Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

PD-1 Expression and its Correlation With Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

MIN HYE KIM, GYUNG HYUK KO, JEONG HEE LEE, JONG SIL LEE, DONG CHUL KIM, JUNG WOOK YANG, HYO JUNG AN, JI MIN NA and DAE HYUN SONG
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1549-1553; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12409
MIN HYE KIM
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GYUNG HYUK KO
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JEONG HEE LEE
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JONG SIL LEE
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DONG CHUL KIM
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNG WOOK YANG
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HYO JUNG AN
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
4Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JI MIN NA
1Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAE HYUN SONG
2Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
3Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Jinju, Republic of Korea;
4Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: golgy{at}hanmail.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) expression levels in many tumors and their correlation with prognosis have been actively studied. However, studies on PD-1 expression and its prognostic value in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are limited and controversial. In this study, we describe the expression of PD-1 and its prognostic significance and association with clinical features in patients with ccRCC. Materials and Methods: We obtained clinicopathological data from 166 patients with ccRCC who were treated at Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea between January 2000 and December 2009. Tissue microarray blocks were made using representative paraffin blocks of ccRCC specimens. Two pathologists analyzed PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in both tumor and inflammatory cells. Results: PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells was significantly correlated with unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p=0.002) in univariate analysis. A statistically significant correlation between PD-1 expression and unfavorable DFS (p=0.025) was observed in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells serves as an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable DSS in patients with ccRCC.

  • Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  • PD-1
  • immuno - histochemistry
  • survival analysis
  • prognosis

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for ~80% of all kidney cancers and is a major lethal genitourinary malignancy (1-3). The prognosis of ccRCC depends on clinicopathologic factors, such as stage, size, grade and necrosis (4). Some studies have been performed to identify gene signatures of ccRCC, molecular prognostication strategies and biomarkers (5-7).

Recently, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed death protein (PD-1) have been under the spotlight. PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in many tumors and their correlation with prognosis have been largely studied (8-13). Recent studies have also demonstrated the expression of PD-L1 and its correlation with prognosis in ccRCC and have reported that elevated levels of PD-L1 expression have a negative prognostic role in ccRCC (14-17). However, studies regarding PD-1 expression and its prognostic role in ccRCC are scarce and controversial (16, 18, 19).

In this study, we describe the expression of PD-1 and its prognostic significance and association with clinical features in patients with ccRCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients and clinicopathological data. By reviewing electronic clinical charts, we obtained clinicopathologic data of ccRCC patients at Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea between January 2000 and December 2009. One hundred sixty-six patients with ccRCC were enrolled in this study. The tumors were staged according to the guidelines of the eight edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Recurrence was diagnosed by surgical biopsy or radiologically. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the period from the date of the surgery to the date of cancer recurrence. Disease-specific survival was defined as the period from the date of the surgery to the date of death due to ccRCC.

Two pathologists reviewed hematoxylin and eosin-stained glass slides. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gyeongsang National University Hospital with a waiver of informed consent (GNUH 2020-04-006).

Tissue microarray. Specimens were obtained surgically and fixed overnight in neutral buffered formalin (20%). The samples were embedded in paraffin blocks. Two cores of 2-mm representative tissue were collected from each paraffin block and transplanted onto new recipient tissue microarray (TMA) blocks. Two cores were collected from the center and periphery of the tumor.

Immunohistochemical analysis. Primary antibodies against PD-L1 (1:200, ElL3N, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and PD-1 (1:100, ab52587, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used to evaluate protein expression. The immunohistochemical (IHC) method is described in our previous report (20). PD-L1 scoring (SP142) was based on the percentage of PD-L1-expressing tumor cells or inflammatory cells with any intensity (21). To increase the reproducibility, we evaluated the intensity of PD-1 expression of membranous staining on tumor cells and inflammatory cells simply as negative or positive for any percentage (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PD-1 expression in ccRCC. (A) PD-1 positive inflammatory cells are infiltrating the tumors (arrow) around the fibrotic band (star) (Original magnification ×100). (B) PD-1 staining of inflammatory cells shows membranous pattern. (Original magnification ×400). PD-1: Programmed death protein 1; ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Statistical analysis. The correlation between PD-1 expression and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed by using chi-square tests. The prognostic significance of the clinicopathological data for DFS and DSS was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Survival probability was also analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for DFS and DSS. The results were considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05. SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the analysis.

Results

Clinicopathological data. The clinicopathological data of patients with ccRCC (n=166) are summarized in Table I. The mean age of the patients was 59 years (range=32-84 years). There were 124 (74.7%), 12 (7.2%), 26 (15.7%), and 4 (2.4%) patients with T stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 disease, respectively. The Fuhrman nuclear grades were as follows: 30 (18.1%) were grade 1, 110 (66.3) were grade 2, 20 (12.1%) were grade 3, and 6 (3.6%) were grade 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological information of 166 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. Of the 332 cores, 58 cores had hemosiderin pigment or artificial brown pigment, and one core was not available due to loss of the specimen. In total, 59 cores were not informative. Ultimately, 273 available cores were used for the analysis.

Of the 273 cores evaluated, 123 showed PD-1 expression in inflammatory cells and no PD-1 expression in tumor cells. No cores showed PD-L1 expression in tumor and inflammatory cells. The positive control for PD-L1 showed high expression. PD-1-positive inflammatory cells showed a membranous staining pattern.

Relationship between PD-1 expression and clinicopathological data. The relationships between PD-1 expression and clinicopathological data are shown in Table II. PD-1 expression was significantly related to male sex (p=0.046) and T stage=1 (p<0.001) but not to age (p=0.597) or Fuhrman nuclear grade (p=0.086).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlations among clinicopathological factors and PD-1 expression.

PD-1 expression and survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival according to PD-1 expression in 273 available cores are shown in Table III. In the univariate analysis, several variables were associated with poor DFS, including age ≥60 (p=0.001), Fuhrman grades 3 and 4 (p<0.001), T stage ≥2 (p<0.001) and PD-1 expression (p<0.001). Poor DSS was also associated with age ≥60 (p=0.021), Fuhrman grades 3 and 4 (p<0.001), T stage ≥2 (p<0.001) and PD-1 expression (p=0.002). Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that PD-1 expression was an independent factor for unfavorable DFS (hazard ratio=2.171; 95% confidence interval=1.103-4.275; p=0.025).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Cox proportional hazards analysis of PD-1 expression in 273 available cores.

Discussion

Tumors are usually infiltrated by inflammatory cells. The composition of inflammatory cells and the number of each subtype differ between different tumors. These inflammatory cells interact with each other and affect the growth of tumors. In addition, these inflammatory cells can be related to a good prognosis or a poor prognosis in patients (22). Tumor microenvironments are mostly composed of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (23). These T cells are regulated by positive and negative signals (24). Among inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins, PD-1 and PD-L1 have been actively studied, and their relationships to cancer, infectious disease, transplantation, and autoimmunity have been demonstrated (25-27). For example, a strong correlation between PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and prognosis in cancer patients has been actively demonstrated (8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 25).

Additionally, there has been significant research on PD-1 and PD-L1 and ccRCC. Usually, PD-L1 is expressed in both immune cells and tumor cells, while PD-1 is mainly expressed in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (28). Many previous reports have also shown that PD-L1 is an independent poor prognostic factor for ccRCC (16, 17, 19). However, previous studies on the correlation between PD-1 and ccRCC are limited and controversial. Stenzel et al. (19) reported that high PD-1 expression in inflammatory cells is significantly associated with favorable cancer-specific survival. In contrast, Ueda et al. (16) reported that PD-1 expression is significantly associated with adverse outcomes in metastatic ccRCC.

Our results showed that PD-1 expression was significantly correlated with male sex and higher T stage. PD-1 expression was related to unfavorable DFS and DSS in the univariate analysis of patients with ccRCC. Moreover, PD-1 expression was related to unfavorable DFS in multivariate analysis in patients with ccRCC. Based on our results, we hypothesize that PD-1 expression inhibits T cell-mediated antitumor responses in ccRCC. This finding suggests that PD-1 pathway blockade will enhance antitumor effects in ccRCC.

Our study has limitation. Tissue microarray is a valuable technique evaluating immunohistochemical markers in tumors and used as an alternative for whole tissue sections (29). However, the possibility of intratumoral heterogeneity in biomarker expression is concerned in small tissue microarray specimen (30). There have been a few studies on PD-L1 expression and heterogeneity. Intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity was present in more than half of the cases (31). However, to our knowledge, there have been no studies on the intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity of PD-1 expression in inflammatory cells. Therefore, further studies of PD-1 expression in ccRCC with whole tumor sections are needed.

Conclusion

This study showed that PD-1 expression in tumor infiltrating inflammatory cells serves as an independent factor for unfavorable DSS in patients with ccRCC.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    MHK and DHS conceived and designed this study. MHK, GHK, JHL, JSL, DCK, JWY, JMN, HJA and DHS collected samples, performed pathological diagnosis and analyzed the immunostained samples. MHK and DHS analyzed all the data. MHK and DHS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GHK, JHL, JSL, DCK, JWY, JMN, HJA and DHS critically reviewed and corrected the manuscript. All Authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this study.

  • Received March 3, 2021.
  • Revision received March 18, 2021.
  • Accepted March 22, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD and
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69(1): 7-34, 2019. PMID: 30620402. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Escudier B,
    2. Porta C,
    3. Schmidinger M,
    4. Rioux-Leclercq N,
    5. Bex A,
    6. Khoo V,
    7. Grünwald V,
    8. Gillessen S,
    9. Horwich A and ESMO Guidelines Committee
    : Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 30(5): 706-720, 2019. PMID: 30788497. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Patard JJ,
    2. Leray E,
    3. Rioux-Leclercq N,
    4. Cindolo L,
    5. Ficarra V,
    6. Zisman A,
    7. De La Taille A,
    8. Tostain J,
    9. Artibani W,
    10. Abbou CC,
    11. Lobel B,
    12. Guillé F,
    13. Chopin DK,
    14. Mulders PF,
    15. Wood CG,
    16. Swanson DA,
    17. Figlin RA,
    18. Belldegrun AS and
    19. Pantuck AJ
    : Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol 23(12): 2763-2771, 2005. PMID: 15837991. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.055
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Leibovich BC,
    2. Blute ML,
    3. Cheville JC,
    4. Lohse CM,
    5. Frank I,
    6. Kwon ED,
    7. Weaver AL,
    8. Parker AS and
    9. Zincke H
    : Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 97(7): 1663-1671, 2003. PMID: 12655523. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Brooks SA,
    2. Brannon AR,
    3. Parker JS,
    4. Fisher JC,
    5. Sen O,
    6. Kattan MW,
    7. Hakimi AA,
    8. Hsieh JJ,
    9. Choueiri TK,
    10. Tamboli P,
    11. Maranchie JK,
    12. Hinds P,
    13. Miller CR,
    14. Nielsen ME and
    15. Rathmell WK
    : ClearCode34: A prognostic risk predictor for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 66(1): 77-84, 2014. PMID: 24613583. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rini B,
    2. Goddard A,
    3. Knezevic D,
    4. Maddala T,
    5. Zhou M,
    6. Aydin H,
    7. Campbell S,
    8. Elson P,
    9. Koscielny S,
    10. Lopatin M,
    11. Svedman C,
    12. Martini JF,
    13. Williams JA,
    14. Verkarre V,
    15. Radulescu C,
    16. Neuzillet Y,
    17. Hemmerlé I,
    18. Timsit MO,
    19. Tsiatis AC,
    20. Bonham M,
    21. Lebret T,
    22. Mejean A and
    23. Escudier B
    : A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: Development and validation studies. Lancet Oncol 16(6): 676-685, 2015. PMID: 25979595. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70167-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rasti A,
    2. Mehrazma M,
    3. Madjd Z,
    4. Abolhasani M,
    5. Saeednejad Zanjani L and
    6. Asgari M
    : Co-expression of cancer stem cell markers OCT4 and NANOG predicts poor prognosis in renal cell carcinomas. Sci Rep 8(1): 11739, 2018. PMID: 30082842. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30168-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Tamura T,
    2. Ohira M,
    3. Tanaka H,
    4. Muguruma K,
    5. Toyokawa T,
    6. Kubo N,
    7. Sakurai K,
    8. Amano R,
    9. Kimura K,
    10. Shibutani M,
    11. Maeda K and
    12. Hirakawa K
    : Programmed death-1 ligand-1 (pdl1) expression is associated with the prognosis of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 35(10): 5369-5376, 2015. PMID: 26408698.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kerr KM,
    2. Tsao MS,
    3. Nicholson AG,
    4. Yatabe Y,
    5. Wistuba II,
    6. Hirsch FR and IASLC Pathology Committee
    : Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry in lung cancer: In what state is this art? J Thorac Oncol 10(7): 985-989, 2015. PMID: 26134220. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Go SI,
    3. Song DH,
    4. Park SW,
    5. Kim HR,
    6. Jang I,
    7. Kim JD,
    8. Lee JS and
    9. Lee GW
    : Prognostic impact of CD8 and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 120(5): 547-554, 2019. PMID: 30745585. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0398-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Ni X,
    2. Sun X,
    3. Wang D,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Li W,
    7. Wang L and
    8. Suo J
    : The clinicopathological and prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 21(5): 674-686, 2019. PMID: 30392153. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1970-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Planes-Laine G,
    2. Rochigneux P,
    3. Bertucci F,
    4. Chrétien AS,
    5. Viens P,
    6. Sabatier R and
    7. Gonçalves A
    : PD-1/PD-L1 targeting in breast cancer: The first clinical evidences are emerging. a literature review. Cancers (Basel) 11(7): 1033, 2019. PMID: 31336685. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11071033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Zhao JJ,
    2. Zhou ZQ,
    3. Wang P,
    4. Chen CL,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Pan QZ,
    7. Zhu Q,
    8. Tang Y,
    9. Weng DS and
    10. Xia JC
    : Orchestration of immune checkpoints in tumor immune contexture and their prognostic significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 10: 6457-6468, 2018. PMID: 30568505. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S181949
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Iacovelli R,
    2. Nolè F,
    3. Verri E,
    4. Renne G,
    5. Paglino C,
    6. Santoni M,
    7. Cossu Rocca M,
    8. Giglione P,
    9. Aurilio G,
    10. Cullurà D,
    11. Cascinu S and
    12. Porta C
    : Prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Target Oncol 11(2): 143-148, 2016. PMID: 26429561. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-015-0392-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Xu F,
    2. Xu L,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. An G,
    5. Feng G and
    6. Liu F
    : Clinicopathological and prognostic value of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(9): 14595-14603, 2015. PMID: 26628942.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ueda K,
    2. Suekane S,
    3. Kurose H,
    4. Chikui K,
    5. Nakiri M,
    6. Nishihara K,
    7. Matsuo M,
    8. Kawahara A,
    9. Yano H and
    10. Igawa T
    : Prognostic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 36(11): 499.e9-499.e16, 2018. PMID: 30131293. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Leite KR,
    2. Reis ST,
    3. Junior JP,
    4. Zerati M,
    5. Gomes Dde O,
    6. Camara-Lopes LH and
    7. Srougi M
    : PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma clear cell type is related to unfavorable prognosis. Diagn Pathol 10: 189, 2015. PMID: 26470780. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-015-0414-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Erlmeier F,
    2. Weichert W,
    3. Schrader AJ,
    4. Autenrieth M,
    5. Hartmann A,
    6. Steffens S and
    7. Ivanyi P
    : Prognostic impact of PD-1 and its ligands in renal cell carcinoma. Med Oncol 34(6): 99, 2017. PMID: 28432616. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0961-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Stenzel PJ,
    2. Schindeldecker M,
    3. Tagscherer KE,
    4. Foersch S,
    5. Herpel E,
    6. Hohenfellner M,
    7. Hatiboglu G,
    8. Alt J,
    9. Thomas C,
    10. Haferkamp A,
    11. Roth W and
    12. Macher-Goeppinger S
    : Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and of immune checkpoint molecules PD1 and PDL1 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Transl Oncol 13(2): 336-345, 2020. PMID: 31881506. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.11.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Song DH,
    2. Ko GH,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. Lee JS,
    5. Lee GW,
    6. Kim HC,
    7. Yang JW,
    8. Heo RW,
    9. Roh GS,
    10. Han SY and
    11. Kim DC
    : Myoferlin expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic role and correlation with VEGFR-2 expression. Oncol Lett 11(2): 998-1006, 2016. PMID: 26893682. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3988
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Teixidó C,
    2. Vilariño N,
    3. Reyes R and
    4. Reguart N
    : PD-L1 expression testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 10: 1758835918763493, 2018. PMID: 29662547. DOI: 10.1177/1758835918763493
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Whiteside TL
    : The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 27(45): 5904-5912, 2008. PMID: 18836471. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. HL Kaufman,
    2. JD Wolchok
    1. Whiteside TL
    : The local tumor microenvironment. In: General Principles of Tumor Immunotherapy. HL Kaufman, JD Wolchok (eds.), Springer, pp. 145-167, 2007.
  20. ↵
    1. Chen L
    : Co-inhibitory molecules of the B7-CD28 family in the control of T-cell immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 4(5): 336-347, 2004. PMID: 15122199. DOI: 10.1038/nri1349
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Okazaki T and
    2. Honjo T
    : PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: From discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol 19(7): 813-824, 2007. PMID: 17606980. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxm057
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pardoll DM
    : The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12(4): 252-264, 2012. PMID: 22437870. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. An HJ,
    2. Ko GH,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. Lee JS,
    5. Kim DC,
    6. Yang JW,
    7. Kim MH,
    8. Kim JP,
    9. Jung EJ and
    10. Song DH
    : Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and its correlation with lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med 52(1): 9-13, 2018. PMID: 28994272. DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2017.07.26
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. McDermott DF and
    2. Atkins MB
    : Immune therapy for kidney cancer: A second dawn? Semin Oncol 40(4): 492-498, 2013. PMID: 23972713. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Khouja MH,
    2. Baekelandt M,
    3. Sarab A,
    4. Nesland JM and
    5. Holm R
    : Limitations of tissue microarrays compared with whole tissue sections in survival analysis. Oncol Lett 1(5): 827-831, 2010. PMID: 22966388. DOI: 10.3892/ol_00000145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Nassar A,
    2. Radhakrishnan A,
    3. Cabrero IA,
    4. Cotsonis GA and
    5. Cohen C
    : Intratumoral heterogeneity of immunohistochemical marker expression in breast carcinoma: A tissue microarray-based study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 18(5): 433-441, 2010. PMID: 20485156. DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181dddb20
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Haragan A,
    2. Field JK,
    3. Davies MPA,
    4. Escriu C,
    5. Gruver A and
    6. Gosney JR
    : Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Implications for specimen sampling in predicting treatment response. Lung Cancer 134: 79-84, 2019. PMID: 31320000. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 35, Issue 3
May-June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PD-1 Expression and its Correlation With Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
PD-1 Expression and its Correlation With Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
MIN HYE KIM, GYUNG HYUK KO, JEONG HEE LEE, JONG SIL LEE, DONG CHUL KIM, JUNG WOOK YANG, HYO JUNG AN, JI MIN NA, DAE HYUN SONG
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1549-1553; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12409

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
PD-1 Expression and its Correlation With Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
MIN HYE KIM, GYUNG HYUK KO, JEONG HEE LEE, JONG SIL LEE, DONG CHUL KIM, JUNG WOOK YANG, HYO JUNG AN, JI MIN NA, DAE HYUN SONG
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1549-1553; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12409
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Predictive Factors for Multiple Metastases of Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Role of ACE I/D Polymorphism in Glioblastoma Pathogenesis: A Study on the Turkish Population
  • Freezing Nitrogen–Ethanol Composite Effectively Eradicates Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm on Prosthetic Surfaces
  • Obesity and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines: Gene Expression Patterns Within Cervical Cancer Progression
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  • PD-1
  • immuno - histochemistry
  • survival analysis
  • prognosis
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire