Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
In Vivo
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
In Vivo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit iiar on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Contemporary Molecular Classification of Urinary Bladder Cancer

DIMITRIOS GOUTAS, ANDRIANOS TZORTZIS, HARIKLEIA GAKIOPOULOU, DIMITRIOS VLACHODIMITROPOULOS, IOANNA GIANNOPOULOU and ANDREAS C. LAZARIS
In Vivo January 2021, 35 (1) 75-80; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12234
DIMITRIOS GOUTAS
1First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: goutas.dimitris{at}hotmail.com
ANDRIANOS TZORTZIS
1First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARIKLEIA GAKIOPOULOU
1First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIMITRIOS VLACHODIMITROPOULOS
2Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
IOANNA GIANNOPOULOU
1First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREAS C. LAZARIS
1First Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The significant heterogeneity in the clinical outcome among patients with bladder cancer has highlighted the existence of different biological subtypes of muscle-invasive and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Transcriptional profiling studies revealed that primary bladder cancers can be grouped into ‘intrinsic’ basal and luminal molecular subtypes. Luminal tumors have a papillary configuration and express markers of urothelial differentiation (uroplakins, cytokeratin 20) fibroblast growth factor 3 (FGFR3), E-cadherin and early cell-cycle genes. On the contrary, basal tumors express markers of the basal layer of the urothelium (cluster of differentiation 44, cytokeratin 5/6 and cytokeratin 14); some show squamous differentiation. Patients with basal tumors respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors and have a worse prognosis than those with luminal tumors, who respond better to FGFR3 and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Patients with squamous differentiation tumors show better response to agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor. The aim of this review was to highlight the chronological order of research performed in the field of the molecular classification of bladder cancer, with particular emphasis on prototypical research projects and recent advances. If prospective studies confirm the association of bladder cancer molecular subtypes with different responses and prognoses to targeted therapies, molecular subtyping will be incorporated into bladder cancer management.

  • Bladder cancer
  • urology
  • pathology
  • molecular subtypes
  • molecular pathology
  • review
  • Received October 6, 2020.
  • Revision received October 28, 2020.
  • Accepted October 30, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

In Vivo
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January-February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on In Vivo.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contemporary Molecular Classification of Urinary Bladder Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from In Vivo
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the In Vivo web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Contemporary Molecular Classification of Urinary Bladder Cancer
DIMITRIOS GOUTAS, ANDRIANOS TZORTZIS, HARIKLEIA GAKIOPOULOU, DIMITRIOS VLACHODIMITROPOULOS, IOANNA GIANNOPOULOU, ANDREAS C. LAZARIS
In Vivo Jan 2021, 35 (1) 75-80; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Contemporary Molecular Classification of Urinary Bladder Cancer
DIMITRIOS GOUTAS, ANDRIANOS TZORTZIS, HARIKLEIA GAKIOPOULOU, DIMITRIOS VLACHODIMITROPOULOS, IOANNA GIANNOPOULOU, ANDREAS C. LAZARIS
In Vivo Jan 2021, 35 (1) 75-80; DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12234
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Molecular Subtypes
    • Consensus Molecular Classification
    • Histological Variants
    • Clinical Outcomes According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Research Progress on the Microregulatory Mechanisms of Fertilization: A Review
  • Gastric Cancer Invading the Pancreas: A Review of the Role of Pancreatectomy
  • To Fight or to Flee? A Systematic Review of Ectopic Pregnancy Management and Complications During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • bladder cancer
  • urology
  • pathology
  • molecular subtypes
  • molecular pathology
  • review
In Vivo

© 2026 In Vivo

Powered by HighWire