of any HPV infection and any high-risk HPV infection were 4.2% (95%CI=3.3%-5.4%) and 3.4% (95%CI=2.5%-4.4%), respectively. Being sexually active [adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 6.22; 95%CI=3.4-11.37] and having ever been pregnant (aPR: 4.82; 95%CI=1.93-12.04) were positively associated with high-risk HPV infection. Whilst 60% of participants had heard of HPV vaccine, only 4.6% had received the vaccine. Conclusion: The low HPV prevalence found in university students in Vietnam indicates that they can benefit from HPV vaccination, along with a well-designed HPV health promotion programme.

  • Human papillomavirus
  • female
  • prevalence
  • university students
  • Vietnam

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections around the world (1). It is the cause of several types of anogenital cancers and oropharyngeal cancer, of which the most common is cervical cancer. The majority of HPV infections (80%) are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously. For those women with persistent infections with high-risk (hr) or oncogenic HPV genotypes, a proportion may later develop cervical abnormalities of high-grade cervical dysplasias which are precursors to cancer (2-5).

To date, three licensed prophylactic HPV vaccines are available, all of which target HPV16 and 18 which are responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases globally. The nonavalent HPV vaccine also protects against an additional five common cancer-causing HPV types (HPV31, 33, 45, 52 and 58) responsible for another 20% of cervical cancer cases worldwide (6). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all countries vaccinate at least 90% of females aged 9-14 years against HPV. This is a key component of the 2030 goal of 90%, 70% and 90% for vaccination, screening and treatment respectively to establish the basis for the global elimination of cervical cancer as a public health matter (7-11). Although cervical screening with high precision tests at 35 and 45 years of age has been successful in detecting hrHPV types predicting underlying cancer precursors, such secondary prevention has several challenges, including difficulties in implementing these procedures at high coverage levels in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where appropriate infrastructure may be lacking (7, 12).

Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy among women in Vietnam (13, 14). However, the country has not yet introduced a national HPV vaccination programme, even though HPV vaccination of young adolescent females has been shown to be cost-effective in Vietnam (15). Young women who have recently become sexually active are at high risk of acquiring HPV infection (16). Low HPV vaccination rates among young girls (9-18 years old) predisposes them to HPV infection as they reach sexual maturity (4, 11, 17, 18). In this cross-sectional study, we measured the HPV infection rates and the risk factors for HPV infection, as well as HPV disease and HPV vaccination knowledge among female university students from three universities in Hanoi, Hue and Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam.

Patients and Methods

Participants. Cross-sectional surveys of HPV genoprevalence, risk factors and knowledge among university students were conducted from November 2017 to March 2019 in three major Vietnamese cities: Hanoi in northern Vietnam, Hue in central Vietnam, and HCMC in southern Vietnam. Most undergraduate students in Vietnam take 4-5-year degree courses with the university calendar starting in September and ending in June of the following year. The majority of students start university at 18 years of age. Participants in this study were first- and fourth-year university students from selected universities in Hanoi, Hue and HCMC. Recruitment began in Hanoi (November 2017), continued in Hue (December 2017), and ended in HCMC (December 2018–March 2019). Students from all departments in the universities were recruited; the departments were then categorized into social and natural science. Although universities in Hanoi and Hue have both departments, the university in HCMC only has the department of natural science. Participants were recruited via social media platforms such as Facebook, Zalo and Instagram, as well as through the student union. Participants were recruited on a first-come-first-serve basis while ensuring the number of students from the first year and fourth year were roughly equal. A total of 1,500 female students were determined eligible and provided consent to participate in this study. Based on an estimated HPV prevalence of 4-20% among girls aged 18-24 years in Vietnam, a total of 245 participants/group/site is needed to achieve 80% power. Thus, we aimed to recruit 500 participants from year 1 and year 4 from each university.

Outcome assessments. In a private room at each university, students received instructions by trained medical staff on self-collection of vaginal samples for HPV screening. After sampling, the students were invited to complete a questionnaire lasting approximately 20 min. A trained interviewer asked the participants basic questions about their demographic attributes, sexual behaviours, HPV vaccination status, medical history and knowledge of HPV and its prevention. Participants were given the option to complete questions on their sexual behaviour by themselves. Any participants found to be positive for HPV16/18 were referred to further gynaecological examination and management.

HPV detection and genotyping test. HPV detection and genotyping were performed in two steps. Firstly, nucleic acid extraction was performed using Cador pathogen 96 Qiacube HT kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) on an automated platform, followed by amplification with PGMY9/11 system by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (19). Next, the positive samples by PCR were subjected to genotyping by Geneflow HPV array test kit (Diagcor, Hong Kong), which allows detection and identification of 33 HPV types [14 high-risk (hr), three probable high-risk and 16 low-risk types]. The kit was in-vitro diagnostic and qualified annually by WHO for hrHPV detection and classification.

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and beta-globulin genes were used as internal controls for the PGMY9/11 PCR and Geneflow kit, respectively. The HLA primer pair are directed against the common site of all HLA types. Samples that were negative for the HLA gene were considered invalid, and the participants were asked to return for a new sample collection. Method validation was done on a panel of 40 previously tested samples prior to the screening test. External quality control was also performed by the Western Pacific WHO reference laboratory for HPV at the Royal Women’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Australia. We found ~90% agreement for hrHPV between laboratories for all samples; some discordant/missed results were found for certain tested hrHPV genotypes: 4/20 for HPV16, 1/12 for HPV18, 1/4 for HPV31, 2/12 for HPV39, 2/7 for HPV45, 3/9 for HPV56, 2/17 for HPV58, 3/16 for HPV 66.

Statistical analysis. Thirty-three HPV genotypes were analysed including (i) high-risk: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66/68; or (ii) low-risk: 6, 11, 26, 40, 42, 43, 44, 53, 54, 55, 57, 61, 70, 71, 72, 73, 81, 82. We calculated the prevalence of any, high-risk, and low-risk HPV infections. To compare the socio-demographic, behavioural, and knowledge variables, we employed a Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test) for categorical variables, and Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate. We explored the bivariate relationship between HPV infection and possible explanatory variables such as college field, year of study, and city. A multivariable modified Cox regression was performed to determine risk factors—participants’ socio-demographics, sexual behaviours, medical history, HPV knowledge—that were correlated with high-risk HPV infection at time of screening. Initially, variables with a significance level of p<0.10 in the bivariate modified Cox regression were included in the multivariable model. A likelihood ratio test was then used to compare the goodness of fit of the nested models. We obtained adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for all comparisons and presented them with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All data analyses were conducted in R.

Ethics approval and consent to participate. Institutional Review Boards of the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Vietnam (reference number: IRB-VN01057-13/2017) and the ethics board of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (reference number: 14207) approved this study. To protect the confidentiality and privacy of the study participants, we replaced personal identifiers from any documents with barcodes and collected data and samples from the participants in private places. Eligible participants were informed of the nature of the study including the risks and benefits they may expect, and the way their data would be used. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Test results were communicated with the participants when available. Any participants found to be positive for HPV16/18 were referred to further gynaecological examination and management.

Results

Participant’s characteristics. A total of 1,500 participants were recruited, with no refusal. Nine students (eight in Hanoi and one in Hue) did not provide sufficient samples (negative for HLA gene), thus their data were excluded from all analyses. The demographic characteristics of the 1,491 female student participants across the three cities — Hanoi, Hue and HCMC — are summarised in Table I. The mean age of female university students across the three Vietnamese cities was 19.8 years (range=18-26 years). Of the 1,491 students screened, HPV DNA was detected in 63 students: a prevalence of 4.2% (95%CI=3.3%-5.4%). The prevalence of any hrHPV infection among the study population was 3.4% (95%CI=2.5%-4.4%) (Table I). The HPV prevalence by University departments, year level and cities are shown in Figure 1. There was little difference between the prevalence of any HPV and any hrHPV infection in Hanoi and Hue, where similar proportions of students studying natural and social sciences were recruited (Table I). Low HPV prevalence (1.2%) was found for the university in HCMC, where there were only students from the Natural Science Department (Figure 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Participants’ demographic and behavioural characteristics by city in Vietnam.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Prevalence of HPV infection among female university students in Hanoi, Hue, and Ho Chi Minh City by college field, year of study, and city. Natural science major/first year (black) and social science major/fourth year (grey) students in the upper and middle panel, respectively; and north Vietnam, Hanoi (red), central Vietnam, Hue (grey) and south Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh (blue) in the lower panel. The high-risk (hr) HPV types include 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66/68 and the low-risk (lr) HPV types include 6, 11, 40, 42, 43, 44, 26, 54, 61, 63, 73, 84, 81, 55. The exact binomial method was used to estimate 95% confidence interval (CI) of HPV infection, depicted by error bars. *In x-axis indicates significant differences (p<0.05) between natural science and social science students, and first- and fourth-year students.

HPV genotype distribution. Twelve high-risk HPV types were found in our cohort (Figure 2); HPV31 and 33 were not detected. HPV52 represents the most common HPV type detected (31.8% of positive samples), followed by HPV39 (17.5%), representing a prevalence of 1.34% (20/1491) and 0.74% (11/1491) for HPV52 and HPV39 respectively. Among the low-risk HPV types, HPV81 was the dominant type, accounting for 20.6% of positive samples (prevalence 0.87%). Multiple HPV types were found in 33 (52%) of the positive samples. Mixed hrHPV and lrHPV infection were found in 25 of them with as many as five types found in some samples. Thirty-seven students (15 in Hanoi, 15 in Hue and seven in HCMC) who reported never having had sex were positive with HPV. Among these, 10 individuals were infected with only low-risk types, and 27 individuals were infected with hrHPV including multiple infections with HPV16, HPV39, HPV52 and HPV56 being the most commonly detected in up to 8 individuals. One individual was co-infected with HPV18, HPV39 and HPV58. No abnormal cytology was found in students who were infected with HPV16 or HPV18. Sixty-eight (4.6%) students who had HPV vaccine were not infected with HPV.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

HPV genotype distribution among samples positives with high- (A) and low risk HPV types (B).

Risk factors for HPV infection. Being older was associated with higher prevalence of HPV infection (p=0.029) (Table II), including hrHPV infections (adjusted prevalence ratio, aPR=1.92, 95%CI=1.07-3.45, p=0.03). Acquiring HPV infection was more likely to be associated with students from the social sciences discipline (aPR, 2.16, 95%CI=1.09-4.27 when compared to age-matched natural science students) and those who have had sex (aPR, 6.22; 95%CI=3.4-11.37) (Table II). Having ever been pregnant was also positively associated with HPV infection (aPR, 4.82; 95%CI=1.93-12.04) (Table II). Knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer. More than half of the study participants had heard about HPV and HPV vaccination (73.6% and 61.5%, respectively), but less than 5% of participants were vaccinated (Figure 3). Final year students had higher HPV knowledge (81.0%) than first-year students (59.2%). However, the majority of students were not aware that HPV causes anogenital cancers and anogenital warts other than cervical cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlations of factors associated with high-risk HPV Infection.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

HPV and cervical cancer knowledge among female university students in Hanoi, Hue, and Ho Chi Minh City, 2017–2019.

Discussion

In the largest HPV prevalence study among young female university students aged 18-26 years old in Vietnam, we found a low prevalence of any HPV infection, including hrHPV, in Hanoi, Hue, and HCMC. This finding contrasts with studies in other countries. For example, Oh et al. found a higher prevalence of HPV infection (17.5%) among South Korean students aged 17 to 26 years (20). Among the identified HPV types, they reported HPV16, 18 and 35 were the most common and HPV infection was associated with sexual debut, new sexual partners, and smoking (20). Studies in the United States have reported HPV prevalence rates of 19.7% to 44.8% among female university students, depending on their age (11, 21). In the study by Forhan et al., among 838 American women aged 14 to 19 years, the HPV-positive rate was 18.3% (22). In Brazil, Vieira et al. found that 25.3% of students aged 25 years old were infected with HPV (23). In Greece, HPV prevalence of 40-70% were observed among young women aged 18-26 years from outpatient clinics during 2011-2016 with HPV16 and 31 being the most common genotypes (24). According to Institute Catala d’Oncologia, the median age of Vietnamese women at first sexual intercourse ranged from 21.0 to 21.5 years old, corresponding to third or final year in university (25). The low HPV prevalence observed in our study population could be attributed to the low sexual activity/initiation in this age group in comparison to other populations in the studies mentioned above in Korea (21%), Brazil (>75%), USA (61.4%-73.2%). Given the low prevalence of HPV infection among female university students in Vietnam observed in our study, HPV vaccination will protect them from acquiring oncogenic HPV genotypes, particularly HPV16 and 18. We found the prevalence of hrHPV infections was not different in the three Vietnamese cities. However, hrHPV infections were more prevalent among students from the Social Sciences Department in Hanoi and Hue when compared to the Natural Sciences Department in all three cities. One potential factor of the difference in HPV prevalence between the departments may be a reflection of differences in sexual behaviour in social science students in our cohort compared to natural science students.

While most participants know about cervical cancer and more than half had heard about HPV vaccines, only 4.6% of the cohort had been vaccinated. High vaccine costs, accessibility and lack of knowledge regarding HPV and the benefits of the vaccine are likely to be the main barriers to HPV vaccine uptake in Vietnam (26, 27). A 2016 study of 932 college students by Kamimura et al. (495 in Vietnam and 437 in the United States) found that Vietnamese participants had lower levels of knowledge about HPV, more barriers to HPV vaccination (i.e., costs and stigma associated with HPV vaccination) and higher levels of risk denial compared to United States participants. In that study, the percentage of Vietnamese participants who were vaccinated with HPV (7.5%) was much lower than the participants from the United States (42%) (26). There is a need to improve access to HPV vaccine and sexual health education, including benefits of HPV vaccination in this population.

The dominant HPV52 genotype in our study is similar to previous studies in Vietnam and other parts of Asia for example Japan (28, 29). HPV58 and 59, which were the common genotypes in other studies in Vietnam, represented 8% and 4% respectively among the hrHPV genotypes in our study (28). It is important to note that HPV52 and 58 are responsible for a significant proportion of cervical cancer in Asia. We identified HPV 39 and 66/68 the second and third most common hrHPV genotypes in our cohort. HPV39 has been found to be one of the most prevalent HPV genotypes in women in rural areas in Bolivia, Nepal and China (30-32), while HPV 66 was found to be prevalent in Korea, Brazil and Mexico (33-35). Notably, these genotypes except HPV52 and 58 are not present in all licensed HPV vaccines. This finding warrants ongoing surveillance of HPV disease caused by these HPV types, which may be important for future HPV vaccine development.

Effective primary and secondary preventions – HPV vaccination and cytology screening – have shown promise in eliminating cervical cancer (26, 36, 37). Early vaccine impact on anogenital warts is demonstrated in some high-income settings where vaccination was introduced in young adolescents (8, 38, 39). The risk of cervical cancer remains high in many LMICs such as Vietnam because of the absence of routine HPV vaccination and effective cervical screening programmes (28, 29). Most LMICs are challenged with financial and logistic constraints, such as the availability of healthcare infrastructure to implement cervical screening at high coverage (7, 8), high costs of HPV vaccine, the ability to acquire adequate vaccine supplies, and the feasibility of reaching high coverage when vaccinating individuals outside infant vaccination schedules.

Our study demonstrated the feasibility of self-swab in HPV screening in Vietnam. More than 98% of samples from each site were valid for further HPV screening, indicated by the presence of HLA internal control. This collection method would facilitate the HPV screening nationwide allowing for HPV screening with high precision assays, an important component of the HPV related cancer reduction program.

The challenges of a multi-site study include logistical and personnel coordination as well as the standardisation of all study procedures including laboratory testing across different sites. These were mostly overcome by regular meetings between the study groups, rigourous study procedures and well-considered study design. Nevertheless, our study has several limitations. First, our study is based around university students in Hanoi, Hue and HCMC and may not be generalizable to out-of-school females and the whole of Vietnam. Second, no social science students were recruited from HCMC, and this led to potential bias in estimating sexual behaviours and HPV prevalence among female students across the three study cities. Third, culturally, female student participants may under-report socially undesirable behaviours such as their sexual activities, as indicated by the presence of HPV in individuals who reported never having had sexual activity. Last, our recruitment method was calling for volunteers to participate which may have led to participant bias.

Conclusion

In this cross-sectional, multi-site study in Vietnam, we identified a low HPV prevalence rate and low HPV vaccination coverage among female university students. Our study highlighted the potential benefit of a national HPV vaccination program and the need for a health promotion program addressing HPV knowledge in rolling out a vaccine program for young females in Vietnam.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the study participants and staff of the Vietnam National University in Hanoi, Hue and in Ho Chi Minh City for their involvement with this study. This work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC), and Vietnamese Ministry of Science and Technology as part of the UK-Vietnam Research Collaboration (Newton Fund), project number HNQT/SPDP/03.16.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to the study.

  • ↵# Equal corresponding Authors.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    KM and NVT conceptualised the study. KM, NVT, SMG, DDA, QDP and HPT contributed to study design. QDP, BTVH, KVN and PTNL were involved in data collection. DTL, LTKL, VC and TDLH screened and genotyped the samples in the laboratory. KP, MJ, MB, KB, QDP, and NVT contributed to statistical analysis and made the figures. KP, ZQT and NVT did the literature review. KP, NVT and MJ wrote the initial draft. All Authors contributed to data interpretation, critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have declared no competing interest.

  • Received August 16, 2021.
  • Revision received September 20, 2021.
  • Accepted October 1, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Crosbie EJ,
    2. Einstein MH,
    3. Franceschi S and
    4. Kitchener HC
    : Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 382(9895): 889-899, 2013. PMID: 23618600. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60022-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Moscicki AB,
    2. Palefsky J,
    3. Smith G,
    4. Siboshski S and
    5. Schoolnik G
    : Variability of human papillomavirus DNA testing in a longitudinal cohort of young women. Obstet Gynecol 82(4 Pt 1): 578-585, 1993. PMID: 8397358.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hildesheim A,
    2. Schiffman MH,
    3. Gravitt PE,
    4. Glass AG,
    5. Greer CE,
    6. Zhang T,
    7. Scott DR,
    8. Rush BB,
    9. Lawler P and
    10. Sherman ME
    : Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women. J Infect Dis 169(2): 235-240, 1994. PMID: 8106758. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/169.2.235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Richardson H,
    2. Kelsall G,
    3. Tellier P,
    4. Voyer H,
    5. Abrahamowicz M,
    6. Ferenczy A,
    7. Coutlée F and
    8. Franco EL
    : The natural history of type-specific human papillomavirus infections in female university students. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(6): 485-490, 2003. PMID: 12814991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Sycuro LK,
    2. Xi LF,
    3. Hughes JP,
    4. Feng Q,
    5. Winer RL,
    6. Lee SK,
    7. O’Reilly S,
    8. Kiviat NB and
    9. Koutsky LA
    : Persistence of genital human papillomavirus infection in a long-term follow-up study of female university students. J Infect Dis 198(7): 971-978, 2008. PMID: 18694334. DOI: 10.1086/591625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. de Sanjose S,
    2. Quint WG,
    3. Alemany L,
    4. Geraets DT,
    5. Klaustermeier JE,
    6. Lloveras B,
    7. Tous S,
    8. Felix A,
    9. Bravo LE,
    10. Shin HR,
    11. Vallejos CS,
    12. de Ruiz PA,
    13. Lima MA,
    14. Guimera N,
    15. Clavero O,
    16. Alejo M,
    17. Llombart-Bosch A,
    18. Cheng-Yang C,
    19. Tatti SA,
    20. Kasamatsu E,
    21. Iljazovic E,
    22. Odida M,
    23. Prado R,
    24. Seoud M,
    25. Grce M,
    26. Usubutun A,
    27. Jain A,
    28. Suarez GA,
    29. Lombardi LE,
    30. Banjo A,
    31. Menéndez C,
    32. Domingo EJ,
    33. Velasco J,
    34. Nessa A,
    35. Chichareon SC,
    36. Qiao YL,
    37. Lerma E,
    38. Garland SM,
    39. Sasagawa T,
    40. Ferrera A,
    41. Hammouda D,
    42. Mariani L,
    43. Pelayo A,
    44. Steiner I,
    45. Oliva E,
    46. Meijer CJ,
    47. Al-Jassar WF,
    48. Cruz E,
    49. Wright TC,
    50. Puras A,
    51. Llave CL,
    52. Tzardi M,
    53. Agorastos T,
    54. Garcia-Barriola V,
    55. Clavel C,
    56. Ordi J,
    57. Andújar M,
    58. Castellsagué X,
    59. Sánchez GI,
    60. Nowakowski AM,
    61. Bornstein J,
    62. Muñoz N,
    63. Bosch FX and Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group
    : Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 11(11): 1048-1056, 2010. PMID: 20952254. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cuzick J,
    2. Arbyn M,
    3. Sankaranarayanan R,
    4. Tsu V,
    5. Ronco G,
    6. Mayrand MH,
    7. Dillner J and
    8. Meijer CJ
    : Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine 26(Suppl 10): K29-K41, 2008. PMID: 18847555. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Simms KT,
    2. Steinberg J,
    3. Caruana M,
    4. Smith MA,
    5. Lew JB,
    6. Soerjomataram I,
    7. Castle PE,
    8. Bray F and
    9. Canfell K
    : Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol 20(3): 394-407, 2019. PMID: 30795950. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30836-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Human papillomavirus vaccines
    : WHO position paper, October 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 89(43): 465-491, 2014. PMID: 25346960.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. World Health Organization
    : Who leads the way towards the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health concern. World Health Organization, 2018.
  8. ↵
    1. Winer RL,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Hughes JP,
    4. Adam DE,
    5. Kiviat NB and
    6. Koutsky LA
    : Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Am J Epidemiol 157(3): 218-226, 2003. PMID: 12543621. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ferrera A,
    2. Tábora N,
    3. Flores Y,
    4. Zelaya A,
    5. Massuger L and
    6. Melchers WJ
    : Assessment of HPV infection among female university students in Honduras via Roche linear array. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113(2): 96-99, 2011. PMID: 21345434. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Bray F,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Soerjomataram I,
    4. Siegel RL,
    5. Torre LA and
    6. Jemal A
    : Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6): 394-424, 2018. PMID: 30207593. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Nguyen TP,
    2. Luu HN,
    3. Nguyen MVT,
    4. Tran MT,
    5. Tuong TTV,
    6. Tran CTD and
    7. Boffetta P
    : Attributable causes of cancer in Vietnam. JCO Glob Oncol 6: 195-204, 2020. PMID: 32045545. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.19.00239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Van Minh H,
    2. My NTT and
    3. Jit M
    : Cervical cancer treatment costs and cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in Vietnam: a PRIME modeling study. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1): 353, 2017. PMID: 28506297. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2297-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Houlihan CF,
    2. Baisley K,
    3. Bravo IG,
    4. Kapiga S,
    5. de Sanjosé S,
    6. Changalucha J,
    7. Ross DA,
    8. Hayes RJ and
    9. Watson-Jones D
    : Rapid acquisition of HPV around the time of sexual debut in adolescent girls in Tanzania. Int J Epidemiol 45(3): 762-773, 2016. PMID: 26944311. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Woodman CB,
    2. Collins S,
    3. Winter H,
    4. Bailey A,
    5. Ellis J,
    6. Prior P,
    7. Yates M,
    8. Rollason TP and
    9. Young LS
    : Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 357(9271): 1831-1836, 2001. PMID: 11410191. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04956-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Franceschi S,
    2. Herrero R,
    3. Clifford GM,
    4. Snijders PJ,
    5. Arslan A,
    6. Anh PT,
    7. Bosch FX,
    8. Ferreccio C,
    9. Hieu NT,
    10. Lazcano-Ponce E,
    11. Matos E,
    12. Molano M,
    13. Qiao YL,
    14. Rajkumar R,
    15. Ronco G,
    16. de Sanjosé S,
    17. Shin HR,
    18. Sukvirach S,
    19. Thomas JO,
    20. Meijer CJ and
    21. Muñoz N
    : Variations in the age-specific curves of human papillomavirus prevalence in women worldwide. Int J Cancer 119(11): 2677-2684, 2006. PMID: 16991121. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22241
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    : Human papillomavirus laboratory manual. 1st edn. World Health Organization, 2010. Available at: https://www.who.int/immunization/hpv/learn/hpv_laboratory_manual__who_ivb_2009_2010.pdf [Last accessed on October 1, 2021]
  17. ↵
    1. Oh JK,
    2. Ju YH,
    3. Franceschi S,
    4. Quint W and
    5. Shin HR
    : Acquisition of new infection and clearance of type-specific human papillomavirus infections in female students in Busan, South Korea: a follow-up study. BMC Infect Dis 8: 13, 2008. PMID: 18234114. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Liddon NC,
    2. Leichliter JS and
    3. Markowitz LE
    : Human papillomavirus vaccine and sexual behavior among adolescent and young women. Am J Prev Med 42(1): 44-52, 2012. PMID: 22176845. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Forhan SE,
    2. Gottlieb SL,
    3. Sternberg MR,
    4. Xu F,
    5. Datta SD,
    6. McQuillan GM,
    7. Berman SM and
    8. Markowitz LE
    : Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among female adolescents aged 14 to 19 in the United States. Pediatrics 124(6): 1505-1512, 2009. PMID: 19933728. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Vieira RC,
    2. Monteiro Jdo S,
    3. Manso EP,
    4. Dos Santos MR,
    5. Tsutsumi MY,
    6. Ishikawa EA,
    7. Ferrari SF,
    8. Lima KV and
    9. de Sousa MS
    : Prevalence of type-specific HPV among female university students from northern Brazil. Infect Agent Cancer 10: 21, 2015. PMID: 26203300. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-015-0017-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Argyri E,
    2. Tsimplaki E,
    3. Papatheodorou D,
    4. Daskalopoulou D and
    5. Panotopoulou E
    : Recent trends in HPV infection and type distribution in Greece. Anticancer Res 38(5): 3079-3084, 2018. PMID: 29715143. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12565
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Bruni L,
    2. Albero G,
    3. Serrano B,
    4. Mena M,
    5. Gomez D,
    6. Munoz J,
    7. Bosch FX and
    8. de Sanjose S
    : Ico/iarc information center on hpv and cancer. Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Vietnam. Summary report 17 june 2019. HPV information center, 2019. Available at: https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/VNM.pdf?t=1633079905688 [Last accessed on October 1, 2021]
  23. ↵
    1. Kamimura A,
    2. Trinh HN,
    3. Weaver S,
    4. Chernenko A,
    5. Wright L,
    6. Stoddard M,
    7. Nourian MM and
    8. Nguyen H
    : Knowledge and beliefs about HPV among college students in Vietnam and the United States. J Infect Public Health 11(1): 120-125, 2018. PMID: 28668657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Tran BX,
    2. Than PTQ,
    3. Doan TTN,
    4. Nguyen HLT,
    5. Thi Mai H,
    6. Nguyen THT,
    7. Le HT,
    8. Latkin CA,
    9. Zhang MW and
    10. Ho RC
    : Knowledge, attitude, and practice on and willingness to pay for human papillomavirus vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Hanoi, Vietnam. Patient Prefer Adherence 12: 945-954, 2018. PMID: 29881260. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S165357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Van SN,
    2. Khac MN,
    3. Dimberg J,
    4. Matussek A and
    5. Henningsson AJ
    : Prevalence of cervical infection and genotype distribution of human papilloma virus among females in Da Nang, Vietnam. Anticancer Res 37(3): 1243-1247, 2017. PMID: 28314288. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11440
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Imai H,
    2. Nakao H,
    3. Shinohara H,
    4. Watarai M,
    5. Matsumoto N,
    6. Yamagishi T,
    7. Saito M and
    8. Kitamura T
    : Prevalence, potential predictors, and genotype-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus infection among sexually active students in Japan. PLoS One 10(7): e0132462, 2015. PMID: 26176861. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Patzi-Churqui M,
    2. Terrazas-Aranda K,
    3. Liljeqvist JÅ,
    4. Lindh M and
    5. Eriksson K
    : Prevalence of viral sexually transmitted infections and HPV high-risk genotypes in women in rural communities in the Department of La Paz, Bolivia. BMC Infect Dis 20(1): 204, 2020. PMID: 32143643. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4931-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thapa N,
    2. Maharjan M,
    3. Shrestha G,
    4. Maharjan N,
    5. Petrini MA,
    6. Zuo N,
    7. He C,
    8. Yang J,
    9. Xu M,
    10. Ge C,
    11. Song Z and
    12. Cai H
    : Prevalence and type-specific distribution of human papillomavirus infection among women in mid-western rural, Nepal-A population-based study. BMC Infect Dis 18(1): 338, 2018. PMID: 30029626. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3175-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Baloch Z,
    2. Yasmeen N,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Ma K,
    5. Wu X,
    6. Yang SH and
    7. Xia X
    : Prevalence and risk factors for human papillomavirus infection among Chinese ethnic women in southern of Yunnan, China. Braz J Infect Dis 21(3): 325-332, 2017. PMID: 28284657. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.01.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Park E,
    2. Kim JY,
    3. Choi S,
    4. Kim DS and
    5. Oh YL
    : Carcinogenic risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and potential effects of HPV vaccines in Korea. Sci Rep 9(1): 12556, 2019. PMID: 31467383. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49060-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Batista JE,
    2. Saddi VA,
    3. Carvalho KPA,
    4. Ribeiro AA,
    5. Segati KD,
    6. Carneiro MADS,
    7. Monteiro SG,
    8. Nascimento MDDSB and
    9. Rabelo-Santos SH
    : Human papillomavirus genotypes 68 and 58 are the most prevalent genotypes in women from quilombo communities in the state of Maranhão, Brazil. Int J Infect Dis 55: 51-55, 2017. PMID: 28088590. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Juárez-González K,
    2. Paredes-Cervantes V,
    3. Gordillo-Rodríguez S,
    4. González-Guzmán S,
    5. Moncayo-Valencia X,
    6. Méndez-Martínez R,
    7. García-Carrancá A,
    8. Martínez-Ezquerro JD,
    9. Rivas-Ruiz R,
    10. Sánchez-Suárez P,
    11. Álvarez-Sandoval P,
    12. Padilla-Arrieta P,
    13. Martínez-Salazar M and
    14. Vázquez-Vega S
    : High prevalence of human papillomavirus type 66 in low-grade cervical lesions of Mexican women. Arch Virol 165(11): 2633-2640, 2020. PMID: 32812092. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-020-04771-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Clifford GM,
    2. Gallus S,
    3. Herrero R,
    4. Muñoz N,
    5. Snijders PJ,
    6. Vaccarella S,
    7. Anh PT,
    8. Ferreccio C,
    9. Hieu NT,
    10. Matos E,
    11. Molano M,
    12. Rajkumar R,
    13. Ronco G,
    14. de Sanjosé S,
    15. Shin HR,
    16. Sukvirach S,
    17. Thomas JO,
    18. Tunsakul S,
    19. Meijer CJ,
    20. Franceschi S and IARC HPV Prevalence Surveys Study Group
    : Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the International Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys: a pooled analysis. Lancet 366(9490): 991-998, 2005. PMID: 16168781. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67069-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Dunne EF,
    2. Unger ER,
    3. Sternberg M,
    4. McQuillan G,
    5. Swan DC,
    6. Patel SS and
    7. Markowitz LE
    : Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States. JAMA 297(8): 813-819, 2007. PMID: 17327523. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.8.813
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Lei J,
    2. Ploner A,
    3. Elfström KM,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Roth A,
    6. Fang F,
    7. Sundström K,
    8. Dillner J and
    9. Sparén P
    : HPV vaccination and the risk of invasive cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 383(14): 1340-1348, 2020. PMID: 32997908. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ali H,
    2. Donovan B,
    3. Wand H,
    4. Read TR,
    5. Regan DG,
    6. Grulich AE,
    7. Fairley CK and
    8. Guy RJ
    : Genital warts in young Australians five years into national human papillomavirus vaccination programme: national surveillance data. BMJ 346: f2032, 2013. PMID: 23599298. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 36, Issue 1
January-February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence and Determinants of Vaginal Infection With Human Papillomavirus Among Female University Students in Vietnam
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prevalence and Determinants of Vaginal Infection With Human Papillomavirus Among Female University Students in Vietnam
NGUYEN VAN TRANG, KIESHA PREM, ZHENG QUAN TOH, BUI THI VIET HA, PHAM THI NGOC LAN, HAU PHUC TRAN, QUANG DUY PHAM, NGHIA VAN KHUU, MARK JIT, DUNG THI LUU, LE THI KHANH LY, VAN CAO, TAM-DUONG LE-HA, KATHRYN BRIGHT, SUZANNE M. GARLAND, DANG DUC ANH, KIM MULHOLLAND
In Vivo Jan 2022, 36 (1) 241-250; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prevalence and Determinants of Vaginal Infection With Human Papillomavirus Among Female University Students in Vietnam
NGUYEN VAN TRANG, KIESHA PREM, ZHENG QUAN TOH, BUI THI VIET HA, PHAM THI NGOC LAN, HAU PHUC TRAN, QUANG DUY PHAM, NGHIA VAN KHUU, MARK JIT, DUNG THI LUU, LE THI KHANH LY, VAN CAO, TAM-DUONG LE-HA, KATHRYN BRIGHT, SUZANNE M. GARLAND, DANG DUC ANH, KIM MULHOLLAND
In Vivo Jan 2022, 36 (1) 241-250; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12697
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Prognostic Value of Uric Acid in Predicting Metastasis Following Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
  • Molecular Hydrogen Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report on the Amelioration of Methotrexate-induced Myelosuppression and Immune Modulation
  • Prostate-specific Antigen Decline During Primary Androgen-deprivation Therapy for Predicting Response and Survival in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Enzalutamide
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Human papillomavirus
  • female
  • prevalence
  • university students
  • Vietnam
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire