Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Six fat-containing probes with fat concentrations varying from 0% to 100% with increments of 20% were prepared.
- Figure 2.
Hounsfield units (HU), image noise (HU-stadard deviation) and fat fraction measurements of the 0% probe: measurement in syngo.via demonstration placement of regions of interest and available results.
- Figure 3.
Clustered scatter plots showing the fat fraction (FF) measured in dual energy CT (DECT) [FF – DECT (%)] vs. the actual fat concentration of the phantom probes (%) using the three reconstruction kernels. Each spot represents the FF value measured at different radiation doses (mAs).
- Figure 4.
Bland-Altman plots depicting the variation of the difference and the absolute difference between fat fraction and actual fat concentrations (averaged over all fat probes and reconstruction kernels) vs. the different radiation dose levels applied. The black thick horizontal lines represent the mean values (averaged over all radiation dose levels).
