Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Systemic Inflammatory Response to Different Sclerosing Agents as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Outcome

ROLANDAS ZABLOCKIS, EDVARDAS DANILA, VYGANTAS GRUSLYS and GIEDRĖ CINCILEVIČIŪTĖ
In Vivo July 2021, 35 (4) 2391-2398; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12516
ROLANDAS ZABLOCKIS
1Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania;
2Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rolandas.zablockis{at}gmail.com
EDVARDAS DANILA
1Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania;
2Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VYGANTAS GRUSLYS
1Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania;
2Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIEDRĖ CINCILEVIČIŪTĖ
1Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania;
2Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The objectives of this study were to evaluate systemic inflammation using different sclerosing agents and to estimate the prediction of systemic inflammation for the efficacy of pleurodesis. Patients and Methods: Ninety-six patients with recurrent and symptomatic malignant pleural effusion were enrolled in this retrospective study. We used serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, serum leukocyte counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) as parameters of systemic inflammatory reactions. Evaluations of these parameters were performed before and 24 h after pleurodesis. Results: Pleurodesis was successful in 81 (84.4%) patients. The non-graded talc induced the highest changes in serum CRP levels, total white blood cell and neutrophil counts compared to other agents, while mitoxantrone induced the lowest. Graded talc and bleomycin induced the same levels of changes in serum CRP levels and serum leukocyte counts. The change in serum NLR was the same for all agent groups. Logistic regression confirmed that a change in serum CRP levels [odds ratio (OR)=0.92, p=0.002] and previous chemotherapy (OR=3.31, p=0.012) were independent predictors of pleurodesis efficacy. Conclusion: Pleurodesis agents induced a systemic inflammatory response at different levels. The change in serum CRP levels could be useful for predicting the success of pleurodesis.

  • malignant pleural effusion
  • pleurodesis
  • systemic inflammation
  • predictive factor.

Approximately half of all patients with metastatic cancer develop malignant pleural effusion (MPE), which is likely to lead to a significant reduction in their quality of life, secondary to symptoms such as dyspnoea and cough (1). The main goals of MPE treatment are to decrease symptoms and improve quality of life (2). Pleurodesis with chemical agents is the most commonly used treatment for MPE (3). Talc is the most frequently used sclerosing agent (4). Nevertheless, talc pleurodesis can manifest some severe complications, such as hypoxia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (5-9). These complications are less frequent after the use of talc with large particles (10-13). Other agents, such as tetracycline derivates, silver nitrate, povidone-iodine, mitoxantrone, doxycycline and bleomycin have also been used, with variable efficacy and safety (14). The search for the most effective and safe agent for chemical pleurodesis is ongoing (15).

Pleurodesis involves the induction of acute pleural inflammation, which, if sufficiently intense, progresses to pleural fibrosis that obliterates the pleural cavity and prevents the reaccumulation of fluid (16). The inflammatory mechanisms involved in this process are not yet fully understood. The manifested inflammatory reaction can be divided into a systemic and local response. The intensity of inflammatory activity in the pleural cavity may predict the efficacy of pleurodesis (17). However, there is a lack of research comparing systemic inflammation induced by different sclerosing agents.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the systemic inflammation induced by different sclerosing agents in patients with MPE and to predict systemic inflammation in order to determine pleurodesis efficacy.

Patients and Methods

Study population. A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent chemical pleurodesis for recurrent and symptomatic MPE in our department from January 2014 to July 2020 were retrospectively selected. Patients with trapped lung, loculated pleural effusion or active pleural or systemic infection were excluded from the study.

All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Vilnius Regional Biomedical Ethics Committee (no. 158200-13-652-210), Vilnius, Lithuania. Written informed consent for participation was obtained from each patient.

Data collection. Data relating to demographic characteristics, pleural fluid parameters and blood sample evaluations were obtained from the medical records. Performance status (PS) was estimated using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale (18). The prognosis of patients was determined using the LENT (pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, ECOG PS score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumour type) scoring system (19). We used serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell (WBC) counts, neutrophil, lymphocyte counts, monocyte counts and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as surrogate markers for systemic inflammation. Serum leukocyte and CRP evaluations were performed immediately before and 24 h after pleurodesis. The efficacy of pleurodesis was evaluated 30 days after the procedure according to Paladine’s criteria (20) as follows: complete response (no pleural effusion detected); partial response (minimal pleural fluid detected without the need for repeat thoracentesis or drainage); no response (reaccumulation of pleural fluid causing symptoms or requiring additional pleural procedures). Complete and partial responses were defined as successful pleurodesis.

Pleurodesis technique. A dose of 5 grams of sterile, non-graded talc (Gintarine vaistine, Lithuania), 60 mg of bleomycin (Medac, Germany) or 40 mg of mitoxantrone (Baxter, Germany) in 100 ml of normal saline was instilled after pleural drainage. A dose of 4 grams of sterile, graded talc (Steritalc® F4, Novatech, France) was applied thoracoscopically (poudrage). A chest tube (24F) was clamped for 4 hours and only afterwards connected to the gravity drainage. The drainage systems were removed when the daily pleural fluid drainage volume was less than 100 ml.

Statistical analysis. Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test were used for comparison between the pleurodesis treatment groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which independent factors had a significant impact on the success of pleurodesis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters and cut-off value. A p-Value <0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Basic characteristics of the study population. Forty-two (43.7%) patients were male and 54 (56.3%) were female. The median patient age was 64 years (ranging from 44 to 85 years). The characteristics of the population according to pleurodesis agents are shown in Table I. The majority (87.5%) of patients had LENT scores ≤2 (low or moderate risk), and just over half (54.2%) of the patients had an ECOG PS of 2-3. The primary cancers were lung cancer (41.7%), breast (13.5%), ovarian (10.4%), gastrointestinal (8.4%), lymphoma (8.3%), kidney (6.3%), uterus (2.1%), and others (9.4%). No one had malignant mesothelioma. The results of the pleural fluid cell block were positive in 72.3% of cases. All other cases of malignant pleural effusion were diagnosed via pleural biopsy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of the patients according to pleurodesis agents.

The efficacy and side effects of pleurodesis. Pleurodesis was successful (39.6% and 44.8% for complete and partial responses, respectively) in 81 (84.4%) patients. Talc was the most effective (91.1%, p=0.046) agent compared to other sclerosing agents (bleomycin 88.3% and mitoxantrone 62.5%). The difference in the response rates of non-graded talc and graded talc was nonsignificant (93.3% vs. 88.5%). We found no significant differences in the incidence of fever, chest pain, oxygen desaturation or respiratory failure between pleurodesis agents. In addition, pleural empyema, wound infection or death were not reported in any patients.

Systemic inflammatory response. The changes in serum CRP levels, total WBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, monocyte counts and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at 24 h after pleurodesis are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Changes in serum CRP level. (a), total WBC count (b), neutrophil count (c), lymphocyte count (d), monocyte count (e) and the NLR (f) 24 h after pleurodesis. Data are shown as the minimum, maximum, median, and first and third quartiles. Significant differences of p<0.05 vs. *Non-graded talc, **Mitoxantrone. CRP, C reactive protein; WBC, white blood cell; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

The non-graded talc induced the largest changes in serum CRP levels, total WBC and neutrophil counts compared to other agents, while mitoxantrone induced the smallest changes. Graded talc and bleomycin induced changes in serum CRP levels and total WBC, neutrophil, granulocyte, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts to the same extent. The change in serum NLR was the same for all agent groups.

Predictors of pleurodesis success. The characteristics of the patients according to the efficacy of pleurodesis at 30 days are presented in Table II. The serum inflammatory marker dynamics according to the efficacy of pleurodesis at 30 days are presented in Table III. All variables with a p-value of 0.2 or less according to the efficacy of pleurodesis were entered into binary logistic regression analysis (Table IV). The regression model was statistically significant (χ2=45.7, p<0.001) and correctly predicted 95.5% of cases. Nagelkerke’s R2 statistic was 0.71, which indicates that the regression model is good for predictive analytics. Binary logistic regression confirmed that a change in serum CRP levels [odds ratio (OR)=0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.88-0.96, p=0.002] and previous chemotherapy (OR=3.31; 95% CI=2.12-4.21, p=0.012) were independent predictors of pleurodesis efficacy. ROC curve analysis revealed that a change in serum CRP levels 24 h after pleurodesis at a cut-off value of 47 mg/L yielded 68.8% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity in identifying successful pleurodesis (Figure 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Patient characteristics according to the efficacy of pleurodesis at 30 days.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Patient characteristics according to the efficacy of pleurodesis at 30 days.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Logistic regression analysis for pleurodesis success.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

ROC curve of the relationship between CRP and success of pleurodesis. (AUC=0.89, p=0.002). ROC, Receiver operating characteristic; CRP, C reactive protein; AUC, area under the curve.

Discussion

We investigated the systemic inflammatory reaction in patients with MPE following the administration of different chemical agents into the pleura and the predictive factors related to the efficacy of pleurodesis in this study. For pleurodesis to be successful, several conditions have to be considered. A tight and complete apposition between the visceral and parietal pleura is required (21, 22). For these reasons, patients with trapped lungs and loculated effusion were excluded from the study.

Among the various pleurodesis agents currently available, talc is the most commonly used sclerosing agent (23, 24). The efficacy of talc in the control of MPE was found to be superior to that of bleomycin and mitoxantrone in our study. The frequency of successful pleurodesis with the non-graded talc and graded talc was similar, which is in accordance with previous studies (1, 10, 11, 25). We found no significant differences in the incidence of side effects with different agents.

Previous chemotherapy was an independent predictor of pleurodesis efficacy in our study. The statement of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) summarises the evidence regarding the management of MPEs. The statement concludes that at present, there is no robust evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to standard palliative procedures for MPE management, although further research is required (26).

The intensity of the systemic inflammatory response was quantified by monitoring serum total WBC, the neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts, as well as the NLR and CRP levels. Our findings indicate that all pleurodesis agents produced an acute systemic inflammatory response in the first 24 h of the procedure. An increase in total serum WBC, the neutrophil count and CRP levels and a decrease in the lymphocyte count 24 h after pleurodesis were observed. The non-graded talc induced the greatest systemic inflammatory response (the highest changes in serum CRP levels, total WBC and neutrophil counts) compared to other pleurodesis agents. Similar findings have been confirmed by previous studies (6, 10, 25, 27).

It is interesting that graded talc and bleomycin induced the same intensity of systemic inflammation, which was more pronounced than that of mitoxantrone in our study. The precise mechanism of action of bleomycin and other antineoplastic agents is not fully understood. Forty-five percent of an intrapleural dose of bleomycin is absorbed into the systemic circulation (28). Accordingly, it may remain in the pleural space only for a short period. One possible advantage of mitoxantrone over bleomycin is that mitoxantrone binds to the membranes of mesothelial cells and is therefore likely to remain longer in the pleural space (29). However, in contrast to previous studies (30, 31), in the current study, the efficacy of mitoxantrone in controlling MPE was the lowest, compared to other agents. In addition, mitoxantrone induced the lowest systemic inflammatory response (change in serum CRP level) compared to other agents.

Different studies have addressed the predictors of success of pleurodesis for MPE in different clinical settings (17, 32, 33). However, there have been contradictory results. A meta-analysis of 42 studies demonstrated that the strongest predictors of pleurodesis success were higher pleural fluid pH, smaller volume of effusion before pleurodesis and full lung re-expansion after effusion drainage (34). Higher pleural fluid glucose, lower LDH, lower pleural tumour burden, and shorter duration of tube drainage seem to favour pleurodesis success. However, data from these studies were limited by statistical heterogeneity (34). It is not known how well serum biomarkers correlate with pleural inflammation.

Our data indicate a clear positive correlation between the change in serum CRP levels at 24 h after pleurodesis and the outcome of pleurodesis. The change in serum CRP levels at a cut-off value of 47 mg/L yielded moderate sensitivity and high specificity for successful pleurodesis.

We found only one study that reported similar findings (35). In this study, a post hoc analysis from the TIME 1 trial was undertaken to establish predictors of pleurodesis success. A total of 320 patients with a diagnosis of MPE who underwent pleurodesis were included. Mercer et al. (35) concluded that inflammation may be a factor in pleurodesis success, as patients with a greater increase in CRP (mean difference: 19.2 mg/l; 95% CI=6.2-32.0 mg/l, p=0.004) were more likely to have successful pleurodesis. In this study however, only talc was used for pleurodesis. Some patients with unexpandable lungs were also included, which may explain the lower success rate of talc pleurodesis than that observed in our study (81.4% vs. 93.3% for non-graded talc and 88.5% for graded talc).

Mercer et al. (35) incrementally increased the cut-off value of CRP to assess its potential association with pleurodesis success. Using a CRP cut-off of ≥30 mg/l, 84.7% of patients in the pleurodesis success group met this criterion, compared with 72% in the pleurodesis failure group (χ2=4.62, p=0.032). Although that study showed a statistically significant difference in the change in CRP between the groups, there was no specific cut-off value that could be used to predict pleurodesis success.

Finding biomarkers that predict pleurodesis success can be clinically useful. Our data support the hypothesis that higher levels of systemic inflammation are associated with pleurodesis success. We found that changes in serum CRP can predict pleurodesis success. We did not determine a CRP cut-off value specific to each pleurodesis agent due to the small group sizes. However, this information could be used to plan future research. An indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is increasingly used as a therapeutic option in patients with MPE (36). The mechanisms underlying pleural inflammation and spontaneous pleurodesis after IPC placement are poorly understood. The pleural fluid cytokines profile may be associated with the outcome of pleurodesis induced by IPCs (37). Pleurodesis stimulates a massive local rise in many pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. interleukin-8) (38-40). It is possible that the measurement of these mediators in blood may better reflect the intensity of pleural inflammation and may be associated with the outcome of pleurodesis (16, 40, 41). Another limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Nevertheless, the study population was typical of that seen in everyday practice.

In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that pleurodesis agents induce a systemic inflammatory response at different levels. Changes in serum CRP levels at 24 h after pleurodesis could be useful for predicting the success of pleurodesis for patients with MPE. These results should be validated in a prospective study in the future.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Rolandas Zablockis designed the study, collected and analysed data, wrote the paper; Edvardas Danila critically reviewed the manuscript; Vygantas Gruslys performed the study and critically reviewed the manuscript; Giedrė Cincilevičiūtė performed the study and critically reviewed the manuscript.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors explicitly state that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

  • Received March 22, 2021.
  • Revision received April 18, 2021.
  • Accepted April 20, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Shaw PH and
    2. Agarwal R
    : WITHDRAWN: Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11): CD002916, 2013. PMID: 24259053. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002916.pub3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Roberts ME,
    2. Neville E,
    3. Berrisford RG,
    4. Antunes G,
    5. Ali NJ and BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group
    : Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 65 Suppl 2: ii32-ii40, 2010. PMID: 20696691. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Nam HS
    : Malignant pleural effusion: medical approaches for diagnosis and management. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 76(5): 211-217, 2014. PMID: 24920947. DOI: 10.4046/trd.2014.76.5.211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lee YC,
    2. Baumann MH,
    3. Maskell NA,
    4. Waterer GW,
    5. Eaton TE,
    6. Davies RJ,
    7. Heffner JE and
    8. Light RW
    : Pleurodesis practice for malignant pleural effusions in five English-speaking countries: survey of pulmonologists. Chest 124(6): 2229-2238, 2003. PMID: 14665505. DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.6.2229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Azzopardi M,
    2. Porcel JM,
    3. Koegelenberg CF,
    4. Lee YC and
    5. Fysh ET
    : Current controversies in the management of malignant pleural effusions. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 35(6): 723-731, 2014. PMID: 25463163. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395795
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Campos JR,
    2. Werebe EC,
    3. Vargas FS,
    4. Jatene FB and
    5. Light RW
    : Respiratory failure due to insufflated talc. Lancet 349(9047): 251-252, 1997. PMID: 9014915. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64860-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rehse DH,
    2. Aye RW and
    3. Florence MG
    : Respiratory failure following talc pleurodesis. Am J Surg 177(5): 437-440, 1999. PMID: 10365887. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00075-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Janssen JP,
    2. Collier G,
    3. Astoul P,
    4. Tassi GF,
    5. Noppen M,
    6. Rodriguez-Panadero F,
    7. Loddenkemper R,
    8. Herth FJ,
    9. Gasparini S,
    10. Marquette CH,
    11. Becke B,
    12. Froudarakis ME,
    13. Driesen P,
    14. Bolliger CT and
    15. Tschopp JM
    : Safety of pleurodesis with talc poudrage in malignant pleural effusion: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 369(9572): 1535-1539, 2007. PMID: 17482984. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60708-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Montes JF,
    2. Ferrer J,
    3. Villarino MA,
    4. Baeza B,
    5. Crespo M and
    6. Garcia-Valero J
    : Influence of talc dose on extrapleural talc dissemination after talc pleurodesis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(3): 348-355, 2003. PMID: 12773332. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200207-767OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Maskell NA,
    2. Lee YC,
    3. Gleeson FV,
    4. Hedley EL,
    5. Pengelly G and
    6. Davies RJ
    : Randomized trials describing lung inflammation after pleurodesis with talc of varying particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170(4): 377-382, 2004. PMID: 15142871. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200311-1579OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Genofre EH,
    2. Vargas FS,
    3. Acencio MM,
    4. Antonangelo L,
    5. Teixeira LR and
    6. Marchi E
    : Talc pleurodesis: evidence of systemic inflammatory response to small size talc particles. Respir Med 103(1): 91-97, 2009. PMID: 18789662. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rossi VF,
    2. Vargas FS,
    3. Marchi E,
    4. Acencio MM,
    5. Genofre EH,
    6. Capelozzi VL and
    7. Antonangelo L
    : Acute inflammatory response secondary to intrapleural administration of two types of talc. Eur Respir J 35(2): 396-401, 2010. PMID: 19679605. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00039209
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Arellano-Orden E,
    2. Romero-Falcon A,
    3. Juan JM,
    4. Ocaña Jurado M,
    5. Rodriguez-Panadero F and
    6. Montes-Worboys A
    : Small particle-size talc is associated with poor outcome and increased inflammation in thoracoscopic pleurodesis. Respiration 86(3): 201-209, 2013. PMID: 23018589. DOI: 10.1159/000342042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Agarwal R,
    2. Aggarwal AN and
    3. Gupta D
    : Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis through tube thoracostomy. Respirology 11(1): 105-108, 2006. PMID: 16423210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00792.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Koegelenberg CF and
    2. Vorster MJ
    : Chemical pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: How far have we come in 80 years? Respiration 90(5): 355-356, 2015. PMID: 26484756. DOI: 10.1159/000441308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Chan JYH and
    2. Lee YCG
    : Pleurodesis and systemic inflammatory markers: Lessons and insights. Respirology 25(7): 676-677, 2020. PMID: 31945800. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Habal P,
    2. Omran N,
    3. Jankovicova K,
    4. Krejsek J and
    5. Mandak J
    : Predictive value of systemic and local inflammation parameters in talc pleurodesis assessment. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 159(2): 234-241, 2015. PMID: 25059234. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2014.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Oken MM,
    2. Creech RH,
    3. Tormey DC,
    4. Horton J,
    5. Davis TE,
    6. McFadden ET and
    7. Carbone PP
    : Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6): 649-655, 1982. PMID: 7165009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Clive AO,
    2. Kahan BC,
    3. Hooper CE,
    4. Bhatnagar R,
    5. Morley AJ,
    6. Zahan-Evans N,
    7. Bintcliffe OJ,
    8. Boshuizen RC,
    9. Fysh ET,
    10. Tobin CL,
    11. Medford AR,
    12. Harvey JE,
    13. van den Heuvel MM,
    14. Lee YC and
    15. Maskell NA
    : Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score. Thorax 69(12): 1098-1104, 2014. PMID: 25100651. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Paladine W,
    2. Cunningham TJ,
    3. Sponzo R,
    4. Donavan M,
    5. Olson K and
    6. Horton J
    : Intracavitary bleomycin in the management of malignant effusions. Cancer 38(5): 1903-1908, 1976. PMID: 62609. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197611)38:5<1903::aid-cncr2820380506>3.0.co;2-a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Rodriguez-Panadero F and
    2. Montes-Worboys A
    : Mechanisms of pleurodesis. Respiration 83(2): 91-98, 2012. PMID: 22286268. DOI: 10.1159/000335419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Huggins JT,
    2. Doelken P and
    3. Sahn SA
    : The unexpandable lung. F1000 Med Rep 2: 77, 2010. PMID: 21173837. DOI: 10.3410/M2-77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Dresler CM,
    2. Olak J,
    3. Herndon JE 2nd.,
    4. Richards WG,
    5. Scalzetti E,
    6. Fleishman SB,
    7. Kernstine KH,
    8. Demmy T,
    9. Jablons DM,
    10. Kohman L,
    11. Daniel TM,
    12. Haasler GB,
    13. Sugarbaker DJ,
    14. Cooperative Groups Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, North Central Cooperative Oncology Group and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
    : Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs. talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest 127(3): 909-915, 2005. PMID: 15764775. DOI: 10.1378/chest.127.3.909
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Baiu I,
    2. Yevudza E and
    3. Shrager JB
    : Talc pleurodesis: a medical, medicolegal, and socioeconomic review. Ann Thorac Surg 109(4): 1294-1301, 2020. PMID: 31593652. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Tan C,
    2. Sedrakyan A,
    3. Browne J,
    4. Swift S and
    5. Treasure T
    : The evidence on the effectiveness of management for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29(5): 829-838, 2006. PMID: 16626967. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bibby AC,
    2. Dorn P,
    3. Psallidas I,
    4. Porcel JM,
    5. Janssen J,
    6. Froudarakis M,
    7. Subotic D,
    8. Astoul P,
    9. Licht P,
    10. Schmid R,
    11. Scherpereel A,
    12. Rahman NM,
    13. Cardillo G and
    14. Maskell NA
    : ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 52(1): 1800349, 2018. PMID: 30054348. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00349-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Froudarakis ME,
    2. Klimathianaki M and
    3. Pougounias M
    : Systemic inflammatory reaction after thoracoscopic talc poudrage. Chest 129(2): 356-361, 2006. PMID: 16478852. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.2.356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Siegel RD and
    2. Schiffman FJ
    : Systemic toxicity following intracavitary administration of bleomycin. Chest 98(2): 507, 1990. PMID: 1695874. DOI: 10.1378/chest.98.2.507
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Alberts DS,
    2. Surwit EA,
    3. Peng YM,
    4. McCloskey T,
    5. Rivest R,
    6. Graham V,
    7. McDonald L and
    8. Roe D
    : Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of mitoxantrone given to patients by intraperitoneal administration. Cancer Res 48(20): 5874-5877, 1988. PMID: 3167842.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Schmidt M,
    2. Schaarschmidt G and
    3. Chemaissani A
    : [Pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion: bleomycin vs. mitoxantrone]. Pneumologie 51(4): 367-372, 1997. PMID: 9221383.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Bjermer L,
    2. Gruber A,
    3. Sue-Chu M,
    4. Sandström T,
    5. Eksborg S and
    6. Henriksson R
    : Effects of intrapleural mitoxantrone and mepacrine on malignant pleural effusion—a randomised study. Eur J Cancer 31A(13-14): 2203-2208, 1995. PMID: 8652243. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00425-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Yildirim H,
    2. Metintas M,
    3. Ak G,
    4. Metintas S and
    5. Erginel S
    : Predictors of talc pleurodesis outcome in patients with malignant pleural effusions. Lung Cancer 62(1): 139-144, 2008. PMID: 18403045. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.02.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Santos PS,
    2. Marques MA,
    3. Cruz C,
    4. Monteiro H and
    5. Fradinho F
    : Predictors of talc slurry pleurodesis success in patients with malignant pleural effusions. Rev Port Pneumol (2006) 23(4): 216-220, 2017. PMID: 28606378. DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.01.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hassan M,
    2. Gadallah M,
    3. Mercer RM,
    4. Harriss E and
    5. Rahman NM
    : Predictors of outcome of pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med 14(6): 645-654, 2020. PMID: 32213100. DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1746647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Mercer RM,
    2. Macready J,
    3. Jeffries H,
    4. Speck N,
    5. Kanellakis NI,
    6. Maskell NA,
    7. Pepperell J,
    8. Saba T,
    9. West A,
    10. Ali N,
    11. Corcoran JP,
    12. Hallifax RJ,
    13. Psallidas I,
    14. Asciak R,
    15. Hassan M,
    16. Miller RF and
    17. Rahman NM
    : Clinically important associations of pleurodesis success in malignant pleural effusion: Analysis of the TIME1 data set. Respirology 25(7): 750-755, 2020. PMID: 31846131. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Yeung M,
    2. Loh EW,
    3. Tiong TY and
    4. Tam KW
    : Indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Metastasis 37(4): 541-549, 2020. PMID: 32524317. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10042-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Grosu HB,
    2. Lu W,
    3. Ost DE,
    4. Vial MR,
    5. Hernandez M,
    6. Ghosh N,
    7. Noor L,
    8. Hasan AM,
    9. Bashoura L,
    10. Faiz S,
    11. Balachandran D,
    12. Casal R,
    13. Eapen G,
    14. Shannon V,
    15. Sheshadri A,
    16. Tang X,
    17. Rahman N and
    18. Wistuba II
    : Pleural fluid cytokine levels at baseline and over time are associated with time to IPC removal: an exploratory study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 27(1): 4-13, 2020. PMID: 31373905. DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. van den Heuvel MM,
    2. Smit HJ,
    3. Barbierato SB,
    4. Havenith CE,
    5. Beelen RH and
    6. Postmus PE
    : Talc-induced inflammation in the pleural cavity. Eur Respir J 12(6): 1419-1423, 1998. PMID: 9877502. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.12061419
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Hsu LH,
    2. Soong TC,
    3. Chu NM,
    4. Huang CY,
    5. Kao SH and
    6. Lin YF
    : The inflammatory cytokine profile of patients with malignant pleural effusion treated with pleurodesis. J Clin Med 9(12): 4010, 2020. PMID: 33322487. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Schwarz Y and
    2. Star A
    : Role of talc modulation on cytokine activation in cancer patients undergoing pleurodesis. Pulm Med 2012: 806183, 2012. PMID: 22536501. DOI: 10.1155/2012/806183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Purdy M,
    2. Kokki M,
    3. Anttila M,
    4. Aspinen S,
    5. Juvonen P,
    6. Korhonen R,
    7. Selander T,
    8. Kokki H and
    9. Eskelinen M
    : Does the rectus sheath block analgesia reduce the inflammatory response biomarkers’ IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1β concentrations following surgery? A randomized clinical trial of patients with cancer and benign disease. Anticancer Res 36(6): 3005-3011, 2016. PMID: 27272818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 35, Issue 4
July-August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systemic Inflammatory Response to Different Sclerosing Agents as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Outcome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Systemic Inflammatory Response to Different Sclerosing Agents as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Outcome
ROLANDAS ZABLOCKIS, EDVARDAS DANILA, VYGANTAS GRUSLYS, GIEDRĖ CINCILEVIČIŪTĖ
In Vivo Jul 2021, 35 (4) 2391-2398; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12516

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Systemic Inflammatory Response to Different Sclerosing Agents as a Predictor of Pleurodesis Outcome
ROLANDAS ZABLOCKIS, EDVARDAS DANILA, VYGANTAS GRUSLYS, GIEDRĖ CINCILEVIČIŪTĖ
In Vivo Jul 2021, 35 (4) 2391-2398; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12516
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Observational Study on the Effectiveness of L-Arginine Plus Vitamin C in the Management of Cancer-related Fatigue
  • Signal Detection Analysis of Hypnotic-induced Respiratory Depression
  • Development and Validation of an EHR-based Algorithm for Identifying Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • malignant pleural effusion
  • pleurodesis
  • systemic inflammation
  • predictive factor.
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire