Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviews

Adhesion Molecules in Non-melanoma Skin Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

JOANNA POGORZELSKA-DYRBUS and JACEK C. SZEPIETOWSKI
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1327-1336; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12385
JOANNA POGORZELSKA-DYRBUS
1“Estevita” Specialist Medical Practice, Tychy, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JACEK C. SZEPIETOWSKI
2Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jacek.szepietowski{at}umed.wroc.pl
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the most frequently diagnosed cancers, generating significant medical and financial problems. Cutaneous carcinogenesis is a very complex process characterized by genetic and molecular alterations, and mediated by various proteins and pathways. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) are transmembrane proteins responsible for cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular matrix adhesion, engaged in all steps of tumor progression. Based on their structures they are divided into five major groups: cadherins, integrins, selectins, immunoglobulins and the CD44 family. Cadherins, integrins and CD44 are the most studied in the context of non-melanoma skin cancers. The differences in expression of adhesion molecules may be related to the invasiveness of these tumors, through the loss of tissue integrity, neovascularization and alterations in intercellular signaling processes. In this article, each group of CAMs is briefly described and the present knowledge on their role in the development of non-melanoma skin cancers is summarized.

Key Words:
  • Cell adhesion molecules
  • non-melanoma skin cancer
  • basal cell carcinoma
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • review

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) are the most frequently diagnosed malignancies and their prevalence has increased dramatically over the last 30 years. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represent 99% of all NMSC. BCC, which constitutes 70% of NMSC develops from basal epithelial cells of hair follicles or pluripotent epidermal basal cells and has a metastatic rate of only 0.0028-0.05% (1). Depending on the different features of tumor cells, there are many histological types of BCC, with different, but still low metastatic potential (2). SCC develops from the proliferating squamous layer of the epidermis, shows a metastatic rate of 0,1-9,9% and contributes to approximately 75% of deaths due to NMSC (3, 4). Although both skin cancers generally have a good prognosis, due to their high prevalence, they generate significant medical and financial problems worldwide. The most important risk factor of NMSC is exposure to the ultraviolet radiation, and both ultraviolet (UV) B and UVA play crucial roles in skin carcinogenesis affecting every stage, including direct cellular damage, production of reactive oxygen species, DNA alterations, and impairment of cell-mediated immune response (5).

A wide variety of risk factors of NMSC is known, such as Fitzpatrick I and II skin phototypes, age over 50 years, family history of skin cancers, chronic immunosuppression, long-lasting ulceration, and scars. In addition, exposure to carcinogenic substances, like arsenic and tobacco, HPV viruses, actinic keratosis, and chronic dermatoses, including lichen sclerosus, lupus erythematosus, and lichen planus, are associated with a higher risk of SCC (6).

Carcinogenesis is a very complex process; it is mediated by various proteins and pathways and characterized by genetic and molecular alterations. Changes in the expression or function of cell adhesion molecules (CAM) are involved in all steps of the progression of the malignancy, starting from the detachment of tumor cells from the primary site, intravasation into the blood, extravasation into distant tissues and formation of the secondary lesions.

Hence, the aim of the present review was to summarize the present knowledge on the role of CAM in the development of non-melanoma skin cancers.

Cell Adhesion Molecules: Division, Functions, and Physiological Involvement

Cell adhesion molecules are transmembrane proteins responsible for cell-to-cell and cell-to extracellular matrix adhesion (7) playing also a crucial role in intercellular signaling and the structure of the extracellular microenvironment. Moreover, they play important roles in physiologic processes like embryogenesis and organ growth, cell migration and differentiation, and wound healing, and are fundamental elements for the maintenance of tissue integrity. However, over 100 different CAM participate in a variety of pathological processes such as inflammation, tumor invasion and metastasis (7). Changes in the expression and function of CAMs have been recently extensively studied. Based on their structures they are divided into five major groups: cadherins, integrins, selectins, immunoglobulins and CD44 family (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The major families of cell adhesion molecules involved in the pathogenesis of non-melanoma skin cancers.

Cadherins

Cadherins are transmembrane glycoproteins and the most studied group of adhesion molecules, divided into classic cadherins (including E-epithelial, N-neural, P-placental), which are the main mediators of calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesions, and nonclassic cadherins, including desmosomal cadherins and newly discovered protocadherins (8). These adhesion molecules play a pivotal role during embryogenesis and morphogenesis and also in the maintenance of adult tissue architecture (8). They are widely present in the normal epithelium and determine its integrity. Major cadherins in the skin include E-cadherin and the desmosomal cadherin desmoglein 1 (9).

E-cadherin mediates interactions between keratinocytes and also between keratinocytes and Langerhans cells, which are the main immune cells of the skin (10, 11). Classic cadherins are composed of five extracellular domains, a transmembrane segment and an intracellular domain. The most studied and first identified is E-cadherin, also known as cadherin-1 or epithelial cadherin, which is expressed in almost all epithelial tissues and is responsible for epithelial integrity and cell polarity (12). The cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin interacts with groups of cytoplasmic regulatory proteins called catenins, which mediate binding of the complex to cytoskeletal actin filaments. The E-cadherin– catenin complex plays a key role in cellular adhesion, regulates cadherin stability, and functions in cell signaling (13). In the normal skin, E-cadherin shows homogeneous membranous distribution in the whole epidermis, with the exception of the lower pole of basal keratinocytes, which are in contact with the basement membrane (10).

Loss of expression or impairment of the function of E-cadherin leads to loss of cell polarity and changes in tissue architecture. The epithelial cells may acquire a mesenchymal-like phenotype, detach from their neighboring cells and migrate, and in case of neoplasms form metastases. This process is called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the loss of E-cadherin and expression of N-cadherin, often called the “cadherin switch”, is considered as the most important indicator of this phenomenon (1). In this context, E-cadherin is also known as a metastasis suppressor protein (14, 15).

Several studies showed abnormal expression of E-cadherin in various skin carcinomas. In BCC, there is an overall tendency for lower expression of E-cadherin, when compared with normal skin, and low expression is more frequently observed in the more aggressive histological types of the tumor (16-19). The observed reduction of E-cadherin expression was more pronounced in the infiltrative and morpheaphorm BCCs, while the superficial and nodular types generally demonstrate less reduced expression of this molecule (17, 20). Moreover, with the higher invasiveness of the tumor, the membranous expression of E-cadherin is reduced and the cytoplasmic expression is increased (21). It is consistent with the current state of knowledge that high E-cadherin expression in the cell cytoplasm and low expression in the cell membrane may be associated with tumor aggressiveness. In support, it has been suggested that correct cell adhesion requires strong membranous activity of E-cadherin (22, 23).

In contrast, it is noteworthy that there are reports revealing no difference in the expression of E-cadherin in the BCC specimens, regardless of their histological type (24-26). A possible explanation of such discrepancy could be the different tissue fixation methods used (25).

The results of the studies in SCC are more consistent. In almost all analyzed SCC specimens, the expression of E-cadherin was reduced compared with normal epidermis (18, 23-24, 27-32) and this reduction was more pronounced in less differentiated and more invasive tumors (29, 33). However, the contribution of lower levels of E-cadherin in the metastatic process is still debatable, with conflicting results demonstrating either lower or a similar expression of this molecule in tumors with and without lymph node metastases (24, 25), although once more, the different fixation method utilized in one of those studies could explain such difference (25).

Many studies on E-cadherin showed its contribution in both SCC and BCC, but only a few investigations have been conducted on N-cadherin in NMSC. N-cadherin is not found in normal squamous epithelium, although is known for angiogenesis stimulation in some cancers (33). In BCC, N-cadherin was found to be up-regulated in the metastatic, but not in non-metastatic tumors (34), while in SCC, the tumors expressing N-cadherin demonstrated higher invasiveness (35). The low number of publications concerning N-cadherin in NMSC might indicate that the EMT phenomenon in which cells lose epithelial and acquire mesenchymal markers needs further investigations in both SCC and BCC, as its mechanism might involve additional molecules, not yet assessed in these tumors.

Like other classic cadherins, P-cadherin is important for cell differentiation during embryonic development as well as for the maintenance of normal architecture of mature tissues (12). This molecule is present in the cells of the basal layer of the normal epidermis, therefore is considered as an indicator of proliferation, and is usually co-expressed with E-cadherin (36, 37). However, both BCC and especially the peripheral sites of non-metastatic SCC specimens, demonstrate P-cadherin expression similar to the normal skin, whereas lower expression is observed only in the metastatic SCCs (36, 38). Hence, it appears that it does not play a significant role in skin carcinogenesis.

Nonclassic cadherins - desmogleins (DSG) and desmocollins (DSC) - play the role in the formation of desmosomes, which are the structures connecting epithelial cells. Desmoglein 1 is localized mainly in the superficial upper layers, and desmoglein 2 and 3 in basal and suprabasal layers of the normal epidermis, respectively (39). Desmocollins and desmogleins are localized in the upper layer 2 and 3 in the lower layers of the epithelium, respectively (39).

Expression of DSG1 was found to be significantly reduced in all cases of SCC and in cases of nodular BCC, and completely absent in the morpheaphorm and superficial types of BCC (40). Similarly, the reduced expression of DSG3 has also been demonstrated in BCC specimens (39). In contrast, DSG2 is significantly more intensively expressed in both types of NMSC, and its higher expression occurs more frequently in poorly differentiated SCCs (39, 41). The discordant expression of these molecules might be related to the fact that DGS2 is regarded as a protein associated with proliferation and aggressiveness of tumor cells, and a marker of lower differentiation (42). As only insignificant differences in the expression of DSC 1-3 in the NMSC have been reported so far, their role in cutaneous carcinogenesis is still not unequivocal (43).

T-cadherin belongs to the nonclassical cadherins and in normal skin is expressed on keratinocytes of the basal cell layer of the epidermis. Although its function in the biology of the skin remains unclear, it has been considered as a suppressor of tumourigenesis in various cancers (9, 44). Although low expression of T-cadherin has been observed in both BCC and SCC (44-46), there is contradictory evidence of even higher expression in BCC specimens, regardless of the histological type (47). Therefore, the role of this adhesion molecule in the development of NMSC appears to be much more complicated and requires further investigations (46, 48).

Integrins

Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane proteins composed of α and β subunits. At present, 18 α and 8 β subunits have been discovered, which in several combinations form 24 integrin complexes (49). These adhesion molecules consist of a larger extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a relatively small intracellular domain. The extracellular domain binds with connective tissue components such as collagen, fibronectin, laminin, whereas the intracellular domain of integrins interacts with the cytoskeleton. The integrins participate in cell-matrix and also in cell-cell adhesion and play an important role in various physiological processes including embryological development, hemostasis, wound healing, and signal transduction (7, 50).

The main integrins of normal human epidermis are α2β1 (collagen receptor), α3β1 and α6 β4 (mainly laminin receptors). The α5β1 and αvβ6 integrins (receptor for fibronectin) are expressed at nearly undetectable level in normal epidermis and their expression increases significantly during wound healing (51, 52). Integrins are known to be involved also in EMT. The “cadherin switch” discussed in the previous paragraphs of this article, is also characterized by changes in the expression of integrins from those containing β4 subunits, present in hemidesmosomes, to those containing β1 and β3 subunits, which results in a higher cellular motility (7, 53, 54).

Few studies on the expression of integrins in NMSC have been conducted. Studies on the expression of α2 β1 and α3 β1 integrins in BCC specimens have revealed high levels of these two adhesion molecules, with a tendency for a higher expression in nodular type compared to the morpheaform (52, 55-57). Moreover, localization of α3β1integrins corresponded to areas with preserved basement membrane (52). Furthermore, epithelial cells of BCC expressed also αv, α4 and α5, which were not present in the normal epidermis (58).

Staining of SCC for α2β1, and α3β1 subunits showed absence or low expression of these integrins, which could be related to higher malignancy of SCC compared with BCC (52).

Selectins

Selectins (Lec-CAM) are calcium-dependent transmembrane proteins composed of an N-terminal lectin domain, an epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain, 2-9 protein repeats, a transmembrane domain and a small cytoplasmic domain (59). This class of adhesion molecules consists of endothelial (E), leukocyte (L) and platelet (P).

E-selectin in normal skin demonstrates a weak expression in the microvessels and - so far - it seems to be the only selectin involved in cancer metastatic activity, probably through the interactions between endothelial cells and tumour surface selectin ligands (50, 60). The results of studies on the expression of E-selectin in the normal skin and NMSC revealed its negative expression in normal skin and positive expression in SCC and BCC. Moreover, in cases of SCC, there was a strong positive staining for E-selectin on malignant keratinocytes and vascular endothelium. In contrast, no tumour cell staining, but endothelial expression of E-selectin was observed in BCC (61). Hence, future studies are warranted to examine the involvement of selectins in the biology of NMSC (62, 63).

CD44

The transmembrane cell surface molecule CD44, which is present multiple isoforms, is broadly distributed in a wide variety of tissues, including the skin, where it is distributed in the hair follicles, sweat glands and in the epidermis with the exception of the basement membrane and granular and corneous layers (64). The physiological distribution of CD44 is concordant with the distribution of hyaluronic acid as CD44 is thought to be a receptor for hyaluronic acid, and also an important ligand of E-selectin (50, 64, 65).

The presence of CD44 in NMSC is controversial, although, in BCC, there is an overall tendency for lower expression (66-71). Some inconsistency in the results of the published studies remains regarding SCC. Although some of them demonstrated that the expression of CD44 in SCC is reduced, and decreased CD44 expression is mostly found in the more invasive and aggressive tumors (65-66, 69, 72), other analyses did not confirm such findings (68, 71, 73). However, in one of the contradictory studies, the process of specimen preservation was substantially different, as the samples were frozen and not paraffin-embedded, hence the availability of the antigens was significantly higher (74).

The Immunoglobulin Family of Adhesion Molecules

Immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecules constitute the largest and most diverse group of adhesion molecules, which includes vascular cell adhesion molecules (VCAMs), intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs), neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAMs), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM), and nectins (7, 49). All members of this family consist of an extracellular domain (which contains one or more immunoglobulin-like domains), a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail (75). The VCAM (CD106) is widely distributed and highly expressed primarily in the endothelial cells (76). Its expression increases, especially in states of inflammation, on tissue macrophages, dendritic cells and epithelial cells (76, 77). Moreover, it plays the role of an endothelial ligand for VLA-4 (Very Late Antigen-4 or integrin α4β1) of the β1 subfamily of integrins (78). A study on the expression of VCAM in SCC demonstrated its intense presence in poorly differentiated SCC, but only moderate expression in well-differentiated SCC (79). VCAM-1 was not detected in BCC tissues and negative or weak staining was observed in the epidermis adjacent to BCC (61, 80). The few publications concerning VCAM in NMSC might indicate that this molecule does not play any significant role in skin cancer development, although its increased expression in SCC tumors could potentially support the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of these neoplasms.

The ICAM family consists of five members (ICAM-1 to ICAM-5), which are important elements of intercellular, but not cell-matrix adhesion (81). ICAM-1 (CD54) contains five Ig-like domains and is only occasionally detectable on keratinocytes of the normal skin, mostly in the T-cell-present regions. It is, however, found on endothelial cells, since ICAM-1 is one of the most expressed endothelial surface adhesion molecules (78). The primary role of ICAM-1 in the human skin is adhesion to the LFA-1, present on circulatory leukocytes. Studies on ICAM expression on NMSC revealed lack of expression on BCC tumour cells (61, 80, 82-84) with minimal expression in the peritumoral stroma (80, 82, 84). In SCC, a dramatic increase in ICAMs in poorly differentiated SCC was shown, while in well-differentiated tumors, there was only focal ICAM expression (79). These results are consistent with the pathophysiology of NMSC, as ICAM-1 expression on keratinocytes increases in chronic inflammatory conditions, which contributes to the development of SCC, but not BCC (81).

NCAM (CD56), another member of the immunoglobulin family, has originally been found on neuronal cells. It plays an important role in morphogenesis, in neural development and mediates intercellular adhesion in various tissues (85). Studies on this adhesion molecule in BCC and SCC revealed strong immunoreactivity in the majority of stained BCC specimens regardless of their histological type, and negative expression in almost all SCC samples (86-89). These results could indicate the difference in the origin of these NMSCs. As the cells of the hair follicle in the normal skin also demonstrate positive immunoreactivity for NCAM, its strong expression in BCC could be a consequence of its development from these cells, which has been supported by studies in recent preclinical models (86, 90-91). However, other theories regarding the origin of BCC should also be taken into consideration (92, 93).

PECAM (CD31) is physiologically involved in leukocyte migration, signal transduction and angiogenesis (94, 95). Staining of NMSC for CD31 showed its elevated expression in the areas adjacent to both SCC and BCC, when compared with normal skin, with expression significantly higher in the areas surrounding SCC (80, 96). In the tumor area, CD31 was identified in SCC, but not in BCC (96). However, in another study, the expression of CD31 did not differ significantly between SCC and BCC cases, and no difference was observed when consecutive different grades of SCC progression or the presence of tumor metastases were analyzed (97, 98). Hence, it appears that the difference in the metastatic potential of squamous and basal cell carcinomas is not only due to differences in angiogenesis, but also in multiple other factors.

Nectin family comprises four members and regulates various cellular functions, such as mobility, adhesion, proliferation, polarization, and differentiation (99). In the normal skin, nectin 1α was colocalized with E-cadherin in cell–cell adherens junctions of the epidermis and was detected in all living layers of the epidermis with the strongest staining in the spinous layer (100). A study on the expression of nectin 1α in NMSC revealed a reduction in staining, more pronounced in morpheaphorm BCC and in SCC than in the solid type BCC, which is rather consistent with the expression of E-cadherin in NMSC. These results might potentially indicate that reduction of nectin expression could be associated with invasiveness of the tumor, but definitely require further investigation (100).

EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) is considered a molecule involved in cellular signaling rather than a cell adhesion molecule, because structurally it does not resemble any of the five major families of CAM, and its classification as an adhesion molecule is still debatable. However, evidence derived from studies on various malignancies indicates that it might be also involved in the development of those pathologies (101).

Physiologically, EpCAM is expressed mainly in glandular epithelial cells, while in pathological conditions, it is mostly overexpressed on the cells of epithelial tumours, but not in non-epithelial tumors (101). There have been reports demonstrating positive staining for EpCAM across all types of BCC (102-105), while loss of its expression was identified in the front of the tumour and in its infiltrative islands (106). There was a negative expression of EpCAM in SCC, irrespective of the histological type or grade of differentiation (104, 105). Hence, although in non-cutaneous epithelial malignancies, increased expression of EpCAM has been considered as a predictor of worse clinical outcomes (107, 108), the evidence derived from studies on NMSCs appears to be insufficient to confirm such hypotheses.

Conclusion

Progression of cancer is a result of altered intercellular interactions and loss of adhesion between the neoplastic cells and the extracellular microenvironment. Numerous studies indicate that differences in the expression of adhesion molecules are related to the invasiveness of skin cancers. Downregulation of some, physiologically present, adhesion molecules has been recently suggested to be a sign of a higher tumor metastatic potential. While in the early stages, both SCC and BCC are treatable, in some cases especially SCC recurs locally and even metastasizes leading to death. Therefore, it is important to identify the more aggressive tumors that require closer follow-up. Besides established prognostic factors like size, anatomic site, clinical and histological type of a primary tumor, adhesion molecules may become additional prognostic biomarkers of non-melanoma skin cancers. Cell adhesion molecules could be also an attractive therapeutic target because their extracellular domains could be easily accessed by antibodies or small-molecule inhibitors. Therefore, future research can open new perspectives for more effective skin cancer treatment.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    JCS and JPD contributed to study design, collection of data, writing of the manuscript’s draft and the preparation of the final version of the article.

  • Received February 12, 2021.
  • Revision received March 5, 2021.
  • Accepted March 19, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Apalla Z,
    2. Lallas A,
    3. Sotiriou E,
    4. Lazaridou E and
    5. Ioannides D
    : Epidemiological trends in skin cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept 7(2): 1-6, 2017. PMID: 28515985. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0702a01
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lesiak A,
    2. Czuwara J,
    3. Kamińska-winciorek G,
    4. Kiprian D,
    5. Maj J,
    6. Owczarek W,
    7. Placek W,
    8. Rudnicka L,
    9. Rutkowski P,
    10. Sobjanek M,
    11. Sokołowska-wojdyło M,
    12. Szepietowski J,
    13. Zegarska B and
    14. Zegarski W
    : Basal cell carcinoma. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of Polish dermatological society. Dermatology Review 106(2): 107-126, 2019. DOI: 10.5114/dr.2019.85572
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Apalla Z,
    2. Nashan D,
    3. Weller RB and
    4. Castellsagué X
    : Skin cancer: Epidemiology, disease burden, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 7(Suppl 1): 5-19, 2017. PMID: 28150105. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-016-0165-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Leiter U,
    2. Eigentler T and
    3. Garbe C
    : Epidemiology of skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 810: 120-140, 2014. PMID: 25207363. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0437-2_7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Didona D,
    2. Paolino G,
    3. Bottoni U and
    4. Cantisani C
    : Non melanoma skin cancer pathogenesis overview. Biomedicines 6(1):6, 2018. PMID: 29301290. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines6010006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. AN Crowson,
    2. CM Magro,
    3. MC Mihm Jr.
    1. Crowson AN,
    2. Magro CM and
    3. Mihm MC
    : Squamous cell carcinoma and its precursors. In: Biopsy interpretation of the skin: Primary non-lymphoid cutaneous neoplasia. AN Crowson, CM Magro, MC Mihm Jr. (eds.). Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, pp. 288-339, 2010.
  7. ↵
    1. Janiszewska M,
    2. Primi MC and
    3. Izard T
    : Cell adhesion in cancer: Beyond the migration of single cells. J Biol Chem 295(8): 2495-2505, 2020. PMID: 31937589. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007759
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cavallaro U and
    2. Christofori G
    : Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 4(2): 118-132, 2004. PMID: 14964308. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Buechner S,
    2. Erne P and
    3. Resink T
    : T-cadherin expression in the epidermis and adnexal structures of normal skin. Dermatopathology 3(4): 68-78, 2020. DOI: 10.1159/000451024
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Van den Bossche J and
    2. Van Ginderachter JA
    : E-cadherin: From epithelial glue to immunological regulator. Eur J Immunol 43(1): 34-37, 2013. PMID: 23229729. DOI: 10.1002/eji.201243168
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Brand A,
    2. Diener N,
    3. Zahner SP,
    4. Tripp C,
    5. Backer RA,
    6. Karram K,
    7. Jiang A,
    8. Mellman I,
    9. Stoitzner P and
    10. Clausen BE
    : E-cadherin is dispensable to maintain langerhans cells in the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 140(1): 132-142.e3, 2020. PMID: 31260672. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.06.132
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Furukawa F,
    2. Fujii K,
    3. Horiguchi Y,
    4. Matsuyoshi N,
    5. Fujita M,
    6. Toda K,
    7. Imamura S,
    8. Wakita H,
    9. Shirahama S and
    10. Takigawa M
    : Roles of E- and P-cadherin in the human skin. Microsc Res Tech 38(4): 343-352, 1997. PMID: 9297684. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19970815)38:4<343::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-K
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Behrens J,
    2. von Kries JP,
    3. Kühl M,
    4. Bruhn L,
    5. Wedlich D,
    6. Grosschedl R and
    7. Birchmeier W
    : Functional interaction of beta-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature 382(6592): 638-642, 1996. PMID: 8757136. DOI: 10.1038/382638a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bozdogan O,
    2. Vargel I,
    3. Cavusoglu T,
    4. Karabulut A,
    5. Karahan G,
    6. Sayar N,
    7. Atasoy P and
    8. Yulug I
    : Metastasis suppressor proteins in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Pathology - Research and Practice 212(7): 608-615, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2015.12.018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Hodorogea A,
    2. Calinescu A,
    3. Antohe M,
    4. Balaban M,
    5. Nedelcu R,
    6. Turcu G,
    7. Ion D,
    8. Badarau I,
    9. Popescu C,
    10. Popescu R,
    11. Popp C,
    12. Cioplea M,
    13. Nichita L,
    14. Hulea I and
    15. Brinzea A
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in skin cancers: A review. Analytical Cellular Pathology 2019: 1-11, 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3851576
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Pizarro A,
    2. Benito N,
    3. Navarro P,
    4. Palacios J,
    5. Cano A,
    6. Quintanilla M,
    7. Contreras F and
    8. Gamallo C
    : E-cadherin expression in basal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 69(1): 157-162, 1994. PMID: 8286199. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.26
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Tucci M,
    2. Lucarini G,
    3. Zizzi A,
    4. Rocchetti R,
    5. Brancorsini D,
    6. Primio R,
    7. Ricotti F and
    8. Ricotti G
    : Cdc42 is involved in basal cell carcinoma carcinogenesis. Archives of Dermatological Research 305(9): 835-840, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-013-1351-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Fuller LC,
    2. Allen MH,
    3. Montesu M,
    4. Barker JN and
    5. Macdonald DM
    : Expression of E-cadherin in human epidermal non-melanoma cutaneous tumours. Br J Dermatol 134(1): 28-32, 1996. PMID: 8745882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Majima Y,
    2. Hirakawa S,
    3. Kito Y,
    4. Suzuki H,
    5. Koide M,
    6. Fukamizu H and
    7. Tokura Y
    : Twist1 as a possible biomarker for metastatic basal cell carcinoma. Acta Dermato Venereologica 92(6): 621-622, 2013. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1422
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Vanjaka-Rogošić L,
    2. Puizina-Ivić N,
    3. Mirić L,
    4. Rogošić V,
    5. Kuzmić-Prusac I,
    6. Babić MS,
    7. Vuković D and
    8. Mardešić S
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and E-cadherin immunoreactivity in different basal cell carcinoma histological types. Acta Histochem 116(5): 688-693, 2014. PMID: 24485332. DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2013.12.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Papanikolaou S,
    2. Bravou V,
    3. Gyftopoulos K,
    4. Nakas D,
    5. Repanti M and
    6. Papadaki H
    : ILK expression in human basal cell carcinoma correlates with epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and tumour invasion. Histopathology 56(6): 799-809, 2010. PMID: 20546345. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03556.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nawrocki B,
    2. Polette M,
    3. Van Hengel J,
    4. Tournier JM,
    5. Van Roy F and
    6. Birembault P
    : Cytoplasmic redistribution of E-cadherin-catenin adhesion complex is associated with down-regulated tyrosine phosphorylation of E-cadherin in human bronchopulmonary carcinomas. Am J Pathol 153(5): 1521-1530, 1998. PMID: 9811344. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65740-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Toll A,
    2. Masferrer E,
    3. Hernández-Ruiz ME,
    4. Ferrandiz-Pulido C,
    5. Yébenes M,
    6. Jaka A,
    7. Tuneu A,
    8. Jucglà A,
    9. Gimeno J,
    10. Baró T,
    11. Casado B,
    12. Gandarillas A,
    13. Costa I,
    14. Mojal S,
    15. Peña R,
    16. de Herreros AG,
    17. García-Patos V,
    18. Pujol RM and
    19. Hernández-Muñoz I
    : Epithelial to mesenchymal transition markers are associated with an increased metastatic risk in primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas but are attenuated in lymph node metastases. J Dermatol Sci 72(2): 93-102, 2013. PMID: 23928229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Tada H,
    2. Hatoko M,
    3. Muramatsu T and
    4. Shirai T
    : Expression of E-cadherin in skin carcinomas. J Dermatol 23(2): 104-110, 1996. PMID: 8839237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1996.tb03979.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Koseki S,
    2. Ansai S,
    3. Aoki T,
    4. Hozumi Y,
    5. Mitsuhashi Y and
    6. Kondo S
    : E-cadherin expression in skin tumors using an AMeX immunohistostaining method. J Dermatol 27(5): 307-311, 2000. PMID: 10875196. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2000.tb02172.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Bălăşoiu AT,
    2. Mănescu MR,
    3. Bălăşoiu M,
    4. Avrămoiu I,
    5. Pirici I,
    6. Burcea M,
    7. Mogoantă L and
    8. Mocanu CL
    : Histological and immunohistochemical study of the eyelid basal cell carcinomas. Rom J Morphol Embryol 56(2 Suppl): 803-810, 2015. PMID: 26429176.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Lyakhovitsky A,
    2. Barzilai A,
    3. Fogel M,
    4. Trau H and
    5. Huszar M
    : Expression of e-cadherin and beta-catenin in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and its precursors. Am J Dermatopathol 26(5): 372-378, 2004. PMID: 15365368. DOI: 10.1097/00000372-200410000-00005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen H,
    2. Takahara M,
    3. Xie L,
    4. Takeuchi S,
    5. Tu Y,
    6. Nakahara T,
    7. Uchi H,
    8. Moroi Y and
    9. Furue M
    : Levels of the EMT-related protein Snail/Slug are not correlated with p53/p63 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 40(7): 651-656, 2013. PMID: 23521708. DOI: 10.1111/cup.12142
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Hesse K,
    2. Satzger I,
    3. Schacht V,
    4. Köther B,
    5. Hillen U,
    6. Klode J,
    7. Schaper K and
    8. Gutzmer R
    : Characterisation of prognosis and invasion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by podoplanin and E-cadherin expression. Dermatology 232(5): 558-565, 2016. PMID: 27875814. DOI: 10.1159/000450920
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Saenz-Sardà X,
    2. Carrato C,
    3. Pérez-Roca L,
    4. Puig L,
    5. Ferrándiz C,
    6. Ariza A and
    7. Fernández-Figueras MT
    : Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to invasion in squamous cell carcinomas originated from actinic keratosis through the differentiated pathway, whereas proliferation plays a more significant role in the classical pathway. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 32(4): 581-586, 2018. PMID: 28796927. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14514
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Barrette K,
    2. Van Kelst S,
    3. Wouters J,
    4. Marasigan V,
    5. Fieuws S,
    6. Agostinis P,
    7. van den Oord J and
    8. Garmyn M
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition during invasion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is paralleled by AKT activation. Br J Dermatol 171(5): 1014-1021, 2014. PMID: 24628329. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12967
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Lan YJ,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Chen JQ,
    4. Lei QH,
    5. Zheng M and
    6. Shao ZR
    : Immunolocalization of vimentin, keratin 17, Ki-67, involucrin, β-catenin and E-cadherin in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res 20(2): 263-266, 2014. PMID: 23999979. DOI: 10.1007/s12253-013-9690-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Keiper T,
    2. Al-Fakhri N,
    3. Chavakis E,
    4. Athanasopoulos AN,
    5. Isermann B,
    6. Herzog S,
    7. Saffrich R,
    8. Hersemeyer K,
    9. Bohle RM,
    10. Haendeler J,
    11. Preissner KT,
    12. Santoso S and
    13. Chavakis T
    : The role of junctional adhesion molecule-C (JAM-C) in oxidized LDL-mediated leukocyte recruitment. FASEB J 19(14): 2078-2080, 2005. PMID: 16195363. DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-4196fje
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Majima Y,
    2. Hirakawa S,
    3. Kito Y,
    4. Suzuki H,
    5. Koide M,
    6. Fukamizu H and
    7. Tokura Y
    : Twist1 as a possible biomarker for metastatic basal cell carcinoma. Acta Dermato Venereologica 92(6): 621-622, 2013. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1422
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Islam S,
    2. Carey TE,
    3. Wolf GT,
    4. Wheelock MJ and
    5. Johnson KR
    : Expression of N-cadherin by human squamous carcinoma cells induces a scattered fibroblastic phenotype with disrupted cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Biol 135(6 Pt 1): 1643-1654, 1996. PMID: 8978829. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1643
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Shirahama S,
    2. Furukawa F,
    3. Wakita H and
    4. Takigawa M
    : E- and P-cadherin expression in tumor tissues and soluble E-cadherin levels in sera of patients with skin cancer. J Dermatol Sci 13(1): 30-36, 1996. PMID: 8902651. DOI: 10.1016/0923-1811(95)00493-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Vieira AF and
    2. Paredes J
    : P-cadherin and the journey to cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer 14: 178, 2015. PMID: 26438065. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0448-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Pizarro A,
    2. Gamallo C,
    3. Benito N,
    4. Palacios J,
    5. Quintanilla M,
    6. Cano A and
    7. Contreras F
    : Differential patterns of placental and epithelial cadherin expression in basal cell carcinoma and in the epidermis overlying tumours. British Journal of Cancer 72(2): 327-332, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.333
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Gornowicz-Porowska J,
    2. Bowszyc-Dmochowska M,
    3. Seraszek-Jaros A,
    4. Kaczmarek E and
    5. Dmochowski M
    : Loss of correlation between intensities of desmoglein 2 and desmoglein 3 expression in basal cell carcinomas. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 19(3): 150-155, 2011. PMID: 21933638.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Tada H,
    2. Hatoko M,
    3. Tanaka A,
    4. Kuwahara M and
    5. Muramatsu T
    : Expression of desmoglein I and plakoglobin in skin carcinomas. J Cutan Pathol 27(1): 24-29, 2000. PMID: 10660128. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2000.027001024.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Brennan D and
    2. Mahoney MG
    : Increased expression of Dsg2 in malignant skin carcinomas: A tissue-microarray based study. Cell Adh Migr 3(2): 148-154, 2009. PMID: 19458482. DOI: 10.4161/cam.3.2.7539
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Pietkiewicz P,
    2. Gornowicz-Porowska J,
    3. Bowszyc-Dmochowska M,
    4. Jagielska J,
    5. Helak-Łapaj C,
    6. Kaczmarek E and
    7. Dmochowski M
    : Discordant expression of desmoglein 2 and 3 at the mRNA and protein levels in nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma revealed by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Clin Exp Dermatol 39(5): 628-635, 2014. PMID: 24934917. DOI: 10.1111/ced.12355
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Kurzen H,
    2. Münzing I and
    3. Hartschuh W
    : Expression of desmosomal proteins in squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. J Cutan Pathol 30(10): 621-630, 2003. PMID: 14744087. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2003.00122.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Takeuchi T,
    2. Liang SB and
    3. Ohtsuki Y
    : Downregulation of expression of a novel cadherin molecule, T-cadherin, in basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Mol Carcinog 35(4): 173-179, 2002. PMID: 12489108. DOI: 10.1002/mc.10088
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Takeuchi T,
    2. Liang SB,
    3. Matsuyoshi N,
    4. Zhou S,
    5. Miyachi Y,
    6. Sonobe H and
    7. Ohtsuki Y
    : Loss of T-cadherin (CDH13, H-cadherin) expression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Lab Invest 82(8): 1023-1029, 2002. PMID: 12177241. DOI: 10.1097/01.lab.0000025391.35798.f1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Mukoyama Y,
    2. Utani A,
    3. Matsui S,
    4. Zhou S,
    5. Miyachi Y and
    6. Matsuyoshi N
    : T-cadherin enhances cell-matrix adhesiveness by regulating beta1 integrin trafficking in cutaneous squamous carcinoma cells. Genes Cells 12(6): 787-796, 2007. PMID: 17573778. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01092.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Buechner SA,
    2. Philippova M,
    3. Erne P,
    4. Mathys T and
    5. Resink TJ
    : High T-cadherin expression is a feature of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 161(1): 199-202, 2009. PMID: 19438454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09195.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Kyriakakis E,
    2. Maslova K,
    3. Frachet A,
    4. Ferri N,
    5. Contini A,
    6. Pfaff D,
    7. Erne P,
    8. Resink TJ and
    9. Philippova M
    : Cross-talk between EGFR and T-cadherin: EGFR activation promotes T-cadherin localization to intercellular contacts. Cell Signal 25(5): 1044-1053, 2013. PMID: 23411345. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.02.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Harjunpää H,
    2. Llort Asens M,
    3. Guenther C and
    4. Fagerholm SC
    : Cell adhesion molecules and their roles and regulation in the immune and tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 10: 1078, 2019. PMID: 31231358. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Reglero-Real N,
    2. Colom B,
    3. Bodkin JV and
    4. Nourshargh S
    : Endothelial cell junctional adhesion molecules: Role and regulation of expression in inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 36(10): 2048-2057, 2016. PMID: 27515379. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307610
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Janes SM and
    2. Watt FM
    : New roles for integrins in squamous-cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Cancer 6(3): 175-183, 2006. PMID: 16498442. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Peltonen J,
    2. Larjava H,
    3. Jaakkola S,
    4. Gralnick H,
    5. Akiyama SK,
    6. Yamada SS,
    7. Yamada KM and
    8. Uitto J
    : Localization of integrin receptors for fibronectin, collagen, and laminin in human skin. Variable expression in basal and squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin Invest 84(6): 1916-1923, 1989. PMID: 2556449. DOI: 10.1172/JCI114379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Kalluri R and
    2. Weinberg RA
    : The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 119(6): 1420-1428, 2009. PMID: 19487818. DOI: 10.1172/JCI39104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Wheelock MJ,
    2. Shintani Y,
    3. Maeda M,
    4. Fukumoto Y and
    5. Johnson KR
    : Cadherin switching. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 6): 727-735, 2008. PMID: 18322269. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.000455
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Stamp GW and
    2. Pignatelli M
    : Distribution of beta 1, alpha 1, alpha 2 and alpha 3 integrin chains in basal cell carcinomas. J Pathol 163(4): 307-313, 1991. PMID: 2033490. DOI: 10.1002/path.1711630407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Orimoto AM,
    2. Neto CF,
    3. Pimentel ER,
    4. Sanches JA,
    5. Sotto MN,
    6. Akaishi E and
    7. Ruiz IR
    : High numbers of human skin cancers express MMP2 and several integrin genes. J Cutan Pathol 35(3): 285-291, 2008. PMID: 18251742. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00810.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Baum HP,
    2. Schmid T and
    3. Reichrath J
    : Integrin molecules: A clue to the non-metastasizing behaviour of basal cell carcinomas? Acta Derm Venereol 76(1): 24-27, 1996. PMID: 8721485. DOI: 10.2340/00015555762427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Tuominen H,
    2. Junttila T,
    3. Karvonen J and
    4. Kallioinen M
    : Cell-type related and spatial variation in the expression of integrins in cutaneous tumors. J Cutan Pathol 21(6): 500-506, 1994. PMID: 7699116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1994.tb00719.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Ley K
    : The role of selectins in inflammation and disease. Trends Mol Med 9(6): 263-268, 2003. PMID: 12829015. DOI: 10.1016/s1471-4914(03)00071-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Keelan ET,
    2. Licence ST,
    3. Peters AM,
    4. Binns RM and
    5. Haskard DO
    : Characterization of E-selectin expression in vivo with use of a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody. Am J Physiol 266(1 Pt 2): H278-H290, 1994. PMID: 7508207. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.1.H279
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Pentel M,
    2. Helm KF and
    3. Maloney MM
    : Cell surface molecules in basal cell carcinomas. Dermatol Surg 21(10): 858-861, 1995. PMID: 7551741. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00712.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Groves RW,
    2. Allen MH,
    3. Ross EL,
    4. Ahsan G,
    5. Barker JN and
    6. MacDonald DM
    : Expression of selectin ligands by cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143(4): 1220-1225, 1993. PMID: 7692735.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Allen MH,
    2. Robinson MK,
    3. Stephens PE,
    4. MacDonald DM and
    5. Barker JN
    : E-selectin binds to squamous cell carcinoma and keratinocyte cell lines. J Invest Dermatol 106(4): 611-615, 1996. PMID: 8617993. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12345385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Yasaka N,
    2. Furue M and
    3. Tamaki K
    : CD44 expression in normal human skin and skin tumors. J Dermatol 22(2): 88-94, 1995. PMID: 7536764. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1995.tb03349.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Marinescu A,
    2. Stepan AE,
    3. Margaritescu C,
    4. Marinescu AM,
    5. Zavoi RE and
    6. Simionescu CE
    : CD44 immunoexpression in the progression of actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous carcinoma. Curr Health Sci J 43(3): 241-245, 2017. PMID: 30595883. DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.43.03.10
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Hartmann-Petersen S,
    2. Tammi RH,
    3. Tammi MI and
    4. Kosma VM
    : Depletion of cell surface CD44 in nonmelanoma skin tumours is associated with increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 7. Br J Dermatol 160(6): 1251-1257, 2009. PMID: 19222463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09031.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Simon JC,
    2. Heider KH,
    3. Dietrich A,
    4. Wuttig C,
    5. Schöpf E,
    6. Adolf GR,
    7. Ponta H and
    8. Herrlich P
    : Expression of CD44 isoforms in human skin cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A(8): 1394-1400, 1996. PMID: 8869105. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00196-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Grimme HU,
    2. Termeer CC,
    3. Bennett KL,
    4. Weiss JM,
    5. Schöpf E,
    6. Aruffo A and
    7. Simon JC
    : Colocalization of basic fibroblast growth factor and CD44 isoforms containing the variably spliced exon v3 (CD44v3) in normal skin and in epidermal skin cancers. Br J Dermatol 141(5): 824-832, 1999. PMID: 10583162. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03154.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Karvinen S,
    2. Kosma VM,
    3. Tammi MI and
    4. Tammi R
    : Hyaluronan, CD44 and versican in epidermal keratinocyte tumours. Br J Dermatol 148(1): 86-94, 2003. PMID: 12534600. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05028.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kooy AJ,
    2. Tank B,
    3. de Jong AA,
    4. Vuzevski VD,
    5. van der Kwast TH and
    6. van Joost T
    : Expression of E-cadherin, alpha- & beta-catenin, and CD44V6 and the subcellular localization of E-cadherin and CD44V6 in normal epidermis and basal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 30(11): 1328-1335, 1999. PMID: 10571513. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90064-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Seelentag WK,
    2. Günthert U,
    3. Saremaslani P,
    4. Futo E,
    5. Pfaltz M,
    6. Heitz PU and
    7. Roth J
    : CD44 standard and variant isoform expression in human epidermal skin tumors is not correlated with tumor aggressiveness but down-regulated during proliferation and tumor de-differentiation. Int J Cancer 69(3): 218-224, 1996. PMID: 8682591. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960621)69:3<218::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Son KD,
    2. Kim TJ,
    3. Lee YS,
    4. Park GS,
    5. Han KT,
    6. Lim JS and
    7. Kang CS
    : Comparative analysis of immunohistochemical markers with invasiveness and histologic differentiation in squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. J Surg Oncol 97(7): 615-620, 2008. PMID: 18404670. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Erfani E,
    2. Roudi R,
    3. Rakhshan A,
    4. Sabet MN,
    5. Shariftabrizi A and
    6. Madjd Z
    : Comparative expression analysis of putative cancer stem cell markers CD44 and ALDH1A1 in various skin cancer subtypes. Int J Biol Markers 31(1): e53-e61, 2016. PMID: 26391478. DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000165
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    1. Sato Y,
    2. Mukai K,
    3. Matsuno Y,
    4. Furuya S,
    5. Kagami Y,
    6. Miwa M and
    7. Shimosato Y
    : The AMeX method: A multipurpose tissue-processing and paraffin-embedding method. II. Extraction of spooled DNA and its application to Southern blot hybridization analysis. Am J Pathol 136(2): 267-271, 1990. PMID: 2407122.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Wai Wong C,
    2. Dye DE and
    3. Coombe DR
    : The role of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules in cancer metastasis. Int J Cell Biol 2012: 340296, 2012. PMID: 22272201. DOI: 10.1155/2012/340296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Barreiro O,
    2. Yanez-Mo M,
    3. Serrador JM,
    4. Montoya MC,
    5. Vicente-Manzanares M,
    6. Tejedor R,
    7. Furthmayr H and
    8. Sanchez-Madrid F
    : Dynamic interaction of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 with moesin and ezrin in a novel endothelial docking structure for adherent leukocytes. J Cell Biol 157(7): 1233-1245, 2002. PMID: 12082081. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200112126
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Bevilacqua MP,
    2. Nelson RM,
    3. Mannori G and
    4. Cecconi O
    : Endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules in human disease. Annu Rev Med 45: 361-378, 1994. PMID: 7515220. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.45.1.361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Dustin ML and
    2. Springer TA
    : Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) interaction with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is one of at least three mechanisms for lymphocyte adhesion to cultured endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 107(1): 321-331, 1988. PMID: 3134364. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Melendez ND,
    2. Smoller BR and
    3. Morgan M
    : VCAM (CD-106) and ICAM (CD-54) adhesion molecules distinguish keratoacanthomas from cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol 16(1): 8-13, 2003. PMID: 12527707. DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000043520.74056.CD
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Kikuchi A,
    2. Sakuraoka K,
    3. Shimizu H and
    4. Nishikawa T
    : Immunohistochemical evaluation of epidermis overlying basal cell carcinomas. Br J Dermatol 128(6): 644-649, 1993. PMID: 7687854. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb00260.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Konter U,
    2. Kellner I,
    3. Klein E,
    4. Kaufmann R,
    5. Mielke V and
    6. Sterry W
    : Adhesion molecule mapping in normal human skin. Arch Dermatol Res 281(7): 454-462, 1989. PMID: 2692519. DOI: 10.1007/BF00510080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Taylor RS,
    2. Griffiths CE,
    3. Brown MD,
    4. Swanson NA and
    5. Nickoloff BJ
    : Constitutive absence and interferon-gamma-induced expression of adhesion molecules in basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 22(5 Pt 1): 721-726, 1990. PMID: 1693385. DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(90)70097-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kooy AJ,
    2. Prens EP,
    3. Van Heukelum A,
    4. Vuzevski VD,
    5. Van Joost T and
    6. Tank B
    : Interferon-gamma-induced ICAM-1 and CD40 expression, complete lack of HLA-DR and CD80 (B7.1), and inconsistent HLA-ABC expression in basal cell carcinoma: a possible role for interleukin-10?. J Pathol 187(3): 351-357, 1999. PMID: 10398091. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199902)187:3<351::AID-PATH227>3.0.CO;2-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Chaturvedi V,
    2. Bonish B,
    3. Bacon P,
    4. Qin JZ,
    5. Denning MF,
    6. Foreman K,
    7. Diaz MO,
    8. Robinson J and
    9. Nickoloff BJ
    : Role for Id-1 in immunobiology of normal keratinocytes and in basal cell carcinoma. Exp Dermatol 12(3): 255-260, 2003. PMID: 12823438. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.00066.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Chuong CM,
    2. Widelitz RB and
    3. Jiang TX
    : Adhesion molecules and homeoproteins in the phenotypic determination of skin appendages. J Invest Dermatol 101(1 Suppl): 10S-15S, 1993. PMID: 8100848. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12362447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Beljaards RC,
    2. Kirtschig G and
    3. Boorsma DM
    : Expression of neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56) in basal and squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 34(11): 1577-1579, 2008. PMID: 18798745. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34327.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ishida M,
    2. Kushima R and
    3. Okabe H
    : Aberrant expression of class III beta-tubulin in basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Oncol Rep 22(4): 733-737, 2009. PMID: 19724850. DOI: 10.3892/or_00000494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen-Tsai CP,
    2. Colome-Grimmer M and
    3. Wagner RF Jr.
    : Correlations among neural cell adhesion molecule, nerve growth factor, and its receptors, TrkA, TrkB, TrkC, and p75, in perineural invasion by basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Dermatol Surg 30(7): 1009-1016, 2004. PMID: 15209791. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30306.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Terada T
    : Expression of NCAM (CD56), chromogranin A, synaptophysin, c-KIT (CD117) and PDGFRA in normal non-neoplastic skin and basal cell carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study of 66 consecutive cases. Med Oncol 30(1): 444, 2013. PMID: 23292839. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0444-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Peterson SC,
    2. Eberl M,
    3. Vagnozzi AN,
    4. Belkadi A,
    5. Veniaminova NA,
    6. Verhaegen ME,
    7. Bichakjian CK,
    8. Ward NL,
    9. Dlugosz AA and
    10. Wong SY
    : Basal cell carcinoma preferentially arises from stem cells within hair follicle and mechanosensory niches. Cell Stem Cell 16(4): 400-412, 2015. PMID: 25842978. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Wang GY,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Mancianti ML and
    4. Epstein EH Jr.
    : Basal cell carcinomas arise from hair follicle stem cells in Ptch1(+/-) mice. Cancer Cell 19(1): 114-124, 2011. PMID: 21215705. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Youssef KK,
    2. Van Keymeulen A,
    3. Lapouge G,
    4. Beck B,
    5. Michaux C,
    6. Achouri Y,
    7. Sotiropoulou PA and
    8. Blanpain C
    : Identification of the cell lineage at the origin of basal cell carcinoma. Nat Cell Biol 12(3): 299-305, 2010. PMID: 20154679. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Wong SY and
    2. Reiter JF
    : Wounding mobilizes hair follicle stem cells to form tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(10): 4093-4098, 2011. PMID: 21321207. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013098108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. DeLisser HM,
    2. Christofidou-Solomidou M,
    3. Strieter RM,
    4. Burdick MD,
    5. Robinson CS,
    6. Wexler RS,
    7. Kerr JS,
    8. Garlanda C,
    9. Merwin JR,
    10. Madri JA and
    11. Albelda SM
    : Involvement of endothelial PECAM-1/CD31 in angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 151(3): 671-677, 1997. PMID: 9284815.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Lertkiatmongkol P,
    2. Liao D,
    3. Mei H,
    4. Hu Y and
    5. Newman PJ
    : Endothelial functions of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD31). Curr Opin Hematol 23(3): 253-259, 2016. PMID: 27055047. DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Chin CW,
    2. Foss AJ,
    3. Stevens A and
    4. Lowe J
    : Differences in the vascular patterns of basal and squamous cell skin carcinomas explain their differences in clinical behaviour. J Pathol 200(3): 308-313, 2003. PMID: 12845626. DOI: 10.1002/path.1363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Ciortea CD,
    2. Jung I,
    3. Gurzu S,
    4. Kövecsi A,
    5. Turdean SG and
    6. Bara T
    : Correlation of angiogenesis with other immunohistochemical markers in cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas. Rom J Morphol Embryol 56(2 Suppl): 665-670, 2015. PMID: 26429157.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Krediet JT,
    2. Kanitakis J,
    3. Bob A,
    4. Schmitter J,
    5. Krediet AC,
    6. Röwert J,
    7. Stockfleth E,
    8. Painsi C,
    9. Hügel R,
    10. Terhorst D and
    11. Lange-Asschenfeldt B
    : Prognostic value of the area and density of lymphatic vessels in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 14(11): 1114-1121, 2016. PMID: 27879093. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12880
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. ↵
    1. Rikitake Y,
    2. Mandai K and
    3. Takai Y
    : The role of nectins in different types of cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 16): 3713-3722, 2012. PMID: 23027581. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.099572
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Matsushima H,
    2. Utani A,
    3. Endo H,
    4. Matsuura H,
    5. Kakuta M,
    6. Nakamura Y,
    7. Matsuyoshi N,
    8. Matsui C,
    9. Nakanishi H,
    10. Takai Y and
    11. Shinkai H
    : The expression of nectin-1alpha in normal human skin and various skin tumours. Br J Dermatol 148(4): 755-762, 2003. PMID: 12752135. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05225.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Balzar M,
    2. Winter MJ,
    3. de Boer CJ and
    4. Litvinov SV
    : The biology of the 17-1A antigen (Ep-CAM). J Mol Med (Berl) 77(10): 699-712, 1999. PMID: 10606205. DOI: 10.1007/s001099900038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Sellheyer K and
    2. Krahl D
    : Basal cell (trichoblastic) carcinoma common expression pattern for epithelial cell adhesion molecule links basal cell carcinoma to early follicular embryogenesis, secondary hair germ, and outer root sheath of the vellus hair follicle: A clue to the adnexal nature of basal cell carcinoma? J Am Acad Dermatol 58(1): 158-167, 2008. PMID: 18158927. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.07.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kist D,
    2. Perkins W,
    3. Christ S and
    4. Zachary CB
    : Anti-human epithelial antigen (Ber-EP4) helps define basal cell carcinoma masked by inflammation. Dermatol Surg 23(11): 1067-1070, 1997. PMID: 9391566. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00449.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Dasgeb B,
    2. Mohammadi TM and
    3. Mehregan DR
    : Use of Ber-EP4 and epithelial specific antigen to differentiate clinical simulators of basal cell carcinoma. Biomark Cancer 5: 7-11, 2013. PMID: 24179394. DOI: 10.4137/BIC.S11856
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Tellechea O,
    2. Reis JP,
    3. Domingues JC and
    4. Baptista AP
    : Monoclonal antibody Ber EP4 distinguishes basal-cell carcinoma from squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin. Am J Dermatopathol 15(5): 452-455, 1993. PMID: 8238781. DOI: 10.1097/00000372-199310000-00007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Gaiser MR,
    2. Hirsch D and
    3. Gaiser T
    : Loss of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) in infiltrative basal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 11(1): 406-412, 2018. PMID: 31938125.
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Went PT,
    2. Lugli A,
    3. Meier S,
    4. Bundi M,
    5. Mirlacher M,
    6. Sauter G and
    7. Dirnhofer S
    : Frequent EpCam protein expression in human carcinomas. Hum Pathol 35(1): 122-128, 2004. PMID: 14745734. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.08.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Herreros-Pomares A,
    2. Aguilar-Gallardo C,
    3. Calabuig-Fariñas S,
    4. Sirera R,
    5. Jantus-Lewintre E and
    6. Camps C
    : EpCAM duality becomes this molecule in a new Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde tale. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 126: 52-63, 2018. PMID: 29759567. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 35, Issue 3
May-June 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adhesion Molecules in Non-melanoma Skin Cancers: A Comprehensive Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Adhesion Molecules in Non-melanoma Skin Cancers: A Comprehensive Review
JOANNA POGORZELSKA-DYRBUS, JACEK C. SZEPIETOWSKI
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1327-1336; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12385

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Adhesion Molecules in Non-melanoma Skin Cancers: A Comprehensive Review
JOANNA POGORZELSKA-DYRBUS, JACEK C. SZEPIETOWSKI
In Vivo May 2021, 35 (3) 1327-1336; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12385
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Cell Adhesion Molecules: Division, Functions, and Physiological Involvement
    • Cadherins
    • Integrins
    • Selectins
    • CD44
    • The Immunoglobulin Family of Adhesion Molecules
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research Progress on the Microregulatory Mechanisms of Fertilization: A Review
  • Gastric Cancer Invading the Pancreas: A Review of the Role of Pancreatectomy
  • Circulating microRNAs and Clinicopathological Findings of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cell adhesion molecules
  • Non-melanoma skin cancer
  • basal cell carcinoma
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • review
In Vivo

© 2025 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire